The Importance of Intangible Assets
Evaluation of Transitional Issues from a Canadian Standpoint
The Trade-off Between Relevance and Reliability
"Nothings" are Something to Consider
Current Practice in Canada
The Challenge of Valuation
Analysis of Potential Improvements to Canadian Standards
Issue One - Valuation
Valuation and Business Combinations
Solution to Valuation Issues
Issue Two - Improved Transparency
Recommendation for Improved Transparency
Comparison of Canada, USA, and International Standards
Goodwill and Initial Measurement
Intangible Assets Recognition
Amortization of Finite Lives Intangible Assets
Impairment Testing of Indefinite Lives Intangible Assets
While intangible assets are proving to become more significant in their role in business today, the policies and practices used in accounting for them seems to fall short when it comes to representing the needs of users of the financial statements. Many significant intangible assets go unrecognized on financial statements due to the current accounting standards. Due to the importance of these intangibles to many companies, the identification of them would better satisfy the needs of financial statement users. However, a trade off between reliability and relevance exists when trying to account for certain intangible assets. Traditional accounting standards stressing reliable information may be too conservative when considering intangible assets. Conversely, recognizing intangible assets may provide relevant information to users, but prove to be unreliable when more information is available. However, given the less than perfect nature of valuation itself, companies should identify and recognize intangible assets when they play a significant role in the respective firms' business.
Current accounting policies also inhibit a lack of transparency with regards to the disclosure of information relating to recognizable intangible assets. Items such as asset value fluctuations can go hidden to the financial statement users, thus affecting their decision making abilities. Creating an allowance accounting against the balances of the intangibles would provide users with a more reliable representation of the asset as a whole.
Comparison of current Canadian standards with current U.S. and international standards on the accounting of intangible assets indicates the overall policies are very similar. Therefore the harmonizing of Canadian accounting standards with U.S. and international policies will still leave room for improvement with regards to recognition, valuation and disclosure of intangible assets. Report
The Trade-off between Relevance and Reliability
In order for financial information to be useful it should possess two qualitative characteristicsrelevance and reliability. Financial statements that are relevant provide users with information about a company's future economic prospects, such us future cash flows, dividends and short/long-term earnings feasibility. Reliable financial information is defined as information that is precise and free from bias. In pursuit of relevance the accounting profession has attempted to move toward fair value accounting or a "measurement perspective" to report for items such as pensions, debt and equity securities, and intangible assets. In order to maintain relevance and shift toward "fair value accounting" a company must use a great deal of estimates in arriving at an accurate picture of a firm's market value. These estimates, in turn, become subject to future revisions and adjustments that compromise reliability of...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document