Preview

Three Strikes Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3255 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Three Strikes Law
THE “THREE STRIKES” SENTENCING:

WHY SHOULD IT BE ABOLISHED?
(FINAL DRAFT)

Tanisha Tate
CRMJ400: Criminology
Professor Conis
Course Paper: Final
February 13, 2011

Tanisha Tate
CRMJ400: Criminology
Professor Conis
Course Paper
February 13, 2011

The “Three Strike” Sentencing
The criminal justice issue that has been chosen as the topic on this course project is the “three strike” sentencing and how it should be abolished. The three strike sentencing was established in 1994 under the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act. (Harris, 1995). In this act, the statute of three strike sentencing provides a mandatory life imprisonment sentence for convicted felons that have been convicted in a federal court for a serious and/or violent felony and they commit two or more previous crimes that they are convicted of in federal and/or state court system in which at least one of the crimes is a serious and/or violent crime. These crimes can be but are not limited to murder, sex offenses, robbery, and kidnapping.
The issue at hand is the question whether this act is really as effective as it is made out to be. Convicted felons are given two more chances to straighten up their acts and get their lives together to be able to live and reside in society. I believe that people who are convicted of a serious crime the first go-round should be punish by the same seriousness as the crime in which he or she committed. If they are giving a second chance to make become civilized and they commit another serious crime, then that should be an automatic life imprisonment sentence. I do not believe that they should be given a third chance. Once someone who commits a crime, they have the potential to commit the same or even more severe crime. It should not have to take the law and criminal justice system three chances to realize that a convicted felon is unfit to live along side with civilians. With this being said, this “three strike” sentencing should be abolished.



References: Messerli, J. (2006, October 15). Is the three-strike law, which provides mandatory 25-to-life sentences for a third felony conviction, a good idea? In Three Strikes Law May 20, 2010, from http://www.balancedpolitics.org/three_strikes.htm Kitchen, R California 's Legislative Analyst 's Office. (1995, February 22). The Three Strikes and You 're Out Law. In Analysis of the 1995-96 Budget Bill. Retrieved May 20, 2010, from http://www.lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/3strikes.html Murphy, J

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    What evidence can help the public with their concerns and ultimate acceptance of changes in the three strikes…

    • 3733 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DQ 4: Should juveniles who are arrested three or more times face mandatory incarceration sentences such as those contained in the three-strikes legislation?…

    • 435 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Beginning in the early 1990s, states began to enact mandatory sentencing laws for repeat criminal offenders. These statutes came to be known as "three strikes laws," because they were invoked when offenders committed their third offense. By 2003 over half the states and the federal government had enacted three strikes laws. The belief behind the laws was that getting career criminals off the streets was good public policy. However, incarceration of three strikes inmates for 25 years to life would drive up correctional costs. The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld three strikes laws and has rejected…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thesis: The United States does not subject prisoners to cruel and unusual punishment as stated in the constitution…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Three Strikes Law was first implemented in 1993, to harshly prosecute repeat offenders of serious crimes by installing fear of receiving strict sentences. The Three Strikes Law aimed to increase prison time in hopes of deterring criminals from committing future crimes. However, the question emerged about whether or not the Three Strikes Law was effectively reducing crime rates. As well as reducing the overall cost of imprisonment and mass incarceration issues already present. The Three Strikes Law are imposing negative long lasting effects by increasing certain types of crimes while decreasing others, exuberating state budgets, such as increased costs in case processing’s and trials that vary state to state, inhumane treatment, death behind bars, discrimination, and increasing suicide rates amongst third strikers awaiting trial and aggravating mass incarceration, one of the biggest issues with the Three Strikes Law.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Brown, Brian. "A Primer: Three Strikes: The Impact After More Than a Decade." California Legislative Analyst 's Office. Legislative Analysts Office, Oct. 2005. Web. 06 Dec. 2011. .…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Three strikes and you’re out”. This is the all too familiar term we are used to hearing in baseball and in the rules of the law in some states. Most heard of in California. Three strikes sentencing were adopted in 1994. It imposed longer prison sentences for repeat offenders. The law requires a person who is convicted of a felony and who previously has been convicted of one or more violent and/or serious felonies. The main feature of the Three Strikes law is the imposition of a life sentence for any felony conviction, no matter how minor, if the defendant has two prior "serious" felony convictions. "Serious" felonies are defined by the California Penal Code and range from murder and rape to non-confrontational residential burglary and purse-snatching.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This week we were able to read two articles that went along with our lecture. The first article, "Three Strikes and You're Out: California's new mandatory sentencing law on serious crime rates", by Stolzenberg and D'Alessio. This article looked at information gathered from cities where the three strikes law was mandated. The research looked at monthly data and found that the three strikes law had no effect on recidivism or crime rates. Personally, though some may agree with the three strikes law, I find it in some circumstances to be unjust. For starters, I feel as though this law does not allow the judge to fully review the case of an offender who has reached their third strike. The reason for this is that each crime committed is different…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three strike law became very popular in the 1990s. These statutes are enacted by state government and require the state court to hand down a mandatory and extended sentence to a repeat offender that has committed two or more previous offences. Between 1993 and 1995, 26 states and the federal government passed three strikes laws. The lawmakers were forced to take a second look at the punishment of repeat offenders after the kidnapping and murder of 12-year-old Polly…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Three Strike Law is a law that was passed in 1994. The purpose of this law is to require the defendant extra time for their new felony because of a crime that was committed in the past. This law have been active for several years and it came with a lot of pros and cons. In this paper I will give my view on what I think the good and the bad is for this law.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three strikes laws have been the subject of extensive debate over whether they are effective. Defendants sentenced to long prison terms under these laws have also sought to challenge these laws as unconstitutional. For instance, one defendant was found guilty of stealing $150 worth of video tapes from two California department stores. The defendant had prior convictions, and pursuant to California's three-strike laws, the judge sentenced the defendant to 50 years in prison for the theft of the video tapes. The defendant challenged his conviction before the U.S. Supreme Court in Lockyer v. Andrade (2003), but the Court upheld the constitutionality of the law.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Three Strikes Rule

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The relation of violent crimes and the idea of recidivism has always been something that has been taken into account in the legal system. As early as 1895 in the Gladstone Committee Report, habitual offenders have garnered attention in penology circles (Katkin 99). The idea of punishing recidivism is split among politicians, though, as many politicians who disagree argue that the result is too monetarily costly for the state and the state’s citizens. One of the proposed solutions to this problem is what is called the “Three Strikes Rule”. Because this is a reserved power of the states, no decision made is federal, thus there are many heated debates over…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Strikes Law

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Begun in the 1990s, the Three Strikes Laws are a category of statutes which were enacted in the United States by certain state governments. These laws were enacted to mandate longer periods of imprisonment for persons convicted of a felony on three or more separate offenses. The term is used similar the three strikes and you’re out rule in baseball. This could also be described, as such statutes are most often known, officially as mandatory sentencing laws.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Three Strikes

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the Inferno, Virgil talks to Beatrice, whom is sent down from Heaven to convince him to believe in her and in God's Will and to guide and protect Dante. Beatrice utilizes three different methods of trying to convince Virgil to aid in Dante's salvation. Beatrice’s argument is very convincing because it not only makes Virgil feel sorry for Dante because Dante is suffering, but Beatrice also involves the Virgin Mary into her argument.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Strike Rule

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In todays society we struggle to enforce crime and reflect deterrence. This is why we have criminologist who study the behaviors of our criminals. They study hard day in and day out to find ways to deter crime. It is hard to stop crime because of all the other variables that may be included in the crime. The system may be willing to change but are you? In class we have discovered many different ways the criminal justice system can be and is modeled. A few models we spoke about were the interracial view of crime, conflict view of crime and consensus view of crime. These models just are examples of how some systems operate. Another way the criminal justice system enforces crime is by the three strikes law. Only twenty-four states have adopted this law. What this law basically does is give the criminal three chances to avoid major jail time. After the third time you get into trouble with the law your doing twenty-five to life in jail without no parole. Ouch! Currently the state of New Jersey has this law. There are certain guidelines and restrictions to this law though. In some states in order for this to be taken into action your third criminal offense must be a serious felony. For example Washington includes non-violent felonies to qualify as a strike. Though it seems that this would be somewhat more affective since this risks more of a threat to one who thinking of committing a crime. This enables more opportunity to earn a strike. It defiantly inflicts more fear on the individuals. I think taking these people out of society is our best bet. They need to de put away so that they don’t continue corrupting our society and reoffending and influencing others. Clearly they are up to no good and have nothing good to offer to our citizens if they chose to commit a serious crime not only once but three times. For our own safety it is better to put them away and separate the haves and the have nots. These criminals are repeat offenders they clearly are not trying to do the…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics