Preview

"Thinking Outside the Idiot Box" by Dana Stevens vs. “Watching TV Makes You Smarter” by Steven Johnson

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1114 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
"Thinking Outside the Idiot Box" by Dana Stevens vs. “Watching TV Makes You Smarter” by Steven Johnson
Jessica Tursi
English Comp I
Kayal
11/5/13
TV Does Not Make You Smarter There is no doubt that television holds a purpose in our society today, but is that purpose brain-numbing or actually beneficial to our brain development? The television, also known as: TV, the boob tube, the idiot box, as well as many other nicknames, has been around for almost a hundred years. Ever since cable TV became popular in the 1950’s, there has always been a worry that people watch too much TV. Most people believe that with exorbitant exposure to the popular media both dumbs us down as well as makes us more likely to tolerate acts of violence. Dana Stevens’ “Thinking Outside the Idiot Box” argues that television does not make you smarter, directly contrasting Steven Johnsons article, “Watching TV Makes You Smarter.” Television has definitely made a mark on our hearts and has most certainly made an impact on society, but too much of a good thing is never a good thing. The propaganda photo about television that was found on Facebook is a good lens that helps me understand Stevens’ argument better. The photo assisted the understanding of Stevens’ depiction and contradiction of Johnsons writing, her discussion about what these “more complex shows” are actually like, as well as her discussion about the national event TV Turn Off Week. This photo clearly depicts that TV does not enhance or benefit in brain production in any way, however it “destroys” the imagination, or what’s left of it, and in return, it fills the mind with complete nonsense, and therefore numbing the brain. The photo, which is a picture of a television, states, “My job is to help destroy what’s left of your imagination by feeding you endless doses of sugar-coated mindless garbage.” As humans, we are very complex intellectual beings, however television has been captivating our minds and bringing our intelligence down. Although Johnson makes some interesting points about how TV can make you

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Author Steven Johnson, of the article “Watching TV Makes You Smarter,” argues the evolution of modern television programming has intellectually challenged audiences, rather than stifling complex thoughts—and more, that audiences are craving a more cognitively demanding, complex plot line. Johnson uses multiple examples of drama type shows and even draws positive conclusions from many of the reality shows that are so popular now. He focuses in on a few key factors to take into account when considering the complexity and value of television—the “Sleeper Curve”, televised intelligence, and intentional viewer confusion.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Steven Johnson argues about watching TV shows makes us smarter by developing our brain. He compares the current TV shows and earlier TV shows.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Steven Johnson’s, “Watching TV Makes You Smarter,” and Nicholas Carr’s, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” both authors highlight the ways media have changed the way we learn in the world today; Johnson argues that television is having a positive effect on society and, in fact, is making us smarter, while Carr contends that media, especially the internet, limits our ability for, “deep thought.”…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ehrenrichs Tv Essay

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “So why do we keep on watching [Television]?” challenges Barbara Ehrenreich in, The Worst Years of Our Lives. Ehrenreich alleges that television “has transformed the American people into root vegetables” (2-3). Television as we know it is a way to escape the troubles of the real world and enter into a sense of fantasy. People sit for hours watching television which is harmful and may brainwash people to believe what they are told. Television was never invented to exemplify the real world; it was merely a distraction in the path of our trajectory. However Ehrenreich classifies modern Americans as couch potatoes simply because they do not accomplish anything that is displayed on television. I disagree with Ehrenreich’s assertions about television because she assumes everything portrayed in television is danger and thrills. Much of what is advertised on television is informative and important in society.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This argument is not to say that television is wrong altogether. This argument is for the opposite. The argument is to point out the importance of balance in the brain for educational purposes. In order to remain a sentient thinker, one must keep the balance strong and exercised. This is done in order to avoid a world of passivism; our minds must be active and thinking at all times. We must transcend the cultural norm to act upon the change needed in society and the world. Do not feed upon the passive narcissism that cultivates a self-centered society, but become a sentient reader and transcend the cultural…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    How Tv Makes You Smarter

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages

    People all over the world turn on their television each night and watch a few moments to a few hours of television and it is hard to miss a reality show which on almost any channel. If they were to pause on one of these shows they might not know it but they would bettering themselves on a personal level. Based on the ideas of Steven Johnson the average person could learn a thing or two from reality TV. In his article called, “Watching TV Makes You Smarter” Johnson states that; "For decades, we've worked under the assumption that mass culture follows a path declining steadily toward lowest-common-denominator standards, presumably because the "masses" want dumb, simple pleasures and big media companies try to give the masses what they want. But as that 24 episode suggests, the exact opposite is happening: culture is getting more cognitively demanding, not less."(214). Johnson talks explicitly about what a scholar might call the “dumbing down of America”, which in his mind is completely false. Watching reality television in his mind makes a person more aware of the everyday occurrences that happen. The major point first made in Johnsons article is based on his theory called, “The Sleeper Curve”. This theory is about how: “television alters the mental development of young people for the better” (215). Johnson talks about reality TV affecting younger generations in a positive light and helping with personal development. Another major topic discussed is how; “multiple threads in new television episodes are much more complex than old television shows.” In talking about this Johnson refers to the Mary Tyler More show being cookie cutter whereas reality TV today has real life issues. Through this kind of television our younger generation can be taught how to handle tough situations. The third major topic that is brought up in Johnson’s article is about how younger generations are given mindless television that provides them with…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “TV’s Negative Influence on Kids Reaffirmed” by Jeffery M. McCall, he claims that too much television is unhealthy for children. McCall states that children are more likely to be sexually active, violent, and socially impaired. The author claims that television not only negatively affects children, it also prevents children form doing productive activities such as doing homework, participating in sports, and reading. Even though all TV manufactures include v-chips in all televisions, McCall says that most families do not understand the system ratings that come with the v-chip. The author goes on to say that networks rate their own television programs and are not accurately labeling or rating their shows. McCall also argues that parents should…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main arguments that the author is making are:TV can be very detrimental to the mental development of children and teenagers. And that it should only be allowed in moderation. Not “whenever they want” and “as much as they want.” The main purpose of this article is: To show that Americans watch way too much TV and are raising their children in the same manner. Oblivious to its negative effects on their child 's development.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    TV as Teacher summary

    • 395 Words
    • 1 Page

    Throughout this essay, Postman talks about how much television has been taken as a mix of entertainment and information. He especially talks about how television affects children, such as when their parents place them in from of a TV thinking a show will give them an education on what they’ll need to learn. The author gives Sesame Street, as an example of a show that parents think will benefit their children by watching. Little do they know that it is anything but benefiting. Placing your child in front of a TV is just teaching the child to watch more television. Neil Postman puts up an argument exclaiming that “we now know that Sesame Street undermines what the traditional idea of schooling represents” (422) He goes on to say that “Sesame Street appeared to be an imaginative aid in solving the growing problem of teaching Americans how to read, while, at the same time, encourages children to love school only if school is like Sesame Street” (422)…

    • 395 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The argument in Johnsons article is that media has had to get more cognitively challenging to keep pulling the attention of viewers. He explains how he believes watching television can help make you a smarter person because it makes you use inferences, track relationships, and makes the reader think by tracking multiple threads. He uses examples from several television shows and series that may be affecting our brain activity. He makes many good persuasive points in his argument that TV isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but too much of anything is never a good thing.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    When watching a program, people are focused on the plot, make inferences, and create relationships with characters. Therefore, develops a cognitive exercise for the audience. Johnson informs his readers that there is an interaction between people and a television screen. Some examples he describes are when TV shows allow the viewer to develop a mental outline of a show, when a characters encounter social issues, and giving someone a cultural experience through a TV screen. He includes visuals that show different threads of TV programs, displaying the complexity of their scenes overtime, and how much it challenges the brain. Those graphs associate with Johnson’s term the “Sleeper Curve” (279), which according to him is the most debased form of mass diversion. He says that even if it is just reality television, violent content on TV or video games, and children shows, it still helps people become perceptive. Johnson concludes that instead of people having a negative attitude or having fears of their children being influenced by content of TV or video games, he insists that they both should share the experience. Parents and children will continue to interact with the TV screen mentally and therefore develop skills no matter what they watch. This essay presents in argument that television is good for…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    choices, but I do agree with Johnson that my selections usually fall into the rating and…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In “Watching TV makes you smarter,” Steven Johnson makes clear his thesis statement to us that television programming today makes increasingly complex cognitive demands of viewers, and enhances people’s cognitive facilities. He uses the images telling us what the intellectual effect of television viewing. First, based on his theory called “The Sleeper Curve”, he talks about reality TV affecting younger generation by helping with personal development. Johnson’s argument responds that when we watch the shows all of parts of our brain seem opening out that monitors the emotional lives of the people around like “The Mary Tyler Moore Show” or “The love boat,” ect. Through this kind of television, the young generation can be taught how to deal with difficult situation. Besides the dialogue from the Woody Allen movie Sleeper Curve also tells something about the human mind is developing to all everyone especially to young people today. It enhances their cognitive faculties, but not dumping their mind down, therefore, it could improve their characters from connection of the TV. He also points out some of the ways that economic of television growing up from these shows by the way multiple times of watching. However, in his thesis we can find out the information of early ‘80s between ‘20s century to see what going on at that time like “Hill Street Blues”, “All the family”. Johnson feels that through of TV can make everyone to be better by the way they see.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    But as reading both articles I have to agree more with Steven Johnson the reason why being is because I do think TV does makes us smarter. Watching the news is being smart because it lets us know what’s happing around the world such as our community. It gives us in idea what where dealing with around the world. Also shows like Glee gives you another example of the lives of high school students and the conflicts between them and also how music plays a big role in there school. As for kids I think TV does make them smarter the fact that they give shows like Barny, Dora, Bob the builder, and etc shows like these make kids learn the aspects of English they start to repeat words and start putting things together like puzzle, learn different types of animals, and…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many parents are guilty of blaming the television for making their kid obsessed with the wrong things, or for distracting them from school. On the other hand, National Public Radio suggests that television actually makes children better readers. They argue that literacy not only means being able to read, write, listen, and speak, but also to understand the different dimensions of these features. These dimensions include digital media and complex skills building to create a more well-rounded individual. They state that to achieve this, television can be used as a medium for kids to experience the “new” literacy while their parents help them achieve the “old” literacy goal. National Public Radio also believes that adults need to get past the more traditional approach of "no screen time" and use more modern approaches for their children to understand since they live in the 21st century. This shows that the author believes that the parents are at fault at times for underdeveloped children literacy, which is the opposite of what other people believe. Television should still be used in moderation, but adults have to understand that keeping their child from this device only hinders their development of what is called a “21st century” literacy. “21st century” literacy refers to being able to interpret other things such as images and emotion, not just being able to read, write, listen, and…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays