I'm a photographer. I walk about capturing everyday life, shows, fashion shoots, concerts etc. I get flown
from city to city drunk off exhaustion with my hands aching from laborious hours of photoshopping and tearing
down studio set-ups. As I gallivant around taking photos, I sometimes think about how I got into this business
and how much its influenced and changed my life.... I think of what Walkers Evans said: “After awhile, a young
man stops, a young women stops looking at art and goes into life”.
Photography has come a long way since the first photograph. The first permanent photo was taken in
1826 by Nicéphore Niépce and entitled: “View from the window at Le Gras”. The black and white photo
required an 8 hour exposure. It would be another 35 years later in 1861 before the first color photograph was
taken. Since that first fuzzy photograph taken almost 186 years ago, more than 3.5 trillion photos have been
taken. Over the last two hundred years, there have been countless advancements in the photographic process,
with countless movements and styles that followed thereafter. Yet, photography has always been considered an
outsider when it comes to modern art. Its falls in this gray area amongst both collectors and admirers of the
medium itself. However, through all its manifestations, photography has remained an important part of our
visual landscape. If anything, the digital age has offered a new way to bring life to images that previously existed
only in their imaginations.
In the age of Instagram, Pheed, Facebook, and smartphones, that number seems to only be multiplying at
an exponential rate. In todays digitalized world, it seems anyone can be an artist or creative genius. Add a filter
to your cluttered concert photo or big night out and the image suddenly transforms into a nostalgic, moody scene
straight out of Rolling Stone. I've been there and have fall victim to it myself on more then one occasion. Is this
what art in the 21st century has become – a series of filters and hashtags? I believe there is no definitive right
answer. Yes, advancements in technology have allowed us as creatives to access, distribute, view, and show
our work to a larger audience – re-defining what the medium has come to evoke both artistically and
The democratization and manipulation of photography via digital cameras and computers — is
compelling. It's true that flat photographs in newspapers and magazines used to be the tools with which we
viewed the world around us. As each day passes, our view gets richer and more sophisticated thanks to
digital technologies. I personally don't see digitization as demonization; I don't think that the risks of
photographic deception made possible by computers outweigh the infinite possibilities new technologies open
Enter phoneography. Firstly, when I refer to phoneography as being the future of photography, I’m not
talking about DSLRs and photography classes and degrees being completely obliterated. But I do mean
phoneography could be a legit and trusted trend in the design community. It has the potential to be trusted
enough for people to feel comfortable doing it outside of a hobby, but using it as a legitimate competitor or
alternative to those that know how to work a really good camera.
On March of 2012, The New York times used a portrait of New York Yankees baseball player
Alex Rodriguez taken with an instagram account. It was if a time bomb went off in the photography world.
Many thought it was the death nail. this isn’t the end of photography, it’s the renaissance. More people are taking
photos today than ever before – snapping and sharing moments from every day life to documenting world
changing events. Professional gear is becoming easier to use, and amateur gear like phones and point-and-shoots
are becoming more professional in quality.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document