Preview

Was the Bombing of Dresden and Hamburg Justified

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1729 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was the Bombing of Dresden and Hamburg Justified
Was the bombing of Dresden and Hamburg justified?

During the Second World War, allied forces targeted German cities for mass aerial bombardment. Two of the cities which felt the full brunt of RAF bombings were Dresden and Hamburg. This air campaign killed an estimated 600,000 civilians and destroyed or seriously damaged some six million homes. The strategy used also came at a cost as Bomber Command throughout the bombing campaigns had 57,143 men killed. The target’s for area bombing were chosen in June 1940 with indiscriminate bombings being forbidden; However as the War progressed, the decision to not use indiscriminate Bombings was overturned. It can be argued here that the experiences which were felt in Britain from aerial bombardment may have overturned this viewpoint. Michael Walzer (1977) states that ‘the aiming points are to be the built-up areas, not, for instance, the dockyards or aircraft factories, the raids were explicitly declared to the destruction of civilian morale’. Walzer also points out that a study made in 1941 indicated that of those planes that actually succeeded in attacking their target (about two thirds of the attacking force), only one third dropped their bombs within five miles of the point aimed at’. This illustrates that even if British bombers intended to hit factories and docks, it is highly unlikely that they would hit their target. In this essay the justification of the bombing campaign will be investigated.
As mentioned previously British Bomber command throughout the war didn’t have the accuracy to perform precision bombings. This inaccuracy led to the British war cabinet contemplating whether or not it was an effective policy in the first place, ‘The choice was between abandoning bombing altogether or intentionally continuing to bomb civilians’. This was a big choice for the British war cabinet to make as at the time the British war effort was closer to defeat than it was victory, ‘And it was made when no other decision



Bibliography: Chirot D, Why not kill them all? Princeton University press: Oxford (2006) Glover J, Humanity, Yale University press: London (1999) Grosscup B, Strategic Terror: The politics and ethics of Aerial bombardments, Zed books: New York (2006) http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/2WWportal.htm http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_I7-fib_7s Quester G, Deterrence before Hiroshima, Transaction Publishers (1966) Ramsey P, The Just war: Force and Political responsibility, University press of America: Boston (1983) Walzer M, Just and Unjust Wars, Basic Books: New York (1977) [ 12 ]. George Quester, Deterrence Before Hiroshima, Transaction Publishers New York, 1966 p. 67 [ 13 ]

