Mr. Lamon
AP Language
3 December 2012
“The Lady or the Tiger”: What really happened? The Lady or the Tiger, a captivating short story of love and loss, teases your imagination by integrating the rising action at the end of the story only to leave you to make your own interpretation of how the falling action concludes. The author uses a third person omniscient narrator so to make it seem as though the he doesn’t even know how the story truly ends. The finale to the short story has been conversation of much debate. What is behind door he opens? Does he die on the princess’s accord? What happens, no one essentially knows, but him dying is the only logical ending that could subsist. The tale starts out with a fascinating introduction by classifying the king as “semi barbaric” “florid” and “untrammeled,” but on the contrary the narrator begins to describe him as “…somewhat polished and sharpened by the progressiveness of distant Latin neighbors…” Although it is not directly stated where the tale takes place, one can pin point the story to Medieval Europe c.300-400 AD, a very tumultuous time. Influenced greatly by the Roman Empire, as they were a prominent society at the time, the European continent was at a crossroads between the liberalism of the Latin culture, and the less enlightened methodologies that were prerequisite to the changes at the time. This setting is what the root of the king’s brutality and the passing of these traits develop.
The fictional account tells of the king’s daughter being “…as blooming as his most florid fancies, and with a soul as fervent and imperious as his own.” As unlikely as it seems the princess seems to create a bond with a young man that is of “lower station” than she. This short lived relationship of a few months was cut to an abrupt end by the Barbaric King. Never once does the story mention the princess make any attempt of arguing the innocence of her lover. This abandonment can only be explained by her savage nature. It says that she could have possibly never loved him in the first place, and that maybe she was just using him to fill a void her over protecting father created by sheltering her from finding a companion.
With the slightest possibility that the arrogant and haughty princess had come to truly love this man then she would know for a fact that he would be safe of this cruel justice, because as the decision was left up to fate then there would be no question of what was coming out of the door. If she truly had any admiration for her lover, and trust of his innocence in his love then she would allow him to make his choice uncompromised by her instruction. She would allow him to open the door to the chamber with the “fair maiden”. But she did not. With a slight notion to her right she indicates which door needed to be opened. Turning to face his fate the young man opened the door to his right leaving his destiny in the hands of the demented princess. Possibly scared of his innocence and fate’s compassion, considering the true love he possessed for her, she directed him to door with the lion. This is just a sadistic favor of disposing this inconvenience for her father.
Once again if the princess did actually truly have feelings for him then she had proven to be very jealous of the lady behind the door. While if she had not had those impulses toward him the animosity she had toward the damsel was strictly out of the hatred of the young girls lust over one of her possessions. Either way it was not left unknown that she had much discontent with her by saying, “Often had she seen, or imagined that she had seen, this fair creature throwing glances of admiration upon the person of her lover, and sometimes she thought these glances were perceived, and even returned.” With the princess in possession of the knowledge of the location of the tiger she had the power to control the future of both the young man and the young woman. The real or unreal passing of glances between the two would be the end of him, because the jealousy she had towards the maiden would cause an “If I can’t have you no one can” mentality. The princess couldn’t bear the thought of them being happy together so she sends him to the tiger.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The princess in “The Lady or the Tiger” struggles when determining the youth’s fate either consisting of death or marriage to another beautiful lady as she contemplates “Which [door to open. The answer is] as plain to her as if [the youth] shouted it from where he stood. There was not an instant to be lost. The question [of which door to open] was asked in a flash; it must be answered in another” (Stockton 302). The princess is forced to decide the youth’s fate in a split second. The short amount of time that is taken for her to make her decision suggests that her emotions may have overruled reason and could lead to her regretting her decision later in life. In a single second, lives could be drastically changed. Up until the last moment, the youth, that the princess had loved, believes that she will spare him; he has a blind faith in the princess and trusts in her choices. The king’s daughter’s heart is torn during this point of decision. She must decide whether she would prefer to see the youth dead or with the lady whom she…
- 922 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“Proceeding to the other qualities mentioned above, I say that every prince must desire to be considered merciful and not cruel; nevertheless, he must take care not to misuse this mercy. Cesare Borgia was considered cruel; nonetheless, his cruelty had brought order to Romagna, united it, restored it to peace and obedience.” (Page 41). Cesare Borgia lived from 1476-1507. He was known for his brutality and lack of scruples, not to mention his exceptionally good luck. He was firm ruler, son of Pope Alexander VI. To support this George Wilson wrote, “The Prince has been much maligned as a work that advocates cruelty. But steadfastly concerned for the common good, the author distinguishes between well- and ill-used cruelties. He warns, for example, that in conquering and annexing a hereditary state, a prince will not be secure until he kills the entire bloodline of the former ruling family. The general community, however, is to be left alone to practice its familiar customs without interference. There are two concerns—to extinguish the family of the hereditary prince, the people whom the new prince has dispossessed, and to leave the taxes and laws of the community undisturbed. In other words, the prince should not subject the entire community but rather a select few to cruelty. These few unfortunates are victimized because doing so would secure the new prince's…
- 1419 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The emperors, Henry VII and Ludwig IV, had both dreamed of bringing about a renewal of imperial authority and the empire, in the mould of the Carolingians, or perhaps even, Rome itself, and it seemed at the beginning of the fourteenth-century that this might be plausible. Yet, this had not been the only envisioned ‘empire’ at the start of the fourteenth-century; there was the imagined papal monarchy, reigning supreme over all of Italy, or perhaps even all Christendom, the Plantagenet Empire dreamed of by King Edward I of England, or the Capetian Empire of King Philip IV of France, or even King Alfonso XI of Castile’s united Iberian Peninsula. These “fantasy kingdoms”, to borrow a phrase from John Watts, would prove to be unachievable, but as…
- 381 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Because she is clearly in love with him, she seems to stand firm on her opinion that the thought of another woman being with him is sickening. Finally, the princess believes that it would be less complicated if he were to die so that she may see him again in the afterlife. The princess was repulsive toward the idea of the ‘young man’ being with another woman. Therefore, if he were to die by the hands (or paws; tee hee) of the tiger, then they could be together in the afterlife. Furthermore, it was illegal for a servant/peasant to be in love with the princess; therefore, making the decision easier. If the two lovers cannot be together while they were alive, then they could be together in the afterlife when the two of them had both passed. In conclusion, the princess signaled for the ‘young man’ to open the door with the tiger because: the princess was semi-barbaric and relished in the sight of blood/violence, she was more afraid of seeing the ‘young man’ with another woman, and they could simply be with one another in the afterlife (due to the laws that outlaw all romance between royalty and non-royalty.) So the next person that is to read the shocking story, choose correctly when given the honoring opportunity to select the…
- 479 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Often In Shakespearean plays, the mysterious death of royalty can cause many problems amongst the royal bloodline. These deaths can allow various characters to take over the throne and either become a tyrant or shameless ruler. Once on the throne many sinful actions can occur under such circumstances, many characters are affected by this new ruler or tyrant and in the end by not obtaining the throne under lawful means that tyrant or ruler will be lead to their inevitable…
- 806 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In “The Lady, or the Tiger?” by Frank Stockton, a woman, so distraught at the fact that she is losing her lover, ushers her love toward one of two doors. This door either contains a tiger, which will gruesomely maul him, or a woman who he is forced to take as his bride. The reader is led to believe that the woman points her lover to the door containing a ferocious tiger. A quote which supports the thesis that the princess had sent her lover to his doom is, “How often, in her waking hours and in her dreams, had she started in wild horror, and covered her face with her hands as she thought of her lover opening the door on the other side of which waited the cruel fangs of the tiger!” (Stockton 6). This quote illustrates how the hot-headed and semi-barbaric princess often dreams about sending her love to his doom rather than having to lose him to another girl. The princess thought that if she had lost him, then no one else has the right to have him. Additionally, “But how much oftener had she seen him at the other door! How in her grievous reveries had she gnashed her teeth, and torn her hair, when she saw his start of rapturous delight as he opened the door of the lady! How her soul had burned in agony when she had seen him rush to meet that woman, with her flushing cheek and sparkling eye of triumph” (6). This quote also explains how much agony the princess would have to face if her lover were to open the door with his future wife inside. The princess, through her selfishness, was not willing to see the enlightened look on her lovers face when he saw his future bride exit the door. Furthermore, “Would it not be better for him to die at once, and wait for her to join him in the future?” (7). The princess thought that she could be rejoined in heaven with the young man who she had fallen in love with because she knew that her father would never allow her to be with him again on Earth. She believed in the afterlife and I believe that she thought that he would be happier…
- 454 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Within this story, the royal family is given distinguishing traits that explain why the princess would choose death upon her lover. Because she is the daughter of a “semi-barbaric king” (Stockton 2), the thought of her companion getting eaten by a tiger might be more accepting than losing him to another woman. The princess’s uncivilized mind would overrule the appropriate decision, and choose the tiger.…
- 613 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
William Shakespeare’s well-renowned play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, has led to centuries of controversial debate on the validity of tyrannicide based on his depiction of Julius Caesar. Some scholars have argued that Shakespeare intended to portray Caesar as a tyrant, while others believe he is acting as a just King. On one hand, it is difficult to assume that Shakespeare plainly viewed Caesar as a tyrant, especially since Shakespeare deliberately left Caesar’s actions and intentions ambiguous, making him into a less obvious tyrannical figure compared to Plutarch’s representation of Caesar. In addition, Shakespeare does not solidify Caesar as a tyrant in the same way he does with Macbeth and Richard III in their respective plays. On the other hand, it is difficult to reason that Caesar is a just King because he came into power by usurpation. “In antiquity the term [“tyrant”] referred to a ruler who came to power by usurpation, without constitutional warrant.”1 Based on insight from several sources and my own interpretation of Julius Caesar, I have concluded that Shakespeare left Caesar’s objectives unknown in order to focus on the moral dilemma faced by Brutus, but Shakespeare still intended to depict Caesar as a tyrant who deserved to be deposed because of his unconstitutional usurpation of power. In order to prove this I will evaluate the political turmoil during the Elizabethan era in an attempt to understand Shakespeare’s perspective on the concept of tyranny and tyrannicide, which is influential to his work, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. In doing so, I will compare the ruling styles of Queen Elizabeth I, who was considered a tyrant queen during her time, and the ruling styles of Julius Caesar in order to characterize Caesar as a tyrannical leader. Furthermore, I will briefly compare Shakespeare’s Caesar to Plutarch’s Caesar…
- 1746 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In the short story, “ The Lady, or the Tiger “ by Frank R. Stockton there lived a barbaric king who is blander and genial who made his prisoner choose between two doors to determine there life after they leave the arena. In one of those two doors there is a tiger that will kill him if he chooses that door. The other door has the lady who will marry him if he chooses her. The prisoner knew which door the lady was in and which door the tiger was in. He saw her coming in. The story does not say what door he chose but with the evidence they gave us it is reasonable that he chose the…
- 120 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
<br>His ambition of staying king now begins to spur him toward further horrifying deeds, and he starts to disregard and even challenge fate and fortune.…
- 1844 Words
- 8 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In Coriolanus, Shakespeare to a full extent questions the value of the Roman warrior code and sees the difficulties that it causes. Firstly I discuss the warrior code that is valued and held in Rome. Secondly I analyze Coriolanus inability to infringe the warrior code entirely. Thirdly I explore the consequences this has on Roman society.…
- 422 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Many realize that the princess, although elegant, is highly barbaric as is her father, The King. So to some, this begins to bring forth that she would have jealously for her lover. She, in fact, hated the young lady that lay behind the one door. A perfect example shows how coarse she really was. This is stated as forth “The semibarbaric king had a daughter as blooming as his most florid fancies, and with a soul as fervent and imperious as his own” (16). The King had to hire mourners and place them along the edge of the ring due to the fact that the accused one’s family did not want to claim. Another fact to point towards the tiger is “They never knew whether they were to witness a bloody slaughter or a hilarious wedding” (16). No one except the men who placed them there would know which to expect. So for the princess to possess the knowledge of the door to her right showed that she truly had real jealously in her mind. As a final note to the tiger waiting behind the door, “And not only did she know in which room stood the lady ready to emerge,…, but she knew who the lady was” (18). The problem of jealously not only lives in us all, no matter how small, it does eventually emerge through. The tiger has had its chance to shine…
- 604 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the Lady and the Tiger, the princess is in love with a man that has the terrible fat of being in the arena. In the arena are two doors that contain 2 very different things. One door contains a bride that the man has to marry on the spot and the other door is a man-eating…
- 348 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
"He understood her nature, and his soul was assured that she would never rest until she made plain to herself this thing, hidden to all other lookers-on, even to the king." The courtier knows that the princess will make the right choice, even if that means she can't be with him. Even though, the decision is upto the courtier, he is looking to the princess for the answer. He understood her essence, knowing that she will lead him into the right door. Despite the king and the crowd not reading the signs. The courtier knew he would end up with the lady. Whether or not the princess liked this…
- 623 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The story “The Lady or the Tiger?” by author Frank R. Stockton is a tale of a semi-barbaric king who has a semi-barbaric way of dealing justice to criminals. The criminal is thrown into a big amphitheater and has a choice between two doors: one with a lady and one with a tiger. If the accused would open the door with the lady, he shall be proved innocent and married on the spot. If he chooses the door with the tiger, he shall be instantly killed. The story revolves around the king’s daughter and a young man of low-life. The king finds out about this relationship and the young man is thrown into a game of life and death. In this essay, I’ll prove to you that the semi-barbaric princess sent the young man to the door of the tiger.…
- 562 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays