Preview

War- Moral Issue

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1122 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
War- Moral Issue
War is a current moral issue because violence is regarded as wrong. Instead of war there should be negotiation and arbitration. War is violent conflict between human beings. There have been many conflicts and wars in history but it is known that humans have also thought about morals and ethics during that time. Although during war many lives are lost and damaged almost all human beings know and have been taught from religion and culture that taking away one’s life is morally wrong. Blood is shed in war and therefore war is a moral issue, to conduct warfare within moral limits is not possible unless conflicts are discussed and brought to a fair conclusion.

Although according to our different cultures and religions war appears to be a moral issue, some people believe that under certain circumstances war is the best option because it is the better of other bad choices. Either way war deliberately kills innocent civilians and soldiers, this goes against human rights, every human being has the right to live and peacefully. There are war ethics which help decide right from wrong, there are debates and countries try to solve conflicts. War ethics also lead to the creation of some formal codes such as “The Hague” and “Geneva conventions” which places rules in warfare.

Rules have been made to govern the conduct of war. In 1864 the Geneva Convention was created to protect the wounded and sick affected by warfare, they provide medical facilities and they also recognized the Red Cross as a neutral medical group. Innocent civilians cannot control the violence and bloodshed in war, therefore the creation of such conventions to help the injured and sick is good. JeanVanier says that there are barriers between us humans which is why there is no peace among us, we need to understand the others, accept differences come to a fair decision and break barriers to create peace. The conventions and medical groups that help civilians regardless of their race or side is an example of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Just War Theory

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages

    What justifies war? Who justifies it? Why as human beings do we feel the need to fight, harm, and kill others to achieve certain goals? These questions have been pertinent to our society since the beginning of time and continue to challenge us to better understand the human psyche, and code of ethics that give Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Coast Guardsmen, and Marines credence to kill in the name of the United States of America. These ethics of war lay the foundation for that code of understanding and righteousness for when it is justifiable to pull the trigger and take the life of another, or commit an act of war.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To conclude, there is no doubt that the conflict of war is a useless encounter that affects many innocent people’s lives, the economic stability and physiological wellbeing of soldiers. It is evident that in some circumstances society makes war to ensure peace, and on the surface this seems rational, even plausible. However, in reality throughout the journey there is a great human and economic cost…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Just War Pacifism

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Human beings have been fighting with each other since prehistoric times, and people have been discussing the rights and wrongs of it. The Ethics of War begins by assuming that war is a bad thing, and should be avoided if possible, but there can be situations when war may be catastrophic. War is a bad thing because it involves deliberately killing or injuring people, and this is a fundamental wrong. The purpose of war ethics is to help decide what is right or wrong, both for individuals and countries, and to contribute to debates on public policy, and ultimately to government and individual action.…

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When is war acceptable? That is the question that the Just War theory (jus bellum iustum) attempts to answer. Guided by an evolving set of criteria, this tradition attempts to provide a framework by which the both the reasons for a war and the combatants' behavior may be judged to be ethical and morally justifiable. This theory or doctrine, has roots in both philosophical and historical contexts, having been shaped by conventions and rules observed through ages of war as well as the thoughts of philosophers of those same ages. These principles are divided into two parts: 'the right to go to war' (jus ad bellum), which concerns itself with whether it is justifiable…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Afghanistan War Ethics

    • 2052 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Are wars even supposed to have ethics? War ethics are important because a lot of people don 't even know they exist or if people even follow them. Civilized nations established the Humanitarian law; it is a law regarding how to confront enemies in a semi civilized way and mandates the treatment of prisoners of war (Masci 1013). This law is what raises a lot of hairs on religious leaders and causes anger since they feel that this law is not abided by. It seems that religion and war always tends to go along with war. Whether the wars are started by religions or its religious leaders having problems with how the wars are being fought. The law also states how prisoners are to be tried in the judicial system and if they are to have their trial in civilian or military courts. The main purpose of this law was an effort to control violence or even stop it. Another big factor of having this law the requirement it puts on governments to assess situations before they even start a war to make sure there is an imminent threat. On the down side, a lot of government officials feel that this law weakens the U. S. because of the peacekeeping could create backfires and end in war anyway. War ethics do exist and there will always be people who believe they are not followed. The people who follow or don 't follow these ethics will always stand out in one way or…