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    B 17 Characteristics

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages

    B-17’s had been greatly upgraded since their first use in Europe by the British and with an improved bombsite this first mission proved much more successful. The initial missions conducted by B-17’s in Europe were tactical bombings against manufacturing and military installations within the range of escorting fighters (Bowers 1976). However, in late 1943 B-17’s based in Italy were able to conduct strategic bombings into the previously unreachable heart of Germany. Strategic bombings allowed the Allied forces to target Germany’s industry and resources, hindering their ability to bring fuel, ammunition, and replacement weapons to the front lines. Strategic bombing into Germany did not come without its consequences, as many B-17’s were lost due to substantial and effective German fighter planes. These losses led England to abandon daytime raids and only conduct night raids; however, the United States continued daytime raids due to its increased accuracy. As a result, the day and night bombings conducted by the two countries was known as “Bombing Around the Clock.” Even still, Germany was able to rebuild their plants and get them back into production in a reasonably short amount of time and therefore the same targets…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twenty years after Harry Truman ordered the dropping of the atomic bomb, scholars and citizens subscribed to the original version of the story: the President acted to avoid the invasion of Japan and lose anywhere from 200,000 to 500,000 American lives. Then in 1965, Gar Alperovitz published a the book “Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam”. He argues that the dropping of the atomic bomb “was not needed to end the war or to save lives” but was a message to the Soviet Union. Fifty years after the atomic bomb was dropped, Alperovitz said that the final answer to why the atomic bomb was dropped is “neither essential nor possible”. He also said,”What is important is whether, when the bomb was used, the President and his top advisers understood that it wa not required to avoid a long and costly invasion, as they later claimed and as most Americans still believe.” Alperovitz believes that if the bomb was not used, Japan might still have been made to surrender before the first American landing on the island of Kyushu.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In august of 1945, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a questionable decision by Harry Truman, the president of The United States of America. Throughout the years, it has been a heated debate in terms of whether the decision was morally correct and justified. Historians have analyzed and presented many arguments. In this short essay, I will attempt to expand on how historians feel about the decision by Truman to use atomic bombs. The revisionists bring into perspective and question the motivations of Harry Truman claiming he had more on his agenda than just the war. In my opinion, the decision to use atomic bombs was somewhat justified because if looked at statistically, the death toll with an invasion would have been higher and Truman…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The horrors of August 6th and 9th of 1945 can in some respects, be compared to Sherman’s “March to the Sea” during the Civil War. In both cases, the military’s targeted objectives were not necessarily connected with the war and instead followed the “scorched earth” policy, Hiroshima obviously more so than Sherman’s ordeal. The goal of both of these war aims was to break their opponent's’ spirit. Whether or not they were successful is up to interpretation, though evidence points to not successful in Hiroshima’s case.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    More than 40 000 civilians were killed and one million London houses were either destroyed or damaged. Initial German bombing raids focused on mainly military and industrial targets. However, Hitler believed that by targeting civilians he could force the British to surrender. It was an attempt to shatter British morale and force Churchill into negotiating. However, the bombing had the opposite effect, bringing the English people together to face a common enemy. Encouraged by Churchill, the people became determined to hold out against the Nazi…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1945 began as a year of increasing tensions between countries as the war extended onto its sixth year. Military groups of the various countries involved were now beginning to seriously consider the conclusion of the war in terms of how the global ceasefire would be carried out and frankly, who would win. After the defeat of the Axis Powers in Europe, the focus had been turned towards the war in Asia and the Pacific Regions in which the Allied Forces of Great Britain, Australia and the USA were in conflict with the Axis power of Japan and her partners. Following the urge to end the war, the ‘Big Three’ made up of the three leaders of the major Allied Forces; Churchill, Stalin and Truman met for what is known as the Potsdam Conference to discuss ‘post-war world’ and as a result, the Potsdam Declaration was written giving the Japanese an opportunity to surrender or face “prompt and utter destruction”. Despite this opportunity, the Japanese chose to ignore the warning, thus, the US decided to administer the use of their newly developed nuclear weapons and drop the atomic bombs on Japan with both hope and belief that the Japanese would be forced to surrender and thus, ending the war on American terms. At the time, there was massive speculation surrounding the attack. However, the USA had entirely justifiable reasons behind the attack; therefore, they should have dropped the bombs on Japan. Firstly, Japan had been given the opportunity to surrender on peaceful terms but refused due to military being in control of the nation. Secondly, the only alternative was an invasion on Japan; however this action would not end lightly with predictions of huge casualties on the Americans’ part. Furthermore, the Japanese surrendered within a week of the dropping of the bombs proving the effectiveness of the USA’s actions.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jong Heon Yoo 10B Hiroshima Project Essay Essay Question: “To what extent was the U.S. justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?” The Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki dropped or not, were ones of the man-made disasters that occurred on August 6 1945, and August 9 1945 respectively. The launching of the atomic bomb has numerous opinions and aspects on whether United States of America should be justified for launching atomic bombs on those cities or not. The essay question for our class is, “To what extent was the United States justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?”. It is hard to mention that US’s action to set bombs Hiroshima and Nagasaki was completely reasonable, however, it is to a larger extent justified.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ronald Takaki's Hiroshima

    • 2131 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The official reason given for dropping the bomb was to bring a quick end to tht war and save American lives. However, Takaki presents many different explanations as to why the decision to use the bomb was made. He disagrees with the popular belief that the decision to use the bomb was made solely to quickly end the war in the Pacific and to save American lives. Takaki presents theories such as international concerns, American sentiment, and racism in an attempt to more fully explain why this decision was made.…

    • 2131 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It did not matter whether the target was military or civilian areas as long as the site where the bombs were dropped was exactly or more than 3 miles in diameter or gave America a strategic advantage. Another reason why the attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unjustified is because of the U.S.’ plan that deliberately killed thousands of innocent people. Prior to the attack, Colonel Fisher commented,“[The] Ultimate range of the B-29s is 1500 miles at 30,000 feet altitude” (Notes on Initial Meeting of Target Committee, May 2, 1945). The group of individuals that planned the attack calculated the ideal altitude for the bombs to be dropped to achieve maximum destruction. Furthermore, not everyone involved in the attack agreed to the plan. One example is, “Admiral William Leahy, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, oppose[ed] using the bomb because it killed civilians indiscriminately” (American History Textbook, American Vision, pg. 615). The attack led to the unnecessary death of thousands upon thousands of Japanese civilian. President Truman later wrote that he “regarded the bomb as a military weapon and never had any doubts that it should be used.” His advisers had warned him to expect massive casualties if the United States invaded Japan. Truman believed it was his duty as president to use every weapon available to save American lives (American History Textbook, American Vision, pg. 615). President Truman, the Commander in Chief, was well aware of the consequences of using the atomic bombs, however, he still initiated the attack which inevitably caused the deaths of nearly 200,000 Japanese civilians (Stanford History Education Group. Reading Like a Historian “6. Atomic Bomb.”). This statement brings the attention back to the idea that the bombings to both cities of Japan were…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Atomic Bomb: Alperovitz

    • 2383 Words
    • 10 Pages

    [ 14 ]. Clayton Chun ,John White, Form Operation Downfall to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, (New York: Osprey publishing, Oct 2008), p.41…

    • 2383 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts, pg. 184). The decision to drop the bomb on Japan leans dangerously close towards the logic of…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 6th of August 1945 was a day that people will always remember with terror. On this day, an atomic bomb was used by the U.S. against Japan, in the city of Hiroshima. This was the first time in world history. Before this sad event, Japan and the U.S. were having conflicts with each other because Japan tried to invade parts of Europe and the Pacific. In an attempt stop Japanese aggressions, the U.S. decided to stop the sale of war materials, such as iron and oil, to Japan. This angered the Japanese, and after peacetalks failed, the Japanese made a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. After this attack, the U.S. declared war on Japan. The two nations fought until after both Atom bombs were dropped (Ellis, 381-382). Through the orders of U.S. President Harry Truman, 13 sq. km were deserted, 70, 000 of 76, 000 buildings were destroyed, more than 70, 000 people were instantly killed, 122, 000 died later, due to the effects of the bombings, and 246, 000 more were severely injured (Söhr, 2). In this essay I want to explain why I would not have bombed Hiroshima like Harry Truman did, although there might have been several reasons to justify his decision.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was the use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki necessary? No, it was not. Neither of the two cities were military targets. Both cities had more civilians than troops. This would also mean that we broke the rules of war. We bombed innocent civilians. This, according to multiple documents of war, is illegal. Especially since the towns had no means of defending themselves. Bombing these towns also started the Cold war arms race. Everyone wanted the atomic bomb. I believe that the dropping the 2 bombs was not necessary because we killed innocent civilians, we started an arms race, and we ended a war that was already on the verge of ending itself.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are still considered two of the most devastating bombings ever seen in mankind. There is uncertainty over the rationality and judgment of President Truman’s reasons for releasing the bombs, as well as the thought process on the mortality of the situation. However, there is no doubt that this was a difficult decision to make. The United States is still paying for this cataclysmic choice, and unfortunately so is Japan. However, no matter the devastating effects that were the result of this calamity, the bombing gave America, as well as the rest of the world, what they wanted: the end of a war.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I have carefully selected six different sources which are either for or against the USA dropping the bombs on Japan. I have tried to find ones which support or oppose the dropping for their own separate reason.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays