Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Impact of Privatization on Firm's Performance

Powerful Essays
2039 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Impact of Privatization on Firm's Performance
1.0 Introduction

Privatization throughout the 1980's has been considered to be the solutions to the problems associated State Owned Enterprise (SOE)s both in the developed and developing economies and even in the socialist economies (Vickers and Yarrow 1995). In reality privatization is an economies policy and other times a political policy that is difficult to achieve mostly when is implemented in a corrupt setting like in most developing countries. However it is wise for a competitive and well regulated business environment structure to be established before privatization takes place.

In recent times there has been a significant increase in the privatization of SOEs. Megginson et al (2004), suggest that political persuasion by government as a result of poor and unsatisfactory financial and operational results by SOEs has cause the transfer of ownership to private investor who will impact their business discipline in order to improve the level of performance for the newly privatized SOEs. While Aktan (1995) suggest that privatization goes beyond the sale of SOEs, assets or shares to individuals or private firms but in a broad meaning, it is to restrict government role and function in providing economic activities and put forward some methods or policies in order to strengthen free market economy.

Privatization is often meant to be the transfer of control and ownership of government asset or firm to private investors. It could be partial or whole, through private placement or public offer of share via the capital market as well as through the distribution of vouchers. The major purpose of privatization is to grow and develop the economic by creating competition that can bring about efficiency ***. It will be right for the logical argument of this research study to compare or examine the different view of academics on what privatization means.

Parker et al (2005) states that privatization is used to cover many arrays of different policies like liberalization, commercialization but in one of its studies, Privatization in Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence and the Policies lessons, suggest that privatization means the transfers of productive asset from the state to the private sector, but also stressed that the most important factors to be considered is the introduction of effective competition and regulatory measures alongside with existing firms and for government to accept the political changes that occurs when privatization takes place. While, Beesley (1997) suggest that privatization is the formation of a company's act company and the subsequent sale of at least 50percent of the total shares of a company to private shareholders. However it is obvious now that privatization starts with the government transfer of its assets or a controlling share to private investors or shareholders in order to stimulate economic development.

Privatization as an inherent part of government efforts to rationalize the SOEs. It's mostly done to reduce the burden on National Budget, improve efficiency of individual enterprise and ensure wider distribution of business ownership among its citizens and other foreign investors. However in most cases it brings about the introduction of market force (Demand and Supply forces) into the economy. Privatization can be set up to achieve different objectives depending on the Political, Economy and Social condition of each individual Country. This is due to the fact that what is applicable in the UK for instance will most likely not applicable in Russia due to the differences in techniques or method of privatization, general government objectives, SOEs condition, firms sectors activities and the countries characteristics.

According to Bennett (2003) there are different methods used during privatization, either one used has its own advantage and disadvantage. The share option method is the mostly used method, it involves the sales of SOEs through the issue of shares to the public through stock market. For this method to be successfully implemented, the local country privatizing its SOEs must have an established Stock market where the trading of these shares should take place. Also there should enough public awareness to sell shares. While the private placement option which involves the sale of SOEs to the highest bidder helps government rise substantial revenue but the issues involved here, is the highest bidder will always want to get back their money back in time by exploiting the consumers. This option is mostly done in developing countries where there stock market is still very weak and there are trying to get foreign investor to invest. Lastly the voucher method which is common with Eastern European countries like, Russia, Czech Republic etc, tends towards alleviating poverty. It involves the allocation of SOEs shares to virtually all local qualified citizens of a state in order for both the poor and rich to be co-owners of the SOE. But in most case the poor ones are more likely to sell their share to the rich one who will then have a controlling stake.

1.1 Background to the Study

The telecoms industry is a sizable sector offering a wide range of products and services as well as employment opportunities across virtually all professional, skilled and unskilled discipline in the economy. However the industry has expanded and develop rapidly since late 1980's, in the 1990's and even more rapidly in most recent times due its consistency in constant need for Research and Development (R&D), technological change on both the service providers and suppliers sides respectively in other to satisfy its market and be more efficient to maximize profitability.

The telecommunication industry whether in a developed or developing economies has had its impact towards the growth and development of virtually all parts of an economy ranging from the political, social, financial, technological sectors over its 100 years of existence. However like every other service providing sector, it provides services to the local market and international market where business strategic is always aimed at gaining competitive advantage in the existence of competition and tight regulatory business environment in terms of providing service to users, expanding its economies of scale and scope and equity expansion.

Many countries grant monopoly power to their local telecoms but establish an office that will regulate their activities and in other cases some merge their postal services and telecoms services together, example is the United Kingdom (UK). The UK Telecommunication has been in existence dating back to 1879, with its first telephone exchange established in Coleman Street, London. 1896 saw the Post Office take over the private sector trunk services while in 1912, all national telephone company exchange was controlled by the Post Office as a monopoly supplier of telephone service in the UK. The Post office had two departments the postal service and telecom. As a rule as stated by Ratto-Nielsen, telephone operations, the postal service where subsidized while labor union where paid high rents to organize labor.

However in 1969, the Post office become a State Public Corporation and after the Carter Report of the Post Office Review Corporation was published, the 1981 the British Telecom's Act 1981 became law and the postal and telecoms of the Post Office became the responsibilities of two separate Corporation namely;

The Post Office and British Telecom's (BT)
Cable and Wireless, which was privatized.
While BT was created as a Public Corporation charged with the responsibilities for Telecommunications, Supplies, Installations and Maintenance. The first competitive rivalry in the industry was the granting of license in 1982 to Mercury Communication Limited (MCL) to operate a fixed Link network in order to compete with BT. This only made a little impact as BT has a huge competitive advantage over MCL because it already had the market share, established and experienced Skilled employees and existing contracts with leading telecoms equipments manufacturers and service providers to operate and even if a year later both where give the advantage to operate without rival firms providing fixed link networks in the UK for seven years

The Government White Paper published, proposed for the sale of 51percent of BT and the creation of a telecoms regulatory body, to be named Office of Telecommunication (Oftel) whose duties where to supervise all the activities going on in the telecoms industry and to also prosecute those who do not comply with the set rules and regulation of the industry as well as protect services users from exploitation. Two years later Oftel was signed into law and then administration of Margret Thatcher creating BT as a Limited Company wholly owned by the Government as BT Plc but was later privatized by selling off 50.2percent Shares to the Public.

BT is one of the world oldest telecommunication Firm and dates back to be the first ever British telecom firm which also had the sole monopoly of providing telecom services in the UK with the backup of British Government. During the period, from 1878 the UK telephone service was been provided by the private sector companies, National Telephone Company (NTC) who were also faced with competition from the General Post Office (GPO) and in 1896 the GPO took over operation of the telephone service from and became a monopoly market for the in 1912 controlling the entire telecoms market in the UK.

In 1965, some finding made by a working party was presented to the government which there found substantial enough. This lead them to split GPO into two divisions; the Post and Telecommunication which gave birth to BT and five units Post, Telecommunication, Savings, Giro and National Data Processing Services respectively. The Post Office act of 1969 made the Post Office to be controlled by the government and established as a public corporation. This gave them the sole right to run the telecoms system with listed power to authorize others to run such systems. However the Post Office retained its telecommunication monopoly.

The Carter Committee of 1977 suggest for the restructuring of the Post Office into two separate units and further renaming of the Post Office to British Telecom's but it also remained a part of the Post Office. In 1981, the introduction of British Telecommunication act transfer the provision of telecommunication from the Post Office as a resulting establishing two different corporations a bold step to create competition in the utility industry (Telecoms). This empowered the trade and industry ministry and the British Telecom's the right to grant Licenses to other telecoms operators to run telecommunication systems therefore creating competition in the sector.

However, in July 1982 the government officially announced her intention to privatize BT by selling up to 51 percent of BT shares to private investors. In 1984, more than 50 percent of BT was sold to the public through share option, then the largest ever most successful SOE privatization exercise in the history of privatization leaving the government with just forty 47.6 percent. This was about the most radical and the largest scale privatization exercise ever had in the history of Britain. However most investor where scared that it was going to fail. It was but in 1991 the government share of BT was reduced to 21.8 percent by rising up to £5 billion and creating about 750,000 new shareholders of BT.

In reality, the privatization of BT opened the telecoms market for other operates to come into the market, invest in the sector and breaking the monopoly advantage had by BT over the years by fighting for market shares through intense competitive business environment. This however forced BT into having fairer business policies, improved technology to optimize productivity as well as to raise its level of efficiency as government regulatory body would introduced a price cap system. On the other side this allowed other firms to spring up and compete with BT in the telecom sector bringing about maximum utilization of available resources, cost cutting and efficiency. Telecoms consumers where the most rewarded people as operator gave them the best deals ever in order to gain market shares. BT Plc is now run in over 170 countries all over the world and faced with about 150 other telecoms operator. This has forced them virtually to constantly to research and develop their existing technology as well as acquire new ones in order to keep pace with their consumers new and market share.

Read more: http://www.ukdissertations.com/dissertations/finance/the-impact-of-privatization-on-firms-performance.php#ixzz2Rfkw0d6V

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When government contract with private companies to perform what was once considered to be the traditional work of government, it is termed as privatisation. Privatisation is occurring at a rather impressive speed in United States. For example, there are over 100 privatised prisons in the country (Kissane, 2007). Other forms of privatisation occurring in United States include privatisation of schools, military plane maintenance, state welfare and employment agencies and hospitals. Privatisation has become a very controversial topic in the country due to its wide range of advantages and disadvantages.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The meaning of Privatization has been widely debated as the years progressed, however one idea scholastics and experts appear to concede to is; privatization is a relationship between a private- sector organization and an administration office with the end goal of finishing a venture that will benefit the pubic. Privatization relationships are the upfront of ideological, political and economic debates, they continue to be used as political tools to solve problems associated with increased demand for public services growing concerns with the size of government, and decreased opportunities for additional resources (MaNamara, Morris 2008). No one public private partnership is the same, each utilizing different arrangements and public management…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Post Soviet Privatization

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On midnight of December 31st 1991, the Soviet Union collapsed, along with the communist ideals that it followed. The former the soviet union were forced to transition from a communism to a private government literally overnight, which is why it was referred to as spontaneous privatization. This abrupt economic reform cause problems with the people, as the government struggled to devise an efficient and fair way to distribute the wealth. The government wanted to take a democratic approach to mending the economy, so the plans they proposed promoted free market economy where the distribution of wealth is left up to the people, with a low amount of government interference. For people to distribute the wealth they must first obtain it, making this the first step in privatizing the former union.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the collapse of Soviet Union, it was practicing a command economy wherein state planners assigned the production of particular manufactures to particular places. All factories, farms and energy providers were state controlled. After the collapse, the new leadership decided to privatize all the state controlled businesses, but due to corruption among state representatives the process of privatization soon became rife with corruption, giving well placed opportunists unjustified advantage, thus denying the new government badly needed revenues. Hence, very little progress was made towards diversification of the economy.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Critical Thinking

    • 2997 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Privatization 20120128Privatization. (2012, January 28). In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved February 5, 2012, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privatization…

    • 2997 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The impact that the prospects of deprivatization have on investment by managers of privatized firms is that these managers will come to a realization that additional investments are prone to more risks in respect to the potential payback. In this situation, the time frame for returns on investments is shortened immensely. The uncertainty stems from the longer time frame, which results in managers hesitating from entering as a private firm. If this notion of deprivatization is upholded upon organizations, the owners will potentially lose any gains they may possess.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Bennett, John, Saul Estrin, James Maw, and Giovanni Urga. Privatisation Methods and Economic Growth in Transition Economies. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research, 2004.…

    • 19418 Words
    • 78 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world of business has come a long way since the laissez-faire government attitudes of the 19th Century. Governmental rules and regulations have emerged over the past century in reaction to the excessive business power of the corporation. The government has frequently stepped in to protect business stakeholders after failed corporate governance. According to (Public Law 107-204-July…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Citigroup Case Study

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The privatization of state-owned enterprises (SOE) in China has provided an investment opportunity for Citigroup. Citibank, a branch of Citigroup, has developed a strategy for targeting strong SOEs by identifying 10 industries that will develop the fastest in a country and targeting profitable companies within those industries. Companies are chosen not only by their financial statement numbers, but also by the industrial sectors they are in and the qualities of the management team.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Privatization of Uk Airports

    • 4900 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Sheshinski, E. and López-Calva, L. F. (2003). Privatization and Its Benefits: Theory and Evidence. CESifo…

    • 4900 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Privatization in Bosnia

    • 5460 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Privatization is supposed to result in a better allocation of resources in an economy, in the sense that resources can be used more efficiently to create social wealth. The new governing model in a privatized economy would respond to consumers’ preferences (demand) rather than state preferences. In addition to these macroeconomic improvements, privatization is supposed to improve the performance of individual companies. Bayliss lists several factors in a privatized economy that result in this improvement (4). Some of the factors include clearer management objectives, better…

    • 5460 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One possible solution to the trade-off between equity and efficiency is to privatize the state-owned monopolies. Lam (2011) reported in the Asia Time that in 2009, the 129 Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) took charge of a big proportion of the country’s wealth, which reaches the number of 21 trillion yuan, while the contribution they made to the society was only 1.15 trillion yuan of taxes, equivalently 5.5% of their total profit. This does do harm to the socio-economic equality. Therefore, the abolition of SOEs is able to make a difference to the unequal wealth distribution by way of delivering money to the poor and thus lead to a drop in wealth inequality. However, although it seems to be effective to redistribute money, the opportunity cost has not been taken into account. Lam (2011) argued that non-stated companies can easily suffer from low reputation, compared with the state-owned ones, especially when applying for a bank loan or asking for support from the public. Due to this serious weakness, the transformation from SOEs to private firms has a propensity to present a decrease in GDP. This tendency was also indicated…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2 Kozarzewski Piotr. Center for Social and Economic Research. Case Study. “Privatization in the Context of Post-Communist Transition: The Case of Poland.” Institute of Political Studies, Polish Academy of Science.…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    * What is Privatizing and who did it first, when and for what? Privatizing is a nationalized company becoming a private company, this means the process of transferring the ownership from the public sector (Government owned) to private sector. BAA (British Airport Authority)is the first to do privatization in 1987…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Privatization is the implementation of a decision to sell companies owned by the State to private individuals/ companies.…

    • 2758 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays