Preview

Was Napoleon Bonaparte the Saviour or the Destroyer of the Ideals of T

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1981 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Napoleon Bonaparte the Saviour or the Destroyer of the Ideals of T
With all the glory and the splendour that some countries may have experienced, never has history seen how only only one man, Napoleon, brought up his country, France, from its most tormented status, to the very pinnacle of its height in just a few years time. He was a military hero who won splendid land-based battles, which allowed him to dominate most of the European continent. He was a man with ambition, great self-control and calculation, a great strategist, a genius; whatever it was, he was simply the best. But, even though how great this person was, something about how he governed France still floats among people's minds. Did he abuse his power? Did Napoleon defeat the purpose of the ideals of the French Revolution? After all of his success in his military campaigns, did he gratify the people's needs regarding their ideals on the French Revolution? This is one of the many controversies that we have to deal with when studying Napoleon and the French Revolution. In this essay, I will discuss my opinion on whether or not was he a destroyer of the ideals of the French Revolution.
<br>
<br>Certain individuals approved of Napoleon's reign as the saviour of France. He finished and completed the Revolution by fulfilling the ideals the people of France demanded. A person such as one belonging to the bourgeoisie, or even a peasant would be very satisfied with the way Napoleon ruled over the country. He gave them equality, freedom, justice, and many rights. Such things never existed during the reign of the monarchs before Napoleon stepped in. A banker too would be very affirmative on how Napoleon had truly helped France in its economic problems. He made the franc the most stable currency in Europe, and the banker had witnessed that, as probably one of the bankers of the Bank of France. Another type of individual that agrees that Napoleon isn't the destroyer of the ideals of the Revolution would be his soldiers and generals. He had fought alongside with his men in many

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The French Revolution of 1789 and the Industrial revolution were important milestones on the timeline of world history. Many changes, radically new ideas, and progressive thinkers emerged from these essential revolutions that sparked a metamorphosis of Europe. The creation of liberalism, conservatism, and the extension of railroad lines are the lasting products of the Dual Revolutions that will echo in eternity.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 11 American History

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I think that Napoleon in a way demonstrated French Revolution ideals. The French Revolution ideals were for equality and rights for the people, but Napoleon took away a many of the rights that people wanted. The people of France were not allowed to gather in groups of people and discuss beliefs that did not follow Napoleons, and he re-established slavery. He also controlled everything that was published and banned some authors from writing or publishing books during his reign. To me he wanted the people to believe in this ideals rather than promote them to have their own beliefs and thoughts, and being killed for thinking differently to me is not equality or a…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philip Mansel is a historian educated at Eton College, where he was a King’s Scholar, and at Balliol College, Oxford, where he read Modern History and Modern Languages. Mansel argues Napoleon brought Europe into the pinnacle of monarchism. Mansel states the Napoleon’s act of overthrowing historic republics and installing family members on newly created thrones changed European politics and government. Mansel objectively dissects Napoleon’s policies without taking sides. He states Napoleon’s methods and significance, does not state whether the policies are right or wrong. This is a valuable source for illustrating Napoleon’s short term impact on government and politics in the Napoleonic Era.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Response Final

    • 1102 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The are two sides to every story. The French Revolution brought significant change to France during the late 18th and early 19th centuries. It was a period of time that produced a remodeling of the French Government system, an Enlightened mindset, and the rise of a new prominent ruler, Napoleon Bonaparte. Emperor Napoleon, as he so deemed himself, initially took on his duties by trying to bring together what had been a much divided nation. He made concessions with both the left (the constitutionalists) and the right (the monarchists). His concessions earned him respect from many, however, as his power grew and grew, Napoleon developed a tendency to rely strongly on his military to gain power. His militaristic eagerness to monopolize Europe earned him much respect and praise from the French people, but very infrequently do we recognize those individuals that served in the military to carry through Napoleon’s aggressive orders. Those who fought for Napoleon’s success received very little in return; much to lack of motivation. Fortunately for the world, Jakob Walter’s story as a conscript for Napoleon’s Grand Army has been public for the world. His powerful accounts of the pitiful conditions that conscripts endured during their wartime travels would give many a different opinion of the “Great” Napoleon. As mentioned earlier, there are two sides to every story.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He certainly made some crucial alterations to France, which later helped to shape all of Europe, but wasn’t the incredible revolutionary many think of him as. From the rule of Louis XVIII in the late 1700s to the Revolution to Napoleon’s rule, France was certainly affected, but Napoleon wasn’t the most influential on the country during this time period. Some of the changes made by this military genius were enormous, such as his changes to the Church (compared to the country’s outlook on religion during the Revolution) and society as a whole. Others, though, weren’t really affected by his changes as much as it seems; education was hardly changed at all, and government and the rights of individuals appeared to evolve, but they really…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has not been a man so widely interpreted as Napoleon in European history. His early heroic reputation is questioned because of other dictators who went down the same path as he did but for other reasons, such as Stalin and Mussolini. The French Revolution had three goals, liberty, equality, and fraternity, and to make it truly successful these goals must be achieved. Freeing the French, making them equal within themselves, and unifying them, is what Emperor Bonaparte strived for with the Napoleonic Code. Although most believe he did not acquire Liberty, they are content with his achievements. Napoleon not only finished the revolution, he finished with what everyone expected, the demise of the King and the equality among all people. Napoleon truly is "the debate…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When he made the changes that he did, it made it all of the classes a little more equal. He was always looking out for the people so he could get their support. Napoleon made a tax system that was fair unlike the old one. The old system would make the poorer people pay more than the wealthy. Another thing at he did for the people was make government ran public schools available for male students of all backgrounds. People that finished the school went to office not with family connections anymore but on the basis of merit. He also made laws that were called Napoleonic Code. These laws gave the country of France set of rules that were for the most part fair and got rid of many injustices. The two major things that were wrong with the code were that the people did not have freedom of speech or freedom of the press. Napoleon wanted to make himself emperor so he did just that. Because of the changes he made the French voters supported him. In 1804 he took the crown from the pope and crowned himself emperor of France. The people would have also been happy with Napoleon when he sold land to the United States. He sold the land for fifteen million dollars. This brought money to France and also would make the British upset. If I was a member of the bourgeoise I would also be happy with how Napoleon was trying to get more land for France. He was a very determined leader which would be another thing that they would be happy about. I would be happy because Napoleon treated the people fairly and made rules in the best interest of the people for the most…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To most of Europe, Napoleon was just another conqueror trying to expand his territories, but to the people of France, he was a great leader; he “restored peace and order at home” (Kagan, Ozment, Turner, Frank 586). Restoring order to France was one of his greatest domestic achievements; the people loved him for his support in helping them win their fight for equal rights “to achieve wealth, status, and security for their property” (Kagan, Ozment, Turner, Frank 586).…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He displayed these ideals by telling his brother about how he should be confident in his decisions and make his subjects happy to be under his power. Napoleon tells his brother, “don’t listen to those who say his subjects are accustomed to slavery will feel no gratitude for the benefits that you give them” (120). Bonaparte also demonstrated French Revolution ideals in that he wanted liberty for his people and equality. He believed his soldiers deserve rights and the freedom to expression themselves. “He concentrated power in his own hands, suppressed opposition, and sought to mold public opinion by controlling the press and education” (119).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For one, Napoleon was extremely egotistical. He only cared for himself and was only concerned with how things affected him. The good of everyone else was secondary. Count Mole, who was a Councilor of State, Minister, and peer of France said of Napoleon, “he thought of nothing but his own gratification, of magnifying himself and his power without limit and without rest.” When Napoleon proclaimed to his troops on the Commencement of the war and third Coalition, he stated, “Soldiers, your Emperor is among you!” As you can see from the quotes, Napoleon thought of himself as a Godly being who was better than everyone else and looked down on others. This is one of the reasons I think he is more of a tyrant than a hero.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The great Bicentenary of the French Revolution of 1789 may be drawing to a close, but that of Napoleon is about to commence. So now is an opportune moment to present a critical overview of his…

    • 3793 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    While this is only one aspect for Lyon 's argument, others suggest that Napoleon was also an enlightened despot who became everything he sought out to destroy. Louis Bergeron, historian and author of many books including France Under Napoleon, claims that although at first, Napoleon generally kept with the philosophies of the French Revolution, he also used many of the principles of the revolution to benefit himself and progress to absolute power (Bergeron 1981, 75-76).…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ideals of the Enlightenment and the French Revolution were both rooted from the desire to abolish absolute authority, ensure the natural rights of men, and develop a stable government. Napoleon Bonaparte, a prominent military general and French Emperor, strived for these political ideologies, but was corrupt in his way of approaching them. He was strictly egotistical and selfish; these characteristics served only as a catalyst to his abolition. Mohandas Gandhi, a pacifistic revolutionary that led India’s emancipation, stated that “power based on love is a thousand times more effective and permanent then the one derived from fear of punishment”. Napoleon, however, seized control over France by ruling oppressively and ruthlessly; citizens followed him only in fear of his boundless power. Although Napoleon did help establish political and social equality in France, his uncontrollable desire for personal supremacy suppressed the ideals of the revolution and violated the basic principles of the enlightenment.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1793 Napoleon had its first offensive, and conquered Belgium, The Netherlands and parts of Germany and also recaptured Toulon from the British. In 1796 he conquered North Italy and founded some republics there, whereas it seemed that those republics were free, they were under French rule as was the Batavian Republic(Belgium and the Netherlands). This shows that Napoleon wanted to look like a good person, but he actually wasn’t. Also he destroyed an Egyptian army that was 4 times bigger, but the British destroyed a French fleet, so it turned out to be a failure.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Napoleon Bonaparte claimed to have put into practice the ideals of the French Revolution and the Enlightenment. Do you think he did? Did his actions and the legacy of his reign represent those ideals? Explain in a short essay whether or not Bonaparte’s reign and legacy embodied the ideals of the French Revolution and the Enlightenment. Provide facts to support your claim.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays