Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Lesser of Two Evils: Why the Atomic Bomb Was Justified

Good Essays
913 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Lesser of Two Evils: Why the Atomic Bomb Was Justified
The Lesser Of Two Evils:
Why the Atomic Bomb Was Justified As history has progressed, Man has always looked back and debated why certain actions occurred and whether or not such measures should have been taken. Though numerous such arguments take place, one of the most debated issues is that of the dropping of the atomic bomb at the end of World War Two. Critics of the atomic bomb argue that far too many people were killed through the United States ' use of the bomb, they state that other means were available. The fact of the matter is, only one other method was available and that was the overland invasion of Japan. The Bomb 's use, despite the many casualties it caused, actually saved lives, both American and Japanese, and prevented many more years of conflict. The most obvious argument for The Bomb is to point at the number of lives it saved. The "island-hopping" campaign in the Central Pacific had slowly pushed the Japanese north towards Japan. Assault on island after island took their toll on both the American and Japanese forces. The first step towards Japan was taken in November of 1943 with an amphibious invasion of Tarawa, a small island containing only 4,800 men, of which only 146 survived. The Japanese were a determined fighting force and inflicted 3,300 casualties upon the attacking American troops. The "die-hard" attitude of the Japanese was reflected in all following island battles such as the Mariana Island invasion in which 23,000 Americans fell victim to Japanese warriors, of whom more than 40,000 were slain. Despite their determination, however, the Japanese could not hold back the American war machine, despite inflicting more than 75,000 more casualties upon the assaulting American servicemen before the dropping of the atomic bomb. As MacArthur 's island campaign was starting, American strategists were already planning for the eventual invasion of the Japanese home-islands. Early in 1943 it was slated that the assault would begin on November 1st, 1945. The initial invasion force would consist of 250,000 troops that would then be backed up by an additional 550,000 soldiers upon establishing a foothold in Japan. Japan 's plans to counter the American invasion included 2.5 million combat troops supplemented by a militia that consisted of nearly a quarter of Japan 's population, including women. Just as the soldiers in the central Pacific had done, most of these people could be expected to fight to the death, with an expected outcome of more than one and a half million Japanese deaths. American soldiers who would be charged with occupying the island could expect only hatred from civilians and many would be killed even in conquered areas. All in all, more than 370,000 Americans would be likely casualties in the invasion of Japan. On August 6th, 1945, the B-29 bomber Enola Gay dropped the first atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima, inflicting 70,000 casualties upon the Japanese and destroying more than sixty percent of the city. Despite this incredible destruction, however, the Japanese still refused to surrender to the Allies. Three days later, another Bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, killing an additional 35,000 Japanese and destroying two square miles of the city. In light of the death of 105,000 of its citizens, Japan 's War Committee finally declared an unconditional surrender to the United States on August 10th, 1945. Though a ghastly number of people were slain by the use of the atomic bombs, more lives were saved by the sacrifice of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As the war approached the autumn of 1945, the American people were growing tired of the war and President Truman needed to find a quick way to end the war. It was estimated that an invasion of Japan would last through 1946 and into 1947. Many troops had been demobilized with the surrender of Germany, but a large number of units were being transferred from Europe to the Pacific for the upcoming invasion. Transferees were becoming increasingly mutinous but could not be dealt with too harshly-- they had done their job in Europe, all the public wished for now was peace. Time was being paid for with lives, and the quickest way to bring the war to an end was through the use of the atomic bomb. World War Two was the largest war in history, with more battles being fought, more boundaries being pushed, and more deaths than had been ever seen. World War Two was a time of great technological advance and, as such things go, the technology discovered was put to use. The discovery and use of the atomic bomb was crucial to the rapid end of the war against Japan and despite the deaths it caused, its use was justified. Lives would be lost as a result of any action against the Japanese, so in the end, it was the atomic bomb, not an invasion, that was the less evil of the paths to end the war. Bibliography
Victory At Sea, James F. Dunnigan and Albert A. Nofi, William Morrow & Company
Inc., New York, NY, ©1995
"World Wars", Encyclopedia Britannica, pages 802A – 802J Encyclopedia Britannica
Inc., ©1971
Since The Beginning, Jerry H. Combee, A Beka Book, Pensacola FL, ©1993
World War II, C. L. Sulzberger, American Heritage Publishing Co., ©1966
History of the World: The Last Five Hundred Years, Esmond Wright, Bonanza Books,
Twickenhan, Middlesex, England, ©1984

Bibliography: Victory At Sea, James F. Dunnigan and Albert A. Nofi, William Morrow & Company Inc., New York, NY, ©1995 "World Wars", Encyclopedia Britannica, pages 802A – 802J Encyclopedia Britannica Inc., ©1971 Since The Beginning, Jerry H. Combee, A Beka Book, Pensacola FL, ©1993 World War II, C. L. Sulzberger, American Heritage Publishing Co., ©1966 History of the World: The Last Five Hundred Years, Esmond Wright, Bonanza Books, Twickenhan, Middlesex, England, ©1984

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Some people are under the belief that Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was because of the nature of the war against Japan. During this time of conflict, Americans believed that the war, itself, was a racial war and the war was also a campaign for revenge because of the attack on Pearl Harbor. In the article “Hiroshima: Why America Dropped the Bomb,” the author Marc Rothenberg…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Atomic Bomb Justified?

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Atomic Bomb made a very serious statement at a time when the world was in disarray (“Manhattan”). World War II was one of the most destructive times in history causing over 50 million deaths and leaving behind mental and physical casualties of war. (“World War II”) It started in September, 1939 when Germany invaded Poland and continued on a destructive path through Europe. Britain and France declared war on Germany. Two years prior in 1937, the Sino Japanese War was in full swing. Japan wanted to dominate China from a political and military standpoint and benefit from China’s many assets (“Sino”). United States, Britain and France aided China with financial aid through war supply contracts, which aggravated Japan to no end. In addition, the United States stood as a firm roadblock to Japan’s grander plans by stopping shipment of aircraft gasoline airplanes and airplane parts.…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dropping of the atom bomb on Japan saved American lives. If American soldiers invaded Japan we would have lost even more lives. “More than 55,000 Americans had already died in the Pacific. The bomb prevented more American lives to be lost” (Walker). This shows that so many American lives were already lost, and by dropping the bombs there were many lives that were saved. Because of the bomb dropping, a huge number of American lives were saved. “An invasion of Japan would have resulted in another 500,000 American lives lost” (The Human Cost). This shows that dropping the bomb was a good idea because we didn’t have to invade Japan so we could save lives.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some say that the use of the atomic bomb was inhumane because of the devastation upon human life. While others say that if the atomic bomb had not been used in the manner it was, that World War II may have continued costing more loss of human life than the bombing (The National Interest, n.d.). America was very strong in the act to defend the country and its citizens, dealing with the moral dilemmas behind the bombing, the mass destruction caused by the bombing, the horrible physical and emotional effects on the citizens of Japan, and strained relations between America and…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In august of 1945, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a questionable decision by Harry Truman, the president of The United States of America. Throughout the years, it has been a heated debate in terms of whether the decision was morally correct and justified. Historians have analyzed and presented many arguments. In this short essay, I will attempt to expand on how historians feel about the decision by Truman to use atomic bombs. The revisionists bring into perspective and question the motivations of Harry Truman claiming he had more on his agenda than just the war. In my opinion, the decision to use atomic bombs was somewhat justified because if looked at statistically, the death toll with an invasion would have been higher and Truman…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before July of 1945, the atomic bomb had never even been tested before, but the allies saw that the collapse of Japan was near. They came up with Operation Downfall, which was the planned invasion of Japan. It was Divided into two parts, Operation Olympic and Operation Coronet. The Americans planned on landing in Kyushu fist, and then using it as a base for their planes, which were to be used to support the landings in Kanto. Unfortunately the Japanese realized as early as the year before that there were few places that could be used for a landing place, so they knew that if an invasion were to take place it would most likely take place on the beaches of Kyushu and Kanto because both could handle a huge amphibious landing. The Joint Chiefs of Staff estimated that just Operation Olympic would cost about 456,000 men, with 109,000 deaths. Operation Coronet would experience 1.2 million casualties, with 267,000 deaths. No matter which figures are used, it is a fact that America would have suffered a catastrophic amount of deaths with even more…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1945, when the atomic bomb was dropped in Japan I felt that it was not justified. Even though it saved thousands of American lives it was at the cost of others lives. The United States could have gave the Japanese a warning before dropping not one, but two bombs on them. However, the Japanese did not surrender until after the second bomb I think a warning would have made the bombing “justified.”…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japans army was too strong for the United States to invade. That is why they chose to drop the bombs. The american soldiers were very tired from four years of fighting the war. Japan had two million soldiers waiting for an invasion to happen. There is no way the war would have ended without the bombings.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The infamous bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima is a highly controversial subject and many continue to debate about the event, over half a century after it occurred. In August of 1945, near the end of World War II, the US military dropped two atomic bombs over Japan, not only causing a mass of death and devastation, but it also induced the question- were dropping the bombs necessary and justified? Due to exaggerated statistics, and what students learn in textbooks, Americans are socialized into believing that dropping the bombs were necessary to ending the war. However, in reality, several reasons ranging from the fact that civilians outnumbered troops in the cities in which the bombs were dropped, to how Japan was willing to surrender to the US under conditions prove that to be untrue. The nuclear bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was both unjustified and unnecessary.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    August 6, 1945, a new age dawned. Technological feats were achieved that our ancestors never would thought possible in such a short period of time, on August 6 Harry S. Truman 33rd president after the death of Roosevelt the United States Airforce flew the "Enola Gay" a B-29 bomber and with its cargo of Airmen piloting, navigating, and doing their job, with them was "Little Boy" the name for the atomic bomb that was ordered to be dropped over Hiroshima, a manufacturing city, in a ploy to get the Japanese to surrender, the first bomb detonated successfully yet the Japanese Emperor Hirohito did not officially surrender until the second Atomic bomb code named " Fat Man" was dropped on Nagasaki creating a devisating mushroom cloud and killing…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The dropping of the atomic bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima in 1945 by the Americans is a very controversial issue with no definite answer. Both sides of the issue have very justifiable arguments. Reasons for dropping the bomb include the fact that Truman’s options were limited at this point in the war, that the bomb did have the desired outcome of Japans surrender and that the majority of reasons America had for dropping the bomb are justifiable. On the other hand, the atomic bomb was complete new technology and there is no way that Japan could have possibly been ready for it and for that reason the dropping of the atomic bomb is very much morally and ethically wrong. It is also important to consider that two bombs were dropped, both with different motivations and it is quite possible that while one is justifiable, the other is not.…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A plan for the invasion of Japan had been drawn up, Operation Olympic was scheduled for November 1945. Truman was of course reluctant to launch another land invasion as he had just suffered from the battle of Okinawa. The Japanese had defended their home islands with huge ferocity sending out one hundred and ninety three kamikaze planes. Out of these attacks launched against the American fleet, 169 were destroyed. Those planes that managed to get through did cause a great deal of damage, especially to America's carrier fleet which unlike the British carriers did not have armoured flight decks. However, the…

    • 3077 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have come a long way since we decided to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in World War II. It is amazing that we continue debating on this subject today. The US should not have decided to drop these atomic bombs. This decision was totally unnecessary. Thousands of people died who did not need to die, and many more became sick from radiation poisoning. The bombs wiped two entire cities off the map. How can anyone even argue for this in the first place? One argument that was used to support dropping the bomb was that the Japanese forfeited their rights when they aggressively attacked Pearl Harbor and committed war crimes against prisoners and the Chinese. This argument does not work for a few reasons. First, there are two types of justice in war. There is the justice for going to war and the justice for how you fight in war. The two are separate. This argument assumes that because the US had a reason to go to war, how they fought the war was automatically justified. This is false. It is possible to fight a just war unjustly. Its between ends and means. Reasonable ends do not justify unreasonable means. Also, violations of the rules of war do not justify similar actions in response. Just because the Japanese fought unfair does not mean that we were allowed too. Saying, “Well, you did it, too!” cannot be the basis for War II was bad, we should not have just forfeited our standards and done bad things as well. Our leaders were operating under the “War is hell” doctrine, which means anything that brings the end of war more quickly is good. This is not a way to actually fight wars. If war is hell, then why do we even have rules of war? Hiding behind “War is hell” is a cop out used to try to escape any responsibility for fighting properly. As long as war is here, we should have rules for it to try to lower its impact. Such rules cause mass killings, for example, the dropping of the…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6, 1945, over 70,000 people died all at once in the city of Hiroshima, Japan. Then, just three days later on August 9, over 60,000 people died in the city of Nagasaki (Swain, 2006). Many more people died weeks, months, and even years later, and at the end of all of the destruction, almost 200,000 people were left dead (Rossenfeld, n.d.). The causes of all of this were two atomic bombs dropped by the United States. At first glance, it may seem that dropping these two bombs was a terrible and horrific thing to do. However, the use of atomic weaponry was actually a necessity in how well our conflict with Japan played out. Without the bombs, we would have fought longer, and more lives would have been lost. Dropping the atomic bombs on…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Throughout history there have been many controversial issues regarding a nations safety. The United States had to make many decisions in order to protect itself, and most of the decisions were not always supported by all. Some of these decisions have left a major mark and impact on not only the county itself, but also the world. In August 1945, the decision to drop two atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a major world event that continues to be mentioned and have an impact today. To this day, that decision is still argued. Ultimately, the event successfully ended a world war, and that cannot be argued.…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays