Preview

The Law Code of Hammurabi

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
949 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Law Code of Hammurabi
The Law Code of Hammurabi

The laws that govern the world of today weren’t without some form of basis or foundation to go off of. As with most subjects, a precedent of sorts was established in the past. In particular, the Law Code of Hammurabi, who was a Babylonian ruler, administered a long list of laws that were depicted as originating from the gods themselves. It is through the creation of these rules that the differences between social standings and distinct classes, as well as the general insight into the society of that time frame are clearly evident. Even as this body of laws is claimed to have been bestowed upon by the gods, it is questionable if there wasn’t some degree of bias in their design, despite the endeavors to put the differing classes in equal terms as far as committing crimes went. It is through this body of laws that the society of today has been shaped as it has, even if indirectly and with much refinement. The age-old era of ancient Mesopotamia during which Hammurabi ruled was a time where the word of the gods was weighted heavily. In the minds of the monarchy, as well as the people, the laws set in place which were derived from the word of these gods put a certain perspective in place. And that perspective was that by violating the laws, it was an act of disregarding the god’s heavenly word. It was not only a means of controlling how the lower class individuals in the social status of the society would adhere to. Everyone was meant to abide by these laws, commoner or noble, as the principle ideal for those that broke the law would be subject to “an eye for an eye” sort of punishment. There was some degree of exceptions, however, which is especially true in the face of the aforementioned social statuses. In those times, an ordinary man harming someone of higher social standing, such as a noble, would be punished much more severely as opposed to him harming another ordinary man. On the other hand, for those holding power in terms of the



Cited: I. Title of Document Reviewed: The Legal Code of Hammurabi II. Western Civilization: A Brief History, Complete [Paperback] By Marvin Perry, Publisher: Wadsworth-Cengage Publishing; 10th Edition 2012 III. Link Used: http://www.fordham.edu/Halsall/ancient/hamcode.asp Link Obtained from the following approved source: Internet Medieval History Sourcebook: Link: http://www.fordham.edu/Halsall/sbook.asp

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    For the most part in the modern world, all people are thought to be created and therefore treated equally. It is instinctual for humans to act in a moral way towards others, and the law in theory protects innocent people from crime and civil injustice. But in ancient Babylonia these standards of society were not present. Hammurabi’s Code, was not in correlation with the modern sense of morality. There is a distinct difference between what is right, and what is the law. But because the government has authority over its citizens, then most people will feel an obligation to act in accordance with whoever it is in the position of authority. A very prevalent theme in Hammurabi’s Code is that of “An eye for an eye,” or the concept that if someone causes harm to another person, then the perpetrator should receive an equal punishment. In the case of a robbery or a minor crime, this concept would seem reasonable. But there are many instances where this idea becomes immoral. For example, if a man’s house collapses and then kills him, the builder or architect of the house would be sent to death as well. Hammurabi’s code does not account for coincidences or mistakes.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hunter Gatherer

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hammurabi’s Code of Laws is often described as an important new “technology” of rule because it established clear expectations of rights, obligations, and possible penalties for all Mesopotamians, thereby making delegation of ruling power easier while also providing people with the stability if knowing what to expected of them. The codes also give modern-day people a clear picture of Mesopotamian values as well as their social and gender differences. Summarize the limitations and rights that Mesopotamian women have.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7. Which of the following pairs correctly identifies the subjects illustrated on the Royal Standard of Ur?…

    • 494 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hammurabi's Code of Law and the Hebrew Law have many differences and many similarities. They both have laws on marriage, farming, religion, equality, and many other things. Both of these codes of law showed that each civilization had order and some form of government. It also showed how two civilizations, that are so far apart, can still think so alike and that humanity learns from it's mistakes by improving on them. Hammurabi had a nice view on how to keep things equal. He has the basic concept of “eye for an eye.” The Hebrew law also has this same concept because in one of it's laws, it says, “if a man smite the eye of his servant, or the eye of his maid, that it perish; he shall let him go free for his eye's sake..” (Exodus 21:28, KJV) This shows that both the Hebrews and Hammurabi's people, the Babylonians, had a sense of equality in social class and other things. There is a Hebrew law that if an ox gores a man or woman and kills him, and the owner knows about this and does nothing, then the ox and the owner will be put to death. This differs slightly from Hammurabi's Code because it does not say that the owner has to be put to death. It says that the owner shall pay ½ a mina of silver. This shows how the two different codes of laws and two different civilizations can still have similar concepts but have different ways to interpret them. But, most of these laws only applied to the situation or geography of the land at the time. There is many differences and similarities in both of these codes of law and almost impossible to conclude whether these are more similar or more different. It really all depends on opinion. These are examples on how Hammurabi's Code of Law and the Hebrew Law are alike or…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) The Babylonian law tried to put a monetary value on different parts of justice, and equate crimes together regardless of intention, leading to the popular saying, “an eye for an eye”. This view does not work with a large, professional bureaucracy as it would soon leave the leading kingdom bankrupt. The use of volunteers by the state is exemplified by the “success” of the laws. The leading kingdom believed that laws would be upheld by volunteers, thus preventing anarchy, and establishing rule over the Babylonian people. Public works were also upheld by the “volunteers” as they brought forward people to self-declared Babylonian justice. They kingdom trusted them to bring themselves into justice, thus leading to the pivotal role of the “volunteers”. With the invention of laws, came the power enforcement of the king. The king uses the power of fear to get people to embrace the laws, thus leaving public works behind, in the list of priorities. The state would use the common people for labor, following religion, supporting infrastructure, managing businesses, and controlling the state economic input.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi and Law Codes

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Law codes serve two major functions, to promote order and enforce stability. Not all law codes are the same. They differ depending on the influences acting upon the ruler, and the region the laws are created to work for. Even so, the laws all serve the same purpose. Like Ashoka’s Pillars and Hammurabi’s code. Asoka’s laws and Hammurabi’s laws differ on the grounds of social systems, yet relate on the idea of technology.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Timmer's Definition of Law

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    From the beginning of time, the elite forced their powers on the people that they believed to be evil. This is type of criminal behavior was of diabolical possession. People were believed to be of or controlled by a spiritual nature (State and Capital. n.d.). During this time, people’s mentality for an explanation of crime was to find a solution to rid crime, so they would exorcise the demons which were responsible for the behavior either by exile or by execution. The Gods took highest priority and to appease them, people would go to great lengths, no matter the cost to stop crime. In primitive societies, a sin and a crime were considered as the same thing. Treason, witchcraft and endogamy were considered as violating the norms so these types of crimes would receive the harshest punishments. It depended on whether a person’s offenses were of a private or public matter. If it was private then their own clan would deal with them…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi Dbq

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The people of Hammurabi essentially believed that whatever Hammurabi instilled was by way of the divinity. To unify the people in a secular religious believe and moral code, Hammurabi needed to install a comprehensive set of laws known has the Code of Hammurabi. The code consisted of 282 laws in which Hammurabi expressed were a devotion to god and his responsibilities as a king. The codes provided a structure to life and the consequences that would follow if such codes were not abided by. The Code of Hammurabi elicited some equalities while insinuating some strong, blatant, inequalities amongst the different classes of people from slaves to the aristocratic class. For example code number 6 in the Code of Hammurabi states, “If a man steals valuables belonging to the god or to the palace, that man shall be killed, and also the one who received stolen goods from him shall be kill.” It seems that Hammurabi was not a forgiving type of leader in that he had laws that were to be followed and the consequence of forfeiting those laws would typically result in…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia, “the Land between Rivers,” was one of the greatest and the oldest ancient civilizations of the world. This civilization flourished around 3000 B.C.E. on the piece of fertile land, now known as Iraq, between the rivers Euphrates and Tigris. Before 1792 B.C.E the city-states of ancient Mesopotamia were not united and constantly clashed in turmoil and warfare. In 1792 B.C.E King Hammurabi conquered and merged the neighboring city-states of ancient Mesopotamia, creating a Babylonian empire and becoming the sixth king of its capitol city, Babylon. During his reign, Hammurabi established law and order and funded irrigation, defense, and religious projects. He personally took care of and governed the administration. In fact, in 1784 B.C.E he wrote two hundred eighty-two laws governing family, criminal punishment, civil law, ethics, business, prices, trade, and every other aspect of ancient life—this set of laws became known as “The Code of Hammurabi.” Carved upon a black stele (Doc A.) eight feet high where everyone could read them, based off these two hundred eighty two laws, I believe Hammurabi’s Code was not just based off three simple aspects, justice for the accused, justice for the victims, and justice for the people of society.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi was ruler of the Babylonian dynasty from 1792-1750 B.C. And is responsible for one of the earliest legal codes in history The Laws. The Laws is a form of constitution, an organized code of social rules, rights of people and legal standards. Hammurabi felt that he was a sort of instrument of the gods and that it was his role to implement The Laws as a form of righteous justice with a divine authority. The underlying principle for The Laws is an “eye for an eye” having cause and effect for physical actions and moral situations while setting economic standards. A good example of The Laws having a cause and effect while setting an economic standard is stated “If a man gives to another silver, gold or anything else on deposit in the presence of witnesses and the latter disputes with him or denies it, they shall call that man to account and he shall double whatever he has disputed and repay it.” It sets a standard for putting a deposit down and also sets an effect should one of the parties try to lie about that deposit. The Laws was ahead of its time in many aspects however slavery is legal therefore everyone is not seen as equal. Even if the penalties were not carried out The Laws would have worked as a threating devices letting the people of the land know of the potential consequences of the actions. Unlike Hammurabi’s code the Ten Commandments list guidelines on worship and holy days. And offers worship as a form of retribution instead of the real literal form of physical retribution found in Hammurabi’s code. One example of a law that is similar, deals in financial matters and states “If a man delivers to his neighbor money or goods to keep and it is stolen out of the man’s house. If the thief is found he shall pay double. If the thief is not found the owner of the house shall come near to God, to show whether or not he has put his hand to his neighbor’s goods.” This is very similar to a law found in Hammurabi’s code in which the repayment amount is…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Code of Hammurabi

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When it comes to the characteristics the United States Constitution and Hammurabi’s Law Code have in common both, obviously, are sets of laws. This means that they both have decrees that must be followed. Also, the purpose of both of these laws is to protect and bring justice to the people to whom the rules shall apply. Some basic…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Code of Hammurabi

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Formerly a region of much conflict, the Babylonian Kingdom unified Sumerian and Akkadian city-states under King Hammurabi. King Hammurabi was the first king of Babylon, he reigned from 1792-1750 B.C.E. (Arts and Culture).During his reign Babylon became a great metropolis. Hammurabi’s code was a legal document that is today considered not only the earliest known written body of laws, but also historic art. The law codes are inscribed on to a stele, which is a slab of stone set vertically. It stands seven feet approximately, and is Basalt (Arts and Culture).At the top of the stone King Hammurabi is shown talking to the sun god Shamash.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi Vs Exodus

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mosses emphasizes duties to God as the root for humanity, arguing the fact that God followed some type of rule to help abolish the true criminals, thus cleansing the people to become the more suitable citizens. Because of this, the laws were made intended to help create make a superior world in the eyes…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book, The Code of Hammurabi, the author, Martha Roth, decodes the law codes of the Babylonian king Hammurabi, who reigned from 1792 to 1750 B.C. Hammurabi expanded the city-state of Babylon along the Euphrates River to unite all of southern Mesopotamia. His code, a collection of 282 laws and standards, restricted rules for commercial interactions and set fines and punishments to meet the requirements of justice. In reading these law codes, readers can start interpreting the different roles in society. The Code of Hammurabi shows no regard for women’s rights, giving them neither personal freedoms nor any role outside of the household.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The law of the Babylonian Empire- Hammurabi code held people responsible for their actions. Laws differed from place to place.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays