Preview

Topic 1: Mary Parker Follett Has Been Described by Schermerhorn Et Al. (2011) as an Administrative Theorist Within the Classical Approach to Management. However, Others Have Seen Her as Ahead of Her Time, and Have Even

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1366 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Topic 1: Mary Parker Follett Has Been Described by Schermerhorn Et Al. (2011) as an Administrative Theorist Within the Classical Approach to Management. However, Others Have Seen Her as Ahead of Her Time, and Have Even
Topic 1: Mary Parker Follett has been described by Schermerhorn et al. (2011) as an Administrative Theorist within the Classical approach to management. However, others have seen her as ahead of her time, and have even described her as 'thoroughly modern ' (Hurst, 1992).What were Mary Parker Follett 's main contributions to management thought and practice; how do they relate to Classical management theory; and how are they relevant to practicing managers in contemporary organisations?

‘Classical approach to management mainly concerned with the increasing the efficiency of workers and organisations based on management practices, which were an outcome of careful observation. Besides, administration principles are based on attempts to document and understand the experiences of successful managers’ (Management, p.90).This essay will seek to some Mary Parker Follett’s main contributions to management thought and practice. It will also explain why Mary Parker Follett has been described as ‘thoroughly modern’ and an administrative theorist in the classical approach to management. For example, the opinion of organisations based on the group behaviour has led to the idea of the self-managing team. “Integration” has become, in modern times, conflict resolution (Hurst, D.K, 1992, Business quarterly, p.45).The aim of this essay is to determine that how her contributions relate to classical approach to management and also examine how they relevant to managers in contemporary organisations.
The first section of this essay will examine Follett’s first contribution to managementis the importance of groups within organisation. ‘In societies we often think of the individual as being the opposite of the group, that groups negate individuality, but she acknowledged that groups are able to help society in general and achieve personal identity to improve the quality of group members’ lives, help to explain how people can work together effectively but with less risk of



References: Mary Parker Follett. (1930) In Creative Experience. London: Longmans, Green and Co. Classical Schools of Management. (2012, March 27). Retrieved from CliffsNotes.com: http://www.cliffsnotes.com/study_guide/topicArticleId-8944,articleId-8851.html Henry C. Metcalf, L. U. (1940). Dynamic Administration. New York, London: Harper & Brothers. Hoopes, J. (2003). False Prophets. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing. Hoopes, J. (2003). The optimist: Mary Parker Follett. In J. Hoopes, False prophets (pp. 101-128). Cambridge, MA 02142: Perseus Publishing. Hurst, D. (1992). Business Quarterly. Thoroughly modern, 55-58. Pauline Graham, R. M. (1920). In Mary Parker Follett - Prophet of Management (pp. 11-31). Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press. Schermerhorn, J. D. (2011). In Management. (4th ed.). Milton, Queensland: John Wiley & Sons.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Related Topics