Preview

To what extent did Witte change Russia?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
788 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To what extent did Witte change Russia?
To what extent did Witte’s Policies develop Russia?

Sergei Witte was the Minister of Finance in Russia in from 1892 to 1903. He desperately wanted to bring Russia, metaphorically, ‘out of the dark ages’ by bringing it up to speed, so that it would eventually reach a level of modernisation where it could go head to head with the advanced countries further west. He believed Russia first needed to attain capital investment in the industrial sector, increase urban workers (Proletariat), attract foreign trade and develop greater train links to ease the possibility of further foreign trade.

Witte believed that Russia would have to follow in the footsteps of the United Kingdom, United States of America and France in the west of developing capitalism within the State. This would be achieved by gaining ‘State Capitalism’. Witte brought enormous loans and investment, across the border; he also encouraged and openly imported foreign goods to help the industrial spurt, which Russia so badly needed. But with the high amount of loans being offered, taxes and interest increased dramatically. A knock on effect of this was a steep rise in prices on goods to keep up with the ever-growing Rouble (Russian currency). This meant Witte had developed Russia’s industry as it could now grow, but it would bring massive prices for the lower classes that they simply couldn’t keep up with. This growth wouldn’t have been maintained, rather made the lower classes of the populace worst off limiting its overall industrial development.

Witte also aimed to develop the railways for travel and communication but to also help with foreign trade. Between the years of 1861 and 1890, 5,800km of railway had been built in Russia. This was then combined with rapid construction, so that the 5,800km of track before had been turned into 59,616km by 1905. Though this was impressive by Witte the industrial growth was again limited. It climaxed at 62,200km by 1913 showing a clear drop off of construction

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Industrialization Frq

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Industrial Revolutions of Britain and Russia both focused on railroads. British railroads set off its industrial revolution. When James Watt created a more effective steam engine in 1765, who knew that this would become the center of railroads and more importantly Britain’s economy? These railroads were first used to transport raw materials, such as coal and iron ore, from the mines. Later on, railroads became available for public use in 1825. It was called the Stockton and Darlington Railroad. Similarly, Russia’s industrial revolution got going when the government built a railroad. Since Russia was still an empire, the tsar assembled a railroad to connect all the places inside the empire. The railroads were also constructed to allow Russians to indulge in their coal and iron deposits. The most popular railroad was the Trans-Siberian line, which linked Moscow and Vladivostok. Because of steam-engine railroads, the industrial revolutions of Britain and Russia began.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    27

    • 610 Words
    • 4 Pages

    question for the Russians was whether or not they could grow their economic gains while…

    • 610 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Russian Empire was a state that existed from 1721 until the Russian Revolution of 1917. It stretched from Europe to the Pacific Ocean and included people with diverse cultures and traditions.2 Russia was a land of disparity and contradiction by the turn of the 20th century. It was caught in between two worlds: the traditional world of the peasantry and the modern world of the westernized elite.3 As these two world coexisted, their values, culture, and way of life extremely differed. Regardless of the persistence of a rural society and economy, Russia became exposed to profound urban and industrial growth during the second half of the 19th century. 4Many peasants surfed…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite the poor working conditions and the inequality that industrialization under capitalism creates (“The Industrial Revolution and Economic Growth”, 529) it is still a necessary step for Russia because it lays the groundwork for a successful socialist and eventually communist system of government that will allow all members of Russia to flourish. “[The Communist] openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions;”(Carl Marks and Friedrich Engel, The Communist Manifesto) Therefore it is important to note that capitalism is an impractical form of government that should not be implemented for any long term scenario it is merely a stepping stone that is unfortunate but essential to the development of a successful government. Then why must Russia endure capitalism? Why not skip straight to communism? It is for this reason, A does not equal C meaning that each step in the process is essential to getting the end result.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1750 and 1914, England, Germany, and Western Europe were all expanding. England was gaining land and trust in the Middle East, Germany was becoming an established nation, and Western Europe was thriving due to the Industrial Revolution. After recognizing all of this, Russia decided it was time for reform or be left in the dust. This caused major changes in Russia’s labor system such as emancipation of the serfs and industrialization to keep up with the changing world. Although they were going through these changes, there were continuities such as the treatment of the serfs and the type of reform they were doing.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Russia economy in terms of industry fluctuated over the period from 1855-1964. It is key to note that under all the leaders, industrialisation and modernisation was always seen as an essential economic aim. Under Alexander II, with Reutern as his Minister of finance who adopted an approach that revolved around continued railway construction, attraction of foreign expertise and foreign investment capital. As a result modernisation and expansion occurred within the staples as well as newer industries which show the impact that alexander II made on industry. Reutern achieved a sevenfold increase in the amount of railway and the capacity of railway to carry break bulk at speed increased which gave a major boost to industrial output Russia seemed to be finally moving towards industrialisation and keeping up with the West. This approach was similar under Nicolas II who also managed to have a great impact on Russia’s industrial economy. This was through the work of Sergei Witte whom at the time of his appointment the Russian economy still resolved predominantly around agricultural production further showing that under Alexander II impacts was limited. Witte continued the idea of foreign expertise as well as taking out foreign loans, raising taxes and interest rates to boost available…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many historians argue The Emancipation of the Serfs in 1861, to be a key turning point within Russian history. It drastically altered Russia’s economic, political and social stipulation. One could propose the argument that this event lead to the fall of communism in 1990, further more suggesting the extent to which this event affected Russia. Hence this is ‘perhaps the most defining moment in Russian history, with its impact being seen many years after the event itself’. Although historians identify short term effects of this event, the significance to which this event developed Russian government and society up to the 21st century has been so tremendous that they cannot be disregarded. However when one considers the argument of the likes of Louis Hobart who suggests the event was only a contributing element to ‘the social and economic transformation’ it must be asked to what extent was this event alone a key turning point in the development of Russian Government?…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the period before 1941, Stalin was able to institute his economical policies of Collectivization and the 5-year plans. ‘Backwards was to be defeated and enslaved’. Russia had to make up for 100 years of lost time for fear of being consumed by the western world. Stalin, sole leader of the Bolsheviks by the late 1920’s, believed that Russia could modernize their Agricultural and Industrial sectors through his policies.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Vyshnegradsky ,Sergei Witte took over as minster of finance in 1892. For him the only way of keeping the "great power status" of Russia was economic modernisation. He also believed that economic development would stop people thinking about riots and a revolution.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia’s industrialisation as a result of the reforms of 1891 proved crucial in the fall of the old order. After Witte’s reforms of the late 1890s the population of Petrograd doubled between 1890 and 1910. With the working population in the cities it gave revolutionary groups the advantage of having a large group of frustrated workers in a confined space. In relation to the events of 1917 February revolution the population density allowed the numbers participating in the violent revolts to reach colossal numbers. With the Tsar on the war front, the masses persuaded the soldiers to join the revolutionary forces and by the time he came back, it was too late. Cities such as Petrograd and Moscow weren’t designed for the population increase, and as such workers were living in crowded dirty, overcrowded apartments. These living conditions lead to the frustrations throughout the revolutionary groups. Witte’s reforms converted a large portion of peasants into proletariat. As the tension raised in 1917 that same industrial working class responded with strikes. The strikes started by the Pulitov Steal workers on the 18th of February 1917 started out with one company, but the frustration with the Tsar wasn’t just in one factory. In exactly 12 days one strike had turned into a revolution the reason was that the reforms of Witte and Stolypin .With the peasants now in factories it ment they lacked farmers and had nobody to farm the good harvests in the war years, in fact the harvests of 1915 and 1916 were the best of the century. Without the food to feed a starving nation, the Russian government was in trouble and with this Wittes reforms that were designed…

    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Witte’s aim was to make the Russian economy strong enough to maintain Russia’s position as a Great Power. However, Russia did not possess several of the essential factors required to be able to rapidly industrialise like countries such as Germany and Britain were. Firstly, the majority of Russian peasant did not have complete freedom, which meant that the migration of workers to towns and cities in search of work was limited. Also, the Russian economy didn’t have sufficient funds to invest in industrial development, because it could not produce enough surplus grain to raise funding to support industrial development. To combat this, Witte encouraged other countries such as Belgium, France and…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. A move to industrialization was part of the process of change. In Russia, state support was vital, because it lacked a middle class and capital. A railway system was created in the 1870s. It reached the Pacific in the 1880s. Siberia was opened to development and increased Russian involvement in Asia. Under Count Wittle, the government passed…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Witte becoming finance minister towards the end of his reign the industrial revolution in Russia far from modernised it. The workers suffered appallingly with poor working conditions, therefore it made them very discontented, and were easily converted to socialism. The growth of extremist middle class and the discontented peasants which became more and more inclined to the preaching of the intellectuals for rebellion. With his repressive policies and actions, and lack of modernisation he ultimately paved his own way to the grave of his own regime…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To what extent did Russia undergo economic and political reform in the years 1906 – 1914?…

    • 1040 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Considering that in 1881 Russia was incredibly underdeveloped and mainly based on agriculture, there were many changes made. The first finance minister of Alexander’s reign was Nikolai Bunge and he introduced laws which reduced the tax burden on peasants in 1882, and also established the Peasant Land Bank offering loans to peasants to help increase their holdings and increase productivity. The “Great Spurt” under Witte between 1892 and 1903 was a period of great economic transformation. Much emphasis was placed on the production of capital goods like iron and steel, coal and machinery. Also, much investment was made from abroad mainly France, Britain and Belgium: within Russia the peasantry was also further taxed to pay for this. The result of this was incredibly dramatic. Over half of the industrial workforce was employed in factories with more than a thousand workers by 1900 as industrial growth was concentrated in industrial areas like Moscow and Ukraine. The population also rose dramatically due to this rapid industrialization for example the population of St Petersburg doubled between 1890 and 1940 from 1 to 2 million. The completion of the Trans-Siberian also meant that influence in the East was increased and the economic potential of Siberia was opened up. In some respects Stolypin was an economic reformer, as he wanted to create a prosperous peasant class to be loyal to the Tsar. In November 1906 he passed a law that freed peasants from the commune and later redemption payments were abolished. This had been a huge weight on the peasants since 1861 and could be argued to be a…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays