There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse.” – Socrates, Phaedo 89d:2
Wisdom is perfect, beautiful and forever absolute – the efficacy of truth, regarding any and all subjects and temporal and metaphysical concerns of conscious being, does not progressively degrade1; however, I believe it is also conversely feasible that one’s comprehension of truth can arguably be perceived to dilute by and within the limitations manifested through the existence and effect of the physical scalar that is time and aging. Though society can progress and human ideas and perceptions can change, the majority of classically important and essential philosophical works – ostensibly succeeding in their efforts to catch and miraculously retain the beauty of absolute truth in our eyes - have remained with us throughout the ages. As I have discerned it, once can justly put forth the notion that an essential and critically important truth regarding the philosophical ideas of Socrates’ Phaedo – a work of one of the greatest thinkers of the field in antiquity – is that it can be justly posited that deliberate ignorance is by nature reflective of an interrelating array of human characteristics, behaviors, and other attributes that in totality reflect manifestations of absolute moral fallacies; or in other words, manifestations of evil within the human and temporal paradigm – terms that are interchangeable and equal reflections of the same holistic and perfect whole2; within this, I believe that Socrates’ notions resound with the argument that the metaphysical and physical being unifies within to compose the comprehensible and thus humanly understandable universe. Hence, I thus hypothesize that one rightfully can, with substantiating validity, draw the conclusion that the philosophical, essential, and ultimately absolute truth which Socrates is trying to disseminate through his aforementioned and emphasized statement, which regards an insightful glean into the...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document