Was Jack the Ripper a Social Reformer?
Jack the Ripper’s identity still remains unknown, even after a century his identity still remains unknown even after killing five poor prostitutes in 19th Century Britain. His murders, all violent showed some knowledge on anatomy but some doctors insist that no knowledge was used while in the process of dissecting the victims’ bodies. He terrified the eastern part of London but what we can say is that he was a social reformer. His murders attracted so much media attention because media was growing meanwhile with these happenings British government had to place laws to improve conditions for everyone. Section One:
London in the 19th Century was very poor. There was the rich part, which was the Western-Part of London and in the other hand there was the Eastern Part which was extremely poor. The industrial revolution was going on at the time; this meant that people were working in factories receiving very low wages. With very low wages people had a very hard time to sustain their families and if they would ever lose their job there was no social security to help. This meant that poverty would take over. A sanitary investigator working for the parliament reported that he found a family living with four pigs (Mum, dad + three children) these investigators were put in action to actually investigate/compare the sanitary conditions in both sides. Another investigator called Leonard Horner found seven people living in a very small room in an underground kitchen with a dead child. Another investigator called Nasseu Senior states that he saw a woman giving birth and meanwhile her eight other children running naked with small pox. The general conditions were also as bad as the home conditions. In Eastern London as there was no sewage system there was thick fog which would cover the eastern part. Besides the fog it was very smelly and you could no see at far distance. Focusing in the general home conditions there was a very unfair balance between the Eastern and Western parts. The Western part had better sanitary conditions which prevent diseases while in the Eastern there was actually no money to make these sanitary systems which would prevent disease spread such as cholera and small pox. This basically means that there was a very big un-balance between the two areas of London and that while some lived well others were putting them and their families to be able to have a shelter.
There are several points to cover before concluding weather Jack the Ripper was a Social Reformer or not. Some details to cover are his victims, Mary Ann Nichols, Annie Chapman, Elizabeth Stride, Catherine Eddows and Mary Jane Kelly. All his victims were poor prostitutes, which were all victims of violent crimes. With the poverty at the time, most of Jack the Ripper’s victims were mostly victims of abandonment of their husbands, as some of them had no other jobs and were severely poor they had no way to get money besides prostitution. Most of them ended up being alcoholic. All of these prostitutes were targets of a cut in the neck to kill them instantly. Then all the other women had their organs dissected (their organs were removed) and doctors investigated if there was any knowledge applied into the process of dissection of the bodies and all doctors agreed that knowledge of anatomy was used. The doctors also concluded that probably it was butcher or someone working with knifes that was the killer. The police, to be able to catch the killer, had several methods put into practise so they could be able to catch the killer. The conditions in the streets of Eastern London would not benefit the police due to the fact that the streets were like mazes (easy to escape) there was this fog caused by lack of sanitary conditions. This fog made the police’s life harder because as they could not see with the fog they could not catch the killer in a pursuit. Besides having police officers...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document