Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

To Download or Not to Download - Revised!!!

Better Essays
2096 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To Download or Not to Download - Revised!!!
The Internet is an extremely useful resource. Using it, one can obtain information on nearly any topic. A relatively new item of Internet technology for sharing music has emerged and brought with it, countless legal debates: Napster. Napster allows people to share music files, discover new artists, and become part of the online-music community. Although Napster 's opponents argue that sharing music files is immoral and should cease immediately, the positive elements that Napster brings to the Internet overshadow any regret for its use.

Marc Geiger, executive of "Artist Direct," an online music-marketing firm and Napster champion, states, "Napster is totally community oriented. It brings artists and fans together, and can allow struggling musicians a chance to be heard; that 's what the program is all about. The more people hear the songs, the more they want {to} buy the CD" (Sullivan). Struggling musicians who do not receive widespread media coverage to enhance their own album sales find Napster invaluable (Sullivan). These avid Napster supporters can use the medium to distribute and publicize their music with literally no cost (Sullivan). Richardson, CEO of Napster, Inc., is promoting the good side of the software, and trying to make upset artists understand that this program is for the little guys (Sullivan). Richardson maintains that Napster will not hinder music sales, but will have an opposite effect (Sullivan).

Napster is an MP3 file-sharing program that enables users to share their music with one another. Anyone with a computer can download the program, sign the user agreement contract and then start swapping music. The program includes chat features, top music sharing lists, search capabilities, charts showing the status of the file transfer, and other assisting utilities (Allen). The chat rooms allow users to converse and exchange information with other people "in" the room (Allen). The search feature allows the music consumer to search by song title, artist, along with a myriad of other variables. The file transfer element of the program allows listeners to manage file downloads (files which they are receiving) and uploads (files which others are copying) (Allen). Napster also includes a "library," a utility for sorting and listing music files stored on a given computer (Allen). Napster users can also listen to their newly downloaded files with Naptster 's built in mp3-player (Allen). The program is easy to use and does not contain too much technical jargon (Allen).

A Northeastern student named Shawn Fanning developed Napster in his college dorm room to share ideas and music with his friends. He wanted to be able to play his friends ' music without having to constantly borrow their CDs and cassettes (Allen). Napster allowed him to do just that (Sullivan). The program that Fanning developed allows users to transfer easily MP3 music files from one computer hard drive to the next. An MP3 file is simply a compressed version of a file found on a common compact disc. MP stands for MPEG (Motion Picture Experts Group), the developers of the compression technology, and three refers to the number of audio layers (Allen). "MP3 files are about one-tenth the size of uncompressed audio files" (Allen). One minute of mp3-compressed music consumes roughly one megabyte (1024 kilobytes) of memory with MP3 compression; uncompressed, the same one-minute would take up to ten times that amount of memory on the computers hard drive (Allen).

The bad rap that Napster has built up is due to allegedly "pirated MP3 files" and the outcry of major recording artists. David Weekly, the Napster 's audio consultant said, "this is a really awful move on the RIAA 's [(Recording Industry Association of America)] part. If what they 're trying to do is prevent programs like Napster from coming out, they backfired and gave every teenage hacker the incentive to write their own [program]" (Sullivan). Weekly emphasizes that any media attention is good attention (Sullivan). Due to Napster 's success, a number of other music file sharing venues have gained recognition for distributing "pirated" files: MP3.com, ArtistDirect.com, Launch Media, Scour, and VNN to name only a few (Sullivan). Dave Goldberg, the CEO of Launch Media, said, "there 's going to be lots of different ways to get pirated music, [Napster] is just a different way,"(Sullivan). Some other ways to acquire pirated music are recording off the radio or "ripping" and encoding CD music files to produce MP3s. The latter is the method used to manufacture the vast majority of MP3 files in circulation (Allen). However, Napster adversaries attest that Napster alone promotes of music piracy over the Internet (Huffstutter).

This program is a little more than a year old and causing controversy because of copyright infringement laws. Contributory copyright infringement, for which Napster is being sued for by the RIAA, is solely the user 's fault. "The software user agreement says that ‘copying or distributing unauthorized MP3 files may violate United States and foreign copyright laws. Compliance with the copyright law remains your responsibility" (Sullivan); this statement is a direct transcription of Napster 's user contract (Sullivan). The user must read and comply with the terms of the contract, before he or she can begin using Napster. This contract implies that the downloader of illegal files is he who should be sued for copyright infringement, not the program makers. "The downloading of any copyrighted music from the Web without permission—even for one-time or personal use—is illegal" (France). The penalty for "contributory and vicarious copyright infringement" is up to $100,000 for each song that was downloaded using Napster (France).

The RIAA has not produced any viable statistics, only statements and claims (Dyson). Besides, Napster is principally used to sample artists and/or songs, if a user likes the sample then he will buy the CD or Cassette. "‘Word of Web ' is infinitely more efficient that word of mouth" (Dyson). Many songs in the Napster community are of unsigned bands that need the free publicity. The problem with their free publicity is that there is no suitable regulation of it.

New bills have been introduced before the courts to try and distinguish what is legal or illegal to download. One such bill is the Digital Millennium Copyright act; this act states the accused Web sites cannot be sued for illegal activity, but it is legal to prosecute the user of the service (France). Also, under the same act, the Web site is required to police the information, which is being put on the site (France). Please note the use of the terminology ' "Web site." Napster is trying to rebuttal this claim because it is not a Web site it is an Internet service provider (France). Another bill is the Music Owners ' Listening Rights Act of 2000, which ensures the "users ' rights to access the music they lawfully own via the Internet at any time from any place," (The House of Representatives of The United States of America/No Author). This bill protects music listeners from the legal threats of recording industries. It also guarantees the advancement of technology instead of its punishment.

As the American justice system tries to crackdown on the "piracy," it makes threats towards everyone using the Internet (France). Napster 's attorneys said that this program could be used as an Internet service provider because it provides access for many people via a few lines of high-speed service (France). Using this claim, Napster has been able to dodge the many assumptions by judges and media of the courts (France). "Copyright laws need to be reformed around a more flexible stance to prepare for the wave of things to come. There 's no crime in listening to music you already have," (The House of Representatives of The United States of America/No Author). The Internet is new territory for many people, and raises many issues for the justice system. New laws have to be created in order to keep everyone happy (Sullivan). Napster authorities have also claimed that the program is merely a music player and provider. A California judge ruled that the MP3 player, which is part of Napster, "isn 't subject to government restriction" (Sullivan). The Mp3 player, to which the judge referred, is contained within the "library" section of the program (Allen).

The Napster court case is similar to the case between Sony and Universal Studios. In 1984 The Sony Corporation was sued because it developed VCR 's (Videocassette Recorders) (Huffstutter). Universal Studios made a case, arguing that consumers of VCR 's could tape movies or programs and were accountable for copyright infringement. The deciding result of the Supreme Court was the VCR had a considerable amount of "non-infringing uses" (Huffstutter). The VCR was mainly used to play rented videos or home videos rather than to make pirated ones. Napster 's court case is extremely similar to Sony v. Universal Studios, in that both cases deal with copyright infringement of recorded media. When the courts reach a verdict, they will found it on the same basis as they did in Sony v. Universal Studios. "It won 't stop the technology" because it 's already out there (Philips and Huffstutter). "It 's impossible to kill the software" and "it 's pointless to try." (Philips and Huffstutter). Napster is not a device used to perpetuate piracy; it is a means by which artists can legally distribute their music.

Napster may be forced to regulate the activities of its customers if copyright infringement accusations continue. As a result, the cost of downloading music would dramatically increase (France). This would defeat the purpose of Napster and return power to the recording industries, leaving innocent music lovers with no method of hearing new, unknown music or sampling music before purchasing it.

In abolishing Napster, the recording industry would be hurting itself. Artists should be able to produce, record, and distribute their own music, ridding the process of recording companies and middlemen. The question is whether the music industry has a business worth operating; if it does then it "needs to prove its value" (Dyson). Eliminating the record companies allows the artists to keep the exclusive rights of their songs instead of the industry owning the copyrights. If the artist were to produce the record on their own, people would "be less likely to [steal] when the person they would be stealing from is the artist" (Dyson). Artists would be getting paid directly by their fans for performances and albums, reducing the cost of CD 's and tickets. Record companies are in a frenzy to abrogate MP3 use only to save themselves. However, even though the record companies suffer from Napster, the artists and music can potentially flourish. Music lovers should have the right to share music in the MP3 format. Napster offers a way to do just that. Napster enhances music and the music industry. Napster allows less-known artists to freely publicize their music, and it gives mainstream artists another medium by which to entice potential CD-buyers. "At a time when neither MTV nor radio has any interest in giving exposure to artists outside the mainstream, Napster has an amazing power: It brings music fans together [in a celebration] so they can turn one another on to artists," (Sullivan).

Works Cited

Allen Steven. "Go to Jail for Downloading?"

http://midimusic.about.com/musicperform/midimusic/library/weekly/aa061200.html (29 Nov. 2000).

Dyson, Esther. "Napster Forcing Music Industry to Change Its Money-Making Tune."

Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles. August 21,2000.

France, Mike. "This Lawsuit is Cranking Up the Volume over Mp3." Dec. 13, 1999.

http://www.businessweek.com/ebiz/9912/ep1213.html (29, Nov. 2000).

The House of Representatives of the United States of America/No Author. "EFF

Supports Music Owners ' Rights Bill." Oct. 20, 2000.

http://news.mp3.com/news/liststory?topic_id=1339&category_id=1001&month=200010.html (22 Oct. 2000).

Huffstutter, P.J. "Napster Says Its Song-Sharing Service Is as Legal as a VCR." Los

Angeles Times, Los Angeles. July 4, 2000.

Allen, Steven. "MP3 Music: What it Is and How to Use It."

http://midimusic.about.com/musicperform/mididmusic/library/weekly/aa091399.html (26 Nov. 2000).

Philips, Chuck and Huffstutter, P.J. "No Matter Napster 's Fate, the Software Is Out

There." Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles. July 26, 2000.

Sullivan, Jennifer. "Napster: Music is for Sharing." Nov. 1, 1999.

http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,32151,00.html (29 Nov. 2000).

Sullivan, Jennifer. "RIAA Suing Upstart Startup." Nov. 15, 1999.

http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,32559,00.html (29 Nov. 2000).

Cited: France, Mike. "This Lawsuit is Cranking Up the Volume over Mp3." Dec. 13, 1999. http://www.businessweek.com/ebiz/9912/ep1213.html (29, Nov http://news.mp3.com/news/liststory?topic_id=1339&category_id=1001&month=200010.html (22 Oct. 2000). Sullivan, Jennifer. "Napster: Music is for Sharing." Nov. 1, 1999. http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,32151,00.html (29 Nov Sullivan, Jennifer. "RIAA Suing Upstart Startup." Nov. 15, 1999. http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,32559,00.html (29 Nov

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Over the past years Internet music sharing has become a major issue for the music industry. A lot of recording companies have found themselves in an uproar because they realize that the constant sharing and downloading of albums are hurting the artists. The people that are turning to the internet to download and share music are saying the reason they are doing this is because they can’t afford to purchase the music in stores. In order to help solve the problem, some record labels have agreed to charge a small monthly fee which allows numerous downloads per month for those who decide to pay.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study 1

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Person-to-person or P2P networking, Sean Fanning, an 18-year-old student with the nickname ‘the Napster’, was intrigued by the challenge of being able to enable his friends to ‘see’ and share between their own personal record collections. Napster.com did not actually hold any music on its files – but every day millions of swaps were made by people around the world exchanging their music collections. Napster opened a door for many others to reinvent similar software’s or technologies successful iPod personal MP3 player they opened a site called iTunes which offered users a choice of thousands of tracks for download at 99c each. This allowed over 1 billion songs to legally be purchased and downloaded…

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With the advent and common usage of the Internet beginning in the late 1990’s, piracy became a major concern for music producers and artists. The website Napster was a pioneer in this illegal trade. Originally created by brothers John and Shawn Fanning and their friend Sean Parker, Napster posted MP3 files for free download of popular recording artists. Sean Parker, of…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The music recording industry is in trouble. For several years now, sales of new and popular music have steadily declined and show no sign of changing. The record companies are quick to blame the growing popularity of the Internet; music is being traded in a digital form online, often anonymously, with the use of file-sharing programs such as Morpheus, KaZaA, and Imesh, to name a few. The RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) succeeded in disbanding the pioneer Internet file-sharing program, Napster, but is facing confrontation with similar programs that are escaping American copyright laws. While there is an obvious connection between declining popular music sales and increasing file sharing, there is more going on than the RIAA wants to admit. I will show that the recording companies are overpricing their products, and not sufficiently using the Internet as an opportunity to market and sell their products. I shall begin by describing in greater detail the problem that the recording companies are facing, as well as the growing epidemic of online music trading. From there, I will show the correlation between the two and describe the other factors affecting record sales, and how these trends could be turned around to help the industry.…

    • 5602 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cis 324 Computer Ethics

    • 2262 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In the short time that computers and internet have existed in the modern era, the world has seen a complete 360 degree turn and in the various forms of electronic entertainment that people all over the world are now using. In the days before CD’s, DVD’s and the internet, not much was said if a vinyl album (remember these?), VHS cassette (or these?) or an audio cassette was loaned to a friend for their listening / viewing pleasure, but today with the availability of sending an email with three or four megabytes (mb) of information, one can enjoy a borrowed song but is assumed that it is piracy or stealing. Is this a fair assumption? This Author will not give his opinion but rather discuss both sides of the Peer to Peer (P2P) downloading and sharing issues and let the reader form their own opinions.…

    • 2262 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The issue surrounding this problem arose when the Recording Industry Association of America claimed that Napster was basically giving out free music and was not paying the fees to issue "free" music. Napster claimed that all the music was shared among its users and were shared from computer to computer rather than a free website issuing free files for all to download. With the innovation of new technologies today, new problems will always come up due to better ways of getting things done. The same incident happened with the "new and improved" VCR. After fighting some battles, it was made legal for consumers to record from their own home and uses it for personal matters. Again, this situation is similar, but with more strings attached.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Large music labels have made statements since the late 1990s regarding the Internet’s damage to music sales through piracy by showing the decline of CDs sold year over year. However, the music labels themselves did not realize the sales opportunities that could be provided by the Internet and only saw a damaging environment. The same music labels also neglected to take advantage of the Internet as a new venue to find popular music artists. As with all types of modernization, understanding takes time, and the music industry is beginning to come around by offering portions of their libraries for sale through sanctioned distributers like Amazon and iTunes as well as taking notice of new artists found through sites like YouTube. The Internet has helped the music industry by providing new methods of music distribution as well as a global arena for self-promotion by new artists.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sherman, Chris. "Napster: Copyright Killer or Distribution Hero?" Online. November 2000. Expanded Academic Index. February 24, 2001.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Music Piracy

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Metz, Cade. "Sharing: Now Serving Up Music, Movies, Software, and More." PC Magazine. 21 Sept. 2006. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Getchell Lib., University Nevada. 1 Mar. 2006 .…

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Two main recording artists Metallica and Dr. Dre have taken actions against Napster. They accused over three hundred thousand people on Napster for music piracy, which means they are stealing songs. There is a huge difference between sharing and stealing. All Napster did was to allow people share songs from one another. At some time somebody had to have bought that recording artists C.D., or it would not have ended up on the Napster network. People who have C.D. burners take it into their own hands to burn them. Burning songs from Napster onto your own C.D. is a copyright infringement, but Napster did not provide C.D. burners in their software the computers people own do. On Napster's web page, there is a warning about the copyright infringement laws. Recording artists feel they are being cheated, but record sales went up 2% since last…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilco's Jeff Tweedy -"If people are downloading our music, they're listening to it. The internet is like radio for us."; "I don't believe every download is a lost sale."; "I don't want potential fans to be blocked because the choice to check out our music becomes a financial decision for them."…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Advancements in today's technology have allowed users to access and use computer programs, movies, music and other multimedia for which they have not purchased. Technological advancements are coming along at such a quick pace that the enforcement of copyright laws cannot keep pace. Music piracy exploded in the late 1990's and caused groups such as the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) to crack down on companies such as Napster that provided that provided free music downloads. The number of lawsuits against individuals who illegally download music has escalated to the point that people are now switching to legal internet sites that sell music downloads. The ethicality of this issue has touched many people throughout the world…

    • 2646 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Napster Debate

    • 2873 Words
    • 12 Pages

    <br>Unlike similar file-sharing applications (Gnutella, Freenet), Napster limits users to uploading/downloading of MP3 files only. These files are compressed wave (.wav) files. The advantage of MP3 files is that they are approximately one-tenth the size of the corresponding .wav file and can be close-to-CD-quality. It is for this reason that many artists, record labels and other music industry stakeholders are concerned by the MP3 file format and applications like Napster that simplify the sharing of copyrighted material.…

    • 2873 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Illegal Music Downloading

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages

    On June 31st 1999 the worlds first way for people to share music for free over the internet was created when Shawn Fanning , the creator of the program, gave a version out to a few friends for beta testing. He called his software Napster after a nickname of his in college (Ante N.P.). He had told the friends not to give it to anyone but they couldn't resist because it was so good of a product In the matter of a few weeks over three thousand people were using Napster and that was when Shawn knew it would be a success. (N.P.). Those few thousand began spreading it over the internet and it began expanding its user base very quickly at a rate of between five and twenty-five percent growth daily (Taro N.P.). By March of 2000 there were around five million users and it was still spreading. When Napster was at its peak it had around twenty-five million users ranking it among the greatest computer applications of all time. (Kover N.P.). After battling in court for fourteen months Napster was shut down on February 2nd 2001 by the Ninth circuit court of appeals. It was shut down because it was a device that allowed the spread of pirated material. There were already numerous applications ready to take it's place most notably Kazaa which holds a record for most downloads of software with two hundred and thirty million copies (Basen N.P.).…

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Internet has had a massive effect on the traditional media for the music industry, which has affected the sales and production of music. The Internet was made in 1991 and has recently come into the music industry in the past 10 years with sites such as pirate bay and programs like LimeWire. Pirate bay which was founded in 2003 is an illegal website which allows you to download songs and movies for free. The website is still running because the website is based in Sweden which allows the laws of pirating software and music. The music industry has been hit hard by this affected. Each year the Music Industry loses an estimated 4.2 billion dollars. Record companies lose eighty-five percent of recordings released don’t even generate enough revenue to cover their costs. Record companies depend heavily on the profitable fifteen percent of recordings to subsidize the less profitable types of music, to cover the costs of developing new artists, and to keep their businesses operational. But the positives are the rise of lesser-known artists may change the entire soundscape of the music industry, as many of these artists don’t concentrate on making music they know people will buy, but rather music they think is good. So putting their music on torrent sites and file sharing.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays