Preview

To What Extent Does Tony Lumpkin Repres

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
729 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Does Tony Lumpkin Repres
How does Tony Lumpkin fit into the comedy genre of Lord of Misrule

In Oliver Goldsmith’s ‘She Stoops to Conquer’ follows the structure of a traditional Shakespearean comedy beginning with a sense of harmony which progressing into disorder and misunderstanding, finally resulting in a resolution of all the problems which occurred in the play. The root of the chaos in the play is orchestrated by Tony Lumpkin, Mr Hardcastle’s step son. In the late medieval and early Tudor period a figure was appointed to orchestrate the entertainment, Tony Lumpkin can be seen as a self appointed Lord of Misrule. The Lord of Misrule was also given a limited time scale in which they ruled; Tony Lumpkin’s time to rule is limited as Goldsmith set the play only across one night. This brings across a comedic side to the play as all the chaos that comes about it mae in such a limited space of time. Shakespeare used the character of a fool to bring about comedy in his plays. Shakespeare’s fools fall into either a licensed fool, whereby the fool is a ‘professional jester’ who is ‘paid’ to sing and dance……... On the other hand, Shakespeare’s second category for a fool was that of a ‘natural fool’ the only element of a natural fool that Tony exhibits is his desire to be ‘country bumpkin’….
At the beginning of the play we might expect that Tony Lumpkin is a natural fool because in Act 1 Scene 1, before Tony’s entrance, Mr Hardcastle expresses that Tony is a ‘a mere composition of tricks and mischief’. The fact that Hardcastle explains that Tony’s ‘composition’ is mainly made up of ‘tricks and mischief’ suggests that is his nature to be a fool. This relates back to Tony being a natural fool as he can only be a fool and has no other elements to his character. Mrs Hardcastle also says that ‘a school would be his death’. This metaphor implies that Tony has never been educated which reinforces the idea of him being a natural fool because it suggests that he has no knowledge. However, there

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    William Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night introduces a wise fool named Feste. As a licensed fool, Feste plays an integral role within the plot of the play. Feste acts as the voice of reason in a play filled with cross-dressing, disguises, confusion, trickery, and chaos. Feste has the ability to break down the barrier between the cast on stage and the audience members, while also embodying the festivities of the feast of the Epiphany and the beginning of Carnival. Even though Feste is called a fool in name, he becomes the only character to not be foolish in nature. Shakespeare uses the character of Feste to provide a running commentary on each of the characters while also participating in the action that is unfolding on stage.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout King Richard III, the value of kingship is one that is explored greatly. The play’s message about kingship is not only seen through Richard’s deceptive schemes but it is also through the fall of his reign where his conscience begins to show, resulting in the destruction of his power. Not only is Richard’s poor kingship seen through his own realization, but it is also seen through other character’s perception of Richard’s reign. Richard’s poor kingship can be seen through Richmond’s expression of Richard as ‘A base foul stone made precious by the foil of England’s chair, where he is falsely set.’ In this quote, Richmond metaphorically describes Richard as nothing more but a worthless rock only made to appear like a gem because of the throne in which falsely claims. It is through this metaphoric description of Richard as a worthless rock that we are able to comprehend what little skills Richard possesses as a king. The highlighting of Richard’s poor kingship not only helps us to comprehend his devious ways but also understand the importance of the value of kingship throughout one’s reign.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through ‘The Tragedy of King Lear’, Shakespeare represents a distinctive voice in which influences the way we perceive the role of power play in our world as it broadens our understanding of the universality and complexity of power play. Compared with the 21st century film ‘Brassed Off’, we are presented with an insight into the various means of attaining power and its ability to uncover the true nature of people within their struggle for supremacy and control. Shakespeare presents 'The Tragedy of King Lear' as the struggle for power and the political and filial machinations that the desire for power can create. Shakespeare focuses the distinctive voice around the central character King Lear who represents a conceited oppressor whose fall from power prompts the downfall of the Kingdom that he once controlled. The main cause of his demise is his failure to understand and possess a clear vision of the people around him. In Lear's eyes, he sees his eldest daughter Goneril’s facade to be a loyal and true expression, 'Sir I love you more than word can wield the matter/Dearer than eyesight, space and liberty', although Lear's inability to see the truth results in his manipulation and the banishing of his loyal acquaintances; his youngest daughter Cordelia and his dear friend Kent. Although Lear can physically see, it is the understanding, awareness and direction that he lacks and is blind to. In contrast to Lear being physically capable of seeing, Gloucester becomes physically blind but gains the form of vision that Lear lacks, and consequently Gloucester evades a corollary comparable to Lear's. Here Shakespeare presents his distinctive voice on power play through the depiction of the manipulation and motivation behind the characters struggle for sovereignty. His clever use of his characters and their relationships allows us to gain an insight into the condition of the human psyche throughout their individual attempts at power and highlights the complexities associated…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Often labeled one of Shakespeare’s most lethal and sinister plays, Macbeth is a drama so praiseworthy that is able to perfectly absorb and embody the greatest fears of its time period, and then instill them back into its audience, frightening them even greater than they were before. Above all, Shakespeare valued a good story, and the witches, traitors, and deceit that was prevalent throughout the play all served to captivate the audience and touch on topics that everyone would be aware of. By opening his play so such a wide audience, Shakespeare was able to impact everyone from the royals to the peasants. Within the plethora of independent battles in the play itself, there is one recurring clash in particular that serves…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Consider how Shakespeare’s themes of prejudice and chaos versus order were received by his contemporary audience. How does Geoffrey Sax’s production continue to find relevance in these issues for the modern audience?…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Foils in Othello

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One of William Shakespeare’s many attributes as a playwright of the late 16th century was his character development. Shakespeare’s seamless use of indirect characterization sets his works apart from the other playwrights and authors of his time. In Othello, the Shakespearian tragedy about the newlywed Othello and Desdemona, Shakespeare uses character foils to emphasize the strengths and weaknesses of the characters. By making inwardly similar characters seem like polar opposites, Shakespeare truly shows how dynamic each of the characters is.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Julius Caesar a tyrant?

    • 1746 Words
    • 5 Pages

    William Shakespeare’s well-renowned play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, has led to centuries of controversial debate on the validity of tyrannicide based on his depiction of Julius Caesar. Some scholars have argued that Shakespeare intended to portray Caesar as a tyrant, while others believe he is acting as a just King. On one hand, it is difficult to assume that Shakespeare plainly viewed Caesar as a tyrant, especially since Shakespeare deliberately left Caesar’s actions and intentions ambiguous, making him into a less obvious tyrannical figure compared to Plutarch’s representation of Caesar. In addition, Shakespeare does not solidify Caesar as a tyrant in the same way he does with Macbeth and Richard III in their respective plays. On the other hand, it is difficult to reason that Caesar is a just King because he came into power by usurpation. “In antiquity the term [“tyrant”] referred to a ruler who came to power by usurpation, without constitutional warrant.”1 Based on insight from several sources and my own interpretation of Julius Caesar, I have concluded that Shakespeare left Caesar’s objectives unknown in order to focus on the moral dilemma faced by Brutus, but Shakespeare still intended to depict Caesar as a tyrant who deserved to be deposed because of his unconstitutional usurpation of power. In order to prove this I will evaluate the political turmoil during the Elizabethan era in an attempt to understand Shakespeare’s perspective on the concept of tyranny and tyrannicide, which is influential to his work, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. In doing so, I will compare the ruling styles of Queen Elizabeth I, who was considered a tyrant queen during her time, and the ruling styles of Julius Caesar in order to characterize Caesar as a tyrannical leader. Furthermore, I will briefly compare Shakespeare’s Caesar to Plutarch’s Caesar…

    • 1746 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's King Lear, the Fool is a source of chaos and disruption in King Lear's tumultuous life. The Fool causes the King distress by insulting him, making light of his problems, and telling him the truth. On the road to Regan's, the Fool says "If thou wert my Fool, nuncle, I'd have thee / beaten for being old before thy time." (1.5.40-41). He denies the king the respect due to him as an aged King, causing the King to wonder at his worthiness. The fool also makes light of Lear's qualms making snide remarks in response to Lear's ruminations. When Lear asks Edgar cryptically, "wouldst thou give ‘em all?" the Fool responds, "Nay, he reserved a blanket, else we had been all shamed" (3.4.69-72). The Fool's snide remarks do little to maintain Lear's fragile control of his faculties. However, the Fool speaks to the king candidly, a rare occasion in Lear's life. Even Kent acknowledges the truth of the Fool's statements, saying, "This is not altogether fool, my lord" (1.4.155).…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though Othello is categorize as a tragedy, but in fact it can be display as a black comedy as well. Shakespeare uses humor through various kind of irony, such as verbal, situational and dramatic. He also creates comical characters in the play which adds humor to the plot.…

    • 606 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Modern Shrew

    • 10482 Words
    • 42 Pages

    Henderson, Diane E. 2003. A Shrew For The Times Revisited. In Burt, Richard and Lynda E. Boose (eds). Shakespeare The Movie II. London and New York: Routledge…

    • 10482 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The fine line between wisdom and foolery has often been explored and blurred in dramatic comedies throughout the ages. Often, in Shakespeare’s plays especially, the fool figure turns out to be the wisest figure out of all of the other characters, and is used as a way to make a comment on the social context of the time. This theme is present in ‘The History Boys’, as Bennett mostly uses characters as a way of exploring the fine line. He also uses scenes and themes during the play to explore the fine line between wisdom and foolishness, but he tends to focus on using the characters to explore the line instead.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew is funny, it is not intentional. His faults include a lack of wit, a…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    You can push my buttons, but you can’t play me for a fool” (Shakespeare 3.2.336-40). Hamlet means he is not a pipe that can be played whenever, and he is the person who can see the tricks and lies and can’t be fooled easily. Also, that's when Hamlet found out they were not true friends, they were fake, but nothing will stop Hamlet either way. Another quote from Hamlet’s point of view, stating he isn’t crazy is “Madness? My heart beats just as evenly as yours does. There’s nothing crazy in what I’ve just uttered. Put me to the test. I’ll rephrase everything I’ve just said, which a lunatic couldn’t do” (Shakespeare 3.4.143-55). This quote tells you he is faking being insane as well because Hamlet is saying he could recall what he says, which a lunatic wouldn’t be able to do. People around Hamlet think he is going crazy, although it could be everyone else. For instance, Hamlet should be able to speak his mind and be straight forward because he is trying to tell the truth but no one will listen. Also, someone like Hamlet has time to plot out his revenge and knows what he is going to do. A lunatic would have no clue to do something like…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout William Shakespeare’s histories, he explores the concepts of leadership and power, and how the nobility utilize the concepts for political ascendancy and maintaining power as a monarch. In Shakespeare’s plays, Henry IV Part I and Richard III, the contrasting characters of Prince Hal and King Richard demonstrate striking similarities in their pursuit and use of power and leadership. Although Prince Hal is destined to be a good king, and Richard a bad king, the two approach power and leadership quite linearly. Hal and Richard both take similar approaches in rising to power, using leadership roles to deceive, and instilling effective leadership in battle, but each have different motivations that ultimately lead to a good king, Hal, and a bad king, Richard. The two kings pursue power and leadership in similar ways, but Shakespeare implies that their ultimate fate rests in their motivations, Hal driven by glory and fun, Richard by greed and paranoia.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Perera

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Within the opening three Acts of Shakespeare’s play, ‘Macbeth’, the relationship between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth is presented as being hugely unusual for the era. In a time when relationships were male-dominated, Lady Macbeth is enabled, through the obvious affection which her husband feels for her, to completely reverse the role which each partner would conventionally be expected to play. In understanding and knowing her husband’s personality and character as completely and wholly as she appears to do, she plays upon his self ambition and manly pride, in order to gain the throne of Scotland; albeit through ‘foul’ means.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics