Trifles Vs. A Jury of Her Peers
A Jury of Her Peers and Trifles by Susan Glaspell are very similar stories. The stories are about the marginalization of women in society. The roles of women as workers were downgraded a lot, never taking into account just how hard the work is doing all of the household chores every day, and preparing and planning for the future. In the stories, they are treated like they do not mean anything in the workforce and are only there to serve the world and the men in it. They both share the same plot. However, one piece is a play and one is a short story. This makes them the same story, but in different genres of literature. I found that it was easier for me to watch the play rather than read the short story. This is because I prefer to watch TV than read books. Now, if the play wouldn’t have been a film then I would have read the short story. I believe plays are easier to understand if they are actually acted out, rather than reading them alone because it is a little difficult to read in a book. An advantage I found in seeing the play was that its title was sadder and it fits the story better. Also, the film can better give an emotional and sad feel to it by being able to see the characters moods and actions. The short story was good as well though. I liked the short story because it flowed much better. The short story also allows the reader to come up with their own film in their head, which some people like better. Another interesting thing I found was that even though both pieces have different names, both titles are effective after reading and seeing the stories, although, I am partial to Trifles. The short story is named A Jury of Her Peers because Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peter basically decided the fate of Minnie. They both decided not to turn in the evidence and then held a major role in the story. The name of the play is also very interesting. In the play Hale states that women are constantly “worrying over trifles.” These are the...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document