Preview

To What Extent Does the Impact of World War I Explain the Outbreak of the Two Revolutions in 1917 ?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1360 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Does the Impact of World War I Explain the Outbreak of the Two Revolutions in 1917 ?
To what extent does the impact of World War I explain the outbreak of the two revolutions in 1917 ?
To a certain extent, the First World War was a major contributing factor to the two revolutions that took place in 1917, the February and October Revolution. The war worsened the issues that already existed in Russia and also highlighted the lack of leadership shown by the Tsar and the Provisional Government set up after the February Revolution and also the Tsars military command over the army during the war. However, World War One was not the only reason for the revolutions taking place and acted as a tipping factor from the already undergoing social, political and economical problems plaguing Russia which led to the fall of the Tsar and the Provisional Government.

The war was a massive mistake for Russia, it gained success support at first from the Russian public until they started to lose battles. After defeats in 1915 the poor attempt at retreating and the number of those wounded the high command and the Tsar were blamed which led to Nicholas II making one of his biggest mistakes ever whilst in his reign, Tsar Nicholas II took the advice of Grigori Rasputin, a peasant who was friends with the royal family from trying to heal their son of haemophilia, and went and led the Russian war effort. The tsar had a slender knowledge about war which led to him putting himself in a vulnerable position as he would now have to make all correct decisions or would be blamed by the people back home for any wrong decisions. Joe Gaucci, a historian, backs up this claim and states that the Tsars decision “proved disastrous as the government became increasingly chaotic”. Over 200,000 men were lost in the war and with 15 million peasants pulled from the farms the food shortage became a larger problem. The army started to lose faith in the Tsar, this was a vital for the revolution as they stopped shooting on the rioters and leading to the revolution continuing. The war also

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After the riots of 1917, the Tsarist regime collapsed, and many would argue that it was mainly as a result of the First World War beginning in 1914.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To what extent was World War One the main cause of the February Revolution 1917?…

    • 3026 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 1 was a crucial and defining factor which led to the collapse of the Romanov Dynasty in February, 1917. Without it a revolution would not have happened at this point in time. This is not to say a revolution would not have eventually happened, as there were many other contributing factors that sparked the revolution. However, what World War 1 essentially did was to heighten discontent throughout society enough for it to revolt.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The government was an autocracy which meant that all power resided in the hands of the Tsar. Nicholas II, however, had a weak and stubborn personality. He was not willing to share his authority with the Duma (parliament) and his government relied on oppression to remain in power. The army and Okhrana (secret police) were used to stamp out protests. A further key feature was that the government was dependent on a narrow social base of aristocratic supporters, which left it vulnerable to opposition from the vast majority of Russians. During the war years the growing scale of strikes and demonstrations was becoming too difficult for the government to handle.The war caused huge casualties (9 out of 15 million soldiers) for very little gain and a series of defeats in battle led to a collapse in morale. Consequently, the Tsar was blamed for failure because he had taken command of the army in 1915. As a result the Tsar was absent from the capital and he left his wife in charge. The Tsarina was distrusted because of her German origins and she was under the corrupt influence of Rasputin, who had the power to appoint and dismiss ministers at will. This led to a major loss of confidence in the government.…

    • 286 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore he decided to take matters into his own hands by becoming Commander in Chief . He thought that his tactics,maneouvering and royal presence would win Russia the war . Unfortunately this did not go as planned, and Russia was defeated. Although they had lost the war , Nicholas as a leader had stepped up and tried to make his country victorious . It was his lack of military experience that had devasted the Russian army , not a weakness in his character .Nevertheless, Russian citizens seen this as another failure in their leader, as they suffered more losses than any other country.This damaged Russias morale.The people had ,had…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, Russia had endured many more hardships and downfalls following the conclusion of World War I. According to The Making of the West, “the government’s incompetence and Nicholas II’s stubborn resistance to change had made the war even worse in Russia than elsewhere” (Hunt et al. 683). The. In the early revolution in February, the monarchy was overthrown and a provisional government was put into place, however it failed to meet all the desires of the working class and…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The war had an adverse effect on the Russian economy. The rising cost of food caused food shortages. Industrial workers went on strike to increase wages and by the end of the war and a new government emerged following Nicholas II abdication. The already delicate domestic political situation in Russia would be imperiled by Nicholas II’s personal affiliation with the military wealth of his country. Any other military commander could be blamed for a disaster and then dismissed, but by taking personal command the Emperor would now take personal as well as political responsibility for all military failures. The crumbling of the Russian position in the field after he assumed command made such an outcome inevitable regardless of innumerable…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each of the factors mentioned above were reason for the revolt that took place at the end of February in 1917, however, many of the factors were similar to the conditions and causes of the revolt in 1905 which raises the question: why was the revolution of 1917 successful? One reason is that WWI worked as a catalyst, which facilitated the success of the revolution by assisting each factor in aligning at the same time and place. WWI was not the only catalyst as the idea of liberal and free conscience was the second key which shaped the success of this particular revolt. The police, distraught and overcome with grief and guilt for their actions the day before when they were ordered to fire on innocent, peaceful masses, turned their weapons over and joined forces with the rebel forces. This forced Nicholas to call to the front to send back patriot soldiers in order to help stabilize the home front, who had not idea what was happening at home but it was too…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition to the huge casualties, food supplies ran short and prices rose by 150%. People became dissatisfied as the war dragged out, and they felt it wasn't worth the cost and human suffering. Once again, the leadership of the Tsar came into question by the…

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tsar had made an enemy of his people while simultaneously entangling Russia in a war that they were unequipped to handle. World War 1 appeared to be a complete disaster for Russia in 1917. The Great Retreat of 1915 brought the Austrian-Hungarian Army to Russia’s doorstep and Nicholas II decides to abandon the home front to command the Russian army in the borderlands. This left the unpopular Tsarina in charge of the country contributing to the anger and discontent of the autocracy. 1916 brought widespread demonstrations, strikes, and conflicts with police as the people desperately expressed “calls for bread” and continued to openly express their hatred for the autocracy’s authority.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ‘Optimists’ offer several reasons as to how WWI incited the Revolution. Strike actions and disillusionment spread with “absolute ruin everywhere” , and, according to an Okhrana report in January 1917, crucially just before the Revolution, an openly hostile attitude “towards the Government and protest with all the means at their disposal against the continuation of the war” had been established. This report illuminates difficult living conditions caused by war, with “the proletariat of the capital on the verge of despair”, and the “wildest excesses of a hunger riot” . This account is relatively reliable, because conversant to Nicholas, publication was never intended. Presumably, their description is impartial; however, the consistency depends on their quality of work, as one assumes the Okhrana encompassed a decent perception of affairs. The Okhrana, albeit upholding their reputation of mercilessness, were repeatedly…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some historians hold the view that the World War I is important in the Russia Revolution as it brought impact on the society. During the progress of the World War I, the social people had…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tsar Nicholas Ii

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The First World War was a very important factor in Nicholas II's downfall, in 1914 it started off well with increased public support for the Tsar, however because it was poorly organized by the Tsar the situation in Russia became worse and worse. Most importantly the army, who had supported the Tsar in the 1905 Revolution and played an important role in ensuring that revolution did not occur in 1905, were now turning against the Tsar meaning they were less and less likely to support him if another revolution broke out, and without their support Nicholas II had little power- he had always used violence to crush any opposition previously, and so would be perhaps destined to fail when faced with any opposition. The war lead to food shortages and unemployment, this would have happened whoever was in charge of Russia but due to the poor organisation these problems became worse and worse and the Tsar's downfall looked more likely. Nicholas' unpopular decision to leave Petrograd leaving the Tsarina and Rasputin in charge of the day to day running of Russia was because of the war, however it was Nicholas' fault that this decision was made and this decision was a big factor in his downfall. Overall…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The military failure in the First World War certainly made the revolution likely. The Russian army was by far the largest army of all the countries that fought in the war. Its crippling weakness, which denied it the military advantage that its sheer size should have given it, was lack of equipment. The problem was not the lack of resources but poor administration and lack of liaison between the government departments responsible for supplies. In the first two years of the war the army managed to obtain its supply needs, but from 1916 serious shortages began to occur. In August 1915 Nicholas decided to take over personal command of the army which meant he was now personally associated with any failure and no longer could his supporters argue that any problems were caused by those under him. By the end of 1916 the army was very different from what it had been in August 1914, however the soldiers, made up of the peasants and workers, were beginning to question what was happening. They were being led by officers who didn't know how to build a trench or they failed to make good use of what…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    By 1917, the Russian army was exhausted and the Russian revolution will overthrow the czar. Russia signs an armsrace with the central powers and exits the war. The Russian czar since 1894 was Nicolas II. In 1917 he was forced to step down his throne because of revolts and breakouts in Petrograd. In 1915 Italy enters the war with France and Britain. In 1917 the Italian army had to retreat for more than 100 kilometers after losing the battle of Caporetto against Austrian and German troops. The Anglo-French launch the Nivelle offensive but are defeated by the German troops. The French troops desert after the Nivelle’s offensive, because when Nivelle replaced General Joffre as the commander off the French army, he planned a new offensive but it was a complete failure. The French Troops were mown down by German machinery. The French lost 200,000 men and there was no breakthrough. Then, the USA enters the war after the Zimmerman telegraph is intercepted by the British. The USA was supplying Britain with raw materials and weapons, thus made the Germans angry. In the telegraph they asked Mexico to attack the USA. One of the figures that take impact on the political effects of World War I is Vladmir Lenin. He was one of the leading political figures and revolutionary thinkers of the 20th century, who masterminded the Bolshevik take over of power in Russia 1917, and was the architect and first head of the USSR. His objectives were to transform the Russian economy to a socialist…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays