Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Tylor

Good Essays
415 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tylor
Tylor’s understanding of the meaning of culture is clearly very different from that of most modern anthropologists. Tylor believed that “culture” was, ultimately, a single body of information of which different human groups had greater or lesser amounts. This understanding is based on his belief in the psychic unity of humankind, here referred to as “the uniform action of uniform causes.”

Marx/Engels believes that that men developing their material production and their material intercourse, alter, along with this their real existence, their thinking and the products of their thinking. Life is not determined by consciousness, but consciousness by life.

Weber believed that individuals could profoundly affect their societies. He called the ability of an individual to influence others charisma as an “extraordinary power” a sort of spiritual force possessed by an individual. He states that in some people this natural charisma simply exists naturally in them, in others it is a “germ” that must be awakened.

Durkheim proposed that the origin of culture is a process of “social condensation” created by a critical mass of individuals coming together.

From research in the text, I discovered many things about the unilineal evolutionary theorists and their theories as well as the theories of the sociological theorists from our text. The concept of “culture” in the eyes of the unilineal evolutionary theorist Tylor, was seen as a body of information of which different humans had greater or less amounts of culture within them. Along with theorists Marx and Engels, whose views on culture are that our life is determined by our own consciousness or own “culture”. These theories are approached in similar ways to each other and are similar in values.

Culture from the point of view of the sociological theorist Weber, claimed that some people had the ability to influence their charisma and greatly affects the individuals societies. The theorist Durkheim believed that individuals coming together in a social way created culture. These two theories are alike in the way that Weber and Durkheim believe that culture is a learned behavior and something that is earned and not something that you are born with, like what the three uniluineal evolutionary theorists believe in.

The early sociologists moved away from the notion of unilineal evolution that was embraced by the first group of theorists (Marx/Engels and Tylor) by forming theories that surround the ideas of culture being a learned process, and the idea that individuals can affect a whole society and their ways of culture.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Although the theory of unilineal evolution emphasizes the importance of the evolutionary stages of societies, several social evolutionists incorporated their own ideas to conjure another interpretation of unilineal evolution. Although the British scientist and social theorist Edward Tylor is most famously known for his definition of culture, his main focus was to find answers for the similarities between all human cultures and to figure out what were the causes for their differences. Tylor explains that the theory of unilineal evolution as progressive model which all human societies are categorized from the most primitive stages to the highest stages of…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Specifically, Boas, in The Methods of Ethnology, argued against the various traditional evolutionary theories proposed by Morgan, Marx, Tylor and Spencer. Stating simply that these theories had a particular resilience, but lacked any sort of empirical evidence, Boas argued that the evolutionary theory was based on the counterfactual assumption that our culture was the most advanced and all others were merely following us (Boas, 134). After attacking the diffusionists by noting that their data was not competent enough, methodological difficulties, he responded to the view that historical particularism (Historical particularism argued that each society is a collective representation of its unique historical past. It showed that societies could reach the same level of cultural development through different paths) was atheoretical. How things are and how they come to exist can give only broad outlines of chronological events. Hence cultures are dynamic and in constant flux; every phenomenon is not only an effect, but also a cause. (Boas, 137) A point, taken to the extreme by Kroeber, but also put forth by Boas was that certain problems may be solved in only particular ways. Because humans are similar in their ``infrastructure'', they would tend to solve these problems in similar ways, leading towards the creation of similar traits. Hence, it is not about cultural achievement, but rather about particular conditions that exist at the moment when the new effect is obtained…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While Damen, L (1987), was of the opinion that culture is a shared human behaviour or models for everyday living, this pattern and models cut across all aspects of human social interaction. In his view, culture is “human’s primary adaptive mechanism” and it is learnt. (p. 367)…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Intro to Chicano Studies

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cultures are like underground rivers that run through our lives and relationships, giving us messages that shape our perceptions, attributions, judgments, and ideas of self and other. Though cultures are powerful, they are often unconscious, influencing conflict and attempts to resolve conflict in imperceptible ways. In other words, there are many circumstances in which these types of conflicts are in a sense, uncontrollable, meaning our regulatory system of life may have been…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Griswold explored the concept of "culture" through two different perspectives, namely through the humanities and anthropology 's viewpoint. With reference to different philosopher 's interpretation of "culture", Griswold defines culture broadly as "a complex whole", including everything in a social world. Since culture and social world are related; to achieve a fuller understanding of "culture", we have to examine the connection between them, and how the two come together. The conceptual tool she uses to investigate the connections between cultures and societies are the "cultural object", and the "cultural diamond". Cultural objects are given meanings shared by members of the culture, and it is through those meanings that those objects are linked to the social worlds. Therefore, we need to decipher how the meanings came by- Griswold introduces and compares different versions of reflection theory in functionalism, Marxism and Weberian Sociology, whereby culture is seen as a reflection of social life, or vice versa.…

    • 504 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Early sociologist, Max Weber researched charisma, keenly observing that certain gifted leaders possessed a relational ability to share personal visions with potential followers. Weber understood charisma had no authority derived from government, regulation or rule, and identified the source of the charismatic leader’s power as coming directly from the followers. Through a complex means of social interaction, followers appeared compelled to act upon this vision based on their belief in an infallible leader rather than a belief in the idea or undertaking. Believers viewed charming leaders as supernatural beings and Weber wrote extensively regarding the phenomenon.…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Case on Social Action

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    key idea that drives action Weber’s interest in social change also leads him to be particularly…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Hofstede, culture is the collective programming of the mind that distinguishes the members of one group or category of people from others (Hofstede and Hofstede, 2005, 4). However, human beings are not programmed same way as the computers are, they have reflective ability and may deviate based on unforeseen event. More so, culture has strong impact on the way a person act on certain situation.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is culture? The British anthropologist Malinowski has presented functional approach to culture. According to him, culture should be studied with a view to find out what it does to him. Culture is an instrument which enables man to secure his bio-psychic survival and subsequently a higher mental-intellectual survival. Since each aspect of culture, whether it is an economic organization or social organization or religion or language is rooted in the needs of the human being, they are all inter-related to each other through the common ground in which they are rooted, i.e., the human being with his needs. There is nothing loose within a culture; it is all inter-connected and no single trait has any meaning by itself unless it is seen in the context of the whole. Malinowski emphasized the self-sufficiency and the…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    World culture is marked by an organization of diversity rather than by a replication of uniformity. (237)…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cultural Background

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The term culture refers to a way of life – traditions and customs – transmitted through learning, which play a vital role in molding the beliefs and behaviors of the people exposed to them. According to Tylor (1871), a British anthropologist, culture is that complex whole, which includes knowledge, belief, arts, morals, law, custom, and other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of society. These influences are conveyed from generation to generation through the learning process. Every culture is unique, but similar in many ways. No culture is like another culture. Some areas that are similar I have noticed are their commitment to their families, religion and education. Some differences that I have noticed are language barriers and family values. This paper will emphasize the various sources that play a part in my cultural background.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tylor defined Culture the best out of anybody. His defintion was "complex whole which includes knowledge,belief,art,morals,law,custom, and any other capabilities and habits aquired by man or member of society." Tylor applied ideas of higher against lower Culture for a theory on the evolution of religion. During this process he redefined Culture as different sets of activity characteristics of all human societies. His defintition was holism of the humanly created world from material Culture to social places to knowledge and meaning. His defintion is still cited to this day. Kottak used Tylor's definition of Culture. But Kottak wrote Culture is "distinctly human transmitted through learning traditions and customs that govern behavior and beliefs". Geertz defined Culture "an historically transmitted pattern of meanings embodied in symbols, a system of inherited conceptions expressed in symbolic forms by means of which men communicate, perpetuate and develop thier knowledge about attitudes toward life". Geertz made a list of meanings "the total way of life of people","the social legacy the individual acquires from his group", "a way of thinking, feeling, and believing", "an abstraction from behavior", “a theory on the part of the anthropologist about the way in which a group of people in fact behave”, "a storehouse of pooled learning", "a set of standardized orientations to recurrent problems", “a mechanism for the normative regulation of behavior”, "learned behavior", “a set of techniques for…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Geertz starts his article discussing the radical nature of the concept of ‘Culture’, one around which the entire field of Anthropology has arisen. He compares it to all other powerful scientific concepts and ideas that rose to fame and power, that due to resolving multiple fundamental problems, are thought to be the ultimate solution to all problems and are used thus in every and all contexts, and purposes, notwithstanding its real potential lying elsewhere. Such an over-estimation of a concept, he says only manages to undermine its real value as it leads to distractions and an entanglement in the unnecessary. Such an over-evaluation of potential, he feels, has occurred with the concept of Culture in defining it, as E.B. Tylor has done, as “that complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, art, morals, law, custom and any other capability and habit acquired by man as a member of society”, thus stretching the field of study far too wide, hence making it more obscure instead of defining its boundaries.…

    • 1825 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Anthropology: Theories

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Edward Tylor has many theories and topics which concerns more about the culture of humans. Some of these theories are:…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Edward Bounette Tylor introduced a statistical method for the comparative study of cultural traits and doctrine of survival. The chief aim of comparison was to discover “cultural adhesions” or necessary co-relation between two or more…

    • 2331 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics