Preview

To What Extent Is the House of Commons Effective in Carrying Out Its Various Functions?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
787 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Is the House of Commons Effective in Carrying Out Its Various Functions?
To What Extent is the House of Commons Effective in Carrying out Its Various Functions? The mechanisms placed in the House of Commons to ensure its effectiveness are vital to the democracy and overall quality of governing within the UK. Whilst government domination proves to be the key hindrance affecting the quality of the Commons’ work, the checks and balances and opportunities to scrutinise produce an effective chamber in regards to the most important of its functions. The primary function of the House of Commons is being a law-making body and the majority government in the House of Commons can be argued as having improved the speed with which bills can be passed by the chamber, especially in relation to states of emergency such as the Anti-Terrorism Laws in 2007. However, it comes with the tendency to pass legislature that hasn’t been fairly scrutinised and to not consider bills that have been proposed by MPs outside of government, overlooking needed legislation simply because it hasn’t originated from the executive, with only 72 Private Member’s Bills being passed under the Labour government from 1997 to 2010. The executive’s domination of seats also means government-sponsored bills can be quickly and assuredly passed in the first chamber, lessening their quality as there is less debate. On the other hand, the House of Commons has defeated government control on various occasions, one example being on the 29 April 2009, in which a Liberal Democrat motion that all Ghurkhas be offered an equal right of residence was passed, in opposition to Labour policy. This shows a degree of efficiency within the non-executive areas of the Commons, particularly over controversial and publicised issues. Also, the recent coalition government, with a relatively small majority of 77 seats, has found it more difficult to logistically dominate votes and is therefore forced to provide sufficient scrutiny and amendment. These examples of the Common’s independence from
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Discuss To The Extent Which Party Contr
    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Discuss To The Extent Which Party Contr

    In the House of Commons there are many parties all fighting individually for control of the house, and to be in power and govern the land of the UK. To win the election and do this a party or coalition of parties needs a 326 majority to be able to form a government. This system creates a dominance in the house of commons if that majority is achieved sufficiently, as with Tony Blair’s landslide in 1997 where he had over a 150 seat majority, it is this kind of one party dominance I am going to be discussing in this essay and whether or not it limits parliaments main function to represent constituents and pass laws which benefit them.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How are effective are Backbench MPs?
    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How are effective are Backbench MPs?

    One of the main functions of backbench MPs is scrutinize the government and hold them to account via different ways, and it is this function which proves them to be highly effective. Their role in Parliament ensures and strengthens the democratic legitimacy of the executive, thus giving government the authority and right to exercise political power. Another key role of backbench MPs is to act as cross-section of the larger society and therefore represent their interests in Parliament. However, the increase of power held by the government further supports the Burkean view that an “elective dictatorship” has formed considerably in the UK political system. In addition to this, many people have argued that backbench MPs have limited power in actually calling the government to account due to the party system, which ensures that MPs are dictated by ministers and party whips – who use persuasive methods (the promise of promotions or the threat of expulsion/demotion) reduce the effectiveness within the political system. There are both arguments for and against the effectiveness of backbench MPs, however it is debatable as to which outweighs the other.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent have constitutional reforms since 1997 reduced the power of the UK government?
    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To what extent have constitutional reforms since 1997 reduced the power of the UK government?

    Another way in which the government’s power could be seen to be reduced is the reform of the House of Lords. This is because there is speculation over whether after enforcing Stage 1 of the reform (the removal of hereditary peers from the House of Lords, other than 92) the process should…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How democratic is the UK
    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How democratic is the UK

    It can be argued that Britain is both democratic and undemocratic; this can be shown via a range of issues relating to British politics and the society in which we live. The generally accepted definition of a democracy is a form of government in which the major decisions of government and the direction of policy behind these decisions - rests directly or indirectly on the freely given consent of the freely given consent of the freely majority of the adults government. There are two forms of democracy but the UK is run through an indirect or representative democracy as opposed to a direct democracy, which relies on referendums and would be difficult in a large, modern society. Furthermore, the UK is a parliamentary democracy, the government and representatives are intermingled meaning that the UK does not have separation of powers, meaning that the executive, legislative and judicial courts all work together unlike the American Presidential system which could create a lack in communication. In this essay, I propose to argue both for and against and eventually come to a conclusion whether the UK is democratic or not and give a comparison between the UK and the US in terms of democracy.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent have constitutional reforms since 1997 made the UK more democratic?
    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To what extent have constitutional reforms since 1997 made the UK more democratic?

    The house of lords is the upper chamber of the Uk’s bicameral parliament, Beginning in the the 11th century. The house of lords’ role in government is to work with the house of commons to; make laws, check and challenge the actions of government ( the house of lords has no veto power) and provide independent competence. Firstly, in 1999 the Labour party under Tony Blair as Prime Minister reformed the house of lords. For centuries the house of lords consisted of members that inherited their seats, the Act removed such right. The act reduced members of the house of lords from 1,330 members to 669 members and a proportion of the members that are ‘cross benchers’ members with no party affiliation. In order for this act to receive supported votes, Tony Blair and the labour party passed the Weatherill Amendment that put in place a deal that allowed 92 of the 669 members to remain heredity. The reforms in houses of lords progressive towards democracy due to the fact that Historically, members of the House of Lords have been the richest and most important landowners in the country, who would pass their peerages down through their family, which creates bias towards the wealthy. By…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Has Constitutional reform in the UK since 1997 made a difference?
    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Has Constitutional reform in the UK since 1997 made a difference?

    United Kingdom changing radically with Labour’s landslide victory , the greatest since 1945. Led by Tony Blair, the party promised an ambitious programme of constitutional reforms which they themselves claimed would lead to “the most ambitious and far reaching changes to the constitution undertaken by any government in this century” (Hazell, Sinclair, 1999, p42)These reforms were also pioneered by Gordon Brown when he became Blair’s successor in 2007. While some of these amendments were successfully implemented others were abandoned or were watered down greatly. Also, the planned reversal of many of these reforms and other amendments made by the recent coalition Government must also be deliberated , however, as the coalition Government has only been in in power two years it is harder to see if they have had any real effect yet . Therefore this essay will focus on the constitutional reforms made by New Labour and will discuss that while they have made a difference, the impact has been limited and far less radical than they first proposed.…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent has the location of sovereignty changed in recent years
    • 1577 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To what extent has the location of sovereignty changed in recent years

    One factor which can be argued to of had the biggest effect in terms of changing where parliamentary sovereignty resides in recent years is the EU. The UK initially joined the EC in 1973 since then the EC has become the EU and has also become increasingly more powerful over the UK as time has passed, the EU could even be argued to be supreme over UK statues and the UK parliament. This is shown in the factortame case in which EU law took precedent over UK wishes, allowing Spanish fishing boats to fish in UK waters, this was the first time UK law was scrutinized and removed by courts due to EU law contradicting these laws. Furthermore, being part of the EU ultimately is a way of binding the UK governments successors partly due to the fact that if the UK left the EU there could be major…

    • 1577 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How effective are backbench MPs?
    • 630 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How effective are backbench MPs?

    Backbench MPs are critical for UK democracy. They allow for high standard scrutiny of the government which holds them accountable for their actions to the people. They help in representing the electorate. However there are some circumstances in which backbench MPs have little control, for example an elective dictatorship or because of the UK party system which is enforced by party whips.…

    • 630 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent has the formation of a coalition altered the relationship between Parliament and government?
    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To what extent has the formation of a coalition altered the relationship between Parliament and government?

    The first sign that the Coalition has changed the relationship between the Executive and the Legislature would be the rising effectiveness and opportunity of scrutiny. Parliament’s role of scrutinizing the government has become extensive with the lack of majority in the House of Commons. With a majority in the government, MPs would usually support the governing party and there was less elbowroom for criticism. Parliamentary scrutiny has become most effective through Prime Minister’s question time, where the Parliament have a chance to hold the executive accountable every Wednesday, and The Wrights Reforms, brought about in 2010. This has made it harder for the government to pass legislation, as they can no longer use the select committees to ease the passage of legislation. The Wrights reforms changed the appointment of chairs of departmental and select committees to being elected by MPs rather than appointed by the Prime Minister. This has freed the select committees from the control of the whips and manipulation by the government. An example of the effectiveness would be when Theresa May faced difficult…

    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To What Extent Is the House of Commons Effective in Carrying Out Its Various Functions?
    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To What Extent Is the House of Commons Effective in Carrying Out Its Various Functions?

    C) To what extent is the House of Commons effective in carrying out its various functions?…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Parliament Carries Out None Of Its Func
    • 1616 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Parliament Carries Out None Of Its Func

    With democracy on the incline and other countries catching up to where the UK once lead it can be argued that parliament does not carry out its functions adequately. Many would say there are not enough checks and balances on the government to insure its parliament is run legitimately being argued that a cross on a ballot paper every four years is hardly a true expression of our will. Current circumstances have lead to his enquiry of the people, most significantly the freedom of information act 2000 introduced by Blair’s government allowing transparency and putting the government under some scrutiny resulted in the daily telegraphy uncovering the expense scandal, including the duck house this exploitation of the government sparked an unanimous felling of not only anger but also disappointment bringing the questioning of the effectiveness of parliament. However not all of parliament can be looked upon in negative light, parliament can be seen as efficient and it is unfair to claim that “none” of its functions are adequate because the surely there would be a collapse in parliament and government.…

    • 1616 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    United Kingdom and Sovereignty Parliament
    • 793 Words
    • 3 Pages

    United Kingdom and Sovereignty Parliament

    ‘Parliamentary sovereignty is a constitutional relic. It has been rendered obsolete, in particular, by the supremacy of EU law and the UK’s statutory recognition of human rights. We should no longer talk about this irrelevant doctrine.’…

    • 793 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Well Does Parliament Perform Its Various Functions?
    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Well Does Parliament Perform Its Various Functions?

    There are several important functions that Parliament must perform. The word Parliament derived from the Latin ‘parliamentum’ and the French word ‘parler’ which originally meant a talk- which is what Parliament does most of the time. Parliament consists of the House of Commons, the House of Lords and the Monarchy. Parliament is the highest judicial, legislative and executive body in Britain. A parliamentary form of government acknowledges that it derives its power directly from the consent of the people. This sort of system ensures democracy and an active interaction between the people and their representatives. The three functions that I am going to focus on are Scrutiny, Representation and Law Making.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    “Constitutional Reform Since 1997 Has Not Gone Far Enough” Discuss
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Constitutional Reform Since 1997 Has Not Gone Far Enough” Discuss

    In 1999 Labour reformed the House of Lords; Labour removed 600 hereditary peers and reduced it to only 92 hereditary Lords in the House of Lords. However, the labor government did propose a system of “elected peers”, where the public could choose peers to sit in the House of Lords. This proposal was never fully implemented into the UK constitution. Until this proposal is full entrenched it is argued that the Lords are not democratically legitimate as all policy making institutions must have legitimacy. Therefore, there is much that can be done towards constitutional reform.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Uk Parliament Is Increasingly Dominated by the Executive
    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Uk Parliament Is Increasingly Dominated by the Executive

    The word parliament derives from a word loosely translated as ‘to talk’ or ‘to deliberate’. The UK Parliament consists officially of the two Houses of Parliament: the Lords and the Commons and the monarch, which by convention, delegates his or her authority to a group of ministers known as the executive. The role of parliament is mainly to legislate and to govern the United Kingdom through elected representatives. However the executive has a special role over the legislatures and it has been argued that the UK Parliament has become increasingly dominated by the executive.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics