Preview

The Real Lesson of New Coke

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5536 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Real Lesson of New Coke
The Real Lesson of New Coke:
The Value of Focus Groups for Predicting the Effects of Social Influence
By Robert M. Schindler n April 1985, the management of Coca-Cola Co. announced its decision to change the flavor of the cotnpany 's flagship brand. The events that followed from this decision, as well as the faetors which led up to it, have been reviewed, discussed, and extensively analyzed in the popular press, the trade press, and in marketing textbooks. Two books and at least two marketing cases have been written on the events surrounding the flavor change decision. Also, a well-known, but somewhat older Harvard Business School marketing case deals with some of the key events which led up to the decision. Despite the extent of this attention, more can be learned from this dramatic pieee of marketing history. Pepsi began communicating these findings to consumers through "Pepsi Challenge" television ads .showing taste tests where Coca-Cola drinkers expressed preferences for a cola which was then revealed to be Pepsi, This campaign contributed to Coca-Cola 's slow, but steady decline of market share in the soft-drink category. This erosion was most apparent in foodstore sales, which reflect consumer preferences more directly than do vendingtiiachine or fountain sales. By 1977, Pepsi had actually pulled ahead of Coke in foodstore market share. Although publicly expressing a lack of concern about the Pepsi Challenge advertising, Coca-Cola 's managetnent privately was quite worried because blind taste tests by the company 's own market research department had confirmed Pepsi 's claims. Secretly, Coke 's management began researching the possibility of reformulating Coca-Cola to respond to the apparent changes that had occurred in consumer tastes. By 1984, researchers had arrived at a new formula for Coke whieh, in blind taste tests, beat Pepsi by as much as six to eight percentage points. In addition to beating Pepsi, cola drinkers chose this new formula over the



References: Allvine. Fred C. (1987), Marketing: Principles and Practices. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Alsop, Ron (1985), "Coke 's Flip-Flop Underscores Risks of Consumer Taste Tests," Wall Street JournaHiuly 18), 23. (1987), "New Coke Is a Smash Success With Consumers in This Poll," Wall Street Journal {Feb. 26), 23. Alter, Stewart (1985) "Coke Hurting Research Image," Advertising Age (July 22), 58. Anderson, W. Thomas Jr. and Linda L. Golden (1984), "Bank Promotion Strategy," .lournal of Advertising Research, 24 (April/May) 53-65. Bearden, William O. and Michael J. Etzel (1982), "Reference Group Inlluence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (September), 183-194. Boure, Hrancis S. (1957). "Group Influence in Marketing and Public Relations," in Some Applications of Behavioral Research, Rensis Likeri and Samuel P. Hayes Jr., eds. Paris: The UNESCO Press. Clark, John B. (1987), Marketing Today: Successes. Failures, and Turnarounds. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Crawford. C. Merle (1987), New Products Management, 2nd ed. Homewood, IL: lrwin. Engel, James F., Roger D. Black well, and Paul W. Miniard (1990), Consumer Behavior, 6th ed. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press. . (December), 3-8. Enrico. Roger and Jesse Kornbluth (1986). The Other Guy Blinked. New York: Bantam Books. Feldman, Sidney P. and Merlin C. Spencer (1965), "Ihe Effect of Personal Influence in the Selection of Consumer Services," in Proceedings of ihe Fall Conference of the Ameriean Marketing Association, Peter D. Bennett, ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association. Fisher, Anne B. (1985), "Coke 's Brand-Loyalty Lesson," Fortune, i 12 (Aug. 5). 44-46. Gelb, Betsy D. and Gabriel M. Gelb (1986), "New Coke 's Fizzle—Lessons for the Rest of Us," Sloan Management Review (Fall), 71-76. Giges, Nancy (1985), "Coke 's Switch a Classic," Advertising Age, 56 (July 15), 1,82. ___^__ (1986), "Adman of ihc Year: Coca-Cola 's Roberto Goizueta Engineers Startling Comeback," Advertising Age, 64 (Dec. 29), 1,26-27. Greenwald, John (1985). "Coca-Cola 's Big Fizzle," Time (July 22), 48-52. Harvard Business School (1978), "Pepsi-Cola (A)," Case # 9-579-108. Hendon, Donald W. (1989), Cta.ssic Failures in Product Marketing. New York: Quorum Books. Hollie, Pamela G. (1985), "Coca-Cola Changes Its Secret Formula, In Use far 99 Years," New York Times (April 24), 1. . and Robert J. Kegerreis (1969), "How Information is HonomichI, Jack (1985), "Missing Ingredients in "New ' Coke 's Research." AdvfiUsing Age (July 22), 1,58. Kotler, Philip (1988), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, implementation, and Control, 6th cd. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Louis, J. C. and Harvey Z. Yazijian (1980), The Cola Wars. New York: Everest House. Martin, Stephen H. (1987), "Marketing Can ^Make A Good Life Better ' If It Is Properly Practiced," Marketing News, 21 (April 10), 2. McCarthy. Michael J. (1990), "Coke II Survives One Test City, Heads to Second," Wall Street Journal {Oct. 5) BLIO. __^ (1991), "Coca Cola is Facing New Pepsi Challenge: Avoiding Signs of Age," Wall Street Journal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ans: In the late 80s, Pepsi market share was catching up with Coca-cola at a great speed. Its main success was coming from a new marketing strategy, directing its focus on new generation consumers as well as hosting a series of commercials called “the Pepsi Challenge”, which is a taste test competition between Pepsi and Coke. The result of this test was in Pepsi’s advantage, it indicated that consumers prefer the taste of Pepsi more. This result made the Coca-cola company’ executives highly concerned and decided to revolutionize its flagship product by changing the taste of the Coke and introduced it as the “New Coke”. After the product was launched, consumers’ response was outrageous and the new product was a complete failure. Only a few months later, the company had to decide to bring its original product back, Coke classic.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Coca-Cola Case Study

    • 303 Words
    • 1 Page

    Coca-Cola uses various segmentation strategies to include and categorize all of its consumers into their beverage market. Coca-Cola has virtually a selecting for everyone on the planet, other than those who naturally prefer Pepsi over Coke. Their “Dieters Segment” appeals to those who are concerned about their weight. Which started with the original Coke and spread to the various versions they offered in late years. Then they created Diet Coke Plus which had added vitamins, which was a customer valued decision. Next there is the “”Real Men” Segment” Which includes Coke Zero, this drink allowed men to purchase low calorie drinks without relating the idea it was very similar to a Diet Coke; “because Diet Coke is for women”. The “Diy Segment” is another segment Coca-Cola has created to divide a extensive target market into subcategories of customers. In this segment otherwise called “Do It Yourself” allowed, consumers to create and mix any possible drink. The new machines are becoming more frequently seen and easily accessible.…

    • 303 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early 1920s Coca-Cola’s president, Robert Woodruff, envisioned Coca-Cola soft drinks “within an arm’s reach of desire” (The Coca-Cola Company, 2014). He recognized that place, goods and services available in the right amounts and in the right locations when customers want them, is extremely critical to the company’s overall success (Perreault et al. 2011). When he started with the company, Coca-Cola was available in only five other countries and in less than ten years of his leadership and marketing strategies that number multiplied six times.…

    • 813 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The article “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century” is about the “love-hate” relationship between the two largest cola companies of America, as they fight with each other for shares of a $60 billion industry, while also fighting with the industry to increase and fuel growth for cola consumption. From 1975 to 1990 both companies achieved an average annual growth of about 10%, while consumption grew in the U.S. and worldwide, but a turn of events in the late 1990s threatened the companies with consumption of carbonated soft drinks (CSD) dropping for a consecutive two years and worldwide shipments were also slowing. The decline is thought to be from the consumer’s want for alternatives to CSD’s like sports drinks, bottled water, juices, teas, etc. The solution to this problem relies on both of the companies’ abilities to boost flagging domestic sales, venture into emerging international markets, broaden their brand portfolio for new streams of revenue and include non-carbonated beverages in their “big plan”.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Coke vs Pepsi

