Preview

Tragedy of the Commons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
869 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tragedy of the Commons
Tragedy of the Commons

Have you ever read the Essay, The Tragedy of the Commons, by Garret Hardin? Although it was written in 1968, it is still quite useful today. The main point of Hardin's essay is to show the conflict between the short term interests of individuals in society and the long term effects those interests have on society itself. Hardin hints to this very simply even in his title. The Commons were similar to a giant plot of land that a community shared as a whole. Everyone allowed their animals to graze there, yet no one really took proper care of the land. The farmers put more and more animals on the land(as instinct would tell almost any farmer trying to make a profit). However, this backfired. Soon enough, everyone was putting all their animals on the land. All the animals were eating the grass, and soon, the soil was un - fit for raising any living being . Some of the other commons Hardin addressed in his essay were fish, land, sheep, and earth. Hardin agreed that many of these commons were being taken advantage of. However, he believed that there was no technological solution to this problem, rather, the solution falls into the hands of morality. This would mean the solution is contingent upon the people, and Hardin certainly believed there were enough of those. In fact, out of all the issues Hardin addressed, population and its rapid growth seems to be one of the most important. Hardin believed that the population was as a whole, selfish. He had a feeling that they would continue to use up their god-given resources, until there were none left. At that point, Hardin believed, society would tragically fall. Hardin did forget to mention the social nature of humans, but in the scheme of things, that does not matter. Sure, we all depend on one another.....but at the same time, we could all stand to be a little more resourceful. The first thing Hardin examines in his essay is the ratio of population to resources. He stated that population

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the article Island Civilization: A vision for human occupancy of Earth, Roderick Frazier Nash describes how the earth that was once a peaceful planet with freedom of living for every specie turned out to be the earth we are living in now. Had human beings more farsighted they wouldn’t have taken wilderness as something that must be controlled. Nash explains how the mankind built fences and roads to control the wild, and soon there came a time when United States Census claimed there was no longer a frontier left that humans haven’t damaged which created a national angst. As Nash says “The notion of wilderness was passing over a tipping point from liability to asset” (Nash 373) This resulted in acts that emphasized the importance of wilderness. Extinction of many other species was observed so acts were taken for the animal protection and various authors started writing books on the negative environmental impact.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main point made in the reading passage is that sharing the ownership of lands, which is called commons, made more benefits for everyone in the colonies of New England. However, the professor argues that commons did not work well in reality.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "That land is a community is the basic concept of ecology, but that land is to be loved and respected is an extension of ethics. That land yields a cultural harvest is a fact long known, but lately forgotten."…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Steinbeck sets up the setting of The Grapes of Wrath with the citizens of the Midwest being extremely affected by the Dust Bowl, it was the people that were more fortunate that made everything as bad as it was. This, plus no crops, no money, and not being able to pay mortgages and other bills resulted in a colossal amount of foreclosures, which in the book causes a mass exodus to California. In the modern world this is exactly what happened in 2011, over 1.2 million households were lost to foreclosures. Another point was that in The Grapes of Wrath the Californian government was attempting to keep migrant workers from coming into the state. This is illegal and was put in place because of the people at the top didn’t have enough jobs to give to the people towards the bottom. Similarly, in Somalia when the government was taken over by terrorists, no one was allowed to leave the country without risking getting killed because the of leader’s personal opinion on other religions. This common idea of man building flames to the inevitable fire is one that still takes place today.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "We shall never understand the natural environment until we see it as being an organism," wrote Paul Brooks in The Pursuit of Wilderness. Paul Brooks was accurate with his statement because if land isn't treated as an organism, it becomes property. Property requires ownership, and ownership then leads to a need for money. Where money is involved, a corrupt system develops, and a vicious cycle is sparked into action. Therefore, it is our duty to stop this cycle.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Colonial Pipeline Tragedy

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In an essay in 1833, William Forster Lloyd outlined a phenomenon called the “tragedy of the commons.” The tragedy of the commons can be defined as individuals acting only for their personal benefit, thus depleting a necessary group resource to the point that it cannot recover (“Tragedy”). This issue reared its head in the state of North Carolina recently due to the gas shortage caused by a damaged pipeline.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In trying to achieve sustainability within the society, the Grapes of Wrath presents different scenarios that involve the struggles of life and survival, the many challenges people encounter and what it takes to attain a sustainable lifestyle. The film is centered on the family unit, the societal perceptions of what the family ought to be and the difficulties involved in sustaining the family unit together. It is a film that highlights the importance of moral uprightness, the significance of finances and what holds societal institutions together to ensure a sustainable…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sand County Almanac

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A ‘land ethic’ is a philosophy that guides and regulates the actions humans take when they attempt to change or use the land. I feel that people over use and over-work the land and resources that we have in the world. Sure, I like to have fancy things but when I think about the fact that everyone in the world likes to have these things they don’t need at all it makes me sick. We are killing our planet every day. I don’t like saying ‘we’ need to come up with a cheaper and cleaner form of energy because I feel hypocritical, but that is definitely something that has got to happen. It is imperative that we meet the needs of society today in such a way that we are still able to meet the needs of future generations.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of these is The World Food Bank, an organization in the process of being established during the time of the essay’s publication. The goal of the organization, in short, was to provide food for people in countries that had a lack of it. This is, of course, completely in opposition to what Hardin argues we should do, and so it is a very good example. To demonstrate why a global food bank is a bad idea, Hardin attacks it from several angles. First, he debases its intention, stating that while it “appeals powerfully to our humanitarian impulses”, it is not as pure of motive as its lobbyists claimed it to be. He outlines that an organization like that would mean “’Billions for U.S Business’”, using the past example of the “Food for peace program” that did indeed, in historical fact, profit its creators much more than its supposed benefactors. After showing corruption in modern institution of charity, Hardin then defeats it in its own terms, or in other words he argues against it as if it was in reality pure in its intentions. He argues that helping the overpopulated poor only leads to more overpopulation, and therefore a greater demand, that defeats possibility and would ultimately deplete the world’s resources, leading to the suffering of our posterity. Here, Hardin thoroughly defeats…

    • 2561 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s essay, Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor, Hardin describes the wealthy population of the world as being in a single lifeboat that is almost filled until buckling while the poor population of the world treads water below. Hardin’s essay gets his readers to feel the natural instinct to survive. The lifeboat metaphor that Hardin uses relieves the wealthy population of their moral obligations to the less fortunate, but in addition, puts all of the blame and cause of the depletion of earth’s resources on the poor. As much as his argument may make sense, there are some flaws in his way of thinking. Alan Durning, who noticed that major flaws with Hardin’s essay, wrote on what he thought about the topic that Hardin has brought to his attention. In Durning’s essay, Asking How Much Is Enough, he argues that it is not overpopulation that is depleting the earth’s resources, but overconsumption of the resources by the wealthy population. The arguments in Durning’s essay makes the reader realize that the way Hardin uses the metaphorical lifeboat to persuade his readers into thinking the same thing as he does and shows that Hardin wrongly places the blame of all of earth’s financial stability problems on the poorer population.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Commons was described as a large open forest area that was open for anyone to utilize. In the modern world, there is no such thing as a Commons. With Andy’s lecture I can understand the comparison between the peasants of old England and the peasants of modern “poor” countries. The peasants of England were pictured as helpless, but even through all these adversities, the Commons were a place to go if all else fails. Peasants of today have no similar options, but instead are shut out of society and left to protect themselves. Something that the two parties share is that both lived (or have lived) in a society that is dominated by the rich. The wealthy have the power to control the resources the poor have access to like how the Commons were taken from the…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our world is growing and is causing a list of problems that include deforestation, shortage of resources and the lost of many nature species. People have the necessity to have a home, but they ask for lavish homes, which affect our environment for the sake of cutting trees. Henry David Thoreau living in a small cabin in the woods, and gave us the example that building simple houses helps avoid deforestation. By creating lavish homes people are increasing deforestation by making more land available for housing, when construction companies start to construct they cut all the trees that are invading the place where the house is going to stand. By creating homes near green land, settlers begin producing their own food and starts by cleaning the land to be able to start with agriculture.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    geog257

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Quite often, environmental issues are discussed in terms of economic, political and/or social implications. Ethical issues, fundamental to the topic, are usually ignored. Failure to consider these issues is often understandable when the nature of pragmatic politics and economics is understood. Ethical positions are most often phrased as questions asking how we, as humans, relate to other humans individually, to other humans as groups, to other humans still to be born, to other forms of life and/or to entire sets ranging from ecosystems to the entire planet. Questions as to humans’ relations with nature are often raised as well as the relationship between technology and progress – for example, are gains from technological innovations mainly accrued by the wealthy and often at the expense of poor or dispossessed peoples? To what extent do technological innovations generate serious social and ecological problems? Is progress in meeting human needs always at the expense of nature? Is the biotechnology revolution in agriculture in the best interest of both humanity and nature? Questions such as these will be dealt with as our course proceeds during the semester.…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life Boat Ethical Analysis

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hardin suggested a “world food bank” to supply food equally to every nation as a means to counter the famine issue. He makes examples of how Overloading the Environment may be in danger. Hardin says “Food can, perhaps, be significantly increased to meet a growing demand. But what about clean beaches, unspoiled forests, and solitude? If we satisfy a growing population's need for food, we necessarily decrease its per capita supply of the other resources needed by men.” Hardin also refers to an essay titled Chinese Fish and Miracle Rice saying, “as an ancient Chinese proverb goes: Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day; teach him how to fish and he will eat for the rest of his…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Hardin's " Tragedy of the Commons," and Diamonds, "The World as Polder: What Does it Mean to Us Today?," One can see how Hardin's main points relate to Diamonds, because both dissect the unsustainable aspects of our society. Both authors use different methods to get their point across, however their main points are very similar. Although Diamond closely looks at past societal collapses, and what aspects of their society caused their collapses, Hardin's current view of the modern worlds unsustainable population, has many characteristic to the older society's that Diamond discusses in his essay. For example Hardin look at our increasing population and how we are over indulging in our resources, that will soon run out if we're not careful. While on the other hand, Diamond describes how over population was a major reason for the Easter Islanders collapse.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays