Preview

Views on Corporate Social Responsibilities

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2068 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Views on Corporate Social Responsibilities
Corporations practicing stakeholder management will be more sustainable. Discuss.

Introduction
The perceptivity of sustainability is both in the sense of achieving long-term success and as survivability of a corporation (Zink, Steimle & Fischer 2008). Dunphy, Griffiths and Benn (2003) conceive corporations as channels of social purpose, constructed within society to attain useful social objectives. Henceforth, corporate social responsibility commits a significant role towards the sustainability of corporations. Both corporate social responsibilities and sustainability, and its related concepts influence all aspects of business. Chandler and Werther (2010) acknowledge the understanding of corporate social responsibilities as an aim to define the future of our society.

However, the apprehension of corporate social responsibility determines the corporate governances. As the question arises, does practicing stakeholder management aid corporations to be more sustainable? In this essay, classical and contemporary view of governance on corporate social responsibilities will be put into discussion before coming to a conclusion under strategic sustainability. In addition, theoretical frameworks and real world corporate cases will be reason about in the respective governances.

Classical View on Corporate Social Responsibilities
“The only social responsibility of business is to maximise profits” - Friedman’s frequent saying.

In reference to Friedman’s classical view, the purposes for business to exist are for distributing products and services to society, and thereafter, for creating economic value which subsequently generate profits for shareholders. Keinert (2008) trusts that the mangers are in control to maximise these revenue for shareholders, obligate by the employment contracts as agents for the shareholders of the firm, the principals. It is also emphasised by Zu (2008)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tony Fernandes, CEO of Kuala Lumpur-based Air Asia started a low-cost airline at a time when everyone thought he would fail. He placed high emphasis on his workforce and flexible HR strategies. During the past few years, Air Asia has become one of the best low-cost airlines in Asia and it has also boosted its CSR efforts. Fernandes' basic sense of CSR starts with his people: Air Asia was one of the first airlines in Asia to hire female pilots. He says that his staff are his best asset and that he constantly uses their suggestions to improve and innovate within the company.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Corporate social responsibility can simply be identified as a duty, which is not a legal obligation lately, under very much consideration by every multinationals, as well as the growing firm. The ongoing concern is meant to increase the awareness between the business Individuals, to implement and draw line which should clearly indicates that what social obligation an organization has towards the society.(Caroll,1970) (Caroll, Archie, B.(1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility is towards the moral management of organization stakeholder.…

    • 2712 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thirty-five years ago, Milton Friedman wrote a famous article for The New York Times Magazine whose title aptly summed up its main point: "The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits." Friedman had no patience for capitalists who claimed that "business is not concerned 'merely' with profit but also with promoting desirable 'social' ends; that business has a 'social conscience' and takes seriously its responsibilities for providing employment, eliminating discrimination, avoiding pollution and whatever else may be the catchwords of the contemporary crop of reformers." Friedman wrote that such people are "preaching pure and unadulterated socialism. Businessmen who talk this way are unwitting puppets of the intellectual forces that have been undermining the basis of a free society these past decades."…

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper is written in order to discuss Milton Friedman’s Goal of the Firm. It will discuss it’s relevancy as it applies to understanding the purpose of a business in society. It will also converse whether or not government and society has a place in expanding the Friedman Discussion.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What are the arguments for and against the concept of corporate social responsibility? Where do you stand, and why?…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent years, Corporate and Social Responsibility has become an ever increasing concern and source of community debate. It is now socially accepted that corporations have some ongoing responsibility, though sometimes ignored, to set a good example, make decisions based on social good and on ensuring positive environmental practices.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In today’s modern business world, commerce implements operation, drive and manner notions with endorsement and adoption of corporate social responsibility as a matter of course (David Henderson 2004). The stakeholder groups, for instance, governments, communities, suppliers, employees, customers and stockholders persistently claim administrators to dedicate capitals to corporate social responsibility (McWilliams and Siegel 2001, 117). Despite the fact, strategic corporate social responsibility is far more selective on being a standing corporation rate citizen and also addressing the social issues that the corporate creates (Micheal E. Porter and Mark R. Kramer 2006).…

    • 2250 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Q and Social Responsibility Social responsibility is a key attribute for businesses in the market today. When consumers look to spend their disposable income, they look for businesses that not only offer the right product, at the right price, but that also offer great service. Great service can include anything from friendly employees to community involvement. That is where social responsibility becomes apparent in a company’s ethics and values. If a company has a strong tie to the community and demonstrates social responsibility, their consumers will consider this a positive quality and it will separate them from the competition. In this case study with Company Q, they are lacking in the area of social responsibility. There are three major areas where the company can immediately make positive changes to improve their social standing in the neighborhoods where they operate. Making these changes and becoming more socially responsible is crucial for this company to see longevity as a business and to increase their market share. They will eventually lose patrons and income if they are not careful with how they manage their company’s interaction with their community. The first area for them to review is the closing of stores in high crime areas. Company Q has cited the reason for closing these stores as low sales and lost revenues in that area. Closing these stores has negative impacts on the company image. Consider the employees that are now without work. Even the extended community could view Company Q as the “bad guy.” It can be displayed as an attitude that the company cares more about the bottom line than the people in the area that would potentially be supporting the company. To improve in this area, Company Q should be challenged to interact with the community to determine why their sales are lower and what products would be beneficial to the neighborhood. Since the neighborhood is not as affluent as…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Responsibility is the new buzz word in the world of business. “It’s no longer a question of if companies should engage in [corporate social responsibility]. It’s now a question of to what extent will they do so […], “says Alison DaSilva, executive vice president for research and insights at Cone Communications (Brooks). The question, however, is not whether or not companies should be socially responsible, but how is that society defined and how is that social responsibly determined. In their debate on social responsibly of business, John Macke and T.J. Rodgers are not in disagreement about the implementation of the concept.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Internet Gambling

    • 7381 Words
    • 30 Pages

    Freeman, R. E. and Velamuri, S. R., (2006). ‘A New Approach to CSR: Company Stakeholder Responsibility.’ In ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Reconciling Aspiration with Application.’ Edited by Kakabadse, A. and Morsing, M. , Palgrave Mcmillan.…

    • 7381 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethic Paper

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Economist Milton Friedman said that “the only entities who can have responsibilities are individuals. A business cannot have responsibilities. So the question is, do corporate executives, provided they stay within the law, have responsibilities in their business activities other than to make as much money for their stockholders as possible? And my answer to that is no, they do not.[2]” Nowadays, this debate falls into the CSR, or also know as the “Corporate Social Responsibility” talk points. In [7] Cheers questions: “What is the business of business”? Should business attempt to solve social issues or should business merely exist to maximize shareholder wealth? My opinion is that corporations and public companies should focus on maximizing stockholder and shareholder wealth, while simultaneously relying on ethical principles.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    To predict real-life phenomena we need theories. Similarly, stakeholder theory is a theory which is used to explain the phenomena of motivation for corporate social disclosures. This research work is based on the concept of stakeholder theory and its practical applications in predicting the phenomena of corporate social disclosures (van der Laan 2009).…

    • 2985 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The paper adopts a social benefit-cost analysis framework to look at three stages in the historical development of management of stakeholder capital of corporations in the Philippines. The first two stages were government-driven. Stage One is internalization and moderation of some social costs starting with the Environmental Impact Statement System adopted by the Philippine government under President Marcos in 1981. Stage Two consists of reforms in the political economy started in 1992 by President Ramos to reduce rentier profit-making and regulatory capture by big corporations. Stage Three has been internally driven from within the Philippine corporate sector. It consists of corporations assuming social development roles and generating social benefits through CSR (corporate social responsibility) policies and programs. It gradually developed during the last two decades or after the February 1986 People Power or EDSA Revolution. The CSR in top Philippine corporations, especially among the larger conglomerates, is studied and analyzed to discern patterns meaningful in the context of Philippine economy, society and culture. The issues and challenges are next outlined. Finally, speculative pessimistic and optimistic Stage Four scenarios in Philippine and East Asian contexts, particularly with reference to Chinese-Filipino conglomerates, are drawn up.…

    • 6173 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “What does it mean for a corporation to be socially responsible? The concept is described by many terms. It has been called, “profit making only”, “going beyond profit making”, “voluntary activities”, “concern for the broader social system”, and “social responsiveness”. “Most focused attention is on the two extremes. On one side, there is the classical-or purely economic view, and on the other side, there is the socioeconomic position” (Robbins/Coulter 100). First, we will explore four theories of social responsibility. The four legal theories surrounding the issue are maximizing profits, moral minimum, stakeholder interest, and corporate citizenship.…

    • 3112 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A bright supporter of the narrow view is Milton Friedman who claims that the only social responsibility a business has is to maximize the profits of its owner or shareholders. Friedman feels that as long as the corporate executive carries out these desires in a way that follows the laws and ethical customs of society, this person has fulfilled his or her duty for the society. Corporate executives are charged with earning and spending corporate money. If an executive chooses an agenda of social responsibility that is in direct conflict with the company’s agenda of profitability. They lack the nessary expertise to assign them non-economic responsibilities would be to place social welfare in the hands of inept custodians. Therefore, he only role of business is the increase of profits. (Pontinen J 2013 )…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays