Preview

Viewing the American Civil War as a War of Unification as Opposed to a Civil War

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1904 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Viewing the American Civil War as a War of Unification as Opposed to a Civil War
When looking back on military history over the past two hundred years, it is tempting to argue that battles and entire wars are exactly as they seem. This common problem is readily found in two wars fought in the 1860s: the American Civil War (1861-1865) and the Austro-Prussian War (1866). However, while it is easy to consider the American Civil War as simply a war fought by the Union to maintain territorial integrity throughout the relatively young United States, and the Austro-Prussian War as merely the “middle” war of the three wars of German Unification meant to expand “German” territory, this is not the case. In reality, the American Civil War and Wars of German Unification (as opposed to simply the Austro-Prussian War), when compared through the lenses of military, socio-political, and personal factors, are in fact quite similar and if one compares these two series of events under the assumption that the Wars of German Unification were in fact driven by the desire to found a unified German state, one can readily come to the conclusion that the American Civil War was also a war fought to establish, as opposed to maintain, a unified American state. However, before one can start comparing the two series of events, it is necessary to point out the inherent differences between the two that makes a comparison between the two somewhat thornier to defend. These differences can be broken up into three groups: geographic differences, economic differences and military differences. In terms of geography, while the United States was clearly a sovereign state with clearly defined borders, the “concept of Germany geographically” (pg. 54) was not clearly developed until 1871. This difference is compounded on by the economic differences between the two regions: by the mid-1860s, Prussia was a relative economic giant, “easily outrunning Austria.” (pg. 54) This economic model was desired by Bismarck, who hoped to impose “model” economic policy on the region. This is in
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Lincoln's Efforts to Preserve the Union
    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Lincoln's Efforts to Preserve the Union

    Cited: 1. Boyer, Paul S. "Chapter 12 The Civil War 1861-1865." Holt American nation. Austin: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 2005. 360, 368,-372,375,382-387,390-395. Print.…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast Union and Confederacy in Civil War
    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Union and Confederacy in Civil War

    The challenges that the Union and the Confederacy faced during the Civil War were very different. Critical weaknesses that seemed unfit for war, plagued the opposing American forces, and would serve to be a continuous obstacle that would need to be conquered by patriotism of the people, for their opposing views. To allow for both sides to be competitive, the efforts put forth had to mold to the varied needs of the armies by both the civilian population and their militaries. To the people in the south the similarity to the colonists in the Revolutionary War, was assimilated to their separatist cause in the Civil War and would be their drive to compete with the dominating Northern states. This mindset started the Confederacy in the Civil War, despite many disadvantages, with the confidence in defeating Union forces, before becoming overwhelmed and being defeated after four well fought years.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why the North Won the Civil War by David Donald: Reflection on the economic, military, diplomatic, political, and social reasons the South lost.
    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why the North Won the Civil War by David Donald: Reflection on the economic, military, diplomatic, political, and social reasons the South lost.

    Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Turning Points in the Civil War
    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Turning Points in the Civil War

    James McPherson’s writings have been geared towards advancing the arguments that the North was justified in crushing the rebellion in the South. He sees the civil war in the lens of not a war against the North and the South, but a war against slavery and against their emancipation; a war between progressive forces against conservative ideologies in the south. In his writings, he is quick to indicate that the North’s win was inevitable, because of the relatively more polished military organizational capabilities and a vindication by history. McPherson downplays the factual successes that the Confederate forces had on the different war fronts throughout his book as either mere short term lapses in the organization of the Union forces rather than the actual inabilities to withstand the South’s firepower (McPherson, 2009).…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why the South Lost the War
    • 2026 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Why the South Lost the War

    “A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved—I do not expect the house to fall—but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other.” These words, spoken by Abraham Lincoln during his campaign to be a senator from Illinois, ring eerily true with the truth about the country’s uncertain future. Only three short years after Lincoln gave this speech, civil war would break out between the northern and southern states, and it would end four years later with the South running away with its tail between its legs. Why did the South lose the war? The South entered into the Civil War unprepared to fight and, ultimately, was starting a fight it was destined to lose. In the end, there were five factors that led to the defeat of the South: The fundamental economic superiority of the North, a basic lack of sound military strategy strategy in the way the South fought the war, the inept Southern performance in foreign affairs, lack of a dominating civilian leader in the South, and President Abraham Lincoln (Hersch, 2002).…

    • 2026 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Did the Civil War Ultimately reduce sectional antagonism and make the United States truly one nation?
    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Did the Civil War Ultimately reduce sectional antagonism and make the United States truly one nation?

    Prior to Civil War, distinct Northern and Southern cultures had been established; The free North occupied the commercial industry, while the slavery-based South undertook an agricultural occupation. The South and the North began to fight over right and wrong. The major issue was regarding slavery, as the South wanted to preserve slavery while, the North wanted to get rid of it. These conflicts rose into sectional antagonism and eventually put the United States and President Lincoln in a loophole. During the Civil War however, Lincoln made some extremely controversial decisions, that resulted in a reduction of the sectional antagonism present, and the United States became truly “one nation.”…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The South Caused the Civil War
    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The South Caused the Civil War

    Ever since the waning battles, and the slow, contentious process of reconstructing the Union and the readmission of the Confederate States, the American Civil War has filled more pages of scholarly discourse than any other event in U.S. history (1). Amongst the endless topics to which these volumes are devoted, no topic is more debated, chronicled and studied than the various causes that lead to the bloodiest conflict in American history, and its effects on this country’s future. As the 19th century rapidly progressed toward internal conflict in the recently-formed United States of America, it’s physical, economic, and military growth created continuous need for its leaders to build its structure through the tools provided by the Constitution. “Manifest Destiny”, as John O’Sullivan described it, was realized as America’s borders stretched to the Pacific. Population rose exponentially and continued West forcing leadership and legislation to work to maintain democracy, quickly putting a spotlight on the cleavages that had been slowly dividing the nation’s allegiances into Northern or Southern. Many of these cleavages, such as different economic, social and political ideologies, were indirectly born from factors inherent to two distinct regions of the nation. Others, such as the Southern defense and reliance on slavery, and its radical, separatist threats of secession, that directly caused passionate divisions and often-violent results. Ultimately, it was the South’s active pursuits of these direct causes of the Civil War, as well as its use of those indirect cleavages to further separate themselves from the North, that lead a nation of united states to be split in…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Was the American Civil War Inevitable?
    • 2546 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Was the American Civil War Inevitable?

    The civil war was inevitable, only however, after one key event; the cotton gin made the civil war inevitable. The invention of the cotton gin in 1793 was the key element which enabled the south to have sufficient vested interest in their traditional lifestyle in order to feel the need to defend it at all costs even from their Northern countrymen. The core argument of this essay centres around the evidence which clearly defines their being in existence two ‘nations' with in America constantly in opposition to each other. Therefore the growth of sectionalism and the events which led up to the conflict made war an inevitable outcome of the hostilities which had arisen from the to ideologically different factions which grew in the United States. Firstly this essay will identify the economic factors which made the civil war an inevitable event with reference to the singular factor that could have averted the need for the conflict. Second it will identify the political measures which were dictated by the sectional economic interests. The third section of this essay will introduce the ideological incompatibility between north and south which added fuel to the fire of sectionalism. The fourth section will discus the underlining social conflict which made inevitable not only the civil war but also a "second American revolution". The final section will deal with the counter arguments which advocate the alleged ‘repressible' nature of the War Between the States.…

    • 2546 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was the Civil War Inevitable?
    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Was the Civil War Inevitable?

    To a great extent the Civil War was inevitable. In 1861, the Civil War in America began, lasting four years and causing terrible destruction. The factors of different economies, slavery and human rights, different views of the Constitution, the westward expansion and Lincoln’s election contributed to the outbreak of war. Although the North and South tried to reconcile their differences with major political compromises in 1820 and 1850, both attempts failed. ‘There is no way the war could have possibly been avoided.’…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why the North Won the Civil War
    • 2915 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Why the North Won the Civil War

    The American antebellum South, though steeped in pride and raised in military tradition, was to be no match for the burgeoning superiority of the rapidly developing North in the coming Civil War. The lack of emphasis on manufacturing and commercial interest, stemming from the Southern desire to preserve their traditional agrarian society, surrendered to the North their ability to function independently, much less to wage war. It was neither Northern troops nor generals that won the Civil War, rather Northern guns and industry. From the onset of war, the Union had obvious advantages.…

    • 2915 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil War as the Second American Revolution
    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Civil War as the Second American Revolution

    The Civil War could easily be seen as the second American Revolution considering it brought about significant change in history in the political, social, and economic aspects. Prior to the civil war, there had been a policy of slavery in the South which was a main cause of the conflict between the Union and the Confederacy. In the post-war period, slavery had been abolished which brought about much change in not only the social but economic aspect as well. There are many points from which the Civil War can be seen as revolutionary. In the political view, the Republican Party had dominated the political system for a long period of time. Economically, both the North and South had suffered from the costs of the war but had also prospered in certain areas. The greatest change may have been seen the social aspect where slaves had been moved up in the social order to being freed men and given some rights along with women. Yet, they had not been given equal rights to white men.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Victory in the North: Us Civil War
    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Victory in the North: Us Civil War

    Since the final battle of the American Civil War was fought in 1865, scholars have debated the reasons for the Union’s victory over the Confederacy. Historians have attributed the war’s outcome to many factors, some of which include Lincoln’s superior leadership, the South’s failure to diplomatically secure foreign intervention, emancipated slaves enlisting in the Union army, and the military strategies employed by the North’s generals. Both the Union and Confederacy expected a quick victory, each believing it possessed several advantages over the other. In the end, however, the North’s overwhelming superiority in manufacturing and industry proved to be far too great a hurdle to overcome by the South’s agricultural economy.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did The South Win The Civil War Essay
    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Did The South Win The Civil War Essay

    Ever since the birth of The United States, we have shown resilience and determination, starting with the Revolutionary war. As years passed and national division became evident there was discussion on who would win the fight between the free and enslaved states. Over time it has become apparent that the colonies and the confederacy have shared many qualities, which makes one wonder how is it that the colonies won, but the confederacy did not? The reason the South didn’t win the Civil War was because they were outgunned, out supplied, received no international aid and this time, their enemy wasn’t an ocean away.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Explain Why The Confederate States Seceded
    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Explain Why The Confederate States Seceded

    This paper sets out to define or shed some light on the possible reasons of the separation of Confederate states from the Union. The North believed the highest power belonged to the federal government while the South believed that each state governed itself, and the question of slavery should be decided by the states not by the federal government. By examining these two points we may be able to get a clear understanding of popular opinions and mindsets that would cause a nation to war against itself. With the election of Abraham Lincoln on November 6, 1860 South Carolina saw the only recourse was to secede from the…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Fate of Their Country
    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Fate of Their Country

    "To locate the most direct causes of the American Civil War," he contends in the preface, "one must look at the actions of governmental officeholders in the decades before that horrific conflict." Professor Michael F Holt needs no introduction among historians. He is single handedly regarded as one of the scholars who is most responsible for the emergence of what some call a neo-revisionist interpretation and outlook about the origins and circumstances that resulted in the Civil War. His ideas which are reflected throughout his books especially “The Fate of their country” emphasize that the reasons which caused The Civil War could have been and should have been averted. Defending this ideology Holt criticizes historians who stand by their argument of “Sectional conflict over slavery and slavery extension caused the Civil War”. Instead he preaches throughout his works that include many influential books including “The Fate of their Country” that, contingent political factors played a very huge and predominant role is stimulations factors causing disunion among the states.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics