Preview

the three teleological frameworks and the three deontological frameworks.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
911 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
the three teleological frameworks and the three deontological frameworks.
List and discuss in depth the three teleological frameworks and the three deontological frameworks. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each? Of these six frameworks, with which one do you most associate?

Teleological frameworks focus in the results of the conduct of the individual is favorable or not. The three teleological frameworks are ethical egoism, utilitarianism, Sidgwick’s dualism.

“Ethical egoism is based on the belief that every individual should act in a way to promote himself or herself if the net result will generate, on balance, positive rather than negative results” (Stanwick & Stanwick, 2009, p. 4). This framework permits self-interest to play a role in the action of the person only if those actions should also have positive benefits to others. (Stanwick & Stanwick, 2009). There are controversial opinions about this framework because different interpretations of what is considered on balance. Supporters of ethical egoism argue that his framework is the only ethical framework that motivates individual and is a “win-win” proposition. The individual reward him or her self-interest while also yielding benefits for others. Opponents of this framework state that part of the connection of the actions that motivate a person also requires certain obligations of him an individual. (Stanwick & Stanwick, 2009). The second teleological framework is utilitarianism which “is based on the principle that each person’s actions add to the overall utility of the community impacted by those actions” (Stanwick & Stanwick, 2009, p. 5). This frameworks focus on the net results of their actions instead of the means or motives that generated the reason for those actions. (Stanwick & Stanwick, 2009). Also this framework causes in favor and oppose opinions. People who support utilitarianism states that captures the essence of benevolent behavior would not do actions that help others if that action doesn’t benefits the self-interest of the individuals.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The Teleological ethical system is the opposite of the deontological system. The teleological ethical system judges the consequences of the act rather than the act itself. It believes that if the action results in what can be considered as a good consequence, than it must be good and that the end result will justify the reason that the act was committed in the first place (Pollock, 2004). Among the teleological ethical systems are utilitarianism, ethics of virtue, and ethics of care.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egoism involves behavior that focuses on self-interest as the main motive. Self-enhancing and self-benefit are the goals or pro-social behavior with egoism motives. People who help others with self-enhancement intent do so in order to feel better about themselves. For example, a person who volunteers for a cause does so merely to feel better about themselves.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical egoism is all about doing what will make oneself better off. The interests of others by and of itself, counts for nothing to an ethical egoist. A modified version could be as follows:…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is the ethical theory behind justifying an action for being for the greater good. This is a teleological theory because it looks at the consequences of an action. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory. There are three types of utilitarianism: Act, Rule and Preference. Jeremy Bentham began the Utilitarianism theory. Utilitarianism is a hedonistic theory because it is based on pleasure and happiness. Each utilitarian has a different theory of Utilitarianism and this will be explained in my essay.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethical Egoism

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I believe in Ethical Egoism and think it would be the best way for people to live. If everyone believed in Ethical Egoism, the world would probably have better people in my opinion. With Ethical Egoism, a person will be able to get ahead in their own life and provide a better life for him or his family. While being an ethical egoist you can still help others so the world won’t be a completely selfish world. And combined with the social contract, it keeps people and things in an order.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Teleology, an explanation of phenomena by the purpose they serve rather than postulated causes, has found its place in the construction of many systems of morality such as John Stuart Mill’s theory of Utilitarianism. In teleological approaches to morality, questions of right and wrong, or the notion what an individual ought to do, are determined by the consequences of a given action. One thinker to reject this idea of consequentialism was Immanuel Kant. In his Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant endeavors to establish a system of ethics that has no trace of the empirical nature of utilitarianism. To him, “the moral worth of an action does not lie in the effect expected from it and so too does not lie in any principle of action that needs to borrow its motive from this expected effect” (Groundwork, 56). Rather than determine moral worth based on cause and effect, Kant seeks to establish a supreme moral principle that is universal in nature, lacking any inkling of desires or inclinations that are subjective to the experiences of the individual. This principle must precede any sort of empirical knowledge, and must therefore be based upon a priori intuitions of our reason. Mill, on the other hand, refutes the idea of this a priori basis of ethics. In his work, Utilitarianism, Mill argues that moral worth must be determined on the bases of a fundamental principle based upon learned experience, namely the Principle of Utility. Under said principle, actions are to be judged on the nature of their outcome, not on their relation to a supreme imperative. In this paper I will reconstruct Kant’s critique of teleology in moral matters, followed by a response to said critique based on the principles that Mill lays out in Utilitarianism. Ultimately, I will show that, while Mill’s defense is valid, Kant’s minimal and universal system of morality provides a far more sensible approach to examining how humans ought to act.…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Same sex marriage

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ethical egoism is the normative ethical position that moral agents ought to do what is in their own self-interest. It is important to distinguish this from psychological egoism, the claim that people can only act in their own interest. Any act, no matter how altruistic it might seem, is actually motivated by some selfish desire of the agentEthical Egoism: The person thinks It is morally right to have "Same Sex marriage", because it is their own best interest.. so the person chooses to do what they think is right to do.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Egoism

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ethical egoism is the normative theory that the promotion of one's own good is in accordance with morality. In the strong version, it is held that it is always moral to promote one's own good, and it is never moral not to promote it. In the weak version, it is said that although it is always moral to promote one's own good, it is not necessarily never moral to not. That is, there may be conditions in which the avoidance of personal interest may be a moral action.…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychological egoism is a theory, in which one naturally acts for self-interest. According to our text, there are three major problems with psychological egoism:…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is the ethical doctrine that the moral worth of an action is solely determined by its contribution to overall utility in maximizing happiness or pleasure as summed among all persons. It means that the moral worth of an action is determined by its outcome – “the ends justify the means”. The theory is founded on the ability to predict the consequences of an action. To a utilitarian, the choice that yields the greatest benefit to the most people is the choice that is ethically correct (Markoczy, 2002).…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egoism is the idea that the ultimate moral motivation for humans is self-interest. There are two main distinctions…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Egoism and Utilitarianism are both moral theories on the consequences of ones actions and what conduct are the primary motivation of what one believes is ethical.…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Dickens and Cook (2015) the right to refuse treatment goes hand in hand with the patient right to informed consent. I personally believe that if a patient is in the right mind to make medical decision for themselves that their rights should be respected. This should only be honored after the medical provider on the treatment team has provided sufficient information about their diagnosis and all possible treatment options available in terms that they can understand.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Ethical Egoism

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Theory of ethical egoism is a moral theory that is about how an action is done for our own best interest. It’s deciding what’s most favorable for me that’ll benefit my own interest. It’s putting one’s own welfare first. Ethical egoism is also seen as for example as performing actions of good deed to someone else where at the end you’re promoting your self-interest. Though you’re thinking of your own self-interest you’re still making sure that what you do is done wisely and have considered any long term effects that may come along.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics 316

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The distinct difference of these theories suggests that virtual theory focuses attention toward creating greatness within one’s self. Utilitarianism focuses attention by creating greatness toward the masses. Deontological ethics relates to doing what is right whether it be for one’s self or for the masses with the understanding that…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays