Us vs. Fowler, Us vs. Bull Case Digests

Topics: United States, Philippines, Supreme Court of the United States Pages: 2 (637 words) Published: July 15, 2011
US vs. FOWLER G.R. No. L-49631 J. Torres FACTS: This is an appeal to the Supreme Court by the appellant, the United States, to review the decision made by the Court of First Instance (CFI) of Manila. The two defendants and appellees, Fowler et al, have been accused of the theft of sixteen (16) bottles of champagne of the value of $20 on 12 August 1901 while on board the transport Lawton. Lawton was then navigating the high seas. The said champagne bottles are part of the cargo and are owned by Julian Lindsay. The said champagne bottles were taken lucri causa, without violence or intimidation and without the consent of the owner. ISSUE: Whether or not the CFI of Manila has jurisdiction over the criminal case, theft, committed on board while navigating on high seas. HELD: The accused claim that the CFI of Manila has no jurisdiction over the case as the crime was committed on high seas and not in the city of Manila or within the territory comprising the Bay of Manila or upon the 3-mile limit which the jurisdiction extends. The prosecution contends that the Military General and Civil Commission admiralty has jurisdiction over all vessels flying the flag of the United States and the same was vested in the CFI of Manila. CFI held that it has no jurisdiction over the case. Hence, the appeal to the Supreme Court. Art. 136, by which the courts of justice of the Philippine Islands were organized, do not expressly confer jurisdiction or confer authority upon the court in Manila. The provisions of the law are clear only on civil and maritime cases but not on criminal cases committed on board. Art. No. 400, states that the Philippines has jurisdiction only with the crimes committed in a ship registered in the Philippines or those within the territorial jurisdiction of the Philippines. Lawton is neither a ship registered in the Philippines nor within the territorial jurisdiction of the Philippines. SC affirmed the decision of the lower court. LATIN MAXIM: lucri causa- the...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay on Canadian Culture vs US
  • Swiss vs Us Legal Systems: Comparative Approach Essay
  • Frye Vs Us Research Paper
  • Us vs China Research Paper
  • Ifrs vs Us Gaap Essay
  • Kent vs Us Essay
  • IFRS Vs US GAAp Essay
  • Us Dollar vs Rmb Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free