Preview

The Three Strike Law

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1173 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Three Strike Law
The Three Strike Law

The policy that I have chosen to discuss is the three strike law. The three strike law was created to handle problems that occurred with habitual offenders. Commonly known in the 1990’s era the three strike law increased prisons sentences of habitual offenders. The three strike law is a statue that allows the courts to impose harsh sentences such as life sentences to individuals who are convicted of three or more major criminal offenses. Habitual criminals automatically qualify for the three strike law because of the number of felonies they have committed. When habitual criminals receive mandatory life sentences, they are not overruled by other judges. I found this to be very interesting. The three strike law is enacted throughout the United States to address repeat criminal offenders. Habitual criminals are more than likely sentenced to prison for life. One of the major reasons that habitual criminals are treated this way is because they create a serious threat to the environment and society. Although it seems as if habitual criminals are treated harshly, they can petition for a review of his or her case with the Supreme Judicial Court. Crimes that are on the felony level qualify as serious offenses or as crimes that could receive life sentences. The following are crimes that qualify as violent and serious crimes: Murder, rape, robbery of residence that involve deadly weapons, and assault with intent to commit murder are all considered to be felony crimes. Problems more than likely occur for felons when they have been convicted for crimes such as these before. The law states that felons are eligible for twenty-five to life sentences after their third felony. For example, if a felon has already been convict of two felonies, he would be a three time felon who would qualify for the three strike law. Individuals who are found guilty are normally given parole possibilities with their life sentences. The three strike law was originally created



Cited: Cbemerinsky, Erwin. "Is California 's "Three Strikes" Mandatory Sentencing Law "Cruel And Unusual Punishment"? PRO." Supreme Court Debates 5.9 (2002): 264. Academic Search Complete. Web. 12 Sept. 2012. Reed, Sarah Maureen. "Sentencing And Punishment--Cruel And Unusual Punishment: The United States Supreme Court Upholds California 's Three Strikes Law, Ruling The Law Does Not Violate The Eighth Amendment 's Prohibition On Cruel And Unusual Punishment." North Dakota Law Review 80.3 (2004): 497-533. Academic Search Complete. Web. 12 Sept. 2012. Romano, Michael. "Striking Back: Using Death Penalty Cases To Fight Disproportionate Sentences Imposed Under California 's Three Strikes Law." Stanford Law & Policy Review 21.2 (2010): 311-348. Academic Search Complete. Web. 12 Sept. 2012.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Three Strikes Law

    • 3255 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The criminal justice issue that has been chosen as the topic on this course project is the “three strike” sentencing and how it should be abolished. The three strike sentencing was established in 1994 under the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act. (Harris, 1995). In this act, the statute of three strike sentencing provides a mandatory life imprisonment sentence for convicted felons that have been convicted in a federal court for a serious and/or violent felony and they commit two or more previous crimes that they are convicted of in federal and/or state court system in which at least one of the crimes is a serious and/or violent crime. These crimes can be but are not limited to murder, sex offenses, robbery, and kidnapping.…

    • 3255 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cruel and unusual punishment is the term used to describe criminal punishment which is considered unacceptable due to the suffering or humiliation it causes on the person. Cruel and unusual punishment has a very long history and is now noted in the constitution. There are several cases that deal with the consequences of cruel and unusual punishment and the constitution also protects people from this being used on them. The government has also put restrictions on the punishment judges can give to people for committing crimes due to the history of cruel and unusual punishment.(2)…

    • 2235 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Three Strikes

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The driving force behind "three-strikes" legislation in Washington, were politicians wanting to "get tough on crime". The reasoning behind the law was to reduce recidivism and get violent offenders off the street. I think that the legislation was merely a response to public outcry rather than a well thought out strategy to actually reduce crime. Advocates say that after "three-strikes" laws were adopted across the country there was a drastic reduction in crime in general. They also argue that once a person has committed a his second "strike" and knows that he faces a life sentence if convicted again will think twice before committing another crime. These arguments are fallacies. Finally what supporters fail to point out is that these three-strike laws target minorities over whites in a severely disproportionate amount.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime. The death penalties are usually carried out for retribution of a heinous murder committed, such as aggravated murder, felony killing or contract killing. Every state handles what method they want to use to put a person to death according to their state laws. The death penalty is given by lethal injection, electrocution; gas chamber firing squad and hanging are some of the ways that certain states may carry out their death penalty procedures. I will present some views and personal opinion dealing with the pros and cons of the death penalty. The death penalty is such a life altering subject that affects all parties’ lives that are involved in the death penalty process. I personally have mixed feeling about the death penalty. I don’t know really if I would be a person that would support the death penalty or not. I do feel that murdering someone is wrong, and since no one really close to me has never been murdered. I don’t know if my feeling would change as being a supporter for the death penalty or not. I can only pray that God will help this county to make the right choices when comes to life or death.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three strikes raises important questions about how sentencing laws need to achieve public safety. How are such laws made? Who do they target? And why did Michael Reynolds and Mark Klaas start out as allies and end up as bitter political rivals.…

    • 5293 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    8th Amendment Essay

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Eighth Amendment of the Constitution reads: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” Since the wording in this amendment is general in regards to what is cruel and unusual punishment, the Court was left to decide whether they would adopt a strict constitutional perspective consistent with the framer’s definitions of “cruel and unusual,” or use a living constitutionalist approach, meaning the definitions of “cruel and unusual” would evolve alongside society’s definition of the words. According to the casebook, “cruel and unusual” was “derived from the English Bill of Rights of 1689, originally understood to refer to such ancient practices as branding, drawing and quartering, burning alive, and crucifixion.” After understanding the framer’s definitions, the Court decided in Trop v. Dulles that the Eighth Amendment should derive its meaning from the “evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society.” This decision carries through to the precedents that follow, especially in the death penalty cases. The Court must then choose a criteria or way of determining the “evolving standards” without overstepping their judicial power. As seen in Roper v. Simmons, the Court uses state laws and international agreements to support their notion of society’s evolving definition of what is “cruel and unusual…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A mandatory sentence is one where judicial discretion is limited by law; those convicted of certain crimes must be punished with at least a minimum number of years in prison. The most famous example of mandatory sentencing is the ‘three strikes and you’re out’ policy adopted first in California in 1994, and now more widespread in the USA. "Three strikes" laws require life imprisonment for a third criminal conviction, but other forms of mandatory sentencing are now being discussed and implemented in various countries. The British Home Secretary Michael Howard implemented a three strike policy in Britain in the mid 1990s, implementing a mandatory minimum three year sentence for a third conviction of burglary. Australia’s Northern Territory in 1997 introduced mandatory sentences of one month to one year for the third offence regarding property and theft. In the USA possession of more than a small amount of a drug is punished by a mandatory harsh sentence. Mandatory life imprisonment has also been proposed in the US Congress for a second sexual offence against children. The British government has proposed a mandatory five year minimum prison sentence for anyone convicted of carrying a firearm illegally. In addition to these mandatory prison terms, some countries employ a system of ‘mandatory restorative justice’, whereby the criminal has to apologize to the victim, rather than one of imprisonment.( Jacqueline Rose Claire College idebate.org)…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 3 Strikes Crime Law is one of the nation’s harshest sentencing laws. Are you aware that even non-violent criminals are sentenced to life in prison under the 3 Strikes Crime Law? More than 4,000 non-violent criminals are currently serving life in sentence in prison in California alone. (Vega & Galloway, 2012). If you take these outrageous numbers and add them to the rest of the nations non-violent criminal statistics the numbers are shocking. The 3 Strikes Crime Law is a violation of the 8th Amendment, as the maximum penalty for non-violent offenders is severe, unjust, and preposterous.…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Beginning in the early 1990s, states began to enact mandatory sentencing laws for repeat criminal offenders. These statutes came to be known as "three strikes laws," because they were invoked when offenders committed their third offense. By 2003 over half the states and the federal government had enacted three strikes laws. The belief behind the laws was that getting career criminals off the streets was good public policy. However, incarceration of three strikes inmates for 25 years to life would drive up correctional costs. The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld three strikes laws and has rejected…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This week we were able to read two articles that went along with our lecture. The first article, "Three Strikes and You're Out: California's new mandatory sentencing law on serious crime rates", by Stolzenberg and D'Alessio. This article looked at information gathered from cities where the three strikes law was mandated. The research looked at monthly data and found that the three strikes law had no effect on recidivism or crime rates. Personally, though some may agree with the three strikes law, I find it in some circumstances to be unjust. For starters, I feel as though this law does not allow the judge to fully review the case of an offender who has reached their third strike. The reason for this is that each crime committed is different…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Three Strikes Law

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages

    3). The law has been in effect for more than ten years and three reasons why it has been effective is because “1) the Three Strikes Law appears to be meeting its theoretical goals; 2) some of the initial concerns of the impact of the law have not occurred; and 3) the interpretation of the law has provided for built-in safeguards to ensure that the intent of the law is carried out” (Goodno,…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three strike law became very popular in the 1990s. These statutes are enacted by state government and require the state court to hand down a mandatory and extended sentence to a repeat offender that has committed two or more previous offences. Between 1993 and 1995, 26 states and the federal government passed three strikes laws. The lawmakers were forced to take a second look at the punishment of repeat offenders after the kidnapping and murder of 12-year-old Polly…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Three strikes and you’re out”. This is the all too familiar term we are used to hearing in baseball and in the rules of the law in some states. Most heard of in California. Three strikes sentencing were adopted in 1994. It imposed longer prison sentences for repeat offenders. The law requires a person who is convicted of a felony and who previously has been convicted of one or more violent and/or serious felonies. The main feature of the Three Strikes law is the imposition of a life sentence for any felony conviction, no matter how minor, if the defendant has two prior "serious" felony convictions. "Serious" felonies are defined by the California Penal Code and range from murder and rape to non-confrontational residential burglary and purse-snatching.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Butterfield, Fox. “Death Sentences Being Overturned in 2 of 3 Appeals.” National: The New York Times on The Web 12 June 2000. 3 Apr. 2010. http://partners.nytimes.com/library/national/061200death-penalty.html…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The defendant challenged the imposition of the death sentences in this case as "cruel and unusual" punishment in violation of the Eighth and the Fourteenth Amendments. 423 U.S. 1082 (1976).…

    • 502 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays