30 November 2010
The Downfall of Victor Frankenstein
In many situations today, the children most common problem can be trace back to their family issue. Without a strong bond of relationship between their parents can consequently cause a destruction of children’s future. Even more, the children grow up unsteadily with aggressive behavior and the sign of depression. This has come to be a controversial issue and as well the depth of the story that is contain in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. To many misinterpretations from the movie, the creature itself was to accused to be a villain in the plot. As it show in Mary Shelly’s novel a deeper analysis has reveal that Victor Frankenstein is the real blame for neglecting the “child-monster”.
As the novel begin, many readers does not find the theme of absent of parenting hood; instead, Mary Shelley’s novel reveals a cautionary tale of Victor Frankenstein that is about to be told to the explorer, Robert Walton. Although Victor was only considering about the pursuit of knowledge, the real story behind this novel was to show the failure of a parenting hood. In Frankenstein, Victor encounter the monster during the night of it creation. He was horrify by the creature and said, “How can I describe my emotions at this catastrophe, or how delineate the wretch whom with such infinite pains and care I had endeavoured to form?”(Shelley 42). Its own creator would even be afraid of his own child that he had just created. The monster did not even made any movement or talked that Victor would soon left his own creation all alone, isolated. How can a father figure, left a child due to his ugly appearance? No parents should abandon their child no matter what the outcome is. From this point on, Victor has just demonstrated a failure as a role of a father. Ironically, how would a child that is raised by an affectionate family lead to the destruction on his family? Victor has the ideal family that anyone would want to have. His mother was caring and devoting, that she “possessed a mind of an uncommon mind” (Shelley 32). His parents recognized him as a gift from God. But although he was raised in a model family, Victor had admitted that his “temper was sometimes violent and my passions vehement” (Shelley 37). According to the author in “Frankenstein: An Analysis of Perseverance and a Child’s Mind,” he or she suggests that Mary Shelley [is] to be using Victor to live out a possibility of the life of a child after being neglect by their family and learning to live on their own while trying to seek vengeance, thus creating the Monster (1). Another author, support this theory is Susan Coulter, who has proposed a hypothesis that without any supervision …Victor is very much left to his own…if instead, his father had take the time to explain that alchemy had been disproved, then (“‘Frankenstein’- a cautionary tale of bad parenting” 1), “It is even possible that the train of my ideas would never had received the fatal impulse that led to my ruin” (38-39). Victor even agreed to the fact that if his father given him a more specific guidance maybe Victor wouldn't “left to struggle with a child's blindness added to a student's thirst for knowledge” (39). Especially after witnessing his mother death, his motivation in seeking life after death had become even greater. Later on in the story, this instance life given to the creature was left all alone and helpless with no one to care and love. The child's mind creature was “cold...frightened, finding myself so desolate. I was a poor, helpless, miserable wretch; I knew, and could distinguish, nothing; but feeling pain invade me on all sides, I sat down and wept” (Shelley 45). Base on his curiosity of the world, he set out wondering in the wood with no guidance. He had no fundamental knowledge about the society; therefore he has to learn everything like a child would. But with a child’s mind all the answers must be found the hard...