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As we all know, Coca-Cola and Pepsi have been rivals for centuries. While most people have their own preference on which cola they prefer, they have no idea what makes these two cola brands so similar yet so different. While both are similar in color and taste, the biggest difference between these two brands are their sugar level. Coca-Cola, the dominant coke brand, contains less sugar compared to that of Pepsi’s. Furthermore, these two world renowned colas are said to help regain energy because of its caffeine content. In addition, Pepsi has higher caffeine content and contains more calories compared to Coke. These two cola types carbonated drinks are slightly different in taste. Coca-Cola has a slight vanilla taste to it while Pepsi has a sort of citrusy taste to it. When poured into a glass, Coca-Cola produces more “fizz” even though it is much smoother when swallowed. On the other hand, Pepsi maintains its fizzy sensation when swallowed. Despite all these differences, most people can barely tell the difference between these two colas in a blind-folded taste test. There was an experiment conducted to test students’ preference on both colas. According to Woolfolk and her associates (185-186), most college student Coke drinkers prefer Pepsi in a test where Pepsi and Coke are labeled as S and L respectively. They have concluded that college students prefer the letter S compared to L. They had conducted an experiment where both cups S and L contained half Coke and half Pepsi. Regardless of the type of cola, the students preferred cola S over cola L in 85 percent of the cases. This has proved that students’ preference on their favorite cola did not result from the preference for different colas, but the preferences for certain letters. In conclusion, these two colas’ have differences so slight that most consumers cannot even tell.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    MGT330 Final Paper

    • 2291 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The new age brings a challenge to Coca-Cola to find a way to reinvent and rebrand itself. With Mary Minnick as the new head of marketing, Coca-Cola is creating a new and fresh image through marketing and product development efforts. In this paper, I will describe and evaluate Coca-Cola’s marketing and innovation strategy transformation designed to position the company on the cutting edge of consumer trends, and developing healthy beverages, examine the underlying logic of Minnick’s emphasis on understanding why people consume beverages, discuss the underlying local of the non-carb drinks strategy, and compare and contrast the performance of Coca-Cola and Pepsi.…

    • 2291 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Two major detriments to Coca-Cola’s strategy of expansion into non-carbonated beverages may be the impact of society’s recent economic uncertainty and increased health awareness. Such beverages may be considered luxuries. Although pricing might be competitive, in today’s economic uncertainty individuals may prefer a variety of beverages that offer better nutritional value vice purchasing Coca-Cola’s soda beverages. It is my opinion; Coca-Cola has strategically…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pendergrast, M. (1994), “Siphoning that Coca-Cola magic”, Management Review, Jan94, Vol. 83 Issue 1, p26, 8p…

    • 2500 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    April 13th 1992, PepsiCo introduced an exciting change to its popular Pepsi product in the test cities of Providence, Denver, and Dallas and called it Crystal Pepsi. This is believed by many to have been one of the best ideas that PepsiCo had ever came out with, as they simply removed any and all coloring from Pepsi, creating a healthier and visually stimulating product. During the 1980's, Madison Avenue advertisers created one of our society's most aberrant spectacles yet, the pinnacle of decades of pop culture and advertising prowess, The Cola Wars. In our technological, media-driven, consumer-happy, and product-driven culture, selling and consuming soda has certainly become one of our biggest American pastimes. Coca-Cola and PepsiCo squared off for decades in various advertising coups trying to sell more soda to the already overly indulgent American public. A seemingly easy goal, but these companies have tried everything from using pop-stars, bold and daring challenges and most recently the chance to win a billion dollars on national television just for drinking their products. Throughout the…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Pharmacist John Pemberton invented Coke in 1886, it was the original energy drink claiming to have restorative powers. The original ingredients of Coke also included a small amount of Cocaine, but this was eliminated from the ingredients in 1903. Coca-Cola is made of water, sugar, a few secret flavors and some bubbles. But behind the product itself is where marketing has played a key role in Coca-Cola’s domination of the market place. Coca-Cola promises more than a beverage, it promises good cheer and happy memories. In the early 1900’s it was exceptionally difficult to decipher between Coca-Cola and Coca-Nola - amongst other competitors. Eventually Coke set itself apart with a design challenge that led to a bottle design, created by Earl Dean in 1915, called the “hobble skirt.” This design would forever set Coca-Cola apart from it’s competitors. Robert Woodruff – head of Coca-Cola for nearly 60 years, starting in 1923 - was also credited with many brilliant ideas including: the six-pack, standardized cooler, and tieins to Olympic events. Woodruff also promised to bring Coke to the US troops during WWII for only a nickel. This promise lead to extreme loyalty from those 11 million Americans that returned home. With artworks done by Norman Rockwell and the association Coke made with Santa Clause, Coke once again, found ways to associate their brand with Americana and wonderful memories. Eventually Pepsi entered the scene with a happy little jingle and offered twice as much soda for the same amount of money. By 1983 Coke only held 24% of the market share. Pepsi was beating Coke in the market. In April of 1985 Coke changed the formula of their soft drink. This outraged consumers and was ultimately an epic failure - turned into a big win. When Coke brought back their original flavor the business boomed. By 1986 Coke was dominating the market. Some believe that Coke planned the entire campaign in order to draw attention back to…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introducing New Coke

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this case of Coca-Cola changing their well established Coke formula and introducing an new one in 1985 for the purpose of gaining more market share; the reason why such decision was made by Coke’s executives was mainly because of a series of marketing campaign conducted by their major arrival - Pepsi. During mid 1970s, Pepsi has ran a the famous “Pepsi Challenge” of blind taste tests on all the commercials to show that the majority preferred Pepsi than Coke based on its teste. By 1977, Pepsi had exceeded Coke’s market share in major restaurant chains and food stores. Under the threat of being taken over by Pepsi and losing the industrial leader position, Coke released their new formulated coke on April 23th, 1985. While the Coke’s new formula was preferred in the blind taste tests, consumers especially loyal consumers across the country had a strong and negative reaction to the fact that Coke was going to replace the original formula with this new. In the end, Coke had to reintroduce the original Coke under the name Coke Classic, and the new coke quickly faded away. And the once leading Pepsi during Coke’s transactional period, fell back to the second market place again.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Initially introduced in Atlanta Georgia in 1886.Coca Cola is one of the most predominate soft drinks of all time. The successes of Coca Cola were not without failures. The reformulation of Coke’s flagship may have been one of the worst product failures of all time. However, this disaster may have begun stemming way before the introduction of New Coke. Coca Cola had been battling with Pepsi Cola since Pepsi’s introduction in 1903. Until just after World War II, Coca Cola had a commanding 60% market share1. Pepsi’s superior management decisions and marketing mix with the aging of the baby boomers enabled them to close the gap in the soft drink market segment. As the baby boomers got older and more health conscious coca cola began to lose market share. Pepsi, which was already the favorable product for the younger less health conscious soft drink users, began to target more niche markets such as the African American market. However, one of the big contributors to closing the market share gap was selling at a lower, market penetrating, price during The Great Depression by selling 12 oz bottles for a nickel while Coca Cola continued selling 6 oz bottles for the same price. Pepsi, adjusted better to their external environment by delivering value to their customers and Coca Cola suffered because of this2. Coca Cola felt that their time was running out with much of their brand loyal customer base aging and Pepsi controlling the younger more favorable segment. Pepsi’s youth focused positioning was getting better and better especially with their “Pepsi Challenge” marketing campaign in 1975. This campaign aimed to develop the belief that this is now the ‘Pepsi Generation’. This campaign was extremely successful because it called Coca Cola the reigning market leader out on it’s taste. Pepsi heavily marketed the results of this challenge to the public in exclamation that the Pepsi Generation has finally arrived3. Coca Cola tried firing back with an ad campaign…

    • 3607 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    New Coke

    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages

    By 1977, Pepsi had actually pulled ahead of Coke in food store market share. (Schindler, 1992) Coke's lead had dropped from a better than two to one margin to a mere 4.9 percent lead by 1984. (Bastedo & Davis, 1993) Coke was clearly in danger of becoming the Number-Two soft drink. In April 1985, the management of Coca-Cola Co. announced its decision to change the flavour of the company's flagship brand. The events that followed from this decision, as well as the factors which led up to it, have been reviewed, discussed, and extensively analyzed in this report.…

    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coca-Cola has strived to remain innovative during its 126 years of operation. The market for soda and other beverages is constantly changing, and Coca-Cola must keep up with these changes to remain profitable. Coca-Cola must invest in new products and technology to remain innovative. There are many motives to maintain a high level of innovation, including sustainable development, competitors, social awareness, new needs of its customers, and changing and shifting demographics. Addressing these motives will help Coca-Cola remain competitive and innovative in a changing marketplace.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introducing the New Coke

    • 2311 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Midway through the case study, the author introduced what is still perceived today as one of the most intrigued case studies: the way Coca-Cola handled one of its competitors, Pepsi-Cola, and the introduction of the new Coke. The author walked us through how with marketing research, product testing (The Pepsi Challenge) and effective advertising, Pepsi-Cola was able to introduce itself in the American culture. Pepsi became Coca-Cola’s fierce competitor and started getting a growing share of the market of soft drinks.…

    • 2311 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics