Running Head: Multiple Intelligence Paper
Mutiple Intelligence Paper
University of Phoenix
Developed in 1983 by Dr. Howard Gardner the theory of multiple intelligences was created to account for a broader range of human potential in children and adults. The theory of multiple intelligences focused on nine strengths and was conducted into a survey which determined my strengths of multiple intelligence. This paper is an overview on the nine multiple intelligences and different learning styles. Incorporating his or her style of learning and teaching can assist in creating a stable classroom environment. This paper will conclude with a reflection on how my learning and teaching style will be introduced into the classroom.
Multiple Intelligences paper
Going into a classroom for the first time could be overbearing and difficult, that’s why it is important to maintain a particular teaching style. The theory of multiple intelligences has a strong impact on how adults learn and develop their way of thinking. Many adults find themselves working at jobs that does not allow them to use their most highly developed intelligences. For instance, a person whom is bodily kinesthetic and stuck in a logical desk job would be much happier at a job that allows them to move around. Adults can look at life in a new perspective, while examining potentials that they left in the past, by applying the theory of intelligence into everyday life.
The multiple intelligence survey consisted of nine pathways to potential learning. Teachers sometimes have difficulties reaching students in a traditional linguistic or logical way of instruction, that’s why multiple intelligences suggest several ways to facilitate effective learning. It does not matter what grade level a subject is being taught on there will always be guidelines that would apply. The intelligences that the survey focused on were Naturalistic, Musical, Logical, Existential, Interpersonal, Kinesthetic, Verbal, Intrapersonal, and Visual strength. Each section of the survey had total ranging from one to 10. Once the scores were tallied part four was broken into nine sections that categorized multiple intelligences.
Multiple intelligences does not implicate that all nine intelligences have to be taught or learn in the classroom, the focus is on particular pathways that can assist teachers with an effective teaching or learning tool. Learning style assessments and multiple intelligences go hand and hand because once the learning style is found teaches can approach new information. Everyone learns and processes information in his or her special way, even though learning patterns, preferences, and approaches are shared on common bases.
Reflecting on the survey and the results multiple intelligences can be improved or remain the same. The highest was a score of 90 on section four which demonstrates the interpersonal strength. Interpersonal strengths is the interaction with others, this strength is in need of improvement and indicates my relationship with others. The next highest number was 80 and that was a tie between section three and six. Section three indicates my logical strength, reasoning and problem solving. This section is an intelligence that would have been the lowest, if asked between the numbers of one and a hundred the rating of this particular intelligence. Section six tells my kinesthetic strength, interaction with the environment. Being an English teacher does not show any importance of introducing the environment to the class. The teaching style that is introduced at the beginning of the school year shouldn’t be changed because, students can get confuse when things are done differently within the classroom. Most students are not good at accepting change, that’s why many students act out when they have several teachers in one school year.
The multiple intelligences play a part in everyone’s...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document