In the novel To Kill Mocking Bird, written by Harper Lee portrays racism through injustice. In the movie Ruby Bridges, directed by Euzhan Palcy portrays racism through segregation and integration. These two pieces of work together portray racism. They portray racism through innocence (meaning), dynamic vs. stock characters (character) and elevated language vs. colloquial language (language).
Both Lee and Palcy utilise stock and dynamic character types to portray changing attitudes towards racism. In To Kill a Mocking Bird, evidence of this is how Jem and Scout are dynamic characters. They start of very stock and then develop into dynamic as there attitudes change and everything else happens. Simararily, in the movie Ruby Bridges, Abon and his wife, Lucile, start off stock characters, as the are really positive about Ruby going to white school, but later in the movie the start getting worried about Ruby’s life and call Dr. Coles. This uses the technique of stock vs. dynamic character and portrays racism through on how white people can be so mean and change someone’s life and their views on their son or daughter. Another example is that in TKAMB, Atticus is a dynamic character as he defends a black man and the whole town, which are dynamic characters don’t like him. This is supported by: "The main one is. If I didn't [defend Tom Robinson in court] I couldn't hold my head up in town" (pg.80). These characters all display changing attitudes through changes in life and through racism. Also dynamic characters have morals directing their decisions to ignore context. For example the town folk outside the court yard in TKAMB, where very curious and very to the point to Atticus and why.. The technique used here is theme and his shows in meaning on why the mob did this. Finally, the whole mob where stock character in Ruby Bridges, who where outside the school and they were put together as a single character to show intolerance and racism.
In conclusion, the two...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document