Preview

the general history of virginia

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
485 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
the general history of virginia
1st Nov, 2013

John Smith – The General History of Virginia, New England and the Summer Isles

After reading the excerpt from John Smith’ book I wondered what his intention was to write this book in the way he did. Did he really want to tell how his exploration looked like or did he try to push himself into the spotlight and to gain fame by describing his deeds like a heroic saga?
Was John Smith more an attendance-seeker than a serious explorer, who just wants to state the facts?
Right at the beginning of the text, John Smith mentions how weak and ill those men were, who came with him on the ship, but he never says a word about his own state of health, which could not be much better , but Smith does not want to admit his own weaknesses.
Another point can be found on page 60 in line 2, as Smith tries to highlight his role model function when he keeps some food for hard times, whereas his people ate everything “from hand to mouth” (p. 59, l.39). He does this to underline his prudence, but to my mind this could not be true, as not everyone would be so ignorant to eat his whole supply of food at once.
Moreover he also tries to highlight his cleverness when he explains how he managed to trade goods with the savages, even if they did not want to trade before (cf. p.59, ll. 9 ff.). Here John Smith tells the story like he had to assault the savages and like his trade offer in the end was acceptable for the savages, but he wisely swept under the table that otherwise he would have killed the savages, as he just wants to focus on his cleverness as far as negotiation is concerned.
The author John Smith is highlighting his cleverness and knowledge again a little later, as he was imprisoned by the savages, but he manages to talk to them and to teach them something abound the sky, the sun and that the earth is round.
Furthermore John Smith intends to show his power as a leader who he wants to be. On page 58 from line 38 on he mentions that suddenly, after have gained

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Smith was born on January 9, 1580 in Willoughby, England. He was an English adventurer and soldier, and one of the founders of Jamestown, Virginia and was the author of the first book written in America in English.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Notes on the States of Virginia was the full length book written by Thomas Jefferson in 1781, during the American revolutionary war. In 1780, the secretary of the French legation to the United States “Francois Marbois” had drawn up 22 questions wishing to collect information on each of the 13 states to answer to his superiors. Those questions were sent to several possible informants including Joseph Jones, who at that time a member of congressional delegation. He had written the original questionnaire in his own hand writing and had given it to Thomas Jefferson; the second governor of Virginia who he had thought was the best person to answer all of the complicated questions about the beloved state. Joseph Jones knew about this Virginian’s knowledge and passion about the largest of the 13 original states. Jefferson rearranged Marboi’s 22 queries into the 23 queries and conducts his readers from a discussion of geography of Virginia through the state’s civilization.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    wrote a pamphlet to the people in England and told about all the good things…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The eccentric entrance of Innocent Smith to Beacon House brings the philosophy of Smith as well to a place much in need of it. Smith's philosophy does not have wild notions or indulgent pleasures; rather, it can be seen as an ascetical philosophy. This philosophy is closely associated with the virtues of temperance and charity. It leads Innocent to continually rediscover himself.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In two of the selections that we read, we had extensive accounts of Europeans that kept detailed journals of their observations and experiences during their voyages to the New World. The accounts given by Christopher Columbus and Samuel de Champlain differ both in their perceived value of the lands they were exploring and their views on the Natives they encountered.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each author depicts Columbus as a different figure entirely. Howard Zinn seems to portray Columbus as a power hungry, money seeking, and arrogant war monger: “The first man to sight land [For money]… Rodrigo never got it. Columbus Claimed he had seen a light the evening before. He got the reward (Zinn).” (Morrison does not acknowledge this) The reader can clearly feel a strong sense of anger from the author towards Columbus, for one thing this particular sentence was not crucial to the essay whatsoever, therefore the lack of necessity and the bluntness of the statement reveals a strong bias. This was only one example of how Zinn portrays Columbus as the next worse thing to the plague, he continues on by explaining, in immense detail, various unnecessary acts of violence by Columbus. Morrison on the other side of the spectrum presents Columbus more neutrally, writing on both Columbus’ good deeds and negative also. Morrison also delves into Columbus’ background to explain some of his shortcomings such as greed and the need for attention. However Morrison almost defends and sympathizes with Columbus at…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Captain Jahn Smith and Governor William Bradford were two influental leaders in the New World during the early 1600s. They both established a colony and they attempted to attract settlers with writings. Their writings were intended for different audiences and they both had different purposes. John Smith’s writings were intended to bring people to the new world. He wrote a pamphlet to the people in England and told about all the good things about New England. In his pamphlet he tried to persuade people to join him in the new land and how he promised the New England was better than England. John Smith's audience was intended for people from England, and possible settlers.Though,William Bradford's writings were intended for different audiences and he had a different purpose than John Smith. William Bradford's audience was intended for the future generation. He wrote a diary about his actual experiences in Colonial America,he discussed in his diary about the many hardships he faced. Both wrote of their experiences in America,were Europeans,and desired to settle the land. John Smith and William Bradford were two important people who led to the settlement in America. They were fine leaders who made survival possible on this new land. They created relationships with the natives and won and lost some with their own men. They led their men across the ocean to settle on lands that were never previously settled by Europeans. They had all of their crew adapt to the new land and form relationships with the natives.If it was not for these two men's great leadership skills, their crews would have died and America would not be the same.Without the decisions made by Smith and Bradford, nobody would have survived in the New World. They took control and found food and shelter. They also made sure all their sick were taken care of when nobody really wanted to do this job. Smith and Bradford made it possible to make a small colony on a land they have never seen.These men…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When is no education ever good? There is less corruption in the U.S because of Lower levels of education which are often caused by poverty are seen as a factor which encourages corrupt government practices. With less amounts of education people are not informed as to how the government works or what rights they have under the government. It is easier for corrupt office-holders to conceal corrupt activities from a poorly educated public. Uneducated citizens are less likely to be aware of corruption in local governments or how to stop it, and therefore, corruption is able to remain and spread. Without some kind of political awareness, citizens will not know which candidates to elect that are honest or dishonest or other ways to prevent corruption from taking place in their local governments. This often leads municipalities to be continually governed by one or more corrupt local officials who use patronage or nepotistic practices to stay in office or keep influence in the government for long periods of time. When local political leaders are less educated, they will be less likely to find legitimate ways to make the municipality well-structured, productive, and successful.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicholas, with his outrageous sense of humour and eager pursuit of love, functions as the charming, likeable hero in Miller's Tale. He is introduced as "hende Nicholas", and his conduct does not at all answer to the usual sense of the adjective which implies great courtesy, but its suggestion of approval is repeatedly invoked as the Miller refers to his hero by this formula. We learn at once that he is knowledgeable and of his interest in astrology. This is seen as a respectable branch of learning, but Nicholas is aware of its power to impress others, while he is able to supplement his income by weather-forecasting. He is also helped financially by friends. The imaginary flood of which Nicholas tells John shows us his cunning, his confident attitude, his inventiveness and especially his contempt for the stupid tradesman: 'Don't worry about that,' said Nicholas, / 'His time's been badly wasted, if a scholar / Can't get the better of a carpenter.' (lines 191-193) In spite of this, however, the Miller presents the astrologer in a way that makes the audience like Nicholas. He does this by making John seem deserving of punishment for his unwise marriage and subsequent jealousy. Nicholas's youth and attractiveness makes us less critical of his boldness, and the comic manner of the tale's telling makes his conduct seem less worthy of censure than would be the case with real people. Nicholas seems a more appropriate partner for Alison than does John, and the Miller's repetition of the formula "hende Nicholas" encourages us to be more sympathetic. However, it is important to note that Nicholas does not escape his daring plan without any consequences. His over-confidence and lack of prudence earn him a punishment appropriate to his offence, and in keeping with the farcical spirit of the tale he is "scalded in the towte" by his rival, who mistakes him for Alison. Thus, Nicholas may be the character that has the audience rooting for him by being likeable and providing good…

    • 361 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that John Smith was not saved by Pocahontas. John smith is nothing but a lying scum thinking he could just lie his way through to his desires: fame, money, ect. In document 1 we receive information that states John Smith was going into trade with the chief and sent home content with himself and his trip. The quote, “He kindly welcomed me with such good words, and great platters of foods, assuring me his friendship, and my liberty within four days…” shows how well John Smith was treated upon arrival. Not so bad right? John Smith also left with these feelings stated in the last sentence of Document 1, “And this having all kindness he could devise, sought to content me, he sent me home.” Clearly John Smith was happy at the results of his trips, leaving “content.” Though in Document 2, which was within 1624, apparently Pocahontas, who is now famous, big in social media; saves John Smith’s life. Key thing to remember here is that Pocahontas died in 1617, so who’s going to debate against what John Smith states in his book? Nobody, that’s who. John Smith did this because he knew that not one single person could go against what he had written in those books. The quote, “ Two days after, Powhatan, more like a devil than a man, came to me and told me how we were friends, and presently I should go to Jamestown, to send him two great guns, for which he would forever esteem me as a son, Nantaquoud.” Now if “Nantaquoud” meant huge liar in their language, I would understand this name given to John Smith. Analyzing the quote, we see how unrealistic it is, “Two days after” almost killing John Smith, the chief is just going to come to John and be friendly and call him his son? This is unbelievable, in my honest opinion, the reason why John stated he was “forever esteem me as a son” by the chief was for more an attention purpose. Being the chief’s “son” he would obviously receive…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Smith changes to third person point of view in order to speak highly of himself without seeming conceited. For example, in paragraph seven, he says, "Captain Smith, who, by his own example, set some to mow, others to bind thatches, some to build house, others to thatch them, himself always bore the greatest task for his own share, so that in short time he provided most of them lodgings, neglecting any for himself" (pg 68). Also, in the tenth paragraph Smith says, "He so demeaned himself against them, as he not only diverted them from surprising the fort, but procured his own liberty, and got himself and his company such estimation amongst them, that those savages admired him” (pg 68). This passage shows Smith’s cleverness and intelligence. John Smith's uses his persona to make himself appear more powerfull, heroic, and…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Starving Time

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The purpose is to show how the British thought that they were helping out by sending provisions but according to this person’s perspective, they gave no help to the people who were in dire need of food and protection.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    West, E (1990) Adam Smith 's Revolution, Past and Present. Adam Smith 's Legacy: His…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While watching the Disney movie Pocahontas I have discovered there were some major differences between the movie and John Smith’s “The General Historie.” It can be easily assumed that many people have heard of the tale Pocahontas which is a movie about a mysterious young native girl from the New World who rescues an English explorer who goes by the name of John Smith, from death and falls in love with him. No matter which version we all may have heard, most people are familiar with the legend that has been told by Disney. However, what we are not familiar with, are the actual events that occurred and all too often, we accept what is presented in films as history without any thought into the matter.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the times of America’s discovery, most European literature was based on voyages to the New World. However, most didn’t convey the truth about the culture they encountered in an informed or unbiased way. An exception to this is Sahagun’s encounter with the Aztec’s which is described in an encyclopedic way and even used people from that culture to describe it. However other writers like John Smith, appeal to the understanding and interests of Europeans by writing the narrative they want to hear. In this paper I will discuss why Sahagun’s form of creating his manuscript on a culture is much better and more informed than Smith’s because it conveys the most accurate truth about a certain culture.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays