Preview

theory of utilitarianism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
786 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
theory of utilitarianism
The Philosophy of Utilitarianism may have a positive outcome, but it can be flawed at times as well. The Utilitarian theory states “ The greatest happiness for the greatest number of people”. Some say this approach is flawed due to it lacking reason and consequence, I believe this depends on specific circumstances. Abortion is a big issue now a days and I feel that the utilitarian theory would be a reasonable outlook on this particular situation. To apply the Utilitarian theory to abortion, first we must relinquish right and wrong and the innate morals that follow, and focus on whether the end result compliments the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. An example of such would be, Lets say a lady gets raped and becomes impregnated by the rapist, first and foremost one would gather that this woman would not want to bare her rapist child, being that the pregnancy will remind her everyday of this horrendous event, causing her constant displeasure and despair emotionally, physically, and mentally. An opposing party would say that adoption would be an alternative, and yes it would be, but this means that she would have to carry this child to term, go through the pain of childbirth and the legality of the adoption process. Everything stated causes this woman displeasure. If she does go this route there still is an issue, the child itself. Secrets always come out, one day this child will find out his/her father is a rapist and that will have a detrimental negative affect on this child. Also, what if he/she wants to meet the biological mother and she protests, yet again more displeasure. What if he/she is persistant on meeting the biological mother and a meeting does take place, the woman is faced with numerous discontentment, she would have to relive and face the events that she tried so hard to bury away in her mind. The utilitarian theory would state that having this child will cause nothing but pain for everyone in the situation including the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Utilitarian ethical theories are based on one’s ability to expect the concerns of an deed. Utilitarianism’s creed is that the result of any action takes importance over any type of means, this means that Utilitarianisms objective is to help as many individuals as possible even if it were to negatively disturb people along the way so as long as it helped the general populace. Basically, it’s the ends that matter not necessarily the means.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate on abortion is one that still to this day has been constantly argued. This argument can be historically dated back to 1973, where a popular case was brought into the Supreme Court. This was the Roe V Wade case, which legalized abortions in “abortion in earlier months of pregnancy without restrictions and with restrictions in later months” (Lewis). Jane Roe was the alias for Norma McCorvery. She was the one arguing that in Texas there should be abortions allowed due to the protection of her rights as well as many other women that she was speaking for. The argument of abortion, however, works well beyond just the “rights” of the women wanting it. There is death involved as well as responsibilities that apparently many women aren’t ready for. However there are certain circumstances in which the pregnancy might not have been exactly planned or the child wouldn’t be safe in the living conditions of its parents. In this case, abortion should still not be looked at instead adoption should be thought about. The Roe V Wade case should be reconsidered to only have an abortion done if it was absolutely vital to the person asking for it.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    A simple way to display this formulation is through a basic pro and con list. While an abortion may seem like the easy route, it does not provide many benefits with one of the only ones being sheer convenience. It would be convenient not to have a baby for the financial aspect, relationship aspect, and possibly your health aspect, but convenience cannot make something right. It would be more convenient for an individual to keep walking instead of holding the door; is that the morally right thing to do? No. With utilitarianism in mind, more good would arise if he or she held the door since a relationship would have formed, other good deeds could spread, and simply the door was held upon for everyone versus the door was held open for one with some convenience factor. It is evident how this adds up. Now going back to abortion, it was concluded the benefits are convenience in a multitude of ways. But let us take a look at the cons associated with this. One, murder. Two, neglects an opportunity for adoption with parents who are not fortunate enough receive the gift of life within them. Three, does not allow for the experience to empower women to overcome impediments. Four, does not give women responsibility. Five, does not allow the child to experience life, limiting so many societal possibilities, some cliches being he or she could find the cure to cancer or develop into our next…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the mother is going through an unfortunate circumstance right now, she is still responsible for carrying out the pregnancy. The woman then has the option to choose whether or not she wants to keep the baby or to give it up for adoption. Also, life is very precious and not something that we can just choose to end for someone else when we are wanting to so we can carry on with our lives like nothing has never happened. Currently, I believe that many people stand behind the belief that the woman has the right to choose whether she wants to abort the baby or not since it is her body. Therefore, many think that the woman is not morally permissible to having and/or keeping the baby. After reviewing the argument I believe that for many people they take the stance that the woman should be able opt out of having the baby and choose the option of abortion if that is what they are…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is another approach to abortion; it is a teleological approach to ethics. A utilitarianist would say whether a woman should have an abortion or not depending on what is the best outcome for as many people as possible. Act Utilitarlianism would be a more appropriate system to apply to individual dilemmas of whether to have an abortion. Act…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Utilitarianism theory supports individual capability to foresee the costs of an act. A Utilitarian considers the decision of giving the best profit to a large number of people; this is known to be ethically correct.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a teleological theory which looks at the consequences of an act to decide whether it is right or wrong. There are lots of strengths to utilitarianism and not many weaknesses. One of the strengths is that it is a theory which established whether something was good or bad according to the majority of people. Bentham came up with this theory and it is known as the principle of utility. Bentham said ‘Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them to point out what we shall do’. This is the foundation for the principle of utility and it is a strength to utilitarianism as pleasure and pain can determine how people act. Bentham also said the aim of utilitarianism is ‘the greatest good of the greatest number’ and he used the Hedonic Calculus that he created to measure how good an act is and how many people it will affect, this is a major strength of utilitarianism because it tries to please everyone and each individual is equal. A weakness of Bentham’s view was noticed by Mill, Mill said it failed to differentiate humans from animals as animals can share the same pleasures that humans have, so this make human beings equal to animals. Mill also said that Bentham’s Hedonic Calculus was a weakness as it was too impractical as to use it you have to think of the; purity, intensity, certainty, extent, duration and fecundity of an act. In some situations this would be pointless as there might not be time to complete the Hedonic Calculus. For example is your house was on fire and you only had time to save either you cat or your dog you would not be able to think through the Hedonic Calculus as by the time you have your house would be burnt to the ground. This is a weakness to Bentham’s theory but not to utilitarianism because you can still please the majority without looking at the Hedonic Calculus every time you want to complete an act.Bernard…

    • 517 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Against Abortion Satire

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Abortion goes against any idea of the sanctity of human ways. It ends up taking away an innocent child’s life; someone that never got the chance to experience the beautiful ways of the world. No civilized society permits one human to intentionally harm or take the life of another human without punishment, and abortion is no different.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    : Two arguments that goes against late-term abortion being immoral is subjectivism and utilitarianism. Subjectivism portrays that everyone has his or her own set of morals and that there is no one right way. A subjectivist’s opinion on the subject would argue that a person's view and choice in terms of late abortion is personal to their specific position.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This would be a specific type of deontology, in which morality of an action is based only on the compliance of the action itself, not on the action’s consequences. Overall, nobody should merely be used to obtain a goal. According to Kant’s second formulation, a person is obligated to account for the dignity and value they possess in oneself and in others. It is the argumentation and their position as rational and noble beings. In Sue’s case she decided she was not ready to have a baby, but was too afraid to let someone adopt it. Once the infant is born, it can no longer pose any threat to the woman’s life or health since she is given the opportunity to put it up for adoption. For some women, having the baby be raised by someone other than themselves may sound scary, so they take the abortion route. Yes, a lot of women may suffer from the idea that their child is being thrown into the adoption system, and the mother will be worried about the child’s happiness, education or health, but in the end the mother should have been more responsible to discuss these things with her family or husband in order to avoid late-term abortion. Surely, there are better ways of dealing with these problems than permitting late-term abortion in such cases. For any killing where the victim did have a valuable future like ours, having that future by itself is sufficient to create the strong presumption that the killing is seriously wrong (Marquis, 4). According to Marquis, killing a fetus is just as wrong as killing a human being after birth. The loss of the future of any human being by killing or by abortion is unjustified. In essence, a seven-month old fetus is not that much different in appearance from a newborn, and has measurable brain activity.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarian’s would be against abortion if it were damaging society. If there were a low in the amount of babies being born because of abortions it would damage society as a whole because we need people to sustain society. Or if we found that unborn babies sensed the pain of an abortion it would be against utilitarian view because the group of babies was feeling pain. Also an abortion could bring about the death of a great person that affects humanity. What if Einstein was aborted or what if bill gates was aborted? Humanity would be significantly different without those individuals and with that society, as a whole would be affected negatively by abortion.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are always cases of women who just don’t want their baby, or can’t care for them. If someone doesn’t want their baby or cant care for their child, there is always adoption. There are families out there that can’t have children, so the logical thing to do would be to give their baby to someone who wants them. However, there are some cases that involve rape and or harm to the baby, the mother, or both. In some cases, they should still consider adoption. I would rather say, “I gave my baby away to have a better life” than say, “I killed my baby for selfish reasons”. Abortion is not legal or illegal because of the Roe vs. Wade case, but that still doesn’t make it right. – (historical allusion)…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If a woman consented to sex and/or didn’t properly use contraception, then she knew pregnancy might result. Being pregnant means having a new life growing inside. Whether the fetus is a person or not and, whether the state takes a position on abortion or not, it’s arguable that a woman has some sort of ethical obligation to the fetus. Most debates on the ethics of abortion focus on whether the fetus is a person. Even if it is not a person, however, this doesn’t mean it can’t have any moral standing. Maybe this obligation isn’t strong enough to eliminate abortion as an option, but it may be enough to limit when abortion can be ethically chosen or justified. According to the best interest principle, the best interest would be to have the baby so it can live a long and fulfilling life.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarian theorist wants what is best for the greatest amount of people. These theorists would think that leaving the girls with their mother would be for the greater…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Utilitarianism is a practical flexible response that makes the world a better place with pragmatic solutions that try to prevent harm and bring about the greater good. In the greater good they believe in personal happiness with an intrinsic value. Personal happiness cannot be viewed as a bad thing. Our basic human intuition is that harming people is intrinsically wrong. Modern utilitarians have expanded Bentham’s theories when addressing an issue such as abortion, act utilitarianism believes that the action is assessed, morally purely on its consequences not necessarily on the actions taken before hand. In addressing the criticisms of utilitarianism, to define happiness itself - what is happiness to the Catholic Church is different to the…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays