Preview

Toyota Case

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1776 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Toyota Case
Executive Summary
The automobile industry can be considered one of the most competitive industries that exists today. The production has to be flawless, the employees hardworking and the managers fully aware of their product. This case study discusses the Toyota production plant in Georgetown, Kentucky.
In July of 1988 Toyota Motor Manufacturing (TMM), USA began producing Toyota Camry sedans. Toyota implements the Toyota Production System (TPS) in their Georgetown plant, similar to all other production facilities. This system reduces cost by eliminating waste. Excess production consumes extra space and human resources to control the products. The two governing principles that Toyota modeled the TPS system after are Just-In-Time (JIT) production and Jidoka. JIT emphasizes the process of producing only what is needed when it is needed. Jidoka focuses on making any production problems instantly self-evident and production would cease when a problem arose. Toyota performs Jidoka by using andon cords to highlight with buzzers and lights the step with the non-compliance. Toyota uses these processes to outperform its competitors and deliver a high quality product.
The Georgetown production plant uses Kentucky Framed Seat (KFS) to supply the seat sets for the entire production taking place at the plant. KFS follows a JIT system of production. When the body shells are finished with the paint line the information about the car is sent to KFS. This information enables KFS to ship out the corresponding seat sets in the correct amount of time to synchronize when the car arrives at final assembly and the seat sets are needed to be installed.
In April of 1992 the Georgetown plant began to experience a decreasing run ratio. This ratio is calculated as the number of actual cars that were assembled to the actual amount of cars that could have been assembled with no interruptions to the assembly line. During the May 1st meeting of Lewis, DaPrile, Friesen and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Ford car contains about five thousand parts—that is counting screws, nuts, and all. Some of the parts are fairly bulky and others are almost the size of watch parts. In our first assembling we simply started to put a car together at a spot on the floor and workmen brought to it the parts as they were needed in exactly the same way that one builds a house. When we started to make parts it was natural to create a single department of the factory to make that part, but usually one workman performed all of the operations necessary on a small part. The rapid press of production made it necessary to devise plans of production that would avoid having the workers falling over one another….…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Toyota Problem Statemeny

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Processes need to be constantly analyzed in order to see if they are operating at full potential. The Toyota Production System (TPS) is one of the most effective processes in the world but it was not fully integrated into foreign market plants. Following is a refined problem statement elaborating on the prior one: The TPS process is not fully in place in all plants across all markets. A fishbone diagram and a flowchart have been provided in order to get to the root of the problem and develop a process improvement plan as well as a complimenting scope. In order for Toyota to remain successful and be prevalent well into the future, the TPS rollout process must be completed smoothly and full-heartedly into all foreign markets.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Automotive Component & Fabrication Plant (ACF) was a major supplier of components for the domestic automotive industry, the original plant site for Bridgeton Industries. ACF was a long-term business since the early 1900s. The market of ACT’s production was growing and dominated by U.S. automobile manufacturers, ACF faced less competition pressure because most competitions from local suppliers and other Bridgeton plants. Until the 1980s, ACF experienced serious cutbacks due to increasing gasoline price, foreign competitors and scarcity which led to decreased domestic market share.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Detroit plant, as an incubation ground for new products and a stable supplier of replacement parts for legacy products, has a different mission than that of the other plants. Its product mix, plant layout and production process embody the job shop model, where flexible resources are employed to produce low-volume, high-variety products under a functional layout design. The high-overhead cost structure, to a certain extent, reflects the characteristics of this model – longer set-up times and a less streamlined production flow.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Toyota production system. (2000). In P. M. Swamidass (Ed.), Encyclopedia of production and manufacturing management (pp. 812). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CCX3042500855&v=2.1&u=embry&it=r&p=GVRL&sw=w&asid=fcfb8d8df225f1187dd944b902adc41c…

    • 2412 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Toyota Production System (TPS) operating management style has become the gold standard in the automotive industry, and even though their strategy has been attempted to be duplicated, it has yet to be replicated. The main reason behind the failures of TPS imitators is that they fall short in developing a management strategy to align the goals and objectives of all the functional groups within the enterprise. These imitators get too caught up in cost-reduction strategic decisions rather than strategies which add the most value to the customer as well as their suppliers. Toyota has tighter supplier relations then their competitors by integrating production facilities and locations with their suppliers. This gives them a competitive advantage in both quality and cost over their competition. Finally, Toyota designs their products with their customers specifically in mind to help add the most value possible to the customer. Toyota is able to concentrate on a value added strategy by using the collaborative technique discussed in class. Toyota employs cross functional collaboration between departments to identify common goals and objectives between functional groups, as well as external collaboration between their suppliers. Toyota takes advantage of their collaborative agreements with their suppliers to not only reduce costs but also to increase quality standards to enhance the value for the customer. Toyota understands that it’s most important to get a quality product from their suppliers, in a timely fashion than it is to get the cheapest product possible, while many of their competitors are focused on just the opposite. With the current economic problems and the credit crisis severely crippling demand in the auto industry, American car makers are facing a big problem in producing a quality product cheaply. Although the Big Three automakers faced similar problems in the 1980’s and survived, they have to try to survive in a much more globally competitive industry.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1988 TMM Japan began production on a new plant located in the US. The plant was modeled after the Tsutsumi plant and was to replace the majority of the Camrys that were being imported from Japan. As part of its setup the Tsutsumi production line was copied and employees were trained in the TPS process. TPS is based on reducing costs through the elimination of waste. TPS relied on two themes Just-In-Time (JIT) and jidoka. JIT means that new parts are produced only when needed. Jidoka is the stopping of production when a problem is noticed and fixing it then and there. TMM USA implemented these methodologies throughout its operation departments. TMM USA also had a remarkable relationship with its seat supplier, in which the production of the seats followed a pull system methodology. This meant that KFS did not produce any seats until TMM USA requested them. With KFS only 30 minutes away from TMM USA there was very…

    • 1626 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Toyota Motor Manufacturing, U.S.A. (TMM) is deviating from the standard assembly line principle of jidoka in an attempt to avoid expenses incurred from stopping the production line for seat quality defects. This deviation has contributed to the inability to identify the root cause of the problem, which has led to decreased run ratios on the line and an excess of defective automobiles in the overflow lot for multiple days. If this problem isn’t fixed quickly, an increased amount of waste will continue to be incurred and customer value will be threatened.…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Toyota way

    • 113841 Words
    • 456 Pages

    Chapter 11 - Principle 5: Build a Culture of Stopping to Fix Problems, to Get…

    • 113841 Words
    • 456 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Monden, Y., (1998) Toyota Production System: An Integrated Approach to Just-in-Time, Third Edition, Norcross, GA: Engineering & Management Press.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As Toyota established itself in the US automotive industry, other players watched in admiration as Toyota plants around the world boasted consistent production of higher quality cars, fewer worker-hours, lower inventory, and fewer defects than any other competitor (Duvall, 2008). Many credited Toyota’s continued success and its ability to roll a new Camry, Avalon, or Solara off of the assembly line every 55 seconds to its application of its core competency, the Toyota Production System (TPS) (Duvall, 2008). Among the various characteristics of this system that made it a success were concepts such as just in time production, real time defect monitoring and correction, waste reduction, and other process knowledge that offered Toyota a sustainable competitive advantage. Toyota’s unrelenting approach in manufacturing was eventually recognized simply as “The Toyota Way”.…

    • 2274 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. What were the production systems developed by the company until today and how General Motors implemented these systems?…

    • 1294 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bmw Swot Analysis

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Spartanburg plant can build 250 to 300 cars a day and production is set up to be flexible so that it can produce several models on the same line in random sequence.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Five Forces Model

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Heavy investment was made to build its production facilities based on state of art technologies. To ensure highest level of productivity world-renowned Toyota Production Systems are implemented.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hyundai Case

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To persist on a case by case basis the different Strength, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats that have been perceived.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays