Title XI and it effect on athletic programs
The purpose of Title IX was to create equal opportunities for both male and female students. The amendment really affected mostly women. They were poorly represented in college athletics over the last 30 years. The Title IX legislation has been a very controversial subject. Many people are opposed to the idea that women program should be equal to males athletic programs. I truly believe that the program is bias and totally unfair. During this paper I will discuss the history of Title IX, the advantages and disadvantages of Title XI, the effects of college and high school programs and the profit obtained from the use of Title IX funds. The Title IX legislation was first implemented in 1972. It stated that “ No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination under any programs or activity receiving federal financial assistance. This information was the preamble to Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. The success of Title IX shows up in many others ways not captured by the often quoted proportionality numbers. Title IX does not have a quota system, nor does it require exact proportionally of money and numbers of sports. One of the most harmful unintended consequences of Title IX has never been about limiting participation: it has been primarily about expanding opportunities. Title IX allows schools to decide what teams they will offer, both men’s and women’s. Title IX statue experienced a major transformation when the law had become a part of the education amendment: Title 20 U.S.C, Sections 1681-1688. As Title IX ensures legal protection against sexual harassment and gender discrimination in the workplace and school grounds, this law also played a major role in high school and intercollegiate sports (Valentine, 1997). The effects of Title IX has caused the women’s varsity teams to spring up...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document