As the great Socrates ones said, that by admiting that you dont know anything, so you can learn something that is how I discover the things that I want to know. The only way of knowing things is the way of becoming conscious of our unknowing, so we can learn. Awareness of the unknowing is the beginning of knowledge. Thus, we can always look for the truth, but the best is if never said that we found it. We may just think of the truth. We may think of what is the truth different in mathematics, the arts and ethics, but let’s never be sure. That is the only way how we are going to become bigger and better people. The truth in mathematics is that we think every part of it is proved. Every formula is derived and every one of sums is solved before we solved them. We suppose that the only thing we can question is the origin of math’s and if that has solid and secure, but is it? The association amid common sense and mathematics at their collective ground rules is looked after the recurrent question in the philosophy of mathematics. On one hand mathematical truths seem to have a believable obviousness, but on the other hand the source of their "straightforwardness" relics indistinguishable. This is a philosophical mystery. Regardless of the fact that mathematics seems as the clearest and most affirmative sort of knowledge we own, there are tribulations. We want to know the character of mathematics. We want to know the significance of the propositions. Many philosophers had different ideas of mathematics, such as Pythagoras, Plato and Aristotle and latter Kant and Descartes. Pythagoras made influential contributions to mathematics and he is best known for the Pythagorean Theorem, named after him. It was his idea that mathematics is a protected foundation for philosophical thinking over and above for considerable thesis and ethics. He says that the ideology of mathematics is the ideology of all things. Pythagoras was a mathematical genius. He invented the easiest way how to measure a triangle. His theorem says that the sum of the areas of the two squares on the legs (a, b) equals the area of the square on the hypotenuse (c) or in any right triangle, the area of the square whose side is the hypotenuse (the side opposite the right angle) is equal to the sum of the areas of the squares whose sides are the two legs (the two sides that meet at a right angle). He and his students in a great deal were influencing Plato’s work. Plato alleged in Forms or Ideas that were everlasting, competent of accurate clarity and autonomous of awareness. Along with such entities he incorporated numbers and the substances of geometry such as lines, points and circles, which were thus seized not with the mind but with motive. In view of the fact that the true propositions of mathematics were true of the consistent associations between unswerving objects, they were without doubt accurate, which revenue that mathematics revealed pre-existing truths to a certain extent than formed something from our cerebral predispositions. On this Aristotle replied with discrepancy, saying that forms were not entities inaccessible from expression. Aristotle claimed that it is something which entered into objects of the world. According to him mathematics was simply understanding of idealizations. He looked in a straight line at the configuration of mathematics, individualizing logic, set of guidelines used to express theorems, definitions, and hypotheses. For Kant mathematical entity was a-priori synthetic propositions. This provided the necessity for conditions and intent knowledge. Time and space was matrix, the containers holding the changing material of perception. The matrix was the portrayal of space and time. What I deeply believe is that mathematical knowledge ought to man understands of the adjacent truth. Therefore a number of fundamentals correlated to the mathematicians’ experience are a...

As the great Socrates ones said, that by admiting that you dont know anything, so you can learn something that is how I discover the things that I want to know. The only way of knowing things is the way of becoming conscious of our unknowing, so we can learn. Awareness of the unknowing is the beginning of knowledge. Thus, we can always look for the truth, but the best is if never said that we found it. We may just think of the truth. We may think of what is the truth different in mathematics, the arts and ethics, but let’s never be sure. That is the only way how we are going to become bigger and better people. The truth in mathematics is that we think every part of it is proved. Every formula is derived and every one of sums is solved before we solved them. We suppose that the only thing we can question is the origin of math’s and if that has solid and secure, but is it? The association amid common sense and mathematics at their collective ground rules is looked after the recurrent question in the philosophy of mathematics. On one hand mathematical truths seem to have a believable obviousness, but on the other hand the source of their "straightforwardness" relics indistinguishable. This is a philosophical mystery. Regardless of the fact that mathematics seems as the clearest and most affirmative sort of knowledge we own, there are tribulations. We want to know the character of mathematics. We want to know the significance of the propositions. Many philosophers had different ideas of mathematics, such as Pythagoras, Plato and Aristotle and latter Kant and Descartes. Pythagoras made influential contributions to mathematics and he is best known for the Pythagorean Theorem, named after him. It was his idea that mathematics is a protected foundation for philosophical thinking over and above for considerable thesis and ethics. He says that the ideology of mathematics is the ideology of all things. Pythagoras was a mathematical genius. He invented the easiest way how to measure a triangle. His theorem says that the sum of the areas of the two squares on the legs (a, b) equals the area of the square on the hypotenuse (c) or in any right triangle, the area of the square whose side is the hypotenuse (the side opposite the right angle) is equal to the sum of the areas of the squares whose sides are the two legs (the two sides that meet at a right angle). He and his students in a great deal were influencing Plato’s work. Plato alleged in Forms or Ideas that were everlasting, competent of accurate clarity and autonomous of awareness. Along with such entities he incorporated numbers and the substances of geometry such as lines, points and circles, which were thus seized not with the mind but with motive. In view of the fact that the true propositions of mathematics were true of the consistent associations between unswerving objects, they were without doubt accurate, which revenue that mathematics revealed pre-existing truths to a certain extent than formed something from our cerebral predispositions. On this Aristotle replied with discrepancy, saying that forms were not entities inaccessible from expression. Aristotle claimed that it is something which entered into objects of the world. According to him mathematics was simply understanding of idealizations. He looked in a straight line at the configuration of mathematics, individualizing logic, set of guidelines used to express theorems, definitions, and hypotheses. For Kant mathematical entity was a-priori synthetic propositions. This provided the necessity for conditions and intent knowledge. Time and space was matrix, the containers holding the changing material of perception. The matrix was the portrayal of space and time. What I deeply believe is that mathematical knowledge ought to man understands of the adjacent truth. Therefore a number of fundamentals correlated to the mathematicians’ experience are a...

## Share this Document

Let your classmates know about this document and more at StudyMode.com