Preview

The Legal Establishment in Murmuring Judges

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
857 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Legal Establishment in Murmuring Judges
Discuss the presentation of the legal establishment in Act One Scene 2 and elsewhere in the play
In the play “Murmuring Judges” by David Hare, the legal establishment is generally portrayed in a negative light. One negative attitude displayed by the barristers is a lack of understanding about the life of the general population. This is reflected by Sir Peter stating that everyone listens to “Desert Island Disks” (a Radio 4 broadcast) when they sit down for “Sunday luncheon”. The fact that Peter thinks appearing on this show and choosing classical songs such as Brahms will make him seem “more human” shows how out of touch he is with the common man. Irina appears to feel this way, but chooses not to say anything due to her lower ranking in the hierarchy, instead looking down, “impassive”.
The barristers also fail to reflect the diversity of British society, with most of them being white upper-class males, Irina being the exception that proves the rule – as highlighted by Peter when he states that she has “all the assets” needed “in a forward-looking Bar”, which could convey that she has been employed because she ticks the box of being a young black female, which may be an attempt to demonstrate some level of variety in the legal establishment.
An exclusive nature is also highlighted by the language used during the exchange between Peter and Cuddeford, with Cuddeford’s analogy of “bowling averages” showing that he expects knowledge of cricket to be held by those he is speaking to. Furthermore, the male workers all appear to have nicknames for each other, referring to one barrister as “Beaky” and an old judge as “Chugger”. This may suggest that the barristers are all from public schools such as Eton, and their schoolboy nicknames have stuck with them throughout their adult life.
Furthermore, the barristers appear to be strongly against the Court and Legal Services Act of 1990, which would allow solicitors to represent their clients in court, “starting a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    3. What is the significance of law and the jury in this novel? What is the difference between the two? Is this important? Why or…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    We cannot deal with any complaint about a barrister who is acting for you or has acted for you unless it has been referred to us by the Legal Ombudsman. If…

    • 3440 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What caught my attention to this play was that the two authors were passionate about this theme for the play and obviously researched the history of the actual trial, in order to portray it as realistically as possible. This hard work and attention to detail created a very informative and memorable play. (Although some…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The distinctive voices, inherent in any text/s, can be deconstructed to develop an understanding which may authorize, confront or challenge society’s values and/or beliefs within a given context. A text may promote obvious distinction between the authorial voice and character's viewpoint. This is important in life as our understanding of life, society and the world we live in is shaped by our interpretations of the spoken word. The texts “The life and crimes of Harry Lavender” by Marele Day and “Parrot” a scene out of a BBC skit written by John Clease both clearly explore the variety of distinctive voices from the impoverished criminal to the empowered, educated lawyers. The language is familiar and relevant to the audience and engages, entertain and inform. The characterization and purpose is enhanced through the diverse dialogue to explore important issues in life such as corruption, manipulation and justice.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare and contrast the role of and function of judges, lawyers and lay people within the English courts…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The work of lay magistrates includes hearing applications for bail (bail act 1976) and for legal aid. Magistrates also sit in benches of three and hear all summary offences and the majority of either-way offences as a court of first instance, that’s over 96% of all criminal cases. The majority of either-way offenders opt for a magistrates hearing as they hope for a shorter sentence because the magistrates sentencing powers are limited to 6 months imprisonment or 12months for 2 offences, and a maximum fine of £5000.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The film Twelve Angry Men suggest that The United States Judicial system is very unfair to the person being tried.In this trial, the defendant is being tried for killing his father. Some of the men in the jury are chosen very poorly. One example of them being chosen poorly is their past clouds their judgment. Juror number three had a bad past with his son which lead him to believe that all children are ungrateful and useless. “You're right. It's the kids. The way they are you know? They don't listen. I've got a kid. When he was 8 years old, he ran away from a fight. I saw him. I was so ashamed I told him right out “I'm going to make a man out of you or I'm going to have to bust you up into little pieces trying.” When he was 15 he hit me in the face. He's big, you know. I haven't seen him in three years. Rotten kid! You work your heart out.... All right let's get on with it.” This is unfair to the defendant because he's now seen as ungrateful and rotten to juror number three even before the case. The US should look…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Speech of Polly Baker

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Baker’s use of diction furthers her appeal to pathos. Being an “unhappy” woman, she pleads the “Honourable Bench” to relieve her of the “heavy fine” she now faces. The repetition of “Fine” emphasizes her never ending debt to the Court for all the illegitimate children she conceived. The parallelism of “twice” magnifies Baker’s inability to pay for the fine, which resulted in public humiliation and even more fines to pay. Her frustration of being “forsook” by a man who she “confi [ded]” in explains her “stupefied” reaction to the charges being made against her. The use of a rhetorical question highlights her resentment towards men and the court, emphasizing that a man can be at fault for leading a woman on, but it’s the woman that pays the disgrace and shame in the end. The repetition of “Duty” accentuates the social structure in that time period in which society viewed anything different to be considered a crime (appeals to ethos).…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role of the Supreme Court is to interpret the constitution and to apply these interpretations to legislation that has been made by Congress as to avoid them from making unconstitutional law. In doing so this is called judicial review in which the Supreme Court takes an active role in intervening in politics. If a law is suggested as being unconstitutional the Supreme Court will either accept or decline and if they accept, this will result in the judiciary then looking at the case and determining whether or not the accusation is true or if the question is entitled to make a claim. In some instances this can be taken too far by the court and they can intervene and end up making a substantial decision on some very controversial issues which would be deemed as unfair by one of the parties, other times their intervention is adequate and justified. I will argue that they are not politically neutral due to the appointment process; however I think they are less like politicians in disguise and more just actively doing their job and interpreting the constitution as how it is supposed to be.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As Americans, we rely a great deal on the entertainment industry to educate us about things we don’t understand. In many ways, we live vicariously through the experiences of fictional characters and believe they learn many things from those fictional characters. For example, many people have said they learned about forensic techniques by watching the “C.S.I.” shows on television. They firmly believe that can assist in an actual criminal investigation because they have seen “experts” on television handle similar situations.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1950s America saw the nation fall into a period of national tension and idealogical turmoil following the McCarthy Trials and the Cold War, which produced a flourish of works such as Regnald Rose’s ‘Twelve Angry Men.’ Using a jury of twelve anonymous men, the play scrutinizes both the strengths and flaws of the American judicial system. The case of a fictional “delinquent” who faces capitol punishment under charges of patricide acts as a vehicle to examine the moral dilemma of prejudice and judgement, and its importance, underpinning American jury rooms in a time of profound social division. Through his structuring and characterizations, Rose does not merely attack the system, but contends is functionality stems from the very individuals within it, and their ability to see with objectivity and compassion.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the play there are many references to the judicial concept of "reasonable doubt". This theme is a thread that runs its way through all the deliberations and eventually exposes the weakness of the whole system as well. Reasonable doubt can be a very difficult term to understand. If a jury has any reasonable doubt that the accused may not have committed the crime, then it must enter a not guilty verdict. Each person has their own opinion of the term reasonable doubt and therefore there is much contrast found across the jury room exposing the weak point in the American judicial system. None of the jurors believe they were cheating the accused out of a fair trial or had any initial doubt in their minds that he was guilty and yet as the case is further picked apart each juror finds a point of clarity in the unravelling of evidence and a better understanding of the term reasonable doubt. A juror’s individuality is a clear fault in the American jury system as the truth or the facts are never the same in the mind of another.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lay Personnel are made up of the jury and magistrates. These are people who do not need to be qualified and are unpaid. Both positions make decisions due to their own view of the case and have to decide a serious outcome for it.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Judicial Branch

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Our American judiciary branch of the federal government has contributed and molded our American beliefs in this great nation. This branch of government is respected because of the code of conduct that the judges, no matter how conservative or liberal. The language of the court as well as the uniform of the cloaks that judges wear has most probably contributed towards this widespread respect. Throughout the history of the United States, I noticed a pattern of “cause and effect” that our judiciary branch had practiced. I noticed that the judicial branch usually restrain themselves from involving in critical civil policy, but will be active when the time comes when the general public, in which the case is decided, feels a change is needed. We have enough evidence to see how our judicial branch should act. Should the judicial branch be more active towards shaping American policy or restrain as long as possible before being forced to act upon very critical civil policies? Judicial activism is the view that the Supreme Court should be an active and creative partner with the legislative and executive branches in shaping government policy (Wasserman American Politics 138). The believers of this philosophical view of how our judicial branch should be suggest that the Supreme Court more active and participate in molding the policies of American society. It can be argued that during the end of the Civil War and the “Separate but Equal” era, in cases such as the Brown v. Board of Education, Baker v. Carr, Missouri ex. Rel. Gaines v. Canada, and Sweatt v. Painter. The more recent, Bush v. Gore case is a fine example of judicial activism. Judicial Restraint, on the other hand, is the idea that the Court should not impose its views on other branches of the government or the states unless there is a clear violation of the Constitution (Wasserman American Politics 138). Judges, who believes in this form of our court system, say that a passive role of the court is preferred and that…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sutherland, M. (2005). Judicial Tyranny: The New Kings of America. St. Louis, MO: The National Policy Center. ISBN: 9780975345566…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics