Preview

Utilitarianism vs. Kantianism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
906 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Utilitarianism vs. Kantianism
ABSTRACT
Utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory originally established by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill that advocates brining about good consequences or happiness to all concerned. Kantianism is the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Kantianism is another famous rule of the nonconsequentialist theory. Kant’s theory contains several ethical principles. These principles are the good will, establishing morality by reasoning alone, categorical imperative, duty rather than inclination, and summary and illustration. There are many strengths and weaknesses to both utilitarianism and Kantianism. Both utilitarianism and Kantianism provide people with a moral structure, from which moral decisions are made. Keywords: utilitarianism, Kantianism, strengths, weaknesses, moral structure

Utilitarianism vs. Kantianism According to Thiroux and Krasemann (2012), utilitarianism is, “a normative ethical theory originally established by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill that advocates brining about good consequences or happiness to all concerned” (pp. 451). Kantianism is the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Kantianism is another famous rule of the nonconsequentialist theory. Kant’s theory contains several ethical principles. These principles are the good will, establishing morality by reasoning alone, categorical imperative, duty rather than inclination, and summary and illustration . There are many similarities and differences associated with utilitarianism and Kantianism. There are many strengths and weakness to utilitarianism. One strength of utilitarianism is it is straightforward and is based on the single principle if minimizing pain and maximizing pleasure and happiness. This is a system that aims to create a happier life for all individuals in a situation. Utilitarianism demonstrates fairness and has the desire to benefit the majority of people. It is the moral side of democracy meaning that if healthcare systems are put into



References: Kantianism. (2005, July 25). Retrieved from Wikipedia: www.wikipedia.org Polly, J. (2009, November 6). Strenths and Weaknesses Kant. Retrieved from philosophical investigations: http://www.philosophicalinvestigations.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=210&catid=42&Itemid=54 Thiroux, J. P., & Krasemann, K. W. (2012). Ethics: Theory and Practice 11th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Tsitsi, T. (2013, March). Utilitarianism. Retrieved from SlideShare: http://www.slideshare.net/aquinas_rs/strengths-of-utilitarianism

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Louis P. Pojman, “Strengths and Weaknesses of Utilitarianism” in Steven M.Cahn “Exploring Ethics –An Introductory Anthology” (Oxford University Press, 2011 , ISBN:978-0-19-975751-0) pp. 105-113…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I struggled comparing and contrasting Utilitarianism and Kant's theory. I had to read through these sections several times in attempt to help me gain a better understanding of the two theories. I understand they both discuss attempting to achieve happiness, but how the two approach happiness is different. I struggle with deciding which theory is better in my opinion. While Kant's theory sounds ideal I feel like utilitarianism is more realistic because sometimes negative aspects will arise no matter the circumstance.…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is based on the principle of utility by John Stuart Mill. It is the belief that people ought to concern themselves with the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people (MacKinnon, Fiala, 2014 p. 356). With utilitarianism, the belief if about the consequences of the action and how it affects all involved. What makes an action moral is its effects, the motive for the action does not matter. For example, let’s use helping an old lady across the road. The helper might have the motive of getting paid,…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy, which was developed in 19th century England by Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill and Henry Sidgwick. The essential feature a utilitarian reside in, is the notion that an action is right if it produces the most amount of happiness well limiting suffering. Utilitarianism focuses solely on the consequences of the action, in an attempt to bring about the most happiness from each situation, well ensuring everybody’s happiness is equally considered.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes overall happiness. Utilitarianism can be characterized as a quantitative and reductionist approach to ethics. It can be contrasted with deontological ethics which does not regard the consequences of an act as a determinant of its moral worth.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is the ethical theory behind justifying an action for being for the greater good. This is a teleological theory because it looks at the consequences of an action. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory. There are three types of utilitarianism: Act, Rule and Preference. Jeremy Bentham began the Utilitarianism theory. Utilitarianism is a hedonistic theory because it is based on pleasure and happiness. Each utilitarian has a different theory of Utilitarianism and this will be explained in my essay.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Thiroux, J., & Krasemann, K. (2009). Ethics theory and practice (10th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.…

    • 3025 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sheppard-Towner Act

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jeremy Bentham is primarily known today for his principle of utilitarianism, which assesses actions given their results. Bentham believes that an act is considered “just” if it produces the most joy and minimal pain for the best number of individuals who affected directly or indirectly by that action. On the other hand, Kant suggests that only duty and rules ought to administer our operations, as outcomes are outside our ability to control.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The contents of this paper will analyze the GM ignition case using several concepts taught in ethics. This will include a background of the issue as well as a detailed evaluation of the decision by GM from the utilitarianism and Kantian perspective. This will show that GM’s decision was morally wrong as well as prove that GM should be held morally responsible for their actions.…

    • 3185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Intro Paper

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarianism is the approach to ethics that focus on choosing the act that has the best consequences (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011). The utilitarian will view all the good and bad produced by the act (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011). Utilitarian’s do not view the difference in chosen act based as moral issues. Acts are classified as morally right or wrong only if the action has consequences that have a result that has a preferred manner (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011). Utilitarianism focuses on the act on the individual performing the action. Utilitarianism only addresses morality if the act is the preferred action but if not, morality does not play a role in basing decisions (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011). Ethics is not viewed in utilitarianism as well because decisions are based on best outcome for the individual.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The utilitarian mainly focuses on the value of the well being, which is analyzed in the terms of the pleasures, happiness welfare, preference satisfaction whereas the Kantianism believes that the morality is grounded in reason, duty rather than the sympathy, emotions. This indicates that the person have to act not only in an accordance with but for the sake of the obligation.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s deontological moral theory provides a strong base for making correct decisions and is a better ethics system than Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill’s utilitarianism.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means.” It believes that outcomes as a result of an action have a greater value compared to the latter, the morally right action is the action that produces the most good. It also states that the most ethical thing to do is to take advantage of happiness for the good of the society. This normative theory considers the overall good for all people and not just a single person.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good and Evil in High Noon

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory most often ascribed to the philosopher John Stuart Mill. The utilitarian theory suggests actions and/or intentions are not right or wrong; rather the morality of a choice or act is determined by the outcome or result. Utilitarian’s believe outcomes can be determined in advance of an action and the ethical choice is one which provides the best result or most happiness for the greatest number of individuals (e.g., pleasure, happiness, health, knowledge, satisfaction). The utility theory asserts morality is a means to some other end, it does not stand on its own as being intrinsically moral.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Maximizing the amount of happiness for the general population is the key to solving ethical problems within utilitarianism. Kantian theory follows the same principle but with greater emphasis on the respect for all things involved with ethical quandaries. Both have their critiques yet both ideas are conceived in an effort to understand and conceptualize some of the biggest controversies and questions that evolve around ethics. This paper will be an attempt to delineate the key components that fabricate each theory, first utilitarianism and then Kantian theory and through examples and practical reasoning after discussing both, I will provide my justification for which theory I would adopt for myself. Utilitarianism is a concept that helps…

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays