The industry structure is mainly that of monopolistic competition, with multiple firms competing for the consumer’s dollar. In the supermarket, 4-6 brands can be found selling relatively homogenous products. The high industry growth should help offset battle for market share, as competitors don’t need to steal one another’s customers. Market growth is increasing due to recent pushes towards complementary healthcare, for instance the work of the Complementary Healthcare Association lobbying the government and surveys undertaken by industry help to spread awareness of complementary healthcare among the aging baby-boomer population. The impact of regulatory bodies. E.g. if the Therapeutics Goods Administration tightens quality constraints, may erode profit margins of smaller firms, lead to push for economies of scale There are low switching costs between brands for consumers, though the Pan Pharmaceuticals debacle highlighted the importance of strong brand equity to maintain customer patronage. Also, if the healthcare products are viewed as commodities, buyers will focus upon price and service as their differentiators. One of the biggest competitors to Blackmores continues to be lower priced alternative complementary medicines. Bio-Organics and Herron are two brands that are competing directly with Blackmores and given their lower price products are sharing much of the market share with Blackmores. Additionally, there are added incentives to purchase Guardian products, such as Guardian loyalty cards. These factors help to boost Guardian owned products. Therefore, a possible improvement in the future for Blackmores is to introduce a loyalty scheme that will help retain their customers.
The bargaining power of buyers:
Bargaining power of buyers is moderate to weak.
Many buyers mostly accounting for a small proportion of total sales. The complementary healthcare industry utilizes 3 major distribution...