    • 2052 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “War, what is it good for”? The lyrics to the 60’s pop song, provokes the question that Just War proponents and Pacifists have wrestled with throughout history, reaching opposite conclusions. Those in favor of Just War theory, say war is only good insofar as it is fought for the right reasons and brings about the right end. Whereas, Pacifists reject war completely, preferring peaceful means to resolve conflict. But which one is morally and ethically right? Which one should be adopted and practiced by the Nations of this World? Upon examining the logic and philosophical implications of each ethical stance, one is able to sympathize with them both, seeing their values and virtue.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative suggests three maxims which separate moral from immoral actions (Kant, 1981).The first aspect of this imperative states one can only act morally if the statement by which you are acting becomes universal law without contradiction and the consequences of such are logical (Kant, 1981). For example, if the statement ‘you ought not kill’ is put forward, the universal consequences are logical making it a moral statement. However, this statement is not true in war, especially in the case of nuclear warfare. Since this statement dictates an action must be universalized without contradiction, the concept and consequences of war become nonsensical and illogical due to the fact that anyone can murder anyone, not just in war and including yourself (Kant, 1981), making this just war theory obsolete.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The video Professor Crist provided, “Rules of War (In a Nutshell),” was very educational. Honestly, I was very unfamiliar with the rules of war and did not even know these set code of conduct existed during wartime situations. After watching the video and reading the text, I believe I have a better understanding of these norms. After having a greater understanding, I agree that there should be norms, which prevail during wartime situations. The norms should include, not targeting individuals who are not a threat (civilians and the unarmed), no damage of necessities, such as water systems and sources of food; lastly, no destruction a total population that cannot recover. I am personally not a fan of war, but I recognize the need to defend and…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just War Theory Essay

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    However, now there are wide criticisms that everyone should be accountable for all of the just war theory. The broadness of the theory however, offers different sets of principles upon interpretation. Different cultures have different beliefs and views, which often does not allow for the theory to be applied. This theory then is able to fit different sides of the spectrum, based on interpretation. For instance, a country that views suicidal attack as honorable is on the opposite side from the American view. The tactic, and view on morality differs and it is difficult to come to the conclusion that they are in accordance to the same rule, and therefore harder to be applied to all parties involved. The theoretical aspect looks at these principles and examines whether decisions for war have been ethically have been made. The responsibility everyone has in crucial. The historical aspect deals with the rules or agreements that have been used for ages. The international agreements such as the Geneva and Hague conventions are a few of the rules aimed at controlling certain warfare conduct. The Just war theory principles are embodied in the International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and the United Nations (UN) Charter. The IHL is “a set of rules which seek, for humanitarian reasons, to limit the effects of armed…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction The notion of war has always been the subject of moral debate throughout history. World War II is no different in this particular regard. In order for wars to be morally justified, the Just War Theory was developed. The Just War Theory has two specific criteria which must be followed in order for the act of war to be considered morally justified – the jus ad bellum (right to go to war) and jus in bello (rightful conduct within war) criterions.…

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Restricted Warfare Ethics

    • 2127 Words
    • 9 Pages

    If all the preceding conditions of Jus ad bellum and Jus in bello are met, the war is said to avoid a greater evil and is considered just. War is thus the appropriate manner of action. Nevertheless, two very different approaches argue that this is not so. First is that the “decision to wage war is governed by realism and relative strength, not ethics; morality thus has no use in war” (BBC). The second is that all war is unjust and is never ethical. Yet both of these appear illogical and irresponsible if the past and present world order is taken into…

    • 2127 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The foreigners must be loved. The children impacted must be loved. Our entire world should be enthroned in love. Does war possess the act of love? If our resources and our names are being used to murder and destroy, then what actions are we taking towards this account? Nonviolent actions should be placed on all. Is there really a need for tragic warfare? World War II was not a war of race, but it was. Race played a central role in every aspect of combat, both in causing the battle and shaping the course. Two groups saw themselves as being racially distinct. Racism during these wars implied a military struggle for sovereignty.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dalai Lama Characteristics

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    War: when a human who has no self-control over his behavior does not get what he wishes for or seeks, and reacts with violence. This could be in a one-on-one argument, or one country against another. When humans do not understand each other or have no respect towards one another, it causes problems. The Dalai Lama says ‘the best way to overcome difficulties is to rely on human understanding and respect’. People need to learn how to respect each other. One of the main teachings of Buddhism is to reach inner peace. If everyone reached inner peace, it would be a world with no one needing to hurt each other, and without jealousy, which is a cause of war. War is caused by conflict, which is generally triggered by a simple misunderstanding, and all we need is respect and a determination for peace to overcome this state of anger.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral law requires that all citizens and all nations do everything they can to avoid war. Pope Paul VI supported this notion by calling for “War no more; no more war!” in his speech to the United Nations assembly. The Church’s reason and the Law of Love tell us that it makes more sense to resolve conflicts without choosing violence, although this choice may be a difficult one to make. When war occurs, we may have to choose whether to defend ourselves through force and violence or through nonviolent resistance.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Morality in war

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Is war ever moral? I feel that War is a necessary part of life. Sometimes force is the only way to defend yourself or others. We are all equals, and It is immoral to take the life of anyone, but it is also immoral to let the life of anyone be taken. We have a responsibility to help each other because cooperation is the only way the human race can survive; we also have a right to defend ourselves. This means that if someone else is threatening you or anothers life, and you are capable of helping, you have an obligation to protect yourself or them.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays