Preview

The Organizational Benefits Of Team

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
9210 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Organizational Benefits Of Team
04glassop (ds)

18/12/01

3:23 pm

Page 225

Human Relations
[0018-7267(200202)55:2]
Volume 55(2): 225–249: 021184
Copyright © 2002
The Tavistock Institute ®
SAGE Publications
London, Thousand Oaks CA,
New Delhi

The organizational benefits of teams
Linda I. Glassop

A B S T R AC T

This study presents an analysis of the benefits of two team structures
– quality circles and self-managing work groups – for Australian work organizations utilizing the Australian Workplace Industrial Relations
Survey for 1995. The analysis indicates that firms with team structures have higher labor productivity, a flatter management structure and reduced employee turnover. The presence of team structures in
Australian firms indicates a decrease in industrial harmony. The findings were inconclusive regarding absenteeism and profitability.

KEYWORDS

industrial harmony ᭿ productivity ᭿ quality circles ᭿ self-managing work groups ᭿ teams

Introduction
The use of formal work teams, team-building activities and the rhetoric of
‘the team’ are, today, commonplace in the theoretical and popular business literature (Cordery, 1995; Hillkirk, 1993). Research extends to such topics as team leadership (Manz & Sims, 1987), group structures (Cohen
& Ledford, 1994), group-think (Manz & Sims, 1982), team leader selection (Armstrong, 1998), and group dysfunction (Diamond, 1991).
Research also suggests that teams can provide many benefits for organizations and employees alike (Cordery, 1995; Morehead et al., 1997; Osterman, 1994).
Callus et al. (1991) and Morehead et al. (1997) suggest that the adoption of formal team structures and the use of team-building approaches in
225

04glassop (ds)

226

18/12/01

3:23 pm

Page 226

Human Relations 55(2)

Australian organizations are widespread. However, an empirical analysis of their benefits is lacking. Cordery (1995) confirms that such survey data are not available in Australia. American researchers also note, ‘. . . empirical evidence regarding [team]



References: Armstrong, A. Using assessment centers to select team leaders. Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 1998, 35(2), 65–79. Berger, R.W. & Shores, D.L. (Eds) Quality circles: Selected readings. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1986. Blakemore, J. Quality habits of best business practice. Sydney: Prentice Hall, 1996. The Journal of Industrial Relations, 1983, 25(1), 291–311. Callus, R., Morehead, A., Cully, M. & Buchanan, J. Industrial relations at work: The Australian workplace industrial relations survey. Commonwealth Department of Industrial Relations, Canberra: AGPS, 1991. Clifford, G.P. & Sohol, A.M. Developing self-directed work teams. Management Decision, 1999, 36(2), 77–84. Human Relations, 1994, 47, 13–43. Cordery, J.L. Work redesign: Rhetoric or reality. Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 1995, 32(2), 3–19. Cordery, J.L., Mueller, W.S. & Smith, L.M. Attitudinal and behavioral effects of autonomous group working: A longitudinal field study. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34, 464–76. CA: Jossey-Bass, 1991. Education, The Australian National University, 1993. Emery, M. (Ed.) Participative design for participative democracy. Canberra: Center for Continuing Education, The Australian National University, 1993. Erwin, P.J. & Iverson R.D. Strategies in absence management. Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 1993, 32(3),13–32. Gilmour, P. Operations management in Australia. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire, 1991. Gilmour, P. & Hunt, R.A. Total quality management: Integrating quality into design, operations and strategy. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire, 1995. Glassop, L.I. The road to quality: Turning effort into reward. Sydney: Prentice Hall, 1995. Graduate School of Management, University of New South Wales, 1997. Harley, B. The myth of empowerment: Work organization, hierarchy and employee autonomy in contemporary Australian workplaces. Work, Employment and Society, 1999, 13(1), 41–66. Ishikawa, K. What is total quality control? The Japanese way. (Translated by D.J. Lu.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1985. Harvard Business Review, 1992, 70(1), 71–9. Jossey-Bass, 1992. Human Relations, 1982, 35, 773–84. Manz, C. & Sims, H.P. Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of selfmanaging work teams. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 1987, 32, 106–28. Mathews, J. Catching the wave: Workplace reform in Australia. St Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin, 1994. New York: McGraw Hill, 2000. Osterman, P. How common is workplace transformation and who adopts it? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1994, 47, 173–88. Human Relations, 1987, 40(11), 751–82. Shewhart, W.A. Economic control of quality of manufactured product. New York: D. Von Nostrand, 1931.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 19 Assignment 1

    • 610 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this assessment you will have opportunities to provide evidence against the following criteria. Indicate the page numbers where the evidence can be found.…

    • 610 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to teamwork, most people will consider teamwork in terms of being part of a baseball, basketball, or football team. In contrast, a team is “really just a group of people who use their skills, experience, and knowledge to work toward a common goal” (Beverly K. Bachel, 2007). Teams working together in the workplace are extremely productive and profitable. Teams working together increase problem-solving skills and innovation, quality, and decrease turnover and absenteeism. (Scarnati, J 2006) Teams have an overall high success rate when well structured and the communication between the team members stays open throughout the project. A team is a collection of individuals who have gathered to achieve the same…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kozlowski, S. W. and B. S. Bell. ―Work Groups and Teams in Organizations.‖ Bormann, W. C., D. R. Ilagan, D. R., and R. Klimoski. In Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology: Vol. 12 Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New York, Wiley.…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Gardner, M. & Palmer, G. (1997) Employment Relations: Industrial Relations and Human Resource Management in Australia (2nd edn), Melbourne: Macmillan, p.3…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This section explores how teams are formed within organizations, from identifying the need for a group, identifying its characteristics, forming the group, and finally developing effective teams within the group. There are 4 types of groups, formal, informal, secondary and primary, each having its own dynamics but all having a foundation that requires a collection of people with different skill sets and personalities, to come together and achieve a common goal.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apa Referencing

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Coutu, D. (2009). Why Teams Don 't Work. Harvard Business Review, 87(5), 98-105. Retrieved 29th April 2012 from EBSCO http://searchebscohost.com…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: Banutu-Gomez, M., & Rohrer, W. G. (2011). Teams in organization. The Business Review, Cambridge, 18(1), 54-60.…

    • 2115 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    The initial part of this report consist the definition of a Team and the different kinds of teams found in organisations. Next the advantage of a team’s followed by the several models and theories on how to accomplish team effectiveness would be discussed. Finally the conclusion will be on the drawbacks of the team work based tasks in organisations, and the mechanisms to improve and minimize the disadvantages. Thus all these theories and issues will be supported by practical examples to affirm that people working in teams always achieve their goals more efficiently and effectively than people working alone.…

    • 2850 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Effective Teams

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although companies have used teams for a long time, they are used with greater effect than in the past. There are a few differences between the traditional work environment and the way teams work in today’s society. Table 11.1 The New Team Environment illustrates the differences in environments (Bateman, Snell, 2011).…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miss: Team Leader

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages

    |the benefits of teams for an organisation|members of a team |effectiveness in meeting its objectives, |…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    LaFasto and Larson (2002) note that teams are very different from each individual employee because each team member must not only work on their own goals and the teams objectives, they must also be collaborative with the other members of the team. In order for a team to be most effective, it depends on a collegial atmosphere similar to the one created by Nike vice president and CFO Don W. Blair who states that he ôseeks to create the milieu that builds organizational capacity to keep us competitiveö (Knowledge@Wharton, 2005, p. 2). The effectiveness of this collegial atmosphere resounds through much of the literature. Kouzes and Posner (2007), note that one of the most important ingredients…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Everest Reflection

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bibliography: • Charles C. Manz and Christopher P. Neck. (1995). ‘Teamthink: beyond the Groupthink syndrome’. Journal of Managerial Psychology. Volume 10 (1):1-9…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the last decade of the Twentieth Century, nearly every company in North America caught the team bug. If the hype was to be believed, workplace teams would solve virtually every corporate problem, ratchet up quality, increase productivity and profits, improve organizational culture, and cure the common cold. University Of Phoenix (2004)…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Self-Directed Work Teams

    • 2275 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Self-managed work teams can be defined as a small number of employees with paired skills, talents and knowledge and are all attached to a particular goal and approach, and for which they are themselves personally accountable. Self-governing work teams usually engage workers within a particular field, or employees who are working on a common product or process. Self-managed work team normally can be of any range between 12 to 15workers (Kathy and Deborah 2007, 27). The team takes all the decisions which previously would have been taken by the management and they are responsible for the decisions taken. The teams might work in collaboration with the organisation’s suppliers or clients or both at the same time. The purpose of this essay is to critically examine to what extent self-directed work teams are really effective to businesses and to employees, that is, how advantageous it is to both parties and to also examine its disadvantages and drawbacks that it brings along with it once it is implemented.…

    • 2275 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays

Related Topics