Preview

was the united states justified in going to war with mexico

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
624 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
was the united states justified in going to war with mexico
Amy Pham6 th HourDBQMexico and the United States were two nations whose opinionsdiffered from each other. In 1846, a war broke out between the two overdisputed territories. The Mexican-American war was one of the mostcontroversial events that occurred in the 19 th century. Both nationsclaimed that the other was at fault for causing the war. The Mexicans mayhave had their reasons for thinking so; however, the Americans wereequally justified, if not more, in going to war with Mexico.One of the main conflicts that drove intentions of going to war wasa disagreement of what the true border between Mexico and Texas shouldhave been. The Mexicans thought of the Nueces River as the appropriateboundary, while the Americans insisted on the Rio Grande to be theTexas-Mexico border. Not only did Mexico have Texas, but also a territorythat extended all the way up to the Oregon territory. John On Sullivan said,oe hampering our power, limiting our greatness and checking th
Amy Pham6 th HourDBQMexico and the United States were two nations whose opinionsdiffered from each other. In 1846, a war broke out between the two overdisputed territories. The Mexican-American war was one of the mostcontroversial events that occurred in the 19 th century. Both nationsclaimed that the other was at fault for causing the war. The Mexicans mayhave had their reasons for thinking so; however, the Americans wereequally justified, if not more, in going to war with Mexico.One of the main conflicts that drove intentions of going to war wasa disagreement of what the true border between Mexico and Texas shouldhave been. The Mexicans thought of the Nueces River as the appropriateboundary, while the Americans insisted on the Rio Grande to be theTexas-Mexico border. Not only did Mexico have Texas, but also a territorythat extended all the way up to the Oregon territory. John On Sullivan said,oe hampering our power, limiting our greatness and checking th
Amy Pham6 th HourDBQMexico and the United

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Even though there was a peace treaty wrote up before the fighting began Mexico did not consider it much of a compromise. They would lose all of Texas, Oregon and California. From the Mexican view point it looked like that had no choice but to fight the matter out. If they did not stand up for themselves they would look like a weak country. It seemed to them that the Americans were not treating them fairly. So, they started taking action. Which ended in an all out war.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Winston Churchill once said “Manifest destiny was on the march, and it was unfortunate that Mexico stood in the path.” In 1845, the Republic of Texas was annexed to the United States of America. There was one problem, though. Mexico and the United States disagreed on the border of Texas, whether it was on the Nueces River or Rio Grande River. There was a war between the two countries that lasted from 1846 to 1848. After the Mexican army lost, they surrendered Nevada, California, Utah, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Wyoming. Also, in the Oregon Treaty of 1846, under…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In chapter three of “Occupied America, A History of Chicanos,” Acuna explains the cause of the war between Mexico and North America. Eugene C. Barker states that the immediate cause of the war was “the overthrow of the nominal republic by Santa Anna and the substitution of centralized oligarchy” which allegedly would have centralized Mexican control (Acuna 39). Texas history is a mixture of selected fact and generalized myth. The expansion and capitalist development moved together. The two Mexican wars gave U.S. commerce, industry, mining, agriculture, and stock rising. The truth is that the Pacific Coast belonged to the commercial empire that the United States was already building in that ocean. In the Polk-Stockton Intrigue, Americans found it rather more difficult than other people to deal rationally with their wars. Many Anglo-American historians attempted to dismiss it simply as a “bad war”, which took place during the era of Manifest Destiny. Most studies on the war dwell on the causes and results of the war, and dealing with war strategy. The attitude of Mexicans toward Anglo-Americans was obviously influenced by the war and vice-versa. In the end, by late 1847 the war was almost at an end. Scott’s defeat of Santa Anna in a hard fought battle at Churubusco…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Mexico justified to go to war with the United States? This essay argues the US was justified because Mexico invaded US territory, Mexician territories needed a new government, and Mexican territories didn´t respect the US reconciliation. Mexico invaded the United States terrirory. The quote that supports this is,”Mexico has passed the boundry of the United States… has invaded our territory and shed American blood upon the American soil. ”(Polk).…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1846- Americans fought an 18 month war against Mexico that resulted in the acquisition of more than half of Mexico--- one third of the current US.---…

    • 3820 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War Mexico Dbq Analysis

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This can best be explained in the following quote, “In the eyes of the [Mexican] government, the mobilization of the US army was an outright attack on Mexico” (Document C). This clearly demonstrates that Mexico had no idea that the US army was only checking the land. After all of the troubles that have been going on between Mexico and the US, the Mexicans believed that the US was attacking them. Another piece of evidence is, “.... As a consequence, the Mexican government reaffirmed the instruction to protect the border, meaning the territory located between the Rio Grande and the Nueces River- and order which led to the battles of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma….” (Document C). This means that the Mexican army was ordered to shoot them because they believed that it was an attack. If Mexico had known that the US was checking the land, they would not have fired on the US army and would have asked them to leave their territory. The US had no reason to go to war with Mexico because, in reality, Mexico did not do anything to the Americans. What the Mexicans did was an accident because they never knew that the Americans were coming. To the Americans it may have seen like the Mexicans were trying to actually kill their soldiers, but in the eyes of the Mexicans, they did it to protect their beloved country. They fired to protect their citizens from the selfishness of the Americans, they did it because it seemed like a threat to them. That is the reason why they did, they never did it on purpose. Although there are many variables that led to the Mexican-American war, the invasion of the US towards Mexican territory being one of them, another variable would be that the US had no respect towards Mexican…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why do disagreements in history lead to war? The Texans fought so that they could be able to declare themselves an independent republic. The Texans dedication they were able to win significant battles such as the won Alamo in which lead to the Texans become independent. The issue between Mexico and Texas were that they could not find a boundary line. Mexico debated that the border line was somewhere near the Nueces river. And Texas debated that it was at the Rio Grande. Was the United states justified for going to war with Mexico? In my opinion they were. First because Mexico did not take Texas seriously and did not want to let them become an independent republic. Second, because the U.S. depended on this westward expansion, the U.S. was…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mexican War Dbq Essay

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    and Texas believed that the Rio Grande was the proper border between Mexico and Texas.” (Roden 315). They believed that the Rio Grande was the proper border. “Mexico thought the Nueces River was the proper border between Texas and Mexico.” (Roden 315).This quote shows that there was some confusion on where the border was. Some of the territory was disputed.. This information shows that no one knew where real territory was or who it belonged to. Polk sent an envoy to try to buy California. This information shows that Polk wanted more land. There was disputed territory that no one had declared. This is why the U.S. was not justified in going to war with…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Polk had offered 30 million dollars to Mexico for this rural area where no one lived. Mexico denied this great offer made by America. Polk was determined to get this land from Mexico. He was determined for a war of conquest. America used the borderline of Texas to fight Mexico until the American blood was shed on American soil.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Mexican-American War all started by Texas. They wanted its independence and started fighting with Mexico and that lead to the Mexican American War and led to the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848 where they paid $15 millions of dollars for Texas, Arizona, New Mexico and California and bits of other states as well. Mexico was filled with internal struggles that approached on the Civil War. However, it was refusing to recognize the independence of Texas. Mexico threatened war with U.S if it took possession of Texas. Americans moved to Texas Territory, the cry grew for Texas to be part of the U.S. This began to happen in 1835, when Texas declared its independence from Mexico.The Mexican-American War was carried on for two years, and clashes…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mexican American war was a result of disagreement between land ownership in the west. The United States wanted to purchase the lands from Texas to California and Mexico would not give it up so America declared war. In 1848, the United States and Mexico signed the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo, which ended the Mexican-American War, and gave the U.S. new territory but was torn in deciding which states could have slaves or not which led to the conflict resulting in the compromise of 1850.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mexican Border Expansion

    • 4489 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Spanish settlement of the west International borders has always been centers of conflict, and the U.S.-Mexican border is no exception. With the European colonizing the New World, it was a matter of time before the powers collided. The Spanish settled what is today Mexico, while the English settled what is today the United States. When the two colonial powers did meet became what is today the United States ' Southwest, it was not England and Spain. Rather the two powers were the United States and Mexico. Both Counties had broken off from their mother countries. The conflict that erupted between the two countries where a direct result of different nation policies.…

    • 4489 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1846-1848 the first U.S. armed conflict fought on foreign soil happened, the Mexican-American War. The administration of the President, James Polk, believed they had a "manifest destiny" to spread across the continet, over to the Pacific Ocean. When the war was over Mexico had lost some where around one-third of it's territory, the U.S. claimed present-day places like California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manifest Destiny

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Similar to the case for and against Manifest Destiny, the case for and against the war with Mexico is controversial. The Mexican-American war can be looked at many ways: such as a war for more land, more slavery, and economic expansion. Many people believed that expansion was needed because of the growing population. Polk a proponent of Manifest destiny desired to expand and therefore supported the war. War with Mexico offered the chance to acquire Texas and California. John Harmanson stated in a speech, “It is not an ‘unjust, unconstitutional, and damnable war,’ or one that could have been avoided with honor. […] By insult and defiance. Nothing but war would do her. Let her have it, then, to her heart’s content.” (5) Thus, the country is bound to go to war and therefore expand. Many people felt that expanding westward was the best possible thing to do. Many agreed with Robert Johanssen. He stated, “To extend the boundaries of the United States was to extend the area of freedom,” (5) Expanding land would give many opportunities allowing many to fulfill their dreams.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manifest Destiny

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the California issue, came the Mexican American war. In 1845, Texas was annexed while ignoring the Missouri compromise along with the nation changing again its policy on free and slave states. Mexico began a dispute with the aim of a war as regards…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays