Preview

Wacc Computation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1267 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Wacc Computation
Case Study II : Weighted Average Cost of Capital

Introduction and objectives
This paper aims at describing a way to compute the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC). This method is often used by company management to determine the economic feasibility of different projects and thus to compute the NPV of a specific project by discounting cash-flows. The WACC determines the return that the company should generate to satisfy its debt-holders. For the company, it consists in a tool for projects decision-making, whereas for the creditors, it is in an indicator of what they can expect to receive as return from their investments and a measure of the global risk associated to the company. Our choice fell on Hewlett-Packard (HPQ), whose activities are computer hardwares and is part of the S&P500.

Assumptions

Cost of equity:
Cost of equity is computed by using the CAPM formula (1). This equation links the risk premium on the market (S&P500) to the excess return of the stock (HPQ) by a factor Beta (B). B is the covariance between the market and stock return divided by the variance of the market.

ErE=rf+β∙E[risk premium] (1)

1. Risk-free rate : The first thing to be found is the risk-free rate. The WACC evaluation should be made through eyes of the company’s most probable investors, which we assumed to be American as HPQ is listed on the US market. The best proxy for rf is therefore the US T-bills rate. The time basis used to reflect the lifetime of the project is assumed to be 10 years, as we estimated it was an acceptable horizon, typically used in case studies (this estimation was reasonably confirmed by bond issuances by HPQ we observed). Hence, the best evaluation taken is 3.36% on 01.03.2011 for a maturity of 10 years (www.treasury.gov).
2. Market return : The second element to find is the market rate. We based our choice on the S&P 500 return since HPQ is quoted in the U.S. market. Through this rate, we can

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In this case, the corporate cost of capital needs to be analyzed and hence, to estimate that, a company’s long-term source of funds (common stock, long-term debts and preferred stock) should be used. Since the corporate cost of capital is used to make decisions today, which will affect the future cash flows, the only acceptable costs are today’s marginal costs that are used. These marginal values are the estimates of the cost of capital that will be raised in future which will provide an accurate estimation of raising the capital in future.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Atlas Metal Company

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The purpose of this report is to help a financial special assistant, Linda, to analyze the financial position of Atlas Metals Company and deciding its capital budgeting and capital structure. Firstly, I explain why firm should use Net Present Value (NPV) methods for capital budgeting rather than Return on Investment (ROI) method and Payback Period method. Secondly, I calculate the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) which will be used as discount rate while calculating NPV. Then, I decide which rapid prototyping system company should invest as well as I compare the each expansion projects’ IRR with WACC to decide which projects should be invested and which should not. After deciding projects which should be accepted, I draw Investment Opportunity Schedule (IOS) and Marginal Cost of Capital (MCC) graphs to decide where the company should finance accepted projects.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dixon Case

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The risk-free rate used was the long-term Treasury bond rate of 9.5% while the debt rate premium was calculated by subtracting the long-term Treasury bond rate from the long-term “AA” corporate bond rate. With Dixon’s ability to cover interest expense and relatively low target debt ratio, we applied “AA” rating to Dixon, which yielded the debt premium of 0.75%.…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nike Case

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many issues should be addressed regarding Joanna Cohen’s WACC calculation. First, to calculate the debt cost of capital, Cohen divided the total interest expense by the company’s average debt balance. This is an issue because she did not take into account the current yield on publicly traded Nike debt. Another issue that should be addressed is the calculation of the equity cost of capital. Using CAPM, Cohen took a 20 year Treasury bond as her risk free, the average Beta for the last 6 years, and a geometric mean for market premium. Also, Cohen calculated the book value of equity and debt instead of using market values.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Boeing 7e7

    • 2591 Words
    • 11 Pages

    1. What is an appropriate required rate of return against which to evaluate the prospective IRRs from the Boeing 7E7?…

    • 2591 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We use free cash flows and the asset cost of capital as discount rate in evaluating this project. There is financial effect involved, since the Ameritrade have both debts and equity.…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Boeing Case

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In finance, the net present value (NPV) or net present worth is defined as the sum of the present values of incoming and outgoing cash flows over a period of time. The net present value is used in order to determine rather a project will be profitable or not. To determine rather the Boeing 7e7 will be profitable or not, my analysis includes finding out the payback period, or how long it will take for Boeing to make a profit out of this plane. The net present value analysis determined that in order for the project to be profitable, it would take 26 years, making the payback period 25 years. The analysis also determined that Boeing would generate a rough total of about 7 billion dollars in profitability by the end of the 37-year forecast. If you only look at the short run, investing in the Boeing 7e7 is not profitable. Looking at the bigger picture, in the long run the company would generate a lot of revenue.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Congoleum Corp.

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In valuing the target company Congoleum after an LBO by First Boston found the expected free cash flows generated by this firm from 1980 to 1984. These numbers were based on values provided in the case. From there, we employed the Adjusted Present Value method to discount these cash flows because we assumed that Congoleum was varying its Debt to Equity ratio during those years. We discounted these cash flows by the required return on assets that was in turn calculated through use of the Modigliani-Miller unlevering formula (to derive the Asset Beta) and the Capital Asset Pricing Model. The required return on Congoleum debt was calculated by the expected return of the average CCC-company’s debt and the expected return of debt under default. Then, the present value of financial side effects was taken into account by discounting the interest tax shield by the required return on debt. Finally, we calculated the terminal value of cash flows by assuming a constant 4.14% growth rate in perpetuity and a constant D/E ratio for the years after 1984. Thus, these cash flows were initially discounted under WACC-ME. From there, we factored in prior debt and cash that Congoleum had generated to calculate the total equity value of the firm after the LBO had taken place.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrigley Junior Case Study

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Wrigley’s pre recapitalization WACC is 10.9%, the cost of equity assumes a risk free rate of 5.65% for 20 years US treasuries in the case exhibit 7; a risk premium is assumed 7% (or 5%), and uses Wrigley’s current beta of 0.75 (case Exhibit 5).…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We should not use a single corporate WACC for evaluating investment opportunities in all its division. The firm should value its projects using a discount rate determined by the characteristics of the risk of the project rather than a single company­wide discount rate. Different divisions have different weighted average cost of capital. If we use the single discount rate of the…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Worldwide Paper Company we performed calculations to decide whether they should accept a new project or not. We calculated their net income and their cash flows for this project (See Table 1.6 and 1.5). We computed WPC’s weighted average cost of capital as 9.87%. We then used the cash flows to calculate the company’s NPV. We first calculated the NPV by using the 15% discount rate; by using that number we calculated a negative NPV of $2,162,760. We determined that the discount rate of 15% was out dated and insufficient. To calculate a more accurate NPV for the project, we decided to use the rate of 9.87% that we computed. Using this number we got the NPV of $577,069. With the NPV of $577,069 our conclusion is to accept this project as long as everything stays as it currently is. We recommend that they evaluate themselves at least yearly as things may change from year to year.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marriott Corporation Case

    • 2434 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Marriot use cost of capital as the hurdle rate (minimum rate of return required to accept the project) to discount future cash flows for the investment projects of the three lines of business (Lodging, Contract Services and Restaurants). They use this rate to calculate NPV and net present value over cost to decide for the profit rate. Since cost of the project stays constant, net present value and hurdle rate are used as variable to decide if they should accept the project or not. The higher the rate, the lower the net present value because future cash flows are discounting at a higher rate. The case clearly describes that WACC can only measure investment of similar risk class and for that reason we don 't think the way Marriott uses to estimate cost of capital makes sense since we believe that WACC and net present value of the project must be separately calculated for each part of the company and for each of their projects.…

    • 2434 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The course project involved developing a great depth of knowledge in analyzing capital structure, theories behind it, and its risks and issues. Before I began this assignment, I knew nothing but a few things about capital structure from previous unit weeks; however, it was not until this course’s final project that came along with opening doors for me to developing a real understanding of why capital structure is important, what to expect from it, and how to evaluate in determining value of a firm. For the first time, various financial statements were closely examined and retrieved via online including Google, MSN, and Yahoo and an extensive amount of research were referred to in order to ensure quality in the project and report any findings that may be relevant to this research. One of the most stimulating part about this assignment was that we were allowed to select a firm of our interest and it was not until this project that I’ve came to suddenly realize there is plentiful amount of information available to enrich us to knowing more about how and why the values are placed about in a firm which convinced me enough to feel that this was the main reason why I selected this assignment to be included for my program portfolio.…

    • 2070 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boeing's Strategy

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The cost of equity is determined by the company’s levered Beta (). This is calculated according to the ‘Hamada equation’:…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study of Bg Group

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) Approach: This method offers a wide range of advantages. For instance, the Capital Assets Pricing Model (CAPM) is employed in the calculation of the Cost of Equity. Thus, the discounted rate of 7.58 percent used in figure 1.12 Appendix is likely to be precise. The total value of the firm is $4.73 billion. Nonetheless, in view of the probabilities of forecasting errors in the estimation of cash flows, the degree of precision does not guarantee an accurate result. Another drawback of the approach would be the failure to allow for the impacts of real options available to management on future cash flows. Hence, this method is considered as an alternative for crosschecking. The assumptions are the dividends grow constantly in perpetuity at 3 percent and the debt ratio is also constant at 28.1 percent. For further analysis, please refer to item 2a and 3c in the Appraisal. 2. The EBIT Multiples Approach: Under this methodology, the debt-equity ratio was not required. Thus, the value of the firm is approximately $4.93 billion after liquidity discount was taken into account. This yields an insignificantly different result compared to the result under the WACC method. However, since the average EBIT multiples strongly depend on the comparable companies in the industry, reliable information is less likely to be available in practice. Therefore, another approach is employed. 3. Adjusted Present Value (APV) Approach: The APV method is more complicated than two methods mentioned earlier inasmuch as it takes account of unlevered value of the firm and the interest tax shield. Recent complexity of the method notwithstanding, APV provides management with an explicit valuation of interest tax shield and an assumption of constant debt-equity ratio is unnecessary. According to figure 1.10, the total value of the firm before synergies is $5.02 billion. Nonetheless, this method ignores the costs of financial…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays