Preview

To What Extent Was Metternich Responsible for Change in Germany in 1815

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
957 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Was Metternich Responsible for Change in Germany in 1815
‘To what extent was Metternich responsible for the lack of change in Germany between 1815-1848’
Metternich was the chancellor of Austria and therefore had a substantial amount of power, this enabled him to make radical decisions regarding Germany, whether it included unifying it or not.
On one hand Metternich had a major influence with the lack of change in Germany. This was largely to do with the fact that he continuously over exaggerated the importance of the student movements. An example of this is that in 1819 a member of an extreme student group murdered Kotzebue, a reactionary writer and a secret agent of the Russian Tsar. This murder prompted Metternich to take action. This resulted in ‘The Carlsbad decrees’, these provided inspectors for universities, student societies were disbanded, press censorship introduced to and a commission set up to investigate revolutionary movements. Consequently these actions stunted the student movement towards unification because Metternich prioritized the communication via universities and newspapers to be stopped. A main idea for liberalisation is freedom of the press, Metternich continuously utilised censorship of the press which was another reason for halting unification.

Communication via news papers and universities was not the only way in which liberal and national ideas were spreading. Another way was by the meeting of south German states. Metternich saw this as a major threat to the ‘status quo’ and therefore made it more difficult for liberal ideas to gain ground by persuading all the states to restrict the subjects which their assemblies could discuss. This stunted unification because it made the liberalist and nationalist ideas hard to spread.

Another way in which Metternich was responsible for the lack of change in Germany was that he attacked the nationalist ideas himself; Unification of religion was a main focus for nationalists, yet in Germany the north was protestant, and the south and west were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the nineteenth century, Germany was struggling to unify after the failure of the Frankfort Assembly of 1848, which was meant to unify Germany. In 1862, William I, formerly known as Frederick William IV, was appointed king of the military state known as Prussia. As a result of disputes from the rising middle class, William I choose to hire Otto von Bismarck as chancellor in order to quiet the unrest. Otto von Bismarck was a realpolitik, someone whose decisions were based on practicality, not morals. The policies of Otto von Bismarck’s government represented the new kind of conservatism because they represented realpolitik through doing what’s best for the country by incorporating the growing idea of socialism into reforms, all while valuing…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the years 1900-1914 there was arguably a significant move towards democracy within Germany. There were general desire for political and social reform and many wished for constitutional change. However, come 1914 Germany still remained nearly as autocratic as it had been back in 1900. Over this period it can clearly be shown through 3 key areas: the Constitution, German policy and events, that, regardless of attempted moves towards democracy, Germany truly was an entrenched autocracy in this period.…

    • 2123 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The historical interpretation of Otto von Bismarck and Bismarckian Germany has undergone extensive transformation, as historians have had access to a wider variety of sources and evidence, and have held differing social and political presuppositions influencing their portrayal of the German unifier. The changing historical interpretations can be seen over time, as differing contexts and sources influence the portrayal, as early interpretations of Bismarck from the 1870s to the 1920s portrayed Bismarck as a man in charge and as a necessity for Germany to move forward. The interpretation of Bismarck continued to change throughout the 1930s and 40s as a result of Nazism and the collapse of the Third Reich, the interpretations shifted, and throughout the 1960s, 70s and 80s the interpretation of Bismarck has become more balanced, not significantly influenced by political desires, whilst still influenced by social context. Through the study of historical debate focussing between the 1880s and 1980s, the changing interpretations of Bismarck can be illuminated and assessed.…

    • 4452 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany, until the late 19th century, was little more than a loose union of fragmented states. Dominating these states was Austria, the Habsburg’s largest stronghold. Unfortunately for Austria, its involvement in the Crimean War forced it out of the major spotlight in European power politics, making it a minor presence in the continent. This left a power vacuum in Germany which was quickly filled by Prussia, a military state with a history of strong rulers.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany was longing for a united nation with a stable economy. The Nazi party, lead by Adolf Hitler, came to power. "And then there is another fundamental error: they have never got it clear in their own minds that there is a difference or how great a difference there is between the conception 'national' and the word 'dynastic' or 'monarchistic.' They do not understand that today it is more than ever necessary in our thoughts as Nationalists to avoid anything which might perhaps cause the individual to think that the National Idea was identical with petty everyday political views. They ought day by day to din into the ears of the masses: 'We want to bury all the petty differences and to bring out into…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Otto von Bismarck is widely recognized as the statesman who engineered the unification of Germany in this period, via astute political awareness, cunning diplomacy and the use of effective military power. However many historians have different views with regard to Bismarck’s real influence and even whether he wanted German unification or just expansion of the power and influence of his home state of Prussia. Bismarck has been described a great statesman, but also an autocrat who resented any opposition to his views . In contrast it has also been suggested that he was merely an astute politician who enhanced the position of his home state of Prussia, through clever management of the internal and external political circumstances that he lived through . This enquiry will attempt to assess the importance of Bismarck’s role in the unification of Germany by identifying and reviewing key historical events in the period 1789-1890.…

    • 4333 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare and contrast the foreign policy goals and achievements of Metternich (1815-1848) and Bismarck (1862-1890)…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the years before the war, around 1848-1914, the period of Nationalism began, where each country was unifying their states. These states wanted national identity, meaning similar language, mission, religion, territory, etc. The German unifier was the chancellor of Prussia, known as Otto Von Bismark. He was a very romantic nationalist and believed in the quote "might makes right", believing that you get what you want through force. He was very powerful and it showed in the three steps he took to unify the country of Germany. He won the war with Denmark in 1864, won the Autro/Prussian war in 1866, and won the war of 1871, finally unifying the country on January 18, 1871.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Purbeck School Humanities. Retrieved October 15, 2013, from http://purbeckhumanities.co.uk/2010/11/17/german.unification-timeline/ Website “German Unification” (2013). Wikipedia. Retrieved October 21, 2013, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unification_of_Germany Work Cited (Work Sheet Work Cited)…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gustav Stresemann led Germany through a very difficult period in their history. He had to contend with economic hardships, political turbulence and much more. In this essay, I will examine his tenure as Chancellor, and the ways in which he was able to achieve stability.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany Before 1848

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The political, economical, and social order of the Germanic states in the nineteenth century was in a state of chaos and disarray. Politically, the states had the desire of becoming unified and had the possibility to do so if it had not been for fear and neglect to follow through. Economically, the states were in a time of hardships with poor growth development in the fields and were also going through the time of the Industrial Revolution with changes to their everyday lives. Socially, the Germanic states were divided into a feudal system that was determined by birth status and wealth. The middle class, made up of scholars and students, and aristocracy had shared the same fear of the commoners’ revolt due to the political failure in attempt to unify the Germanic states, and had wanted to maintain their rights as well as becoming unified without giving the lower class any more power. The economic structure was poor and resulted with unemployment and higher food prices, which enabled the peasants to be outraged in anger towards the government for lack of action to make the necessary changes causing them to revolt in hopes of more stability financially while also desiring a unification of the German states.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    nationalism of german

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Political nationalism grew with the spread of new ideas about Liberalism and Nationalism. also Nationalism was the desire of people with a common national identity to have their own country. furthermore, Liberalism was the desire to have a parliament, like Britain’s, where rulers were elected by the people of the country as opposed to being ruled by a king alone. Especially, In the years initially following 1815, support for political nationalism in Germany was very small- it was limited to small groups of radical students from a middle class background known as the Burschenshaften. They were often encouraged by their lecturers who made speeches reflecting their motto, ‘Honor, Freedom, and Fatherland’. Also Repressive laws were issued by the Austrian Chancellor Metternich in 1819 called the Carlsbad Decrees which banned student societies and censored newspapers. The following year the power of the Diet was increased so that soldiers could be ordered to stop the spread of new ideas in any of the German states. Nonetheless the growth of nationalism continued with the emergence of the student societies of the 1830s which were far more radical in their outlook. For The growth of nationalism culminated in the revolutions of 1848. For the first time an all-German Parliament (The Frankfurt Parliament) met to create a united Germany. It consisted mainly of Liberals and Nationalists. Despite its eventual defeat the following year by the forces of Austria and Prussia, the setting up of this Parliament was a clear sign that support for unification was growing. for example The Napoleonic Wars…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the reasons why the revolutionaries were not as successful as Bismarck was because of the difference in religion, culture and on the ways Germany should be ruled. First of all, the north and the south of Germany had different religions: the north was Protestants and the south Catholics. This clash between religions made the unification of Germany more…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociologists

    • 27031 Words
    • 109 Pages

    • –––, 1918/1994. “Parliament and Government in Germany Under a New Political Order” in Max Weber: Political Writings.…

    • 27031 Words
    • 109 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gustave Stresemann had a lot of influence over Germany in the period between 1923 and 1929. Before Stresemann took charge in 1923 the Weimar Republic had many problems. In 1922 the government declared that they could no longer pay reparations to France due to severe economic problems. The French angrily responded to this by sending in 60,000 French and Belgian troops to invade the Ruhr. They took most of Germany’s raw materials, the government called for the workers to carry out passive resistance. The workers in Germany refused to collaborate with the French. Consequently industrial production ground to a halt. Many in Germany blamed the government for the invasion of the Ruhr as it was the government who signed the treaty in which the treaty stated that they had to pay large reparations to France After the invasion of the Ruhr, industrial production decreased dramatically causing industries and factories to shut down. This meant that unemployment rose rapidly and poverty in Germany rose too. The government decided to print more money to give to the people. As more and more were printed prices rose higher and higher, this meant that more money had to be printed to meet the increasing prices. As a result money became worthless. This was the second problem the Weimar Republic faced; hyperinflation. Although the wages rose the prices always seemed to rise faster this meant that many people’s income was too low to live on. Most people suffered from the hyperinflation, and were extremely fed up with how the government had printed more money. It wasn’t just the fact that all their life savings could now only buy them a loaf of bread but it was also that it was degrading and it was humiliating: the German mark and economy had become worthless. Before Stresemann the Weimar Republic was facing unpopularity amongst most people, without Stresemann the Weimar Republic might not have seen 1924.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays