the summary of "Andreas_Suchanek__Business_Ethics_and_the_Golden_Rule" case
CASE 1: Andreas_Suchanek__Business_Ethics_and_the_Golden_Rule
I. Introduction:
In a corporation, the leaders are always required to perform a perfect management ability, which plays an important role in the firm's success. The perfection here includes business ethics. In fact, moral standards are real challenges for every business because the conflict between corporate ethics and success happens sometimes. The leaders can solve this situation through three perspectives: take a position on criticism challenged corporate actions, illustrate the firm's responsibilities by justifying the integrity of its business activities, and finally, develop competitive and argumentative working environment for its employees. In additional, to overcome this challenge, the “conditio humana” have to be considered as a core for all questions: Each individual is a moral subject, possessing dignity and endowed with liberty. To sum up, what is the relationship between morality and self-interest?
II. The Relationship between Morality, Self-Interest, and the Golden Rule:
Self-interest acts are contrasted to moral act which is related to mutual interests. With some prejudice from public discussion on corporate’s self-interest which is focusing on profit, the morality are considered as such a thing over one’s own benefits and should be an one’s obligation. This rule is hard to follow when people cannot be forced to do things against their self – interest. Because people are affected by a lot an empirical factors which are defined as the ingredients of certainly self-interest concept. Because of the inverse relationship between morality and self-interest, principle needs applying compatibly to someone’s benefits. That means the benefit is not for any individuals but for whole community. In business, it means a leader acts on himself for mutual company’s interest. This is wrapped up in a say or we can named as an economic Golden Rule “Invest in social cooperation for mutual advantage!”
I. Introduction:
In a corporation, the leaders are always required to perform a perfect management ability, which plays an important role in the firm's success. The perfection here includes business ethics. In fact, moral standards are real challenges for every business because the conflict between corporate ethics and success happens sometimes. The leaders can solve this situation through three perspectives: take a position on criticism challenged corporate actions, illustrate the firm's responsibilities by justifying the integrity of its business activities, and finally, develop competitive and argumentative working environment for its employees. In additional, to overcome this challenge, the “conditio humana” have to be considered as a core for all questions: Each individual is a moral subject, possessing dignity and endowed with liberty. To sum up, what is the relationship between morality and self-interest?
II. The Relationship between Morality, Self-Interest, and the Golden Rule:
Self-interest acts are contrasted to moral act which is related to mutual interests. With some prejudice from public discussion on corporate’s self-interest which is focusing on profit, the morality are considered as such a thing over one’s own benefits and should be an one’s obligation. This rule is hard to follow when people cannot be forced to do things against their self – interest. Because people are affected by a lot an empirical factors which are defined as the ingredients of certainly self-interest concept. Because of the inverse relationship between morality and self-interest, principle needs applying compatibly to someone’s benefits. That means the benefit is not for any individuals but for whole community. In business, it means a leader acts on himself for mutual company’s interest. This is wrapped up in a say or we can named as an economic Golden Rule “Invest in social cooperation for mutual advantage!”