Preview

Topic 6

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
791 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Topic 6
B. First Try at Governing Documents

Why was such a system of government enacted in the post-revolutionary era? Such a system of government was enacted post-revolutionary era because the Confederacy needed a set of rules and regulations. The Articles of Confederation laid out the rules of congress and how it should act.

How were the Articles of Confederation different than the U.S. Constitution? The Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution differ in several ways. The U.S. Constitution created a court system which did not exist in the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution also gave the federal government more power, that way it could successfully function. These changes were important because if they weren’t done, our founding country probably would have failed, and we would not have the country we know today.

Why were the Articles of Confederation replaced with the Constitution so quickly? After little time, it became clear that the Articles of Confederation would not work to keep the nation united. So, they had to act quickly to replace the Articles of Confederation, so their country would not fail. Under the Articles of Confederation there was no separation of powers, and if they did not change this, someone could manipulate their political standing and take over. Also, the central government was too weak under the Articles.

C: Who Exactly Are "The People?"

Was it a conscious decision at the Constitutional Convention to exclude certain groups of individuals? Yes, it was a conscious decision to leave out certain groups because in 1787 they may not have had any rights, or were not considered important. For example, Negros were excluded because they were viewed as property, not people.

If so, why did this occur? Who was left out? Negros were left out as well as indentured servants and natives. This occurred because they were viewed as property and were not considered significant.

What attempts have been made

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The people of early America had many faults and strengths after becoming free from England. They wanted to create a government different from England’s so the Americans could have more rights. To do this, the articles of confederation had no executive branch, congress didn’t have the power to tax directly which made it hard to support their own country, to change a law, it had to be unanimous and to pass a law 2/3 of the colonies had to agree which made it practically impossible to change or make laws and overall the country was just unbalanced. The first official form of government of America, The Articles of Confederation, was one of the disputable topics whether or not it was a good form of government. Evidence that proved the articles was an effective form of government was the spreading of land westward. On the other hand, there were many more ineffective ways the articles didn’t work, like Americas affairs with foreign countries like England and Spain and its economy.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Regarding structure, the Articles of Confederation, or simply Articles, were relatively ‘bare-bones’ when compared to the complex constitutions and declarations of government other countries had. It laid out a simple and ultimately primitive government: the power of the government was to lie solely in Congress, a group of delegates from all states. It was to be Congress and only Congress to create laws and run most of the government. This concept did not work well in practice: Congress, the only branch of the government, was weak and unable to bring about policy change for the country. First, all amendments to the Articles required a unanimous vote of all thirteen states - something that was quite rare - and even the simplest of national laws required a two-thirds majority to be established. This became a major issue. As a new country, a lot of issues were going to come forth to Congress, and due to the bureaucratic rules that were in place, it was difficult for a treaty or policy to be approved. Furthermore, the Articles did…

    • 2437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation had many flaws within it; it made the States more independent but the federal government have very limited control. They weren't allowed to make trade treaties, or allowed to tax which resulted in them not being able to pay their debts. The Constitution was made to tighten up the Articles and set a standard within the States. “ All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.” (A-3) This is what caused a change, and tightened up the government. The government had 3 branches now, each with its own responsibilities and neither was more powerful than the other. The legislative had the power to create a new currency…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although there are many differences between the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution there are two principles that showcase the greatest differences; separation of powers (three branches that all have different obligations to the people of the U.S.) and checks and balances (the three branches that keep one from becoming tyrannical).…

    • 52 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1781 and 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an ineffective government, Although there were flaws, strong steps were taken in the attempt to try and make the United States a better country. The Articles set up a government that gave individual states the power to make their own laws and enforce them. This was ineffective for the following reasons: 1) The Continental Congress controlled public affairs but there was nothing in the Articles that gave Congress the power to enforce laws or unify the states. 2) There was no solid system of money to ensure that taxes would be paid or protect commerce, both nationally and with foreign trade. 3) The country lacked unity and strength because there was no leadership.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Q: The phrase “ a lawyer’s brief justifying a revolution” has been used to describe the ___…

    • 4220 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “From 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government." During those years the United States government was still developing and the Articles of Confederation was not an effective form of government. The states had a strong objection against the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was not a government well suited for this new country. The United States needed power over the states to make it a better place to live and have separate states with different laws.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of confederation allowed States to be independent while the federal government was overall a meeting place for all the state representatives to meet and debate new law. The federal government had laws in place but their were very hard to enforce. The federal government under the Articles of Confederation had no president. They instead had the Committee of the States which had one representative from each state. Even though that the Committee of the States was the most central form of the federal government, they had very little power to the Constitutional Congress.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 9 Outline Apush

    • 2669 Words
    • 11 Pages

    1. Several northern states either abolished slavery outright or provided for the gradual emancipation of blacks.…

    • 2669 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution were both recognized and followed by the same group of people. Even though the same group of people followed these two documents, these documents are very different. One example is the writing style of each document. The Articles of Confederation were repetitive, less direct and less certified for quoting than the Constitution. The two documents have a different approach towards the type of government and its control over the matters.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although the Articles of Confederation gave the state more power but this was not enough because the congress did not get enough power. The country was in need for a stronger Federal government;in which, it was not present in the Articles of confederation. The lack of power for the national government and the congress led to the creation of the United States Constitution. The constitution created the executive branch, and federal courts. This makes the constitution better than the Articles of confederation because the Federal court system was created to ensure that law was followed throughout the country. The creation of executive branch is another advantage of the constitution.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, although both written documents explaining how the American government would be ran, they have very distinct qualities about them. During the Constitutional Convention, instead of revising the Articles of Confederation as originally planned, those attending the meeting felt that a whole new document needed to be written. Legislation, the sovereignty of states, and the executive branch were all major differences between the two documents.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. Constitution which was established in 1777 was very successful in the foundation of America. However political freedom conflicts of segregation tore apart politics. Blacks in North were vetoed against voting and making decisions that would affect their lives and careers. The Constitution outlawed blacks of any role in the Senate and any part of politics as whole. As stated by Charles Mackay, “-had no right to share with us (whites) the deliberations of the jury box…” No such judiciary right was given among any black man…

    • 943 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For instance, if we look back, during the era of slavery the constitution did not include the rights for slaves. The only thing that was noted was “Separate but Equal”, which allowed the government to allow African…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Excluded Agricultural and Domestic workers, many of whom were black or from other minority groups…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays