Preview

"Two Kinds of Commerce" by Aristotle

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
732 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
"Two Kinds of Commerce" by Aristotle
Clive Thompson on Why the Next Civil Rights Battle Will Be Over the Mind
By Clive Thompson 03.24.08

Illustration: Paula Scher/Pentagram START
Previous: A State-By-State Look at Where Cell Phones and Driving Don’t Mix
Trolling down the street in Manhattan, I suddenly hear a woman's voice.

"Who's there? Who's there?" she whispers. I look around but can't figure out where it's coming from. It seems to emanate from inside my skull.

Was I going nuts? Nope. I had simply encountered a new advertising medium: hypersonic sound. It broadcasts audio in a focused beam, so that only a person standing directly in its path hears the message. In this case, the cable channel A&E was using the technology to promote a show about, naturally, the paranormal.

I'm a geek, so my first reaction was, "Cool!" But it also felt creepy.

We think of our brains as the ultimate private sanctuary, a zone where other people can't intrude without our knowledge or permission. But its boundaries are gradually eroding. Hypersonic sound is just a portent of what's coming, one of a host of emerging technologies aimed at tapping into our heads. These tools raise a fascinating, and queasy, new ethical question: Do we have a right to "mental privacy"?

"We're going to be facing this question more and more, and nobody is really ready for it," says Paul Root Wolpe, a bioethicist and board member of the nonprofit Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics. "If the skull is not an absolute domain of privacy, there are no privacy domains left." He argues that the big personal liberty issues of the 21st century will all be in our heads — the "civil rights of the mind," he calls it.

It's true that most of this technology is still gestational. But the early experiments are compelling: Some researchers say that fMRI brain scans can detect surprisingly specific mental acts — like whether you're entertaining racist thoughts, doing arithmetic, reading, or recognizing something. Entrepreneurs

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle Essay

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A relativist would react to “What makes you happy might be one thing, but what makes another person happy could be entirely different, so do not impose your lifestyle on other people” by agreeing with the statement about not inflicting your lifestyle on someone else. Relativists believe you cannot urge morality on others. Even if it is someone who you share a primary relationship with, you can not make any judgement on what decisions they make. Relativists do not judge others, so if something very immoral makes you happy, a relativist can not impose on your choice of being immoral. Relativism says that all culture is good and all culture is bad; it’s the same thing as happiness, it can be good or bad but you can not judge a persons happiness whether it is good or bad. Overall, a relativist would never impose on someone’s lifestyle even if something totally different makes them happy, or even if what makes one happy is completely wrong and immoral.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drinking and Driving

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages

    III. Relevance: Why should you care? This topic relates to you because ‘’it is the number one cause of crashes for people within the ages 18-25.’’ (University of Utah)…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of privacy needs to be considered in five key areas – bodily observation (what we observe of others), bodily space (that which concerns our personal body), property (that which we own), information (documented and undocumented about ourselves) and thoughts and communication (personal thoughts and feelings). Each of these key areas has levels of privacy invasion acceptable to society. For example, bodily space invasion may be permitted when assisting those who are physically unable to perform a task by themselves.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final English 122

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Privacy is perhaps one of the most personal issues in today’s society. Privacy is an intensely personal issue, and perhaps not only to the right of the individual to dress the way he or she desires, worship in any way he chooses, but also to expect that those rights be protected by the government that upholds them. At one point or another, every individual in our society has asked the question, “Is privacy in the 21st Century possible?” The answer lies in the exploration of what privacy really means, and what privacy issues society faces in today’s modern, informational, and digital age of what we call the 21st Century.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The term ‘privacy’ has been difficult to obtain a universally accepted definition between legal scholars. In ALRC 22 it was noted that ‘the very term “privacy” is one fraught with difficulty. The concept is an elusive one’. As Professor J Thomas McCarthy noted, ‘Like the emotive word ‘freedom’, ‘privacy’ means so many different things to so many different people that it has lost any precise legal connotation that it might once have had.…

    • 2506 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Privacy is a fundamental moral right in a democratic society. It is the right bestowed upon individuals that strengthen the freedoms of speech, press, association, and assembly which are crucial for a free, democratic society. However, advancement in technology threatens privacy and autonomy which reduces the control over private data and exposes individuals to undesirable consequences. Thus, a loss of privacy leads to a loss of an individual’s freedom in society.…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 5650 Words
    • 23 Pages

    1. LEGAL RIGHTS 2. INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS 3. THE RIGHT OF PRIVACY 4. PRIVACY AND TECHNOLOGY…

    • 5650 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the essay, “Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide’”, published on May 15, 2011, Professor Daniel J. Solove is trying his best to convince his well sophisticated audience that the issue of privacy affects more than just the everyday people veiling a wrong doing. His argument focuses around ethos, and a lot of it. Although there are some logos and pathos, they aren’t as nearly as strong as his ethos. In the type of society that we live in today, privacy has become more and more broad. Everyone sees it on an everyday occurrence just about; including on social networking sites, HIPAA forms, or even with people just simply observing you and what you do. This could be anything from talking on the phone, to searching something on the internet. This essay is ethical as well as logical in tone, appealing to his audience. He starts this argument off with his “I’ve got nothing to hide” argument, which is mentioned in arguments regarding the government’s gathering of our personal information as well as data. Solove explains how this argument goes from a faulty definition of what privacy truly is, as well as what it retains. The importance of the nothing-to-hide argument says that since the information will not be revealed to the people of the public, the “privacy interest is minimal,…

    • 2065 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Griswold vs Connecticut

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The legacy of the privacy rights doctrine points to the permanent problem of Court efforts to deal with changing social needs, values, and interests though appeal of traditional norms long supportive of quite different relationships. The right of privacy affirmed in Griswold still stands, but clearly is jeopardized by increasingly restrictive Court rulings on protections for abortion, its most important doctrinal application.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    from an inadequate definition of what privacy is and the value that privacy possesses. The adherents of…

    • 2748 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The "right to privacy" has been around since the early part of the last century. It has evolved to apply—more…

    • 3371 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Graves, L. (2010). The Right to Privacy in Light of Presidents ' Programs. Retrieved from…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fourth Amendment Essay

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1928, Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in his dissenting opinion “the greatest dangers to liberty lurk in the insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding”. The men of zeal, described by Brandeis, were police officers trying to enforce the Prohibition Act. He would never have been able to fathom the modern men of zeal fighting the “War on Terror”. The modern era has carried questions of how far the Fourth Amendment and the right to privacy should and does extend to protect the rights of the individual. With advancing technology, there are more legal lines to be drawn in the sphere of privacy as well as determining how far the Fourth Amendment extends. Some of these topics include government watch lists, mass…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texting While Driving

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When the cell phone was first invented it was made as a personal safety device especially if a person lived alone or some distance from family members. Many of us may line in regions of the country where sudden tornado or hurricanes could occur without warning. Then there are other events such as fires, flooding, and blizzards that may require a quick evacuation or move to a shelter. A cell phone is important to either get help to let others know a person’s location and level of safety. In today’s society cell phone are being used for texting and talking while driving. The state of Alabama is ranked 3rd in nation for texting while driving (State ranks 3rd for texting while driving). There are only six’s states that have passed laws against driving while using a cell phone California, Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Washington and Virginia (Cell Phone and Texting Laws) . Driving while using a cell phone is precarious because it cause accident, injuries, and deaths between the age 16 and 17.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Rubel, Alan. "Privacy and the USA Patriot Act: Rights, the Value of Right, and Autonomy." Law and Philosophy 26.2 (2007): 119-59. JSTOR. Web. 10 Oct. 2011. .…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays