Preview

Theories of International Organization

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4141 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theories of International Organization
Introduction

International Organizations are formal institutional structures transcending national boundaries that are created by multilateral agreement among nation-states. Their purpose is to foster international cooperation in areas such as security, law, economic and social matters and diplomacy.
The theory of international organization has evolved from developments in such areas as internationalism, transnationalism, complex interdependence, and the study of regimes, functionalism, federalism and integration.

Defining International organization

International organization is a process; international organizations are representative aspects of the phase of that process which has been reached at a given time. Based primarily upon an analysis of the organizational efforts in which governments participate as the official agencies of states. The definition of an international organization as a formal, continuous structure established by agreement between members, whether governmental representatives or not, from at least two sovereign states with the aim of pursuing the common interest of the membership, covers a wide range of institutions even if profit-making associations are excluded.

Theories of international organization

The study of International Relations includes the study of organizations in a great deal. Almost every writer of international relations has their literature on International organizations. In this study of the theories of international organization, four major groups are emphasized. They have remarkable contributions in this area of study. Traditional Views

The traditional writers have in common a state centric approach to international relations. Though some were concerned that governments should reflect more inevitably good intentions of their citizens in international affairs or that world organization should have more power to deal with warlike or renegade states, their focus of attention is the international

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In my opinion, an organization is basically members of a working group that are structured and allocated various tasks with the aim of achieving a common goal.…

    • 4765 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The case analysis:Bata Shoe

    • 3574 Words
    • 15 Pages

    · The International structure: a decentralized organization, where operating companies are independent businesses, supported by a global management team.…

    • 3574 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Organizations, in a small form stated as a group of individuals structured in a capacity or venue to produce a desired end state. If we take this, with more depth and breadth we better define, clarify and realize that our entire global society is made up of many unique organizations that have impacts on our daily lives throughout a lifetime.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    International relations helps better explain the relationships between states (for example, why the UK and the USA have such a close coalition) and explains why there is international interdependence, as in why member states of the UN have to accept decisions that don’t necessarily facilitate their own needs. International relations explain the governmental systems of dominance and dependence that can help, and hinder countries in their decision-making (e.g. Capitalism, Imperialism and communism). International relations explains more than just the actions of individual and collective states, it also explains the actions of governmental and non-governmental groups, such as terrorist organizations, guerilla militia groups and Green Peace. The I.R theory exists solely to help us understand the world and guide policy decisions. Different theories of I.R. can help provide different perspectives of world events.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Us Foreign Policy

    • 2444 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Dougherty, J.E. & Pfaltzgraff, R.L. 1981. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey. 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row, pp. 84-133.…

    • 2444 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many organizations than promote internationalism; two of them are the United Nations and the World Trade Organization. Both of these organizations help promote internationalism, but in different ways. The World Trade Organization is an international non-governmental organization that promotes fair trade between countries. One important aspect of internationalism is that it encourages people all over the world to interact and become more involved in one another's culture. Although the World Trade Organization has been criticized for the way it allows wealthy countries control the system, it still consistently negotiates equal trade for countries that need it, ultimately supporting and promoting internationalism. When it comes to trade,…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Francesco, A.M. and Gold, B.A. (2005), International Organizational Behaviour: Text, Cases, and Exercises, 2nd Ed, Pearson Prentice Hall, pp. 17-45…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    According to Jackson and Sorensen (2003), the leading contemporary neorealist thinker is undoubtedly Kenneth Waltz (1979). His starting point is taken from some elements of classical and neoclassical, such as independent state existing and performing in an anarchical international system. Waltz’s Theory of international Politics (1979) seeks to provide a scientific explanation of the international political system. A scientific theory of international relations leads us to expect the certain pattern that states to behave in predictable ways. In Waltz’s view the best IR theory is a neo-realist systems theory that focuses centrally on the structure of the system, on its interacting units, and on the continuities and changes of the system. In classical realism, state leaders and their subjective valuation of international relations are the center factor of valuation. In neorealism, however, the structure of the system, in particular the relative distribution of power, is the central analytical focus. Actors are less important because structures oblige them to behave in certain ways. Structures more or less determine actions. Chris Brown (2001) in his book ‘Understanding International Relations’ states that once we concentrate on the system we can see, he suggests, that there are only two kinds of accessible system – a hierarchical or an anarchical system. The distinction between hierarchy and anarchy is crucial to Waltz; the present system, he claims, is obviously anarchical, and has been since its late medieval origins (Brown, 2001). In hierarchical system, different kinds of units are organized and adjusted under an absolute layer of authority. Meanwhile, in an anarchical system, units which are the same in nature, even though they differ severally in capabilities, operate relations with…

    • 2159 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The structure of an international organization encompasses how the power, roles and responsibilities of the international units are arranged and how information flows from one level of management to another. The structure of an international organization must be strong because it contributes to the success and implementation of the company’s strategy (http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/organizational-structure.html). International strategy is the way in which a business makes vital decisions about developing and arranging scarce resources. “The goal of international strategy is to create a competitive advantage that is sustainable over time” (Ball, D. A., Geringer, J. M., McNett, J. M., and Minor, M. S. (2013). International business: The challenge of global competition (13th ed.) p. 249). To accomplish strategy, the company should develop competencies that add value for the customers at a price they are willing to pay and they should make sure that the competencies are rare but organized in such a way that they allow the company to fully exploit the value from the competitive potential. (Ball, D. A., Geringer, J. M., McNett, J. M., and Minor, M. S. (2013). International business: The challenge of global competition (13th ed.)p. 231). To begin to strategize, or plan globally, senior management must identify opportunities and threats from all over the world. They must be able to plan on how they will effectively resolve those issues and how they will be able to finance the implementation of the strategies. International companies must be able to attract and retain the best talent available worldwide, including both women and men…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    • Simmons B. A., Martin L. L., “International Organizations and Institutions”, pp.192-211, (in) Carlsnaes W., Risse T., Simmons B. A., (ed.), Handbook of International Relations, (London, London: Sage Publications 2002),…

    • 28561 Words
    • 115 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An organization is defined as a group of people working, in a structured setting, towards the achievement of a common goal. It is a collectivity with a relatively identifiable boundary, a normative order, ranks of authority, communication systems, and membership coordinating systems. This collectively exists on a relatively continuous basis in an environment and engages in activities that are usually related to a set of goals; the activities have outcomes for organization itself and society.…

    • 3578 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) Neo-realism, also known as structural realism see international politics as a power struggle between states. Conflicts between states and security competition are due to a lack of “an overarching authority above states and the relative distribution of power in the international system” (Dunne 98). Scholar Kenneth Waltz defined the structure of the international system in three elements: organizing principle, differentiation of units, and distribution of capabilities. To structural realists the distribution of capabilities gives important insight to grasping international outcomes, and the relative distribution of power in the international system is the strategic variable to understanding such outcomes. Structural realists argue that the number of great powers that exists concludes the structure of the international system. Waltz describes the structure as the “ordering principle of the international system, which is anarchy and the distribution capabilities across units, which are states” (Dunne 127). Neo-realists also believe the structure of the international system shapes all foreign policy choices and see power as the collective competences of the states. In other words the more power a state has in the international system the more influence they have on world affairs. However the flaw that accompanies neo-realism, is the increase of the application of “self-help”, a.k.a. increase of military security. Neo-liberalist agrees largely with the views and beliefs of neo-realists, “the anarchic international structure, the centrality of states, and a rationalist approach to social scientific inquiry” (Dunne 115). The main difference between the two theories is neo-liberalist believe that anarchy does not mean the arrangements of cooperation are impossible. International regimes are the implementer for cooperation. Arguments made by neo-liberalists believe that academic inquiry is guided by…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. International system level – explanation rests with the anarchic characteristics of the international system or with international and regional organizations’ strengths and weaknesses…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The writings of Davis and Blustein use the struggles and triumphs of real international affairs cases to demonstrate the new methods of influence and power that international organizations afford developing countries. However, both authors make it clear that global organizations are not a panacea for international tensions.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays