Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

United States as a Superpower

Better Essays
1641 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
United States as a Superpower
As we head toward the 21st century, America will be the greatest influence to the rest of the world as being the only true superpower in the post-cold war era. It is the only country with the military, diplomatic, political and economic might to handle any type of conflict or misfortune that may arise. The misconception that because the cold war is over, America should relinquish some of its military forces around the world and let country's deal with their own conflicts and economic adversities. However, there are many problems around the world in which it would affect the U.S. directly or indirectly. These four articles depicts the military, diplomatic, political and probably the most important economic situation of the world in the post-cold war era. The main theme of these articles is about America and its role in the global arena in the 21st century. What is the role of our nation is the argument of the four articles? The realist would argue to continue its dominance of the world and only be involved in world affairs when it deals directly with national interest. However, idealist would say it is in our best interest to be involved, to help others in need and to keep the world secure. Krauthammer's view In "Unipolar Moment" seems to come from a realist point of view, he states we are in abnormal times, with conflicts with Iraq and other states trying to obtain nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, it is the greatest threat to the world security today. Also, the enemy could be anyone, Iraq today, North Korea or Libya tomorrow. Further, Krauthammer states with an unstable period ahead of us, the best hope for peace is the American strength and will, making the rules for the world and enforcing them when broken. The U.S. is by far the only major power leading in toward the 21st century, rather we want that burden is another question. By living in an unipolar world, other nations will look to us to deal with all conflicts or look to us for economic support. The main argument in the article is rather the U.S. can support its unipolar status and from all indications it may very well can if by getting domestic support. America in general have to change their attitudes towards foreign policy, it is just as important if not more important then domestic policy. Another argument I agree with is that by withdrawing troops from certain parts of the world or not to give economic aid to other nations it will not translate to eradicating America's economic problems. In fact, our involvement abroad is essential to our economy, we need a stable world environment especially now with global trading and multi-national corporations doing business in other nation's. There are many disadvantages by being the only big kid in the block. Although the cold war is now over, I feel there is far greater danger ahead in the 21st century. There are numerous nations trying to gather weapons of mass destruction and there has been an increase in nations with biological, chemical and even nuclear weapons. The U.S. has seemed to have alienated some of these nations and the people have blamed the west, especially the U.S., for there misfortunes and that alone puts us in an awkward position. An example would be Iraq, we have bombed them, imposed sanctions to try to destroy there weapons of mass destruction but in the course of acting we have fueled the fire of extremist in that part of the world to act against us. For now we have to embrace our unipolar status, act when our interests are threatened and get support from allies when conflicts arise. In "Preparing for the 21st Century", Paul Kennedy discusses how the economically developed countries hold all the cards, and will prosper in a more technologic era. Latin America, Middle East, countries in Asia, and especially Africa are in social, political and economical disarray. Kennedy looks to the Far East as an illustration on how to improve economic performance, culture attitudes, education, political stability and to set long term goals. Since the argument in the "Unipolar Moment" was to impose our will on other nations, that will can be positive as well as negative. We should aid these nations in there pursuit of prosperity. Although, realist would argue that unless there is specific interest in a certain part of the world, it should be up to them to resurrect their misfortune. The gap between EDC'S and LDC'S is even more prevalent now in the age of better communication and technology; consequently the findings are not encouraging. The LDC'S has major problems some worse in certain nations then others. In order to tackle the problem one of the arguments was look to East Asia as an illustration to a successful transformation. Even though the countries are differently structure the way they approach success, they have many similar characteristics. Although I agree that East Asia has turned it around from past economic instability and they would be a great road map to lead other nations to success, however, I feel the U.S. is the best example to emulate for LDC'S. The U.S. are a superpower for a reason, obviously nation's won't be able too immense the same power and success as the U.S. but it can follow the same structure. I feel there are 3 areas that these nations must tackle to reverse their situation.
First, education is crucial to success, especially higher education, if you look at nation's that are consider EDC'S, have high literacy rates, more students in higher education and a more educated society will have the better capability to deal with the nation dilemmas. Second, the health of your nation is very important, probably the most important. Health care for your people is vital for a nation's stability. You cannot lead your nation to success with a rapid spread of disease or people who are malnutrition. Third, is to have a strong and stable political system, to collect taxes, to invest and to be more involved in trade. These 3 areas are intertwined, to have more people in higher education you have more doctors to deal with health issues and more educated people to deal with the nation's economic situation. In "Has Democracy a Future", Arthur Schlesinger says that democracy has barely survived the twentieth century but will enjoy a more promising future in the 21st century. However, he states democracy will have to manage the strain of race tension, especially in the U.S., technology and capitalism. There are more democracy's today then there have ever been, rather or not it will remain that will is another question. In America I feel it will survive, but not with major bumps in road. One argument in article I agree with is that technology and computers with destroy more jobs then it creates. As a result, people will blame others different from themselves for their misfortunes and will create even more racial tension. However, as we lead toward the 21st century, I feel race tensions will diminish greatly, partly because of intermarriage between people with different races and cultures. It also seems that the younger generation is more open to people and cultures that is different. I disagree with the author however on the point that globalization will lead people to retreat to their own familiar settings. I feel that globalization is good for the world to be introduced to new cultures and societies and will break taboos and stereotypes. In "Why America Thinks It Has to Run The World", Benjamin Schwarz discusses the importance of a continued U.S. world leadership to maintain a global economy. One of the arguments was we must continue to dominate the international system and to discourage other nations to challenge our leadership role in the international system. For instance, America must do exactly as they did in the past, by addressing conflicts that threaten our interests, our allies interests and those that will interrupt the international system. In a time of globalization, multinational corporations, IGO'S, NGO'S and more of a shift toward a free trade market it is essential to have a stable international system. In order to have a stable system you must have a safe global arena to do business and to have a safe arena you must have someone to keep it safe. Since, we are the major superpower of the world we have to maintain the peace and ensure the stability of the global markets. We have to protect our allies, even though some of them have no immediate threat of danger. I feel it is important to spend billions of dollars on our forces around the globe to retain our dominance and to ensure nobody try's to challenge our leadership in the global arena. Also, by keep ensuring the safety of our allies it keep them from forming there own military forces if they had to protect themselves. In conclusion, the United States is in the best and worst situation leading in the 21st century. The future looks very promising for our economy in more ways of more trade, less protectionism and better technology and communications. However, the world will look to the U.S. as the saver or as the virtue enemy. To our allies we must keep them as our friends, to our enemies we must keep them down and impose our will on them. We must limit weapons of mass destruction, which seems to be the number one threat to our global stability. Finally, we must assistance other nation's to achieve political, social and economical success.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    POL114 Essay

    • 2371 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The United States of America is a hegemonic power which has great influence in international politics due to its contributions to history. President Barrack Obama said in his speech at the United States Military Academy at West Point, “…America must always lead on the world stage. If we don’t, no one else will.” When it comes down to which country holds greater influence in the international system, America is known in being a hegemon which has influence in many international institutions. The United States of America took the lead in founding the United Nations and contributes the most money towards the UN’s spending, thus shapes the UN in favour of its interests. This concept of hegemony was analyzed by Gramsci, whom used Machiavelli’s view of power as a centaur, “half man and half beast”, to argue power is a mixture of coercion and consent which are tools for hegemonic states which is what realists agree with1. In this sense, the United States has been using such “tools” to seek national interest. Thus, by examining Obama’s speech through Realist, Liberal and Marxist/critical perspectives, this essay will argue that the perspective of realism best defines America’s position in the global order through its consecutive use of hard power.…

    • 2371 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    His 135 Week 9 Final Project

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages

    When most people are taught about U.S. history, we think of mostly the bad times like the wars, the civil rights movements, President Kennedy’s and M. L. King Jr’s associations, just to name a few. In this paper I will discuss those and more going into the start of the 21st century. The previous five decades consisting of the 1950s into the millennium happened during the U.S. History equally turbulent, but exciting. There also were numerous transformations within social, governmental, plus technological sections, but the WWII era currently seems rather prehistoric. Since the 1950s America has experienced major cultural transformations, starting with four main military disagreements, accelerated technological advancements, new but dangerous diseases, also one president resigns from office instead of facing impeachment or prison, then collapse to the Soviet Union, also numerous economic challenges. The United States was winning the WWII war, also some ensuing economic growth and political circumstances forced the United States in the spotlight. America had money and predictably assisted other countries, while developing their own troubles on the home front, increasing troubles socially plus economically. Numerous big trends happened throughout the 1950’s, ranging from the Cold War amidst America and the Soviet Union grew, and then the Korean War brought America to a new global war, although tensions intensified in “Egypt with the Suez Canal disaster,” and the Cuban Revolution between Castro and the people, then the United States went through some confused moments with the Anti-Communist viewpoints, and the Senator J. McCarthy’s allegations. (Halberstam, 1994).…

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A major debate that is being discussed both domestically and internationally is the involvement of the United States of America in international affairs. This debate includes the practicality of where the United States has intervened in foreign affairs, its right to intervene in the first place considering past mistakes and questionable leadership, and whether or not that foreign involvement is in the general public’s best interest. Obviously, the two sides of the debate refer to the ‘yes’ position, explained by Ivan Eland (as in yes, the United States should limit it’s global involvement) and also the ‘no’ position, backed by President Barack Obama (as in no, the United States should not limit it’s foreign involvement). Eland’s basis for his argument is that the United States has habitually overspent it’s treasure and overextended it’s military power to a point where we cannot keep pace economically and which could bring upon the demise of the American government as we know it. He also points out that continued foreign endeavors increases the risk of the United States being a target for terrorist attack. Obama’s vision is that The United States of America needs to re-establish its place as a world leader by maintaining an active foreign policy. Obama admits that mistakes have been made where international affairs are concerned, but that is a reason to fix those mistakes and step up as a suitable leader once more. Discussed later in the paper is my own point of view, which supports President Barack Obama and his plan for active engagement in foreign affairs, in a conservative and confidant manner.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq: Us as a World Power

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the 1890’s, the idea of imperialism had begun imprinting itself in American minds. Many Americans began to believe that the United States was either going to explode or expand. Our country had a new sense of power which was generated from the growth of our industry and wealth. There were Americans who had pushed the idea of imperialism through books and articles, calling it the adventures of childhood dreams. The first moments had begun with President Cleveland and his secretary of state James G. Blaine. Imperialism had come off as an idea that benefited the world but, the cold hard truth was that we were simply just benefiting ourselves. Our new international interests began in several ways. Blaine had pushed the Big Sister policy, with this policy we were able to get the Latin Americans to rally with Uncle Sam. This give off an impression that we want to help out the others, give them an idea of bond ship with the United States but in reality, what we truly wanted was their open markets and utilize them for ourselves. Document A shows how power-hungry we are, wanting “to show our strength” and wanting “the taste of Empire”. One of the first ways we showed off our new, violent, and power hungry status was in 1899 against Germany. The two nations had been bickering over the Samoan Islands. Luckily, this was resolved and no war broke out. Alaska, another area of issues that occurred between The U.S. and Canada. This fight was a more idealistic than self interest one though. The hostilities had begun with seal hunting which, the United States was against giving off their humanitarian ideology. Doc. B, provide an explanation of this by stating that “we cannot fly from our world duties”. Hawaii was another area of interest to America. It’s location was able to hold a naval and it was enriched with resources the nation could use. American planters were searching for ways to secure Hawaii’s annexation. The Queen of Hawaii was against this and…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States As A World Power: How Much Longer Will The US Be The Policeman…

    • 3471 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Policeman of the World

    • 1026 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is common knowledge that by the 20th century, the United States had become the dominant force in international relations. Some have argued that the United States ' military functions as the world 's police. For centuries United States has been found as the world 's policeman regardless if they were asked for the help or not. In this paper I will highlight two instances in which United States intervene in an international matter. Also I will identify what prompted America to become a dominant force after World War II and what were the differences in the foreign policy before and after the war.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that the United States will decline in economic importance as China, India, Brazil and other countries will rise in power and influence politically and economically in the twenty first century. As the other countries are rising, we are falling. The United States alone has over fifteen trillion dollars in debt and still counting. We are only falling more and more as we take out more loans from other countries. Soon enough all of the countries are going to be trying to control us because we have all of the debt that we are going to owe to everyone else around the world.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Preceding the twentieth century, America finally made the world appear smaller. By utilizing its resources of advanced communication, transportation, and ideas, the United States became a world power (Keene, 170). This new title created conflict in and outside of America. Through this dissention, America’s role was formed by the desire to expand, obligation to help allies, and debate over entering the League of Nations. The role of the United States in the twentieth-century world should have been dominated by the hunger for power but also the desire to help those in need.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Once upon a time, in the decades following WWII, the United States had its hand in nearly every international action that had occurred. The United States was also majorly responsible for the establishment for many of the reigning supranational organizations today including the UN, the World Bank, the IMF, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Although many of these US born ideals played in the interest of the US, these organizations benefited the world for the better. It is important to assume that the world operates under a realism approach and that other nations desire to take the place of the United States as a global Hegemony. Stephen Walt states “The only way to have the world’s most capable military forces both now and into the future is to have the world’s most advanced economy, and that means having better schools, the best universities, a scientific establishment that is second to none, and a national infrastructure that enhances productivity and dazzles those who visit from abroad.” What realistic steps can the United States take in order to better our schools and universities, scientific establishment, and national infrastructure ending in a raised economy? (Walt, 2011/16). Even though the US is set in its ways, all hope is not lost. If strict changes are made to the education system, scientific establishment, and national infrastructure, the US will again see itself rising to the top uncontested. Allowing the United States to again maintain its ability to have a positive influence in nearly every “corner” of the globe not only benefits Americans, it plays in the interest of the entire world.…

    • 2680 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In brief, Hilary Clinton proposes that the United States should remain the central power and continue its role as the world’s indispensable country. She claims that without the central power regulating the affairs, the result will be chaos and conflict (p. 11). She expresses her plans of how to maintain the role by utilizing all levers of powers. Her approaches include the use of technology, nonproliferation, economics as well as development and human rights.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The years following World War II were a time of economic boon and prosperity for most Americans. At the same time, the Iron Curtain was firmly in place, the cold war was heating up, and the fear that communism would take over the world like a zombie apocalypse was almost palpable. In international politics during the post-war years the United States sought to establish itself as the leader of the free world. We no longer took the isolationism position that had been established as far back as George Washington and generally maintained until December 7, 1941.We began to consider ourselves the “world’s policemen”.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rise of China and India

    • 2243 Words
    • 9 Pages

    America ended the 20th century as the sole unchallenged world superpower, in the 21st century however it started a little differently. America’s military power has remained dominant; they have to decline in certain areas such as wealth and information. The Wealth and information has shifted dramatically to the east in particular to China. Schmemann (2011) argues that there is in fact a huge power shift occurring and America may no longer be the dominating state, the power will move to Countries such as China and India if things continue going the way they’re going. This has been called the shift from the west to the east. Mahbubani (2011) argues that America…

    • 2243 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Chapter 10, America Under Fire, two subtitles in the chapter are called “Strains in the Unipolar Order” and “Retreat from Multilateralism”. These two topics help the reader understand the tension and thought processes American had in the late 1990’s. The relative calm of the late 1990s affirmed Americans’ long-standing belief that the peace, is the natural state of global affairs, and that the spread of democracy and free markets would produce violent conflict. In addition to the unrest over globalization, a second source of tension confronted the makers of American foreign policy after the Cold War: the growing rift between Washington and the array of international institutions the United States had actively supported since World War II.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly, Krauthammer gets to the foundation of America’s foreign policy when examining the four contending schools: isolationism, liberal internationalism, realism, and democratic globalism. He describes isolationism…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    American Idealism Analysis

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Had the idealist demand that the United States never work with oppressive nations been honored, Hitler well might have won World War II. The pursuit of democracy that forces the United States beyond its military and political resources ultimately will weaken democracy. Moral demands that are not rooted in political and military reality achieve the opposite of the desired end. But the realist position also has its weakness. Sometimes being ruthless becomes an end in itself. Sometimes the defense of the national interest becomes a justification for defending one's own…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays