Preview

Was the appeasement policy an error?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
500 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was the appeasement policy an error?
In the 1930s, Britain and France adopted the appeasement policy towards Germany. It was to give in to some of the demands of Hitler in the hope that they would be satisfied and not ask for more. The appeasement policy aimed to prevent another large-scale war like the World War I. The appeasement policy was not an error as appeasement bought time for Britain to rearm. In the 1930s, they were still recovering from the tremendous losses in World War I, and were not militarily prepared for a war on a similar scale. Also, there had been widespread disarmament in the 1920s, so there were no troops immediately available to mount a challenge. Germany’s forces were a lot stronger than Britain and France were at that time as Germany had rearmed in 1935 and stepped up the conscription programme. Britain and France knew they would not be able to defeat Germany in the case of war, so they chose to adopt the appeasement policy to buy time for rearmament. The appeasement policy allowed Britain and France to improve their military balance in the late 1930s. Therefore, the appeasement policy was not an error. The appeasement policy was an error as it encouraged Hitler to be more aggressive and ambitious. Hitler made a few attempts to break the Treaty of Versailles. For example, Hitler remilitarized Rhineland in 1935, which was demilitarized according to the terms of Treaty of Versailles. Hitler ordered German troops to cross the Hohenzollern Bridge and remilitarized Rhineland. Hitler was not sure about France’s response, so he did not send a strong force into Rhineland. The troops were ordered to withdraw if they were attacked. However, France did not respond to the force. Hitler’s gamble paid off, and he met with no resistance. As a result, his standing among the German people and the German army increased tremendously. He became bolder in his demands. World War II broke out in 1939 as Hitler’s demands became bolder and going to war was the only way to stop Hitler’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Assess the view that appeasement was the only realistic option for British policy towards Germany between 1936 and 1938…

    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is always a consequence for not standing up to stop a situation at the first sign of trouble. Unfortunately, that consequence was one that the world had to pay because the world leaders did absolutely nothing to stop Hitler at the first sign of trouble. They just let Hitler continue with what he was doing in order to “keep the peace”. However, they didn’t realize that by letting Hitler do these things, they were opening a door to a world tragedy that would change history as we know it forever. Some of the factors that contributed to appeasement being incorrect was Sudetenland becoming German territory, Hitler gaining more support as time went on, and Germany taking control of Austria.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II DBQ

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the early 1920s, as World War I ended, nations looked for peace as an outlet and hope for the future. As time passed, most countries were happy that the Great War had ended, however they were upset with the outcome. Since there were many costly expenses from the war, it caused many of the hostile nations to look for strong rulers for change. This allowed many harsh dictators to rise to power. These dictators were aggressive rulers and took forceful actions. In order to combat these aggressive rulers, other nations tried to resist war and give in to their demands. This type of action was known as appeasement. Not all countries felt the same way about this response; other countries believed that a collective security would work better.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think the most effective response is with out a doubt collective security. (Doc 4) In 1938 Britain, France, and Italy met with Hitler to discuss his demand for the Sudetenland. Hitler got what he wanted from this meeting because of appeasement. Europe was happy from this because it avoided war. This did not benefit the Czechs at all though. For some reason Neville Chamberlain favored appeasement. (Doc 5) He thinks appeasement is the best way because he believes war is a "fearful thing." He thinks that appeasement will benefit Europe. Winston Churchill disagreed with Chamberlain's policy of appeasement. (Doc 6) He believed that keeping peace depends on holding back the aggressor. He also thinks we lost many opportunities in the quest for peace. He believes it was the people in control of our political affairs fault. Another view on appeasement was also put out there by A.J.P. Taylor. It stated that since the majority of German people put Hitler into power they were the only ones that could turn him out. Also he said some "appeasers" feared that the defeat of Germany would be followed by Russian domination over most of Europe. In another excerpt an author named Keith Eubank states that stopping Hitler prior to 1939 was not an issue. (Doc 9) He says that Hitler had too massive of a force and that nothing he had done had been considered that dangerous at that point in time. All this options but still if the rest of the country didn't do something besides just keeping appeasement Hitler was going to just keep demanding more and more. This would have left Europe ten times worse off. They made the right choice on going into Collective Security. They should have done this from the beginning instead of wasting so much time and losing so much, to just end up going into war anyways, just later in time. Collective Security…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    France and UK came up with the policy of appeasement which was a policy with nazi germany that would allow hitler to take a lot more land than he was supposed to. The reason being is the policy was put into place so that the UK and france would let Hitler do what he wanted as long as he didnt do what they told him not to do. The policy of appeasement however did not work because Hitler was not someone you could appease. Once Hitler invaded poland the policy ended thus ending the reign of letting hitler walk all over…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    From 1933 to 1934, during the consolidation of Nazi party and the process of Gleichschaltung, the Nazi party presented themselves as a less aggressive force than they would later prove to be. The Nazi party had considerable popular support in Germany from 1933 due to their strong opposition to the Treaty of Versailles. When Germany withdrew from the League of Nations and the World Disarmament Conference in October 1933, this was eagerly accepted in Germany due to its association with the Treaty. A Non-Agression Pact was signed with Poland in 1934 and this significantly bolstered the Nazi party’s image in the international scene. Hitler reinforced this new image of a peaceful Germany in a speech in May 1933 stating “The French, the Poles etc. are our neighbours, and we know that through no possible development of history can this reality be altered.” In June of 1935, Germany signed the Anglo-German Naval Treaty with Britain in which Germany agreed to have only 35% of the size of the British Army. For the Germans, this signified the end of the military terms of the Treaty of Versailles and was used as propaganda to promote the Nazi party in Britain. With the rest of Europe lulled into a false sense of security about Hitler’s foreign policy aims, a policy of ‘brinkmanship’ was employed.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Did Wwii Begin?

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As for France and Great Britain, not wanting to repeat the huge losses they experienced in World War I, they decided not to attempt stopping Hitler from taking over Czechoslovakia and Austria. After Germany realized what they could get done, September 1, 1939, they decided to go ahead and take over Poland as well. After France and Great Britain saw that Hitler/Germany wasn't going to stop after that, they gave Germany the option of war.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    q. Failure of appeasement, Munich: This marks the end of creating an international policy. Hitler went through a series of marches with no opposition. Appeasement is the idea of giving someone what they wants to get them to shut up, even though it isn’t good for them. The Munich Conference Hitler lies and promises that the expansion was over. Hitler’s book, Mein Kampf explained he was going to continue…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Hitler’s power began to rise during the 30s, many Americans still believed that they could avoid the issue through a policy of appeasement (Document G), though it failed and both Britain and France…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 1930s, lots of politicians in both Britain and France came to see that the terms of the Treaty of Versailles had placed restrictions on Germany that were unfair. Hitler's actions were seen as understandable and justifiable.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler did not want to advance on to foreign territory first. He explained that the first thing he wanted to accomplish was to secure all of Germany; he wanted all of Germany to stand with him and support him. While accomplishing this, he decided to secretly grow his military (in 1933-1934). It gave him time to prepare for war and grow the country. Growing his military was a breach of the Treaty of Versailles, but the Allies weren’t aware. However, using appeasement was basically pointless. Although the allies weren’t aware of the secret growth of Hitler’s military, they could have used collective security in the near time future to stand up as a power and attack Germany upfront. It would have been more effective, as appeasing to Hitler was just giving him what he wanted, whenever he…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Britain’s policy of appeasement was partly due to popular opinion. The British people did not want to enter another war after losing 722,000 lives and having 1,676,000 people wounded. There was a widespread feeling that death and destruction should never be allowed to happen on such a scale again. However public opinion was not the only reason Britain followed a policy of appeasement to Hitler. There were other factors such as Military Weakness, German Bombers, Lack of reliable allies and economic problems which also added to why Britain followed a policy of appeasement. The size of the army decreased in the 1920s because of government cost cuttings which meant the military was weak as there was not as many soldiers available as before. In the 1930s there was a great sense of fear that German bombers would attack Britain and kill 600,000 people. Economic problems contributed to Britain following appeasement as Britain did not have enough money to support a war. The USA was in isolation and Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa did not want to fight.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeasement was set in place in hopes of avoiding war, this was the Policy created by Britain allowing Hitler to expand German territory. This policy was created by the British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, this policy could easily be considered a policy of weakness because Britain and France were just giving Germany what they wanted to avoid war. Appeasement stemmed from British feeling guilty about the treatment of Germany after The Treaty of Versailles, a peace settlement that screwed over Germany they had to accept the blame for the war, lose all of it territories, lose a good portion of its army, and pay reparations. In the 1930s when the Nazis were in power Hitler, was ambitious to reverse the terms. Hitler’s plans were to regain…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hitler; Wwii

    • 2243 Words
    • 9 Pages

    During 1935-39 Britain and France used the policy of Appeasement in a conscious manner to avoid war entirely. Britain and France were obliged to continue Appeasement as they had already seen the atrocities of 1914-18 and had a strong commitment to maintain peace in Europe. There was a mutual…

    • 2243 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 2 Dbq Essay

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    World War II is the cruel, black scar that marks the back of the Twentieth century. After World War I the seeds of World War Two were planted through the unbearable burdens put on the German people from the infamous treaty of Versailles. With the rise of the notorious dictator Hitler, the German people were hungry for a new beginning. Appeasement was one of the biggest things that lead to World War II. It basically just postponed the War from happening. Leaders arose in countries that were unsatisfied with the results of the past war, World War I. Italy, Germany and Japan took action and no one was stopping them. The Most effective response to aggression at this time was surely collective security. Using Appeasement got the countries nowhere…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays