Robert Bork's The Right of Privacy examined the landmark case Griswald v.
Conneticut. Bork's "originalist" view proclaimed that Justice Douglas erroneously interpreted the right of privacy from the Constitution. The originalist view is that judges must strictly adhere to the language of the
Constitution, thus people do not have a general right to privacy because it was never actually written into the Constitution. This view severely restricts judges in dealing with new issues that our forefathers could not have possibly envisioned. The inability of "originalist" to deal with modern and future problems displays a need for Supreme Court judges to be able to interpret laws from the Constitution. Without this ability it would be doubtful if people today could claim a general right to privacy.
The Griswald case involved a bizarre law that forbade the use of condoms in the hope that it would prevent adulterous affairs. This deduction is as absurd as banning all sales of chocolate in order to prevent obesity.
Robert Bork admitted that this law did not make sense, especially in the ability of government officials to enforce the law. Yet, Bork disagreed with the method used by Justice Douglas to overturn the conviction of two doctors distributing information on condoms. Bork felt that Douglas's liberal use of penumbras to create a zone of privacy was an excessive use of judicial power. Bork feels a judge must follow the Constitution and should not imply anything from the various ideas in the Constitution. This poses problems when trying to deal with cases that the Constitution does not specifically mention. For example, without the ability to interpret some of the various amendments in the constitution it would be virtually impossible for a judge to decide cases dealing with the on- line world. Is an on-line service provider similar to a magazine publisher
(Responsible for the information that it disseminates) or like a bookstore (That is not specifically liable for the information that it disseminates)? These types of decisions cannot be solved with an "originalist" view, because the
Constitution did not have the foresight to deal with such issues. In this same manner Justice Douglas implements penumbras to arrive at a general right of privacy that is not explicitly written into the Constitution. These penumbras are all valid within the spirit of the Constitution and does not go against anything specifically forbidden in the document. Thus, the justification of
Justice Douglas to create a zone of privacy is legitimate and the old archaic
Griswald laws is forever vanquished into the history books. Justice Douglas writes; "Various guarantees create zones of privacy. The right of association contained in the penumbra of the First Amendment The Third Amendment in its prohibition against the quartering of soldiers The Fourth Amendment explicitly affirms 'the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures' The Fifth Amendment in its Self
Incrimination Clause The Ninth Amendment provides: 'The Enumeration in the
Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." (Pg.124)
Bork also complained that Justice Douglas was being quite the alarmist by implying that the Griswald case would never be enforced. "There was, of course, no prospect that it ever would be enforced." (Pg. 133) It is not very assuring to my own peace of mind, when one defends an offensive law by stating that it's never going to be used. It only takes one ambitious politician to selectively enforce these laws for their own prejudice or gain. Bork complained that Douglas imagined "horrible events that never happened, never will, and could be stopped by the courts if they ever seemed about to happen." (Pg. 134) It should have dawned upon Mr. Bork that Justice Douglas and his colleagues was precisely the court that would stop those horrible events from ever happening.
The "originalist" philosophy is admirable in its use of such a strict discipline in interpreting the Constitution, yet the ultimate lack of flexibility in addressing modern problems in the Constitution is far to binding. The role of judges is ultimately based upon arbitrating what is right or wrong from the laws themselves, but when a problem arises that is not addressed within the laws/Constitution, then judges must be able to imply decisions based on the general spirit of the original document. Basically, if the Constitution does not specifically prohibit a right, and most amendments concur with that right, then it is permissible for judges to create rights like privacy. It would be most problematic if we had a strict "originalist" judicial history because blacks would be only 3/5 of a person, women would never have been enfranchised, and the
Senate would still be chosen by the House of Legislature.
The Supreme Court (consisting of the most learned and able legal experts in the country) should have the ability to interpret certain aspects of the
Constitution in order to prevent the Constitution from becoming a dated, historical document. Problems will continue to rise that the fathers of this country could not have possibly envisioned. Robert Bork's "originalist" view is far too restrictive in practice to allow the Constitution to be as vital today as it was 200 years ago.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
On April 6th, 1967 at Boston University in William Baird violated Massachusetts law at the time when he handed a condom and a package of Emko vaginal foam to an unmarried 19 year old young woman. At the time of the incident, under Massachusetts state law “Crimes against Chastity” makes it a felony for anyone to give away a drug, medicine, instrument, or article for the prevention of conception except in the case of (1) a registered physician administering or prescribing it for a married person or (2) an active registered pharmacist furnishing it to a married person presenting a registered physician's prescription. The Massachusetts Supreme Court set aside the conviction for exhibiting contraceptives on the grounds that it violated Baird First Amendment rights, but sustained the conviction for giving away the foam. The law permitted…
- 886 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Justice Black also believes the command that no unreasonable searches or seizures be allowed is too little to infer such a large decision. With these differences aside Justice Black feels that along with previous court decisions that the "Fourth Amendment's ban against unreasonable searches and seizures is considered together with the Fifth Amendment's ban against compelled self-incrimination, a constitutional basis emerges which not only justifies, but actually requires the exclusionary…
- 1111 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Kennedy, John F. “Speech to The Greater Houston Ministerial Association at the Rice Hotel in…
- 447 Words
- 2 Pages
Best Essays -
In “A Constitution for the New”, Michael Parenti's thesis was that the Constitution was made in favor of the Founding Fathers and the rich, and that the Constitution would make the rich, richer and the poor, poorer. To start off, one point he argued was that the Founding Fathers were supposed to meet in Philadelphia to revise and improve the Articles of Confederation. Instead, they decided to get rid of the Articles of Confederation and start from scratch without the approval from anybody or anybody knowing what they were doing. Secondly, when people first heard about the new government, “the wealthy looked to the national government as a means of protecting their interests.” (Parenti). This basically means that the rich will get richer and the poor will become poorer. Thirdly, small farmers had to pay heavy rent and taxes with low incomes and often had to borrow money in order to pay those fees. This led to Daniel Shay's Rebellion, where angry farmers intended to march to the Capital, but were stopped by the state militia. Lastly, “the most common and durable source of faction has been the various and unequal distribution of property.” (Madison). Many poor farmers were denied land because they could not afford it and without ownership of property, they were denied the right to vote. To conclude Parenti's thoughts, “The Constitution, then, was a product not only of class of privilege, but of class of struggle that continued and intensified as the corporate economy and the government grew.” (Parenti). But in truth, The Founding Fathers did not write the Constitution just for the rich or just for the poor, they wrote it for the benefit of our entire…
- 289 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
I found your response very enjoyable. I agree with you in saying that Mary Bibb faced many biases due to her race and sex and support your statement in saying that “one’s identity should not restrict or deny them from any opportunities.” I thought it was important that you addressed the issue of separation and exclusion, as the society was disregarding her accomplishments and making her seem invaluable due to her skin tone, sex and gender. Black children were also excluded/denied access to common schools and Mary Bibb wanted to change this, making sure that children of any skin colour could receive an education. Even though schools now accept students of various cultures/backgrounds/races, I find that within the classroom and schools, judgement,…
- 286 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
By definition, something that is fundamental is basic, essential, and involving all aspects of the subject at hand. Seeing that the preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that there should be a universal respect for and observance of the inalienable human rights and fundamental freedoms set forth in it, who could deny a human these things? ‘Human’, in this instance, is used as an adjective to describe the rights, which are of and belonging to all members of the human race; regardless of race, religion, color, gender, or social status. In the memoir, Night, by Elie Wiesel, he tells of his life as a young Jewish boy, and of the horrors he, his family, and others faced due to the stripping away of their rights by those…
- 1578 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Sadly, you are right. Even sadder still is the fact that Brandon Mayfield is not the only one going through this injustice. In a report by Human Rights Watch and the American Civil Liberties Union in the year 2002, since the 9/11 attacks, at least 70 men have been detained due to terrorism-related suspicions. Except for one man, all of them are muslims. Most of them are held without charges, access to lawyers or the basis of their arrest. Even if they were released, they still have to wear tracking bracelets and their rights to privacy taken away.…
- 149 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
This paper will argue that perfectionism, the idea that we should interpret the American Constitution so as to make it the best it can be, is the most adequate method used in judicial decision-making. Perfectionists follow the Constitution’s text, yet they may choose to interpret the meaning of the text in a way, which ultimately reflects their own beliefs regarding all the fundamental questions that arise in the courts. Within this method, the constitution can be portrayed as a living organism, and with the passing of time, this organism evolves and adjusts to current moral conditions, and fundamental questions of the law. Aside from perfectionism, also known as living constitutionalism, there are two other highly involved theories in judicial…
- 922 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“An understanding of the antecedent history of the Fourth Amendment is therefore important for an evaluation of the subsequent development of that amendment through judicial construction. History alone cannot, of course, provide the Supreme Court with clear guidance on all search and seizure questions up for decision, if only because the historical record is not always as clear as we should like it to be, and also because some issues raised under the Fourth Amendment such as the constitutionality of wiretapping or compulsory blood tests in criminal cases are of recent origin and could have been anticipated by those who drafted the Bill of Rights.” (p. 19 Landynski…
- 1106 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In chapter, five there are several points. However the biggest points are if the colonists should be independent from Britain, the colonists reaction to the laws and acts made by the British Empire, and the rights of the colonists. These points summarize the contents of chapter five of “Voices of Freedom” and “Give Me Liberty”. The articles in voices of freedom that are arguing the primary points the first article is the “Virginia Resolutions on the Stamp Act (1765)”. This article is about Virginia’s House of Burgesses making resolutions to defend their liberty they decided to approve four of these resolutions and rejected three. The next article is “New York Workingmen Demand a Voice in the Revolutionary Struggle (1770)”. This article is about how craftsmen have a right to speak there voice for public policy, as well as how ordinary men in new york city challenged how far the merchants should go for this resistance. The third article is “Association of the New York Sons of Liberty (1773)”. This article is about Britain taking advantage of the colonists’ rights and explaining to how their treatment is like slavery. The fourth article is “Farmington, Connecticut, Resolutions, on the Intolerable Acts (1774)”. This article is about the one thousand residents of Farmington, Connecticut response to the intolerable acts, as well as how liberty was the same cause as gods cause. The fifth article is “Thomas Paine, Common Sense (1776)”. This article is about what was wrong with monarchial rule and used colonists’ experiences as to why they should be independent to the British Empire. The last article is “James Chalmers, Plain Truth (1776)”. This article is about James Chalmers response to “Common Sense” and how the colonists would be better off staying loyal to the British, as well as how if they become independent then they will be taken over by another country and be slaves. This chapter is about the American Revolution and the argument about if the colonies should…
- 1443 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Some groups of Americans were allowed their civil liberties in the U.S. history. However, other groups of Americans were denied those civil rights. The government has recognized civil rights, protected civil rights, and addressed the importance of citizens to respect the civil rights of others through a process of civil unrest and political interventions.…
- 787 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The National Security Agency (NSA) is a federal program under the Department of Defense that has the primarily task of global monitoring, collection, decoding, translation and analysis of information and data for foreign intelligence and counterintelligence purposes, including surveillance of targeted individuals on U.S. soil. In the mid-1970s, the NSA was investigated for the first time by Congress. At that time, the order of the NSA was that is “would never direct it’s surveillance apparatus domestically.” After the investigation was performed, Frank Church, the Democratic senator who was the head of the investigative committee, warned: “The NSA’s capability at any time could be turned around on the American people, and no American would have any privacy left, such is the capability to monitor everything: telephone conversation, telegrams, it doesn’t matter” (Greenwald). Recent leakage of government documents, that shows evidence of immense domestic spying, has many Americans worried that Frank Church’s warning has become a reality. So, what exactly is the NSA collecting and why? How does the United States’ data collection compare to that of other countries? And most importantly, have the government and the NSA put the privacy of US citizens at risk?…
- 1205 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The USA PATRIOT Act stands for “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism." This act was enacted 45 days after more than 3,000 American lives were lost at the state of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The intended purpose of the act is to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes. There are four primary initiatives of the act in improving our nation’s counterterrorism efforts: It allows investigators to use the tools available to investigate organized crime and drug trafficking; facilitates information sharing and cooperation between government agencies so they can detect patterns of terrorist activities; update the law compatible to new technologies and new threats; and raise penalties…
- 461 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
want something that is a must for every human being, and that includes but not limited to dignity. As Chris Cuomo says in his article entitled, “Dignity and the Right to be Lesbian or Gay,” “It make sense to point out that an important aspect of the fight for gay quality is about asserting dignity, because, on the flip side, it is true that homophobic logics often regard queer identity as a sort of debased or degraded essence” (79). In todays world, LGBTQ community are certaintly more acceptable and more respected compared to old ages, but there are still so much to be done for them to be consider as a majority not a minority, and be respected and not judged.…
- 350 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The position of first lady in a country like the United States has never and will never be an easy job. Women that have held that position through the ages have been the wife’s of both praised and infamous presidents. This has led to a general overlooking at the first lady’s importance in the well-being of the nation that is until certain women became more involved and defined new standards for the role. One of the first of such women and the one that is said to have set the bar for all future first ladies was Eleanor Roosevelt. Praised for her charm, generosity and outstanding intellect she was an avid activist and a supporter of human rights.…
- 2346 